{"id":312055,"date":"2024-01-24T11:00:38","date_gmt":"2024-01-24T05:30:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=312055"},"modified":"2024-01-24T11:07:33","modified_gmt":"2024-01-24T05:37:33","slug":"hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/","title":{"rendered":"Hero Investcorp v. V.R. Holdings | Supreme Court refuses to interfere with Delhi HC\u2019s stay in Trade Mark rectification matter"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In a Special Leave Petition under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574865\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">136<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a> by Hero Investcorp challenging the order passed by the Delhi High Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">V.R. Holdings<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Hero Investcorp Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5e38VJio\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 4673<\/a>, the Bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJI, J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, JJ. dismissed the same without interference.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court granted liberty to Hero Investcorp to raise all the objections, including those raised in the SLP, after the appeal was finally disposed of.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In its order dated 4-08-2023 passed by the Delhi High Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">V.R. Holdings<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Hero Investcorp Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5e38VJio\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 4673<\/a>, which was challenged in the instant matter, The Division Bench was dealing with the challenge against dismissal of rectification moved by V.R. Holdings, referrable to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563709\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">57<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Delhi High Court Division Bench noted the fact that not only the arbitration proceedings, but several other rectification petitions were pending before the Court whose subject of contestation of proceedings was rights of parties asserted to flow from competing interpretations of the FSA and TMNA. While observing that stay on impugned decision in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">V.R. Holdings<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Hero Investcorp Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/qjh242l5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 1380<\/a> would neither revive cancellation petition nor adversely impact the subsisting registration of trade mark in favour of Hero Investcorp, to balance interests of parties and ensure adverse impact of the decision till the examination of appeal, the Court found passing of interim directions as appropriate and rejected the contention of VR Holdings being estopped from seeking interim protection. Thus, the Court had stayed order dated 6-03-2023 in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">V.R. Holdings<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Hero Investcorp Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/qjh242l5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 1380.<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Hero Investcorp Pvt. Ltd. v. V.R. Holdings, Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 46199 of 2023, Order dated 12-01-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Petitioner: Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate A.M. Singhvi, Senior Advocate Karan Luthra, Advocate Mahesh Agarwal, Advocate Rishi Agrawala, Advocate Ankur Saigal, Advocate Sarvana Niranjan, Advocate Ankit Banati, Advocate Shubham Kulshreshtha, Advocate on Record E.C. Agrawala<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Respondent: Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, Senior Advocate Akhil Sibal, Advocate Ankur Sangal, Advocate Pragya Mishra, Advocate Amrit Sharma, Advocate Kiratraj Sardana; Advocate on Record Khaitan &amp; Co.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=33\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=33\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Trade Marks Act, 1999 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1218\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1218\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"trade marks act, 1999\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-296380\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-2048x1365.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-886x590.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Division Bench of Delhi High Court had stayed the order in V.R. Holdings v. Hero Investcorp Ltd., 2023 SCC OnLine Del 1380.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67513,"featured_media":312065,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[2543,64651,5363,64646,64647,64645],"class_list":["post-312055","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-hero-investcorp","tag-supreme-court","tag-trade-mark-case","tag-trade-mark-rectification","tag-vr-holdings"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Hero Investcorp vs V.R. Holdings | SC refuses interference with Delhi HC stay order in Trade Mark rectification matter<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court refused to interfere with order passed by Delhi High Court in Trade Mark rectification in Hero Investcorp vs V.R. Holdings.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Hero Investcorp v. V.R. Holdings | Supreme Court refuses to interfere with Delhi HC\u2019s stay in Trade Mark rectification matter\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court refused to interfere with order passed by Delhi High Court in Trade Mark rectification in Hero Investcorp vs V.R. Holdings.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-24T05:30:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-01-24T05:37:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Trade-mark-rectification.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Hero Investcorp v. V.R. Holdings | Supreme Court refuses to interfere with Delhi HC\u2019s stay in Trade Mark rectification matter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/24\\\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/24\\\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ridhi\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\"},\"headline\":\"Hero Investcorp v. V.R. Holdings | Supreme Court refuses to interfere with Delhi HC\u2019s stay in Trade Mark rectification matter\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-24T05:30:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-24T05:37:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/24\\\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":403,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/24\\\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/Trade-mark-rectification.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"Hero Investcorp\",\"Supreme Court\",\"trade mark case\",\"trade mark rectification\",\"VR Holdings\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"Supreme Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/24\\\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/24\\\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/24\\\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\\\/\",\"name\":\"Hero Investcorp vs V.R. Holdings | SC refuses interference with Delhi HC stay order in Trade Mark rectification matter\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/24\\\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/24\\\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/Trade-mark-rectification.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-24T05:30:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-24T05:37:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court refused to interfere with order passed by Delhi High Court in Trade Mark rectification in Hero Investcorp vs V.R. Holdings.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/24\\\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/24\\\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/24\\\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/Trade-mark-rectification.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/Trade-mark-rectification.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Trade mark rectification\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/24\\\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Hero Investcorp v. V.R. Holdings | Supreme Court refuses to interfere with Delhi HC\u2019s stay in Trade Mark rectification matter\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\",\"name\":\"Ridhi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ridhi\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/scc_editor\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hero Investcorp vs V.R. Holdings | SC refuses interference with Delhi HC stay order in Trade Mark rectification matter","description":"Supreme Court refused to interfere with order passed by Delhi High Court in Trade Mark rectification in Hero Investcorp vs V.R. Holdings.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Hero Investcorp v. V.R. Holdings | Supreme Court refuses to interfere with Delhi HC\u2019s stay in Trade Mark rectification matter","og_description":"Supreme Court refused to interfere with order passed by Delhi High Court in Trade Mark rectification in Hero Investcorp vs V.R. Holdings.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-01-24T05:30:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-01-24T05:37:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Trade-mark-rectification.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ridhi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Hero Investcorp v. V.R. Holdings | Supreme Court refuses to interfere with Delhi HC\u2019s stay in Trade Mark rectification matter","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ridhi","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/"},"author":{"name":"Ridhi","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea"},"headline":"Hero Investcorp v. V.R. Holdings | Supreme Court refuses to interfere with Delhi HC\u2019s stay in Trade Mark rectification matter","datePublished":"2024-01-24T05:30:38+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-24T05:37:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/"},"wordCount":403,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Trade-mark-rectification.webp","keywords":["Delhi High Court","Hero Investcorp","Supreme Court","trade mark case","trade mark rectification","VR Holdings"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","Supreme Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/","name":"Hero Investcorp vs V.R. Holdings | SC refuses interference with Delhi HC stay order in Trade Mark rectification matter","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Trade-mark-rectification.webp","datePublished":"2024-01-24T05:30:38+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-24T05:37:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea"},"description":"Supreme Court refused to interfere with order passed by Delhi High Court in Trade Mark rectification in Hero Investcorp vs V.R. Holdings.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Trade-mark-rectification.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Trade-mark-rectification.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Trade mark rectification"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/hero-investcorp-v-r-holdings-sc-refuses-interference-delhi-hc-stay-order-trade-mark-rectification\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Hero Investcorp v. V.R. Holdings | Supreme Court refuses to interfere with Delhi HC\u2019s stay in Trade Mark rectification matter"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea","name":"Ridhi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ridhi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Trade-mark-rectification.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312055","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67513"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=312055"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312055\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/312065"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=312055"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=312055"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=312055"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}