{"id":312052,"date":"2024-01-24T10:00:50","date_gmt":"2024-01-24T04:30:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=312052"},"modified":"2024-07-05T18:15:42","modified_gmt":"2024-07-05T12:45:42","slug":"cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Calcutta High Court upholds Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Calcutta High Court:<\/span> In a revisional application challenging the impugned order holding that the application for pre-emption was not barred by limitation, a single-judge bench comprising of Biswaroop Chowdhury,* J.<\/span>, held that the issue of limitation was not raised in lower courts and cannot be entertained for the first time in revision. The Court upheld the Appellate Court\u2019s findings and dismissed the revisional application.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the petitioners are the opposite parties in a case under Sections 8 and 9 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955. They are respondents in an appeal before the appellate court, challenging the order of the trial judge. The case revolves around the disputed RS plot no. 1158, which underwent LR operations and was renumbered as 1297. The father of opposite parties initially held a 4 anna share in the plot. In 1984, he gifted 4 decimals to his three sons (opposite parties) and one another. The dispute arises from the subsequent sale of an 8-decimal portion by co-sharer to the petitioners in 1996. The petitioners contested, asserting themselves as bargadars cultivating the land and denying the opposite parties\u2019 right to pre-emption.<\/p>\n

The trial court, after considering the evidence, dismissed the case on the grounds that since the co-sharer had sold his entire share to the opposite parties, there was no basis for pre-emption. The Court cited a precedent stating that pre-emption could only be exercised when a co-sharer transfers a portion of their interest.<\/p>\n

Aggrieved by the trial court\u2019s decision, the opposite parties filed an appeal before the Additional District Judge. The Appellate Court, vide judgment dated 22-12-2021, allowed the appeal and held that the registration of the sale deed in 1996 was completed in March 2008. The court rejected the petitioner\u2019s contention that the application for pre-emption was barred by limitation.<\/p>\n

The petitioners approached this Court, alleging that the Appellate Court erred in holding that the application for pre-emption was not barred by limitation. It was argued that the sale deed was completed in 1996, making the application filed in 2008 time barred.<\/p>\n

Moot Point<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Whether Additional District Judge acted illegally and with material irregularity in determining that the application for pre-emption is not barred by limitation?<\/li>\n
  2. \n

    Whether the impugned order, if upheld, would cause irreparable loss and injury to the petitioners?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Parties\u2019 Contentions<\/p>\n

    The petitioners contended that the sale deed was registered in 1996, making the 2008 application for pre-emption barred by limitation. On the other hand, the opposite parties argued that the registration was completed in 2008, and the plea of limitation is raised to mislead the court.<\/p>\n

    Court\u2019s Assessment<\/p>\n

    The Court emphasised that the point of limitation was not raised in the lower courts and was introduced for the first-time during revision. Referring to the Registration Act, the court highlighted the need for compliance with Section 61 for the registration to be considered complete. Citing Bhaguvati Prasad Sah<\/span> v. Bhaguvati Prasad Sah<\/span>, (1964) 5 SCR 105<\/a>, the Court stated that the plea of premature registration was a question of fact that should have been raised earlier.<\/p>\n

    The Court affirmed the Appellate Court\u2019s finding that the sale deed’s final registration was in 2008, and the application for pre-emption filed in 2008 was within the prescribed period. The court dismissed the revisional application, upholding the Appellate Court’s judgment and finding no ground for interference.<\/p>\n

    Court\u2019s Decision<\/p>\n

    The Revisional Application was dismissed, and the judgment of the Appellate Court, dated 22-12-2021, was affirmed. The Court found no merit in the petitioner\u2019s contention that the application for pre-emption was barred by limitation.<\/p>\n

    [Ajit Kumar Bhunia<\/span> v. Prabhash Chandra Maity<\/span>, 2024 SCC OnLine Cal 487<\/a>, order dated 19-01-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n

    *Judgment by Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n

    Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

    Mr. Rabindranath Mahato, Mr. Aritra Shankar Roy, Counsel for Petitioners<\/p>\n

    Mr. Snehasis Jana, Mr. Sudeep Sanyal, Counsel and Mr. Chandrachur Lahiri, Counsel for the Opposite Parties<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Calcutta High Court held that issue of limitation being a question of fact ought to have been raised before trial court and evidence ought to have been adduced.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,59398,3655,64643,11481],"class_list":["post-312052","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-justice-biswaroop-chowdhury","tag-limitation","tag-pre-emption-rights","tag-revision"],"yoast_head":"\nCalcutta High Court upholds Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court upheld Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court upholds Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court upheld Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-24T04:30:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-05T12:45:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court upholds Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court upholds Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-24T04:30:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-05T12:45:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court upheld Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court upholds Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation | SCC Blog","description":"Calcutta High Court upheld Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Calcutta High Court upholds Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation","og_description":"Calcutta High Court upheld Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-01-24T04:30:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-07-05T12:45:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Calcutta High Court upholds Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/","name":"Calcutta High Court upholds Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2024-01-24T04:30:50+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-05T12:45:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court upheld Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-upholds-appellate-courts-order-on-pre-emption-rights-and-limitation-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Calcutta High Court upholds Appellate Court\u2019s order on pre-emption rights and limitation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":196888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/06\/12\/under-indian-law-neither-consideration-nor-agreement-is-necessary-to-constitute-waiver-of-rights\/","url_meta":{"origin":312052,"position":0},"title":"Under Indian law neither consideration nor agreement is necessary to constitute waiver of rights","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Asha Arora, J. dismissed a revisional application filed by the petitioner assailing the order of the learned Additional District Judge who reversed the order of the learned Civil Judge granting a decree of pre-emption in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310260,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/28\/cal-hc-overturns-temporary-injunction-in-pre-emption-case-under-section-236-of-the-mahomedan-law-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":312052,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court overturns temporary injunction in Pre-emption case due to delay in immediate demand under Section 236 of the Mahomedan Law","author":"Ritu","date":"December 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court acknowledged the importance of strict compliance with the requirements of Section 236 of the Mahomedan Law in pre-emption cases.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311102,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/10\/cal-hc-allows-revision-application-for-addition-of-parties-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":312052,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court allows revision application for addition of parties; remits for reconsideration pending special officer\u2019s report","author":"Ritu","date":"January 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court stated that court has discretion under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the CPC to add necessary or proper parties for effective adjudication.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":312058,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/24\/cal-hc-criticises-trial-court-for-allowing-counter-claim-post-filing-of-written-statement-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":312052,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court criticises trial court for allowing Counter-Claim after filing of written statement","author":"Ritu","date":"January 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court highlighted the importance of adhering to the legislative intent behind Rule 6A of Order 8 CPC to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and ensure speedy trial.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310189,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/27\/calcutta-high-court-affirms-rejection-of-stay-application-under-section-10-cpc-scc-blog-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":312052,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court affirms rejection of stay application under Section 10 CPC; Allows simultaneous Civil and Criminal proceedings","author":"Ritu","date":"December 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court stated that Section 10 CPC applies to suits in civil court, not proceedings under special statutes.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296978,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/17\/income-of-the-club-involving-contributors-and-participators-is-not-taxable-calcutta-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":312052,"position":5},"title":"Income of a club involving contributors and participators is not taxable: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"July 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe members of the club are seen both as contributors and participators. The club and its members are seen as one person. Usually a member has to pay to avail of the services and facilities provided by the club.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312052","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=312052"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/312052\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=312052"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=312052"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=312052"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}