{"id":311817,"date":"2024-01-19T18:00:02","date_gmt":"2024-01-19T12:30:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=311817"},"modified":"2024-02-21T13:16:42","modified_gmt":"2024-02-21T07:46:42","slug":"calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Calcutta High Court dismisses Revisional Application on claim of collusion and fraud; Case to proceed for Trial"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Calcutta High Court:<\/span> In a revisional application challenging the impugned order dismissing the application of the petitioner for rejection of plaint, a single-judge bench comprising of Bivas Pattanayak,* J.<\/span>, dismissed the civil revisional application and affirmed the lower court’s decision not to reject the plaint. The Court found no merit in the petitioner’s arguments and held that the case will proceed for trial on the issues raised in the suit.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the plaintiff-opposite party 1 filed a suit for declaration and injunction against petitioner-defendant 1 and proforma defendant 2. Plaintiff claimed ownership of land through a gift deed from her husband (proforma defendant 2). The husband allegedly transferred the same property to petitioner through sale deeds before the gift deed’s registration. The plaintiff challenged the sale deeds as fraudulent, void, and illegal in Title Suit No. 68 of 2021.<\/p>\n

The petitioner filed an application under Order VII Rule 11<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (CPC) seeking rejection of the plaint on the ground that Section 47 of the Registration Act does not apply to compulsorily registrable gift deeds. The petitioner argued that the suit is barred under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act due to the absence of a prayer for cancellation of the sale deeds. The plaintiff argued that being a non-executant, she sought a declaration and court fees should be computed accordingly. The Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Ghatal, Paschim Midnapore, vide order dated 23-06-2022 in title suit dismissed the application for rejection of plaint. The petitioner filed the present revisional application challenging the impugned order.<\/p>\n

Contentions<\/p>\n

The petitioner argued that the deed of gift is not covered by Section 47 of the Registration Act and should not operate from the date of execution. It was contended that the plaintiff’s suit, without seeking cancellation of sale deeds, is barred under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act. It was contended that the plaintiff undervalued the suit to avoid ad valorem court fees. It was stated that the declaration regarding the records of rights is barred under Section 51C of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act. It was lastly contended that the plaintiff has no cause of action, and the suit is collusive.<\/p>\n

Court’s Observations<\/p>\n

The Court referred to Order VII Rule 11<\/a> of the CPC<\/a> and noted the restrictions on considering the application for rejection based on the petitioner’s allegations. The Court applied the principle that a registered document operates from the date of execution under Section 47 of the Registration Act and upheld the validity of the gift deed. The Court held that since the plaintiff is a non-executant, seeking a declaration is appropriate, therefore, rejection under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act is not justified.<\/p>\n

The Court dismissed the argument with regards to undervaluation of suit based on precedents and upheld plaintiff’s valuation as per Section 7(iv)(c) of the Court-fees Act. While rejecting the contention that declaration regarding the records of rights is barred under Section 51C of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, The Court stated that the rejection of a part of the plaint is not permissible under Order VII Rule 11<\/a> of the CPC<\/a>. The Court opined that the petitioner’s argument with regards to fraud and collusion are the questions of fact to be established during the trial.<\/p>\n

Court’s Decision<\/p>\n

The Court dismissed the revisional application, upholding the trial court’s order. The Court directed that the issues raised by the petitioner should be decided during the course of the trial.<\/p>\n

[Amit Begwani v. Ranu Parui, 2024 SCC OnLine Cal 324<\/a>, order dated 15-01-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by Justice Bivas Pattanayak<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

Mr. Sakya Sen, Mr. Tarak Nath Sarkar, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n

Mr. Shyamal Chakraborty, Mr. Manabendra Thakur, Mr. Swarup Kr. Ghosh, Counsel for the Opposite Party 1<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Calcutta High Court clarified that rejection of the plaint is not warranted based on allegations of collusion or lack of cause of action, which are factual issues to be determined during the trial.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31647,64534,2689,30348,10141,64533,22424,7181],"class_list":["post-311817","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adjudication","tag-appropriate-venue","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-collusion","tag-fraud","tag-justice-bivas-pattanayak","tag-rejection-of-plaint","tag-trial-court"],"yoast_head":"\nCalcutta High Court dismisses claim of collusion and fraud, asserts trial court as appropriate venue for adjudication | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismissed claim of collusion and fraud, asserts trial court as appropriate venue for adjudication.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismisses Revisional Application on claim of collusion and fraud; Case to proceed for Trial\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismissed claim of collusion and fraud, asserts trial court as appropriate venue for adjudication.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-19T12:30:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-21T07:46:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismisses Revisional Application on claim of collusion and fraud; Case to proceed for Trial\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court dismisses claim of collusion and fraud, asserts trial court as appropriate venue for adjudication | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-19T12:30:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-21T07:46:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court dismissed claim of collusion and fraud, asserts trial court as appropriate venue for adjudication.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court dismisses Revisional Application on claim of collusion and fraud; Case to proceed for Trial\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses claim of collusion and fraud, asserts trial court as appropriate venue for adjudication | SCC Blog","description":"Calcutta High Court dismissed claim of collusion and fraud, asserts trial court as appropriate venue for adjudication.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses Revisional Application on claim of collusion and fraud; Case to proceed for Trial","og_description":"Calcutta High Court dismissed claim of collusion and fraud, asserts trial court as appropriate venue for adjudication.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-01-19T12:30:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-21T07:46:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses Revisional Application on claim of collusion and fraud; Case to proceed for Trial","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/","name":"Calcutta High Court dismisses claim of collusion and fraud, asserts trial court as appropriate venue for adjudication | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2024-01-19T12:30:02+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-21T07:46:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court dismissed claim of collusion and fraud, asserts trial court as appropriate venue for adjudication.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Calcutta High Court dismisses Revisional Application on claim of collusion and fraud; Case to proceed for Trial"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":304602,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":311817,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revisional application; leaves property distinction determination to Trial Court","author":"Ritu","date":"October 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court affirmed the Executor's authority in representing deceased\u2019s estate and Shifted onus to the executor to establish suitability.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":225347,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/10\/mad-hc-non-service-of-copies-of-plaint-is-not-a-ground-for-converting-a-summary-suit-filed-under-or-37-cpc-into-a-regular-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":311817,"position":1},"title":"Mad HC | Non-service of copies of plaint is not a ground for converting a summary suit filed under Or. 37 CPC into a regular suit","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court:\u00a0V. Bharathidasan, J., dismissed a revision petition filed against the order of the trial court whereby the application filed by the petitioner-defendant to convert the original summary suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff under Order 37 CPC into a regular suit was dismissed. The respondent had filed a suit\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":315631,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-rejection-of-order-vii-rule-11-cpc-application-scc-times-legal-news-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":311817,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds rejection of Order VII Rule 11 CPC application despite disclosure of Cause of Action through \u2018clever drafting\u2019","author":"Ritu","date":"February 29, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court stated that \u201cOrder VII, Rule 11 is applicable to the plaint which does not disclose cause of action and not the cases where the plea is non-existence of cause of action.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":155204,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/","url_meta":{"origin":311817,"position":3},"title":"High Court refuses to invoke revisional jurisdiction as impugned plaint doesn\u2019t suffer from any irregularity","author":"Saba","date":"September 11, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court:\u00a0The petitioner aggrieved by an order of rejection of his application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC by the Senior Civil Judge, Rajgarh preferred a petition. The respondent filed a suit for eviction and mesne profit against the petitioner-defendant before the Civil Judge, Rajgarh, Churu. During the pendency\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":253255,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/26\/5-additional-judges-appointed-to-calcutta-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":311817,"position":4},"title":"5 Additional Judges appointed to Calcutta High Court | Read details of tenure","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 26, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Appointment of Additional Judges President appoints (1) Miss Kesang Doma Bhutia, S\/Shri (2) Rabindranath Samanta, (3) Sugato Majumdar, (4) Bivas Pattanayak, and (5) Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, to be AdditionalJudges of the Calcutta High Court, in that order of seniority. Tenure The appointment of S\/Shri (1) Sugato Majumdar, and (2) Bivas\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310189,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/27\/calcutta-high-court-affirms-rejection-of-stay-application-under-section-10-cpc-scc-blog-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":311817,"position":5},"title":"Calcutta High Court affirms rejection of stay application under Section 10 CPC; Allows simultaneous Civil and Criminal proceedings","author":"Ritu","date":"December 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court stated that Section 10 CPC applies to suits in civil court, not proceedings under special statutes.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311817","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=311817"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311817\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=311817"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=311817"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=311817"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}