{"id":311816,"date":"2024-01-19T17:00:06","date_gmt":"2024-01-19T11:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=311816"},"modified":"2024-01-19T17:31:09","modified_gmt":"2024-01-19T12:01:09","slug":"us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"US Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute on blood oxygen level measuring technology"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

United States Court of Appeal, Federal Circuit:<\/span> In an appeal by Apple Inc., against International Trade Commission’s (‘ITC’) limited exclusion Order in their Investigation in the matter of “certain light-based physiological measurement devices and components thereof”, whereby, Apple was prohibited from unlicensed entry of infringing wearable electronic devices with light-based pulse oximetry functionality, Alan D. Lourie, Sharon Prost and Richard G. Taranto, J. dismissed Apple’s appeal and lifted the interim stay.<\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

The complaint against Apple was filed by Masimo Corporation and Cercacor Laboratories, Inc., a medical technology company which alleged violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which eventually were found by the ITC to be true in its investigation.<\/p>\n

Section 377 of the Tariff Act of 1930, provides that unfair methods of competition and unfair acts in the importation of articles into the United States, or in their sale, are unlawful if these unfair acts or methods of competition have the effect or tendency to (i) destroy or to substantially injure an industry efficiently and economically operated in the United States, (ii) prevent the establishment of such an industry, or (iii)restrain or monopolise trade and commerce in the United States.<\/p>\n

A limited exclusion order prohibiting the unlicensed entry of infringing wearable electronic devices with light-based pulse oximetry functionality and components thereof covered by certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,912,502 or 10,945,648 that are manufactured by or on behalf of, or imported by or on behalf of, Apple or any of its affiliated companies, parents, subsidiaries, or other related business entities, or its successors or assigns, and a cease and desist order against Apple and any of its affiliated companies was issued.<\/p>\n

The Exclusion Order Enforcement Order Branch of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (EOE Branch) ordered that the Apple’s redesigned products were not subject to the limited exclusion and cease and desist order.<\/p>\n

Order<\/p>\n

Referring to Nken v. Holder<\/span>, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009), the Court examined the following four factors while deciding Apple’s plea:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    Whether the movant made a strong showing of likelihood of success on the merits;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Whether the movant will be irreparably harmed absent a stay;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  3. \n

    Whether issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other parties interested in the proceeding;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  4. \n

    Where the public interest lies<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    On consideration of the four factors and EOE Branch’s order, the Court denied Apple’s appeal.<\/p>\n

    [Apple Inc., v. International Trade Commission, Case: 24-1285, Decided on 17-01-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Masimo Corporation and Cercacor Laboratories, Inc., a medical technology company alleged the iPhone giant Apple Inc. of violating Section 337 of the Tariff Act, 1930.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":311823,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,12],"tags":[64531,64532,64530,64529,64528,64527],"class_list":["post-311816","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-foreigncourts","tag-blood-oxygen-level-measuring-technology","tag-masimo-corporation-and-cercacor-laboratories-inc","tag-patent-dispute","tag-sale-of-apple-watch","tag-upholds-ban","tag-us-court-of-appeal"],"yoast_head":"\nUS Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"US Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute on blood oxygen level measuring technology\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"US Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute on blood oxygen level measuring technology\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"US Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute on blood oxygen level measuring technology\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-19T11:30:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-01-19T12:01:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/ban-on-sale-of-Apple-watch.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"US Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute on blood oxygen level measuring technology\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"US Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/ban-on-sale-of-Apple-watch.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-19T11:30:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-19T12:01:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"US Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute on blood oxygen level measuring technology\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/ban-on-sale-of-Apple-watch.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/ban-on-sale-of-Apple-watch.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"ban on sale of Apple watch\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"US Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute on blood oxygen level measuring technology\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"US Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute | SCC Blog","description":"US Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute on blood oxygen level measuring technology","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"US Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute on blood oxygen level measuring technology","og_description":"US Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute on blood oxygen level measuring technology","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-01-19T11:30:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-01-19T12:01:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/ban-on-sale-of-Apple-watch.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"US Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute on blood oxygen level measuring technology","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/","name":"US Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/ban-on-sale-of-Apple-watch.webp","datePublished":"2024-01-19T11:30:06+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-19T12:01:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"US Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute on blood oxygen level measuring technology","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/ban-on-sale-of-Apple-watch.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/ban-on-sale-of-Apple-watch.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"ban on sale of Apple watch"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/us-court-of-appeal-upholds-ban-on-sale-of-apple-watch-over-patent-dispute-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"US Court of Appeal upholds ban on sale of Apple watch over patent dispute on blood oxygen level measuring technology"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/ban-on-sale-of-Apple-watch.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":370432,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/20\/intra-court-appeal-in-patent-disputes-not-maintainable-madras-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":311816,"position":0},"title":"Intra-court appeal not maintainable in patent disputes; Commercial Courts Act overrides Letters Patent of High Court: Madras High Court","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"December 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAny expansion of the scope of the Commercial Courts Act would defeat its objectives, and there is no ambiguity regarding appeals from decrees of Commercial Courts and Commercial Divisions under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"intra-court appeal patent disputes","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/intra-court-appeal-patent-disputes.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/intra-court-appeal-patent-disputes.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/intra-court-appeal-patent-disputes.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/intra-court-appeal-patent-disputes.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":36701,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/02\/23\/high-court-upholds-bonafide-termination-of-employment-by-a-superior-officer\/","url_meta":{"origin":311816,"position":1},"title":"High Court upholds \u201cbonafide\u201d termination of employment by a Superior Officer","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 23, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Observing the allegations of unreasonable termination and colourable exercise of power against the respondent employer, a Division Bench comprising Bhat J. and Sharma JJ. dismissed the appeal concluding that the actions of the respondent were bonafide, objective and supported by reason. The appellant is a woman appointed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":343167,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/07\/letters-patent-appeal-will-not-lie-against-judgment-passed-by-single-judge-in-appellate-jurisdiction-dhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":311816,"position":2},"title":"Letters Patent Appeal will not lie against judgment passed by Single Judge in appellate jurisdiction or against order by Court subject to superintendence of this Court: Delhi HC","author":"Arushi","date":"March 7, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The jurisdiction available to this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution is primarily in the nature of superintendence and accordingly the Letters Patent Appeal will not lie in the instant matter.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204131,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/24\/principles-for-applicability-res-judicata-among-co-defendants-re-iterated-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":311816,"position":3},"title":"Principles for applicability \u201cres judicata among co-defendants\u201d re-iterated: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 24, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: A Bench comprising of N.V. Ramana and M.M. Shantanagoudar, JJ., dismissed an appeal filed against the judgment of a Division Bench of Madras High Court whereby it allowed a letters patent appeal filed by the plaintiff in a partition suit. The plaintiff filed a suit in regard to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":136221,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/06\/12\/scotus-upholds-the-principle-of-international-patent-exhaustion\/","url_meta":{"origin":311816,"position":4},"title":"SCOTUS upholds the principle of International Patent Exhaustion","author":"Saba","date":"June 12, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court of the United States: While relying upon the landmark decision in Kirtsaeng v.\u00a0John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013 SCC OnLine US SC 15, the Supreme Court of United States has\u00a0held that a patentee cannot control a sold item through the patent laws since its patent rights are\u00a0exhausted in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court of The United States","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/supreme_court_of_US.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":74691,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/09\/30\/letters-patent-appeal-against-the-judgment-of-the-single-judge-in-an-international-arbitration-matter-is-maintainable-before-the-division-bench\/","url_meta":{"origin":311816,"position":5},"title":"Letters patent appeal against the judgment of the Single Judge in an international arbitration matter is maintainable before the Division Bench","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 30, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Deciding the question as to whether an appeal against the judgment of the Single Judge in an international arbitration matter is appealable to the Division Bench or to put it otherwise, whether the intra-court appeal would lie because of the Letters Patent, the Court held that such appeal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/DSC_5487.jpg?resize=1400%2C800&ssl=1 4x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311816","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=311816"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311816\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/311823"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=311816"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=311816"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=311816"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}