{"id":311428,"date":"2024-01-15T12:00:48","date_gmt":"2024-01-15T06:30:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=311428"},"modified":"2024-01-18T11:22:57","modified_gmt":"2024-01-18T05:52:57","slug":"calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Calcutta High Court upholds eviction decree on non-compliance of stringent requirements under Section 7 of the W.B. Premises Tenancy Act, 1997"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Calcutta High Court:<\/span> While deciding whether the Appellate Court had authority to consider grounds not decided by the Trial Court, a division bench comprising of Harish Tandon and Madhuresh Prasad, JJ., held that Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523691\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">107(2)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (CPC) allows the Appellate Court to decide issues not decided by the Trial Court when both parties had presented evidence. The appeal was dismissed since no substantial question of law was identified.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the plaintiff filed a suit for the eviction of the defendant under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002887672\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997<\/a> (the Act), citing grounds of default, reasonable requirement, and guilt of waste and damages. The Trial Court decreed the suit based on the ground of default as the defendant failed to comply with mandatory provisions under Section 7(1) and (2) of the said Act. The defense was struck off under Section 7(3) of the Act, preventing the defendant from presenting evidence other than cross-examining the plaintiff&#8217;s witness. The First Appellate Court affirmed the Trial Court&#8217;s decree, considering the ground of reasonable requirement, which was not expressly decided by the Trial Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the Trial Court held that the defendant, by not complying with the mandatory provisions of Section 7(1) and (2) of the Act, is regarded as a defaulter in rent payment, justifying the eviction decree. The Appellate Court considered grounds not addressed by the Trial Court, including reasonable requirement, and affirmed the judgment based on the evidence presented.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that enabling provisions in Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001687377\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1(3)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002887672\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997<\/a>, allows the State Government to extend or exclude areas from the Act&#8217;s operation through notifications. The Court, while rejecting the defendant&#8217;s contention that Chandannagar is excluded from the Act, citing Section 1(3) of the Act, observed that a government notification dated 22-04-2003 explicitly included Chandannagar within the Act&#8217;s purview.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court, while citing Section 107(2) of the CPC, observed that the Appellate Court had the authority to consider grounds not decided by the Trial Court when both parties had presented evidence. The Court emphasised that the Trial Court and the Appellate Court had the authority to proceed with the case despite a pending challenge to the order striking off the defense under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574971\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">227<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law was found. The application for stay became infructuous. No costs were awarded.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Anupam Dutta<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bela Mukherjee<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7Z9wzYw0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Cal 265<\/a>, order dated 11-01-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee, Mr. Kajal Baran Roy, Mr. Rudranil Das, Mr. Suman Nandi, Counsel for the Appellant<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Sukumar Ghosh and Mrs. Moumita Ghosh, Counsel for the Respondents<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=33\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=33\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Calcutta High Court observed that the Compliance with mandatory provisions, specifically Section 7(1) and (2), is crucial for a tenant defending against eviction under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,31984,30681,22804,64350,64348],"class_list":["post-311428","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-eviction-decree","tag-non-compliance","tag-section-7","tag-stringent-requirements","tag-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Calcutta High Court upholds eviction decree on non-compliance of Section 7 of West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court upheld eviction decree on non-compliance of stringent requirements under Section 7 of West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court upholds eviction decree on non-compliance of stringent requirements under Section 7 of the W.B. Premises Tenancy Act, 1997\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court upheld eviction decree on non-compliance of stringent requirements under Section 7 of West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-15T06:30:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-01-18T05:52:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court upholds eviction decree on non-compliance of stringent requirements under Section 7 of the W.B. Premises Tenancy Act, 1997\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/15\\\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/15\\\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"headline\":\"Calcutta High Court upholds eviction decree on non-compliance of stringent requirements under Section 7 of the W.B. Premises Tenancy Act, 1997\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-15T06:30:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-18T05:52:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/15\\\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":472,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/15\\\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Calcutta High Court\",\"Eviction Decree\",\"non-compliance\",\"Section 7\",\"stringent requirements\",\"West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/15\\\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/15\\\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/15\\\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court upholds eviction decree on non-compliance of Section 7 of West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/15\\\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/15\\\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-15T06:30:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-18T05:52:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court upheld eviction decree on non-compliance of stringent requirements under Section 7 of West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/15\\\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/15\\\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/15\\\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2024\\\/01\\\/15\\\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court upholds eviction decree on non-compliance of stringent requirements under Section 7 of the W.B. Premises Tenancy Act, 1997\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/editor_7\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds eviction decree on non-compliance of Section 7 of West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 | SCC Blog","description":"Calcutta High Court upheld eviction decree on non-compliance of stringent requirements under Section 7 of West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Calcutta High Court upholds eviction decree on non-compliance of stringent requirements under Section 7 of the W.B. Premises Tenancy Act, 1997","og_description":"Calcutta High Court upheld eviction decree on non-compliance of stringent requirements under Section 7 of West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-01-15T06:30:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-01-18T05:52:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Calcutta High Court upholds eviction decree on non-compliance of stringent requirements under Section 7 of the W.B. Premises Tenancy Act, 1997","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/"},"author":{"name":"Ritu","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"headline":"Calcutta High Court upholds eviction decree on non-compliance of stringent requirements under Section 7 of the W.B. Premises Tenancy Act, 1997","datePublished":"2024-01-15T06:30:48+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-18T05:52:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/"},"wordCount":472,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","keywords":["Calcutta High Court","Eviction Decree","non-compliance","Section 7","stringent requirements","West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/","name":"Calcutta High Court upholds eviction decree on non-compliance of Section 7 of West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2024-01-15T06:30:48+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-18T05:52:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court upheld eviction decree on non-compliance of stringent requirements under Section 7 of West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Calcutta High Court upholds eviction decree on non-compliance of stringent requirements under Section 7 of the W.B. Premises Tenancy Act, 1997"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311428","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=311428"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311428\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=311428"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=311428"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=311428"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}