{"id":311358,"date":"2024-01-12T18:00:13","date_gmt":"2024-01-12T12:30:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=311358"},"modified":"2024-02-21T14:31:28","modified_gmt":"2024-02-21T09:01:28","slug":"temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Temporary nature of agreement and renewals indicates license status\u2019; Calcutta High Court orders eviction"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Calcutta High Court:<\/span> While deciding a second appeal challenging district judge&#8217;s order holding that the agreement for accommodation is an agreement for tenancy and not a licence agreement, a single-judge bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee,* J.<\/span>, rejected the appellant&#8217;s claim of tenancy due to insufficient evidence and lack of rent receipts.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Factual Matrix<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the plaintiff-respondents initiated an eviction suit, claiming ownership of a property bequeathed to them. The defendant, an acquaintance, sought temporary accommodation in the property in April 1987, paying a monthly license fee. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant, initially accommodated as a licensee, breached the agreement, leading to the eviction suit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The trial court vide order dated 31-03-2009, dismissed the suit, reasoning that the original licensee had left, rendering eviction infructuous. The plaintiffs appealed, and the Additional District Judge allowed the appeal, setting aside the trial court&#8217;s decision. The court held that the agreement was a leave and license and not a tenancy. Aggrieved by the impugned order of the district judge, the defendant-appellant filed a second appeal, questioning whether the lower court erred in not recognizing the agreement as a tenancy due to stipulations in the document.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Parties&#8217; Contentions<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant argued that clauses in the agreement, such as subletting prohibition and alterations control, reflected a tenancy relationship. It was contended the agreement lacked the original defendant&#8217;s signature, and renewals occurred without his consent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The respondent argued that the agreement, renewed for 11 months, was unambiguous as a leave and license. It was emphasised the absence of continuous 12-month tenancy periods, refuting the tenant&#8217;s claim. The respondent cited clauses supporting licensee status.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Analysis<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court analysed Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001521522\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">105<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726942\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Transfer of Property Act, 1882<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001522899\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">52<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808045\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Easement Act, 1882<\/a> to distinguish between lease and license. The Court considered the intention of the parties, substance over form, and exclusivity of possession.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court found the agreement consistently renewed for 11 months, indicative of a leave and license. The Court emphasised clauses allowing inspection, maintaining possession with the licensor, and termination conditions. The Court rejected the appellant&#8217;s contentions regarding clauses resembling tenancy grounds and stated that they don&#8217;t nullify the license agreement. The Court concluded that the agreement was a leave and license, not a tenancy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold; margin-bottom: 3%;\">&#8220;&#8230;attending circumstances coupled with the evidence clearly suggests that the parties really intended to create a licence agreement by execution of the said document which had expired automatically after the expiry of the licence period and as such the defendant is liable to be evicted from the suit premises.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that the defendant failed to provide evidence of tenancy, such as rent receipts, and dismissed the contention that the agreement&#8217;s clauses resembled those of tenancy. The Court emphasised that the substance of the document, not its label, determined its nature.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court decreed the title suit in favor of the plaintiffs, ordering the appellant&#8217;s eviction within 60 days. The Second Appeal was disposed of on contest.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Rajendra Sirohia v. Amitava Gupta, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/YBtFlb6M\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2024 SCC OnLine Cal 260<\/a>, order dated 10-01-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Buddhadeb Ghosal, Mr. Ganesh Prasad Shaw and Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Counsel for the Appellant<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee, Mr. Saunak Bhattacharya, Mr. Sounak Mondal, Mr. Abhirup Halder, Mr. Souvik Das and Mr. Anirban Saha, Counsel for the Respondents<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Even if there are certain clauses which the parties may have aided from the tenancy legislation, is no ground to &#8230; declare the unambiguous leave and licence agreement to be an agreement of tenancy ignoring preponderance of probability.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,4531,60251,7871,30326,32846,64328,9741],"class_list":["post-311358","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-eviction","tag-justice-ajoy-kumar-mukherjee","tag-lease","tag-license","tag-renewal","tag-temporary-agreement","tag-tenancy"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>\u2018Temporary nature of agreement and renewals indicates license status\u2019; Calcutta High Court orders eviction | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While noting the temporary nature of agreement and renewals which indicates license status, the Calcutta High Court ordered appellant\u2019s eviction.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Temporary nature of agreement and renewals indicates license status\u2019; Calcutta High Court orders eviction\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While noting the temporary nature of agreement and renewals which indicates license status, the Calcutta High Court ordered appellant\u2019s eviction.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-12T12:30:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-21T09:01:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Temporary nature of agreement and renewals indicates license status\u2019; Calcutta High Court orders eviction\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018Temporary nature of agreement and renewals indicates license status\u2019; Calcutta High Court orders eviction | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-12T12:30:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-21T09:01:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"While noting the temporary nature of agreement and renewals which indicates license status, the Calcutta High Court ordered appellant\u2019s eviction.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Temporary nature of agreement and renewals indicates license status\u2019; Calcutta High Court orders eviction\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018Temporary nature of agreement and renewals indicates license status\u2019; Calcutta High Court orders eviction | SCC Blog","description":"While noting the temporary nature of agreement and renewals which indicates license status, the Calcutta High Court ordered appellant\u2019s eviction.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Temporary nature of agreement and renewals indicates license status\u2019; Calcutta High Court orders eviction","og_description":"While noting the temporary nature of agreement and renewals which indicates license status, the Calcutta High Court ordered appellant\u2019s eviction.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-01-12T12:30:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-21T09:01:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Temporary nature of agreement and renewals indicates license status\u2019; Calcutta High Court orders eviction","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/","name":"\u2018Temporary nature of agreement and renewals indicates license status\u2019; Calcutta High Court orders eviction | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2024-01-12T12:30:13+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-21T09:01:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"While noting the temporary nature of agreement and renewals which indicates license status, the Calcutta High Court ordered appellant\u2019s eviction.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/12\/temporary-nature-of-agreement-and-renewals-indicates-license-status-calcutta-high-court-orders-eviction-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Temporary nature of agreement and renewals indicates license status\u2019; Calcutta High Court orders eviction"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":299271,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/14\/no-eviction-on-unauthorized-construction-outside-tenanted-portion-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":311358,"position":0},"title":"No eviction under Section 108 of Transfer of Property Act on unauthorized construction outside tenanted portion: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 14, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court remanded the eviction case to First Appellate Court on finding that the alleged construction was outside the tenancy property.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263641,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/14\/parties-to-agreement-of-sale-consciously-changing-their-relationship-cannot-seek-relief-on-the-basis-of-previously-established-relationship\/","url_meta":{"origin":311358,"position":1},"title":"Cal HC | Parties to agreement of sale consciously changing their relationship cannot seek relief on the basis of previously established relationship","author":"Editor","date":"March 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: The Division Bench of Soumen Sen and\u00a0 Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, JJ., dismissed an appeal concerned with a breach of contract. The appeal arose out of a judgment in a suit for recovery of possession and injunction. Trial Court had decreed the suit on contest and dismissed the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":203182,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/05\/tenancy-cannot-be-terminated-on-the-ground-of-unregistered-agreement-for-sale\/","url_meta":{"origin":311358,"position":2},"title":"Tenancy cannot be terminated on the ground of unregistered agreement for sale","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 5, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jharkhand High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Rajesh Kumar, J., dismissed a second appeal filed against the order of the trial court whereby a decree of eviction was passed against the appellants. The respondents (landlords) had filed a suit for eviction against the appellants (tenants) because of personal reasons\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":311423,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-presidency-small-cause-courts-jurisdiction-under-w-b-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":311358,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds Presidency Small Cause Court\u2019s jurisdiction to decide ejectment suit under W.B. Premises Tenancy Act, 1997","author":"Ritu","date":"January 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court upheld legislative competence to confer jurisdiction on Presidency Small Cause Court, considering the specific language of Section 12A excluding jurisdiction of any other court.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305526,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/23\/eviction-decree-reasonable-requirement-valid-cal-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":311358,"position":4},"title":"Eviction Decree based on reasonable requirement valid even without considering ground of building\/rebuilding: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"October 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA respondent without filing cross objection can canvass the correctness of finding against him in order to support the judgment that has been passed against the appellant.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311428,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/15\/calcutta-hc-upholds-eviction-decree-on-non-compliance-of-section-7-of-west-bengal-premises-tenancy-act-1997-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":311358,"position":5},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds eviction decree on non-compliance of stringent requirements under Section 7 of the W.B. Premises Tenancy Act, 1997","author":"Ritu","date":"January 15, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court observed that the Compliance with mandatory provisions, specifically Section 7(1) and (2), is crucial for a tenant defending against eviction under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311358","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=311358"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311358\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=311358"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=311358"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=311358"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}