{"id":311256,"date":"2024-01-11T18:30:54","date_gmt":"2024-01-11T13:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=311256"},"modified":"2024-01-12T11:18:04","modified_gmt":"2024-01-12T05:48:04","slug":"minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Explained| Aligarh Muslim University and its Minority Status; SC Constitution Bench partly hears arguments"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> The Seven-Judge Constitution Bench comprising of Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJ., Sanjiv Khanna, Surya Kant, JB Pardiwala, Dipankar Datta, Manoj Misra and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ. began hearing of an appeal against Allahabad High Court&#8217;s Order in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Naresh Agarwal (Dr.)<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/RNOoz813\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2005 SCC OnLine All 1705<\/a>, whereby, Aligarh Muslim University&#8217;s (&#8216;AMU&#8217;) action of 50 percent seat reservation in postgraduate medical courses for Muslim candidates by claiming it to be a minority institution, was struck down and held that AMU cannot have an exclusive reservation because it is not a minority institution.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">S. Azeez Basha<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/RNOoz813\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1968) 1 SCR 833<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The constitutionality of the Aligarh Muslim University (Amendment) Act, 1951, whereby, non-Muslims could also be members of the Court of the University, however, the Court would still remain the supreme governing body of the University, and the Aligarh Muslim University (Amendment) Act, 1965, whereby, the University Court no longer remained the supreme governing body and could no longer exercise the powers conferred on it by Section 23(2) and (3) of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948167\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Aligarh Muslim University Act, 1920<\/a> (&#8216;1920 Act&#8217;) was brought into challenge.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It Court held that AMU was created by an Act of Parliament i.e., the 1920 Act is not a minority institution so as to be covered under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575113\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution of India<\/a>. It was observed that the nucleus of the Aligarh University was the M.A.O. College, but the conversion of that College into a University was however not by the Muslim minority, it took place by virtue of the 1920 Act which was passed by the Central legislature.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Aligarh Muslim University Amendment Act, 1981<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">To nullify the effect of <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Azeez Basha<\/span> (supra), the Aligarh Muslim University Amendment Act, 1981 was brought into effect. The 1981 Act substituted the Sections of the 1920 Act which formed the basis for the verdict in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Azeez Basha<\/span> (supra) and the definition of the term &#8216;University&#8217; was amended to mean an <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;educational institution of their choice established by the Muslims of India, which originated as the Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental College, Aligarh and which was subsequently incorporated as the Aligarh Muslim University&#8221;.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Naresh Agarwal (Dr.)<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/RNOoz813\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2005 SCC OnLine All 1705<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The decision of the Admission Committee of the AMU in 2005 that the total seats available for Post Graduate Medical Courses be reserved to 50 percent for the Muslim candidates was challenged. The Court held that AMU is not a minority institution within the meaning of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575113\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>, therefore, the University cannot provide any reservation in respect of the students belonging to a particular religious community. Accordingly, it was held that the decision in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Azeez Basha<\/span> (supra) still holds good even after the Aligarh Muslim University Amendment Act, 1981.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Aligarh Muslim University<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Malay Shukla<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/5za9RHzc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2006 SCC OnLine All 2207<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether AMU is a minority Institution?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that the AMU, a body corporate, came into existence only by Act of legislature. The Court also said that it is true that 1920 Act was passed as a result of the efforts of the Muslim minority, however, the then Government also had its significant role in the establishment of the University. Therefore, the AMU cannot be a minority institution within the meaning of Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575113\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Reference to 7-Judge Bench<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The High Court&#8217;s decision in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Naresh Agarwal<\/span> (supra) was challenged before the Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Aligarh Muslim University<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Naresh Agarwal<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/54v97y8I\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2020) 13 SCC 737.<\/a> The 3-Judge Bench of the then CJI Ranjan Gogoi, L. Nageswara Rao and Sanjiv Khanna, JJ. noted that the issue in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">S. Azeez Basha<\/span> (supra) was referred to a seven-Judge Bench by an order of the Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Anjuman-e-Rahmania<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">District Inspector of School.<\/span><a id=\"fnref1\" href=\"#fn1\" title=\"1. Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 54-57 of 1981.\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a> The issues that were formulated in these references was &#8220;<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">What are the indicia for treating an educational institution as a minority educational institution? Would an institution be regarded as a minority educational institution because it was established by a person or persons belonging to a religious or linguistic minority or its being administered by a person or persons belonging to a religious or linguistic minority?&#8221;<\/span> A similar question was heard by the Court in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">T.M.A. Pai Foundation<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Karnataka<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/XQawM2z7\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2002) 8 SCC 481<\/a>, however, it remained unanswered. Therefore, the Bench noted that the correctness of the decision taken in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">S. Azeez Basha<\/span> (supra), which was called into question, remained undetermined.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, taking into regard the background, when the precise question was already referred to a seven-Judge Bench and was, however, not answered in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">P.A. Inamdar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Maharashtra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6Uc583Rg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2005) 6 SCC 537<\/a>, the <span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Bench referred the matter to a Seven Judges Bench.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">The ongoing Trial<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The matter was placed before the Seven-Judge Constitution Bench comprising of Dr. DY Chandrachud, CJ., Sanjiv Khanna, Surya Kant, JB Pardiwala, Dipankar Datta, Manoj Misra and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ. The hearing began on 09-01-2024. The Bench on its day 3 of the hearing said that Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001575113\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">30<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> does not mandate that administration has to be by minority itself, but it only contemplates and recognises the right of choice, the discretion given to minorities to administer in a manner which they deem appropriate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal, Civil Appeal No. 2286\/2006<\/span>]<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=33\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=33\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr\/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 54-57 of 1981.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The 7-Judge Constitution Bench began hearing against Allahabad High Court&#8217;s decision on 09-01-2024, whereby, it was held that AMU cannot have an exclusive reservation because it is not a minority institution, within the meaning of Article 30 of the Constitution of India.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":311307,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,38282],"tags":[38877,15921,59299,57563,60234,64306,46630,64307,45895,5363,64305],"class_list":["post-311256","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-decisions-of-the-constitution-benches-of-the-supreme-court","tag-aligarh-muslim-university","tag-constitution-bench","tag-dipankar-datta","tag-dr-dy-chandrachud","tag-jb-pardiwala","tag-manoj-misra-and-satish-chandra-sharma","tag-minority-status","tag-s-azeez-basha-v-union-of-india","tag-sanjiv-khanna","tag-supreme-court","tag-surya-kant"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Question of Minority Status of Aligarh Muslim University before Supreme Court | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Aligarh Muslim University dispute over its Minority Status before Supreme Court Constitution Bench\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Explained| Aligarh Muslim University and its Minority Status; SC Constitution Bench partly hears arguments\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Aligarh Muslim University dispute over its Minority Status before Supreme Court Constitution Bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-11T13:00:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-01-12T05:48:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/blog-6-1-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Explained| Aligarh Muslim University and its Minority Status; SC Constitution Bench partly hears arguments\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Question of Minority Status of Aligarh Muslim University before Supreme Court | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/blog-6-1-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-11T13:00:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-12T05:48:04+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"Aligarh Muslim University dispute over its Minority Status before Supreme Court Constitution Bench\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/blog-6-1-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/blog-6-1-1.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Aligarh Muslim University Minority Status\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Explained| Aligarh Muslim University and its Minority Status; SC Constitution Bench partly hears arguments\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Question of Minority Status of Aligarh Muslim University before Supreme Court | SCC Blog","description":"Aligarh Muslim University dispute over its Minority Status before Supreme Court Constitution Bench","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Explained| Aligarh Muslim University and its Minority Status; SC Constitution Bench partly hears arguments","og_description":"Aligarh Muslim University dispute over its Minority Status before Supreme Court Constitution Bench","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-01-11T13:00:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-01-12T05:48:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/blog-6-1-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Explained| Aligarh Muslim University and its Minority Status; SC Constitution Bench partly hears arguments","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/","name":"Question of Minority Status of Aligarh Muslim University before Supreme Court | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/blog-6-1-1.webp","datePublished":"2024-01-11T13:00:54+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-12T05:48:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"Aligarh Muslim University dispute over its Minority Status before Supreme Court Constitution Bench","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/blog-6-1-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/blog-6-1-1.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Aligarh Muslim University Minority Status"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/minority-status-of-aligarh-muslim-university-before-supreme-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Explained| Aligarh Muslim University and its Minority Status; SC Constitution Bench partly hears arguments"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/blog-6-1-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":334741,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/dissent-amu-minority-status-verdict-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":311256,"position":0},"title":"We dissent! Here\u2019s why 3 out of 7 Supreme Court Judges ruled against AMU\u2019s minority status","author":"Apoorva","date":"November 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cTo assume that the minorities of the country require some \u2018safe haven\u2019 for attaining education and knowledge is wholly incorrect. The minorities of the country have not just joined the mainstream but comprise an important facet of the mainstream itself.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Supreme-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Supreme-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Supreme-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Supreme-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338256,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/01\/supreme-court-landmark-judgments-2024\/","url_meta":{"origin":311256,"position":1},"title":"50 Landmark Rulings: Supreme Court&#8217;s defining verdicts of 2024","author":"Apoorva","date":"January 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"In 2024, the Supreme Court of India delivered a series of landmark judgments that reshaped key legal and constitutional landscapes. Among the most significant were the AMU verdict; Mineral rights; Unilateral appointment of arbitrators; Constitutional validity of UP Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004; State's power to regulate industrial alcohol;\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Supreme Court judgments 2024","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Supreme-Court-judgments-2024.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Supreme-Court-judgments-2024.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Supreme-Court-judgments-2024.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Supreme-Court-judgments-2024.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334824,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/11\/justice-sanjiv-khanna-takes-oath-51st-cji-supreme-court-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":311256,"position":2},"title":"Justice Sanjiv Khanna takes oath of office as 51st Chief Justice of India","author":"Sucheta","date":"November 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"On 11-11-2024, President of India administered the oath of office to Justice Sanjiv Khanna who was elevated to the Supreme Court as Judge on 18-1-2019 and is due to retire on 13-5-2025, which means he will have a tenure of 6 months as Chief Justice of India.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice Sanjiv Khanna takes oath","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Justice-Sanjiv-Khanna-takes-oath.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Justice-Sanjiv-Khanna-takes-oath.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Justice-Sanjiv-Khanna-takes-oath.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Justice-Sanjiv-Khanna-takes-oath.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334709,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/08\/amu-minority-status-verdict-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":311256,"position":3},"title":"[AMU Verdict] Minority Status of educational institutions not affected by statute, date of establishment, or non-minority administration: Supreme Court holds in 4:3 verdict","author":"Apoorva","date":"November 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cTo be a minority institution, it only had to be established by the minority and not necessarily be administered by the minority members. Minority institutions may wish to emphasise secular education and for that minority members are not needed in administration\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"AMU Verdict","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/AMU-Verdict.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/AMU-Verdict.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/AMU-Verdict.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/AMU-Verdict.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338242,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/31\/supreme-court-constitution-and-larger-bench-judgments-in-2024\/","url_meta":{"origin":311256,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court Constitution and Larger Bench Judgments which steered India\u2019s course in 2024","author":"Editor","date":"December 31, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court\u2019s 2024 decisions have marked a significant turning point in the country\u2019s legal and constitutional framework. Key rulings delivered by Constitutional Benches on Electoral bonds, private property, royalty as tax, AMU\u2019s minority status, sub-classification within reserved categories, etc. have left an impact on fundamental rights, political transparency and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Constitutional Bench 2024 roundup","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Constitutional-Bench-2024-roundup.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Constitutional-Bench-2024-roundup.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Constitutional-Bench-2024-roundup.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Constitutional-Bench-2024-roundup.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":338324,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/02\/2024-dissents-landmark-verdicts-yearly-review-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":311256,"position":5},"title":"2024: A Year of Bold Dissents in the Face of Landmark Verdicts","author":"Sucheta","date":"January 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"2024 was a year of pathbreaking verdicts on several issues such as Electoral Bonds, Citizenship Act, Tax\/Royalty on Mines, Minority Institutions etc. Some major issues saw unanimous and near unanimous verdicts by the Supreme Court; however, there were notable Dissenting Opinions in 2024 which shed light on several key legal\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Dissents Supreme Court verdicts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Dissents-Supreme-Court-verdicts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Dissents-Supreme-Court-verdicts.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Dissents-Supreme-Court-verdicts.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Dissents-Supreme-Court-verdicts.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311256","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=311256"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311256\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/311307"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=311256"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=311256"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=311256"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}