{"id":311182,"date":"2024-01-11T11:00:21","date_gmt":"2024-01-11T05:30:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=311182"},"modified":"2024-01-18T17:31:26","modified_gmt":"2024-01-18T12:01:26","slug":"mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/","title":{"rendered":"Mutual Consent Divorce under Hindu Law: Cooling-Off Period and Withdrawal of Consent"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"color: #903; float: left; font-family: Georgia; font-size: 75px; line-height: 60px; padding-top: 4px; padding-right: 8px; padding-left: 3px;\">H<\/span>indu marriages are traditionally regarded as a sacrament and a union of two souls.<a id=\"fnref1\" title=\"1. Koppisetti Subbharao v. State of A.P., (2009) 12 SCC 331.\" href=\"#fn1\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a> While in the ancient Hindu law, marriage was considered an everlasting and a permanent institution, with the evolution of society, the concept of \u201cdivorce\u201d was introduced as a part of Hindu personal law, more specifically under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hindu Marriage Act, 1955<\/a> (HMA).<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While the pandemic is well behind us, the repercussions of the same can still be felt on marriages. In fact, publicly available sources indicate that with the pandemic, the ensuing lockdown, and the advent of the \u201cwork from home\u201d culture, there has been a steep rise in the number of cases related to divorce and child custody. For instance, the city of Mumbai itself saw a nearly threefold increase in cases pertaining to divorce and other allied issues.<a id=\"fnref2\" title=\"2. Kanu Sarda, Lockdown Impact: Divorce, Child Custody Cases Spike Across Country, Mumbai Tops Chart, The New Indian Express; Rica Bhattacharyya &amp; Maulik Vyas, Divorces Among Professionals Zoom Amid Pandemic Gloom, The Economic Times.\" href=\"#fn2\"><sup>2<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Divorces can be messy and acrimonious, and the only silver lining in such cases can be if the parties cordially reach a common ground. Therefore, divorce by mutual consent is regarded as one of the most amicable ways to settle marital disputes. The courts also assist in helping the parties reach a common consensus, to the extent permissible, and in some cases, even waive off the procedural requirements under the law. In fact, a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court (SC) of India in May 2023) reaffirmed that it has the power to dissolve a marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown (which is, per se, not a ground for divorce under the HMA) under Article 142(1) of the Indian Constitution and that it can dissolve a marriage by mutual consent without following the procedural requirement as set out in the HMA.<a id=\"fnref3\" title=\"3. Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 544.\" href=\"#fn3\"><sup>3<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">This article discusses the law and jurisprudence in relation to obtaining divorce by mutual consent and whether such consent, once given, can be withdrawn by either party.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, #79a4d2);\">Divorce by mutual consent under Hindu law<\/h4>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, #ecc6c6);\">What is divorce by mutual consent?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">If the parties i.e. the husband and wife have been living separately for one year or more, they may agree to mutually dissolve their marriage and approach the court with a divorce petition on the ground that they have not been able to live together and would like to obtain a divorce by mutual consent.<a id=\"fnref4\" title=\"4. Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, S. 13-B.\" href=\"#fn4\"><sup>4<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, #ecc6c6);\">Procedure and timelines<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The HMA provides for a statutory cooling-off\/waiting period, of at least 6 months, from the date of presentation of the divorce petition, to enable the parties to explore the possibility of settlement and cohabitation. If the petition is not withdrawn post 6 months (and no later than 18 months) from the date of presentation of the petition, the court, after hearing the parties and making necessary inquiry(ies), may pass a decree of divorce declaring the marriage to be dissolved.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Akin to the HMA, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002835344\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Special Marriage Act, 1954<\/a> (SMA) also provides that mutual consent divorce can be sought if the parties: (<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">i<\/span>) have been living separately for a period of one year or more; (<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">ii<\/span>) have not been able to live together; and (<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">iii<\/span>) have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved. A cooling-off period of 6 months has been provided under the SMA also.<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, #79a4d2);\">The 6-month cooling-off period \u2014 Mandatory or merely directory?<\/h4>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, #ecc6c6);\">The cooling-off period is mandatory<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The cooling-off period is categorically included in HMA and the intention of the legislature is to provide the couple a minimum period of 6 months to reconsider their decision and if possible, to reconcile their differences.<a id=\"fnref5\" title=\"5. Subhasree Datta v. Nil, 2008 SCC OnLine Cal 224.\" href=\"#fn5\"><sup>5<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Typically, courts have held that a mandatory provision of the law (in this case, the HMA) if construed as being directory in nature, may result in defeating the object of the provision.<a id=\"fnref6\" title=\"6. Family Court v. Nil, 2008 SCC OnLine Bom 759.\" href=\"#fn6\"><sup>6<\/sup><\/a> In fact, there are a multitude of judicial pronouncements that subscribe to the view that Section 13-B of the HMA is mandatory in nature<a id=\"fnref7\" title=\"7. Mohinder Pal Kaur v. Gurmit Singh, 2001 SCC OnLine P&amp;H 633; Nitin Ramnaik Lal Jhavtri v. Padmini Nitin Jhavsri, 1984 SCC OnLine Bom 535; Hitesh Narendra Doshi v. Jesal Hitesh Doshi, 2000 SCC OnLine AP 169.\" href=\"#fn7\"><sup>7<\/sup><\/a> and that courts cannot overlook the substantive provisions of the statute and pass orders concerning an issue which can be settled only through a mechanism prescribed in a statute.<a id=\"fnref8\" title=\"8. Manish Goel v. Rohini Goel, (2010) 4 SCC 393; see also Poonam v. Sumit Tanwar, (2010) 4 SCC 460.\" href=\"#fn8\"><sup>8<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, #ecc6c6);\">Can the cooling-off period be waived?<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the flip side, courts have also held that the object of Section 13-B is to enable the parties to dissolve a marriage by consent if the marriage has irretrievably broken down, and to enable them to rehabilitate without undue hardship. This is owing to the fact that while the cooling-off period is to safeguard against a hurried decision, it could not have been the intention of the legislature to perpetuate a purposeless marriage or to prolong the agony of the parties when there was no chance of reconciliation.<a id=\"fnref9\" title=\"9. J.S.V. v. V.P.G., 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8391.\" href=\"#fn9\"><sup>9<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The SC has noted that the 6-month period is not mandatory, and it will be open to the court to exercise its discretion and waive the cooling-off period, where there is no possibility of parties resuming cohabitation and there are chances of alternative rehabilitation.<a id=\"fnref10\" title=\"10. Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur, (2017) 8 SCC 746; Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 544.\" href=\"#fn10\"><sup>10<\/sup><\/a> Even though every effort must be made to save a marriage, if there are no chances of reunion and there are chances of fresh rehabilitation, the court should not be powerless in enabling the parties to have a better option and future. Various High Courts have followed the suit and waived the waiting period (on a case-by-case basis) and held that the 6-month period is only discretionary in nature.<a id=\"fnref11\" title=\"11. K. Omprakash v. K. Nalini, 1985 SCC OnLine AP 98; Roopa Reddy v. Prabhakar Reddy, 1993 SCC OnLine Kar 111; Dhanjit Vadra v. Beena Vadra, 1990 SCC OnLine Del 18; Dineshkumar Shukla v. Neeta, 2005 SCC OnLine MP 3.\" href=\"#fn11\"><sup>11<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In effect, the courts may waive the cooling-off period based on the extant facts and circumstances. Such cases include instances where: (<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">i<\/span>) the marriage has irretrievably broken down; (<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">ii<\/span>) parties have been fighting\/litigating for a long time and there is no chance of reconciliation;<a id=\"fnref12\" title=\"12. Santosh Kumari v. Virendra Kumar, 1986 SCC OnLine Raj 7; Dhiran Harilal Garasia v. N. Mansu, 1987 SCC OnLine Guj 68.\" href=\"#fn12\"><sup>12<\/sup><\/a> (<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">iii<\/span>) the parties have already settled their disputes by way of mediation;<a id=\"fnref13\" title=\"13. R. Jegannathan, In re, 2014 SCC OnLine Mad 8814.\" href=\"#fn13\"><sup>13<\/sup><\/a> or (<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">iv<\/span>) not waiving off the waiting period would frustrate future prospects of the parties.<a id=\"fnref14\" title=\"14. Nikhil Kumar v. Rupali Kumar, (2016) 13 SCC 383.\" href=\"#fn14\"><sup>14<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, #ecc6c6);\">Way forward<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Considering the above, the jurisprudence on whether the cooling-off period is mandatory or directory, is still evolving. The tussle for the judiciary is whether the legislature intended, under exceptional circumstances, for the courts to divert from the \u201cliteral interpretation\u201d of the law and follow the \u201cspirit\u201d of the law instead. In a nutshell, courts typically take a view that considerable sanctity and seriousness must be given to this legislative directive and it is only in exceptional cases that the cooling-off period should be waived, on the basis of facts and underlying circumstances of each case.<a id=\"fnref15\" title=\"15. Anil Kumar Jain v. Maya Jain, (2009) 10 SCC 415; Poonam v. Sumit Tanwar, (2010) 4 SCC 460.\" href=\"#fn15\"><sup>15<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, #79a4d2);\">Can consent, once given, be withdrawn unilaterally?<\/h4>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, #ecc6c6);\">Mutual consent should be prevalent at all times<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It is well established that mere filing of the petition for obtaining divorce by mutual consent does not authorise the court to make a decree for divorce.<a id=\"fnref16\" title=\"16. Yash Mehra v. Arundhati Mehra, 2009 SCC OnLine Del 152.\" href=\"#fn16\"><sup>16<\/sup><\/a> Mutual consent of both parties is required at every stage for an application under Section 13-B of the HMA to succeed, which includes: (<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">i<\/span>) when the parties move to the court at the first instance with the divorce petition; (<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">ii<\/span>) when the parties approach the court after the waiting period; (<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">iii<\/span>) when the court makes inquiry under Section 13-B(2) of the HMA; and (<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">iv<\/span>) at the time when the decree of divorce is granted. Therefore, it is only on the continued mutual consent of the parties that a decree for mutual consent divorce can be passed by the court.<a id=\"fnref17\" title=\"17. Smruti Pahariya v. Sanjay Pahariya, (2009) 13 SCC 338.\" href=\"#fn17\"><sup>17<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, #ecc6c6);\">Consent can be unilaterally withdrawn before divorce is granted<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The HMA specifically recognises the right of the parties to withdraw the consent given to the divorce petition. This right is unqualified and for any reason whatsoever, if the parties or one of them, choose to withdraw their consent, such withdrawal of consent would be in accordance with the statutory provision i.e. Section 13-B(2) of the HMA.<a id=\"fnref18\" title=\"18. Rajesh R. Nair v. Meera Babu, 2013 SCC OnLine Ker 24486.\" href=\"#fn18\"><sup>18<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Laying emphasis on the importance of \u201cconsent\u201d, the Supreme Court held that any party to a divorce petition may withdraw his\/her consent to the said petition unilaterally. The court observed that the statutory cooling-off period is intended to give time and opportunity to the parties to reflect on their move and seek advice from relatives and friends. In this transitional period, one of the parties may have second thoughts and change his\/her mind and choose not to proceed with the petition. If any party says inter alia that, \u201cI have withdrawn my consent\u201d or \u201cI am not a willing party to the divorce\u201d, the court cannot pass a decree of divorce by mutual consent.<a id=\"fnref19\" title=\"19. Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash, (1991) 2 SCC 25.\t\" href=\"#fn19\"><sup>19<\/sup><\/a> The above view was reinforced by a subsequent ruling of the Supreme Court<a id=\"fnref20\" title=\"20. Hitesh Bhatnagar v. Deepa Bhatnagar, (2011) 5 SCC 234.\" href=\"#fn20\"><sup>20<\/sup><\/a> wherein the Court dismissed the husband\u2019s petition for divorce by mutual consent because the wife withdrew her consent before the second motion.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, both parties have an unfettered right to unilaterally withdraw their consent and reconsider the decision to apply for divorce. This is notwithstanding any undertaking given in any legal proceeding or recorded in any settlement\/joint statement, in or outside the court, resulting in a consent order\/decree.<a id=\"fnref21\" title=\"21. Rajat Gupta v. Rupali Gupta, 2018 SCC OnLine Del 9005.\" href=\"#fn21\"><sup>21<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, #ecc6c6);\">Withdrawal of consent should be genuine and legitimate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While parties have the unequivocal right to withdraw their consent, it must be noted that that there have been instances where courts have ruled that the withdrawal of consent is not genuine and\/or proper and therefore, such withdrawal should not be given effect to.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Withdrawal of consent should be genuine and either party should not have any ulterior motive(s) \u2014 such as taking undue advantage of the other party;<a id=\"fnref22\" title=\"22. Shikha Bhatia v. Gaurav Bhatia, 2010 SCC OnLine Del 1962.\" href=\"#fn22\"><sup>22<\/sup><\/a> to extort (more) money and\/or obtain additional property(ies)<a id=\"fnref23\" title=\"23. Anil Khatwani v. Nistha Khatwani, 2012 SCC OnLine Raj 1449.\" href=\"#fn23\"><sup>23<\/sup><\/a>, etc. For instance, in a case before the SC<a id=\"fnref24\" title=\"24. Anil Kumar Jain v. Maya Jain, (2009) 10 SCC 415.\" href=\"#fn24\"><sup>24<\/sup><\/a>, the wife had specifically withdrawn her consent for divorce, after receiving valuable property rights in consideration of the divorce. Additionally, she refused to cohabit with her husband despite her explicit refusal to proceed with the divorce. The court not only granted divorce but also upheld the settlement agreement despite the withdrawal of consent. Therefore, while withdrawal of consent is an unfettered right, care must be taken to ensure that the basis for withdrawal is legitimate, reasonable, and genuine. Additionally, it must be noted that consent cannot be withdrawn once the divorce has been decreed.<a id=\"fnref25\" title=\"25. Pralay Kumar Bose v. Shyama Bose, 1997 SCC OnLine Cal 424.\" href=\"#fn25\"><sup>25<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n<h4 style=\"background-image: linear-gradient(to left, #FFFFFF, #79a4d2);\">Concluding remarks<\/h4>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Under Hindu law, marriage is considered a sacred indissoluble bond and the concept of divorce is relatively new and ever evolving. In such matters, courts have to tread carefully and uphold not just the sanctity of marriage but also give deference to the varied interests of the parties involved. Therefore, there is some divergence in the judicial opinion in cases pertaining to mutual consent divorce. While courts generally uphold the letter of the law, in some cases a liberal and purposive interpretation has been given to legal provisions so as to ensure that justice is carried out between the stakeholders involved.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In our view, law should be tempered with equity and each case must be decided on the basis of its peculiar facts and circumstances. The cooling-off period is statutorily prescribed and is even necessary in cases where there may be an opportunity to save the marriage. However, enforcing the same in cases where the marriage is broken beyond repair, may lead to more complexities and drag the process of divorce needlessly. As regards withdrawal of consent, it must be noted that the concept of \u201cmutual consent\u201d divorce works on the primacy of consent, of both parties. Therefore, while parties have the right to withdraw consent, such consent should not be withdrawn unnecessarily, and care must be taken to ensure that the withdrawal of consent does not affect the other party prejudicially.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">\u2020Partner, Khaitan &amp; Co.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">\u2020\u2020Principal Associate, Khaitan &amp; Co.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn1\" href=\"#fnref1\">1.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Koppisetti Subbharao<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of A.P.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/nKs3SYnN\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2009) 12 SCC 331<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn2\" href=\"#fnref2\">2.<\/a> Kanu Sarda, Lockdown Impact: Divorce, Child Custody Cases Spike Across Country, Mumbai Tops Chart, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">The New Indian Express<\/span>; Rica Bhattacharyya &amp; Maulik Vyas, Divorces Among Professionals Zoom Amid Pandemic Gloom, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Economic Times<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn3\" href=\"#fnref3\">3.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shilpa Sailesh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Varun Sreenivasan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/uw8w32PV\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 544<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn4\" href=\"#fnref4\">4.<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hindu Marriage Act, 1955<\/a>, S. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543735\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">13-B<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn5\" href=\"#fnref5\">5.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Subhasree Datta<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Nil<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/MQIGUo83\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2008 SCC OnLine Cal 224<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn6\" href=\"#fnref6\">6.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Family Court<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Nil<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/YNUsaVi7\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2008 SCC OnLine Bom 759<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn7\" href=\"#fnref7\">7.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mohinder Pal Kaur<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Gurmit Singh<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/D3fVqRSr\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2001 SCC OnLine P&amp;H 633<\/a>; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Nitin Ramnaik Lal Jhavtri<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Padmini Nitin Jhavsri<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/WJNpkv92\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1984 SCC OnLine Bom 535<\/a>; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Hitesh Narendra Doshi<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jesal Hitesh Doshi<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/T49u3O7g\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2000 SCC OnLine AP 169<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn8\" href=\"#fnref8\">8.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Manish Goel<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rohini Goel<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/sZdy7h94\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2010) 4 SCC 393<\/a>; see also <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Poonam<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sumit Tanwar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/v282y6OE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2010) 4 SCC 460<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn9\" href=\"#fnref9\">9.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">J.S.V.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">V.P.G.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/N3JT0U8M\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2019 SCC OnLine Del 8391<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn10\" href=\"#fnref10\">10.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Amardeep Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Harveen Kaur<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/pYlDVqSC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2017) 8 SCC 746<\/a>; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shilpa Sailesh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Varun Sreenivasan<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/uw8w32PV\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 544<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn11\" href=\"#fnref11\">11.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">K. Omprakash<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">K. Nalini<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/48kU53h2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1985 SCC OnLine AP 98<\/a>; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Roopa Reddy<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Prabhakar Reddy<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0NEzX9f3\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1993 SCC OnLine Kar 111<\/a>; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dhanjit Vadra<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Beena Vadra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/NymsCvHl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1990 SCC OnLine Del 18<\/a>; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dineshkumar Shukla<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Neeta<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/E739zAg1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2005 SCC OnLine MP 3<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn12\" href=\"#fnref12\">12.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Santosh Kumari<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Virendra Kumar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/7Nv5Y9Lt\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1986 SCC OnLine Raj 7<\/a>; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Dhiran Harilal Garasia<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">N. Mansu<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/W5Jg8o9i\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1987 SCC OnLine Guj 68<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn13\" href=\"#fnref13\">13.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">R. Jegannathan, In re<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/15nB5r9h\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2014 SCC OnLine Mad 8814<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn14\" href=\"#fnref14\">14.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Nikhil Kumar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rupali Kumar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Rc37Cti4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2016) 13 SCC 383<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn15\" href=\"#fnref15\">15.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Anil Kumar Jain<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Maya Jain<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/4q9k3pSM\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2009) 10 SCC 415<\/a>; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Poonam<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sumit Tanwar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/v282y6OE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2010) 4 SCC 460<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn16\" href=\"#fnref16\">16.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Yash Mehra<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Arundhati Mehra<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/VbvIky87\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2009 SCC OnLine Del 152<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn17\" href=\"#fnref17\">17.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Smruti Pahariya<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sanjay Pahariya<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/mogp57CD\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2009) 13 SCC 338<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn18\" href=\"#fnref18\">18.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rajesh R. Nair<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Meera Babu<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/r1puwgTe\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2013 SCC OnLine Ker 24486<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn19\" href=\"#fnref19\">19.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Sureshta Devi<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Om Prakash<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/00xJD145\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1991) 2 SCC 25<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn20\" href=\"#fnref20\">20.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Hitesh Bhatnagar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Deepa Bhatnagar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/n4RvXa7N\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2011) 5 SCC 234<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn21\" href=\"#fnref21\">21.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rajat Gupta<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Rupali Gupta<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/R8Cp74Vj\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2018 SCC OnLine Del 9005<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn22\" href=\"#fnref22\">22.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shikha Bhatia<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Gaurav Bhatia<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/lwEMc84k\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2010 SCC OnLine Del 1962<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn23\" href=\"#fnref23\">23.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Anil Khatwani<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Nistha Khatwani<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/EOd9Ld8c\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2012 SCC OnLine Raj 1449<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn24\" href=\"#fnref24\">24.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Anil Kumar Jain<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Maya Jain<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/4q9k3pSM\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2009) 10 SCC 415<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt; text-indent: -18pt;\"><a id=\"fn25\" href=\"#fnref25\">25.<\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Pralay Kumar Bose<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Shyama Bose<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/491WkSii\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1997 SCC OnLine Cal 424<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Bijal Ajinkya\u2020 and Sachin Bhandawat\u2020\u2020<br \/>\nCite as: 2024 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 5<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":311183,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[20271,47404],"tags":[31376,2846,46260,10202,6221,22654,12051],"class_list":["post-311182","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-experts_corner","category-khaitan-co","tag-cooling-off-period","tag-divorce","tag-experts-corner","tag-hindu-law","tag-irretrievable-breakdown-of-marriage","tag-mutual-consent-divorce","tag-withdrawal-of-consent"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Mutual Consent Divorce under Hindu Law: Cooling-Off Period and Withdrawal of Consent | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Khaitan and Co. team discussed cooling-off period and withdrawal of consent in mutual consent divorce under Hindu Law\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mutual Consent Divorce under Hindu Law: Cooling-Off Period and Withdrawal of Consent\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Khaitan and Co. team discussed cooling-off period and withdrawal of consent in mutual consent divorce under Hindu Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-11T05:30:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-01-18T12:01:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/mutual-consent-divorce.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"887\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Mutual Consent Divorce under Hindu Law: Cooling-Off Period and Withdrawal of Consent\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/\",\"name\":\"Mutual Consent Divorce under Hindu Law: Cooling-Off Period and Withdrawal of Consent | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/mutual-consent-divorce.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-11T05:30:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-18T12:01:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Khaitan and Co. team discussed cooling-off period and withdrawal of consent in mutual consent divorce under Hindu Law\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/mutual-consent-divorce.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/mutual-consent-divorce.webp\",\"width\":887,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"mutual consent divorce\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mutual Consent Divorce under Hindu Law: Cooling-Off Period and Withdrawal of Consent\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mutual Consent Divorce under Hindu Law: Cooling-Off Period and Withdrawal of Consent | SCC Blog","description":"Khaitan and Co. team discussed cooling-off period and withdrawal of consent in mutual consent divorce under Hindu Law","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mutual Consent Divorce under Hindu Law: Cooling-Off Period and Withdrawal of Consent","og_description":"Khaitan and Co. team discussed cooling-off period and withdrawal of consent in mutual consent divorce under Hindu Law","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-01-11T05:30:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-01-18T12:01:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":887,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/mutual-consent-divorce.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Mutual Consent Divorce under Hindu Law: Cooling-Off Period and Withdrawal of Consent","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/","name":"Mutual Consent Divorce under Hindu Law: Cooling-Off Period and Withdrawal of Consent | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/mutual-consent-divorce.webp","datePublished":"2024-01-11T05:30:21+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-18T12:01:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Khaitan and Co. team discussed cooling-off period and withdrawal of consent in mutual consent divorce under Hindu Law","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/mutual-consent-divorce.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/mutual-consent-divorce.webp","width":887,"height":590,"caption":"mutual consent divorce"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/11\/mutual-consent-divorce-hindu-law-cooling-off-period-and-withdrawal-of-consent\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mutual Consent Divorce under Hindu Law: Cooling-Off Period and Withdrawal of Consent"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/mutual-consent-divorce.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":320861,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/27\/dissolution-as-the-resolution-use-of-section-13-b-of-the-hindu-marriage-act-1955-in-appellate-jurisdictions\/","url_meta":{"origin":311182,"position":0},"title":"Dissolution as the Resolution: Use of Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in Appellate Jurisdiction(s)","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 27, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ravi Shankar* and Akanksha Natesan**","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Dissolution as the Resolution","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Dissolution-as-the-Resolution.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Dissolution-as-the-Resolution.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Dissolution-as-the-Resolution.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Dissolution-as-the-Resolution.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":367354,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/21\/mad-hc-muslim-born-woman-divorce-plea-valid-hindu-marriage-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":311182,"position":1},"title":"No roving enquiry required: Madras High Court holds Muslim-born woman&#8217;s divorce plea maintainable under Hindu Marriage Act","author":"Editor","date":"November 21, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThere was absolutely no necessity for the Court to conduct any roving enquiry in such circumstances, merely because the wife\u2019s name continues to be her original Muslim name.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Muslim-born woman's divorce plea","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Muslim-born-womans-divorce-plea.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Muslim-born-womans-divorce-plea.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Muslim-born-womans-divorce-plea.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Muslim-born-womans-divorce-plea.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":358517,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/09\/01\/validity-of-hindu-marriage-valid-unregistered-mutual-divorce-certificate-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":311182,"position":2},"title":"Hindu Marriage valid even if unregistered; Family Court cannot mandate registration certificate for mutual divorce: Allahabad HC","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 1, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe requirement of filing registration certificate is only in cases where the marriage is registered under Section 8 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Admittedly, in the present case, the marriage which was solemnized in the year 2010 is not registered and therefore, there is no necessity of filing registration\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"validity of Hindu marriage","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/validity-of-Hindu-marriage.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/validity-of-Hindu-marriage.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/validity-of-Hindu-marriage.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/validity-of-Hindu-marriage.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":238365,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/11\/02\/bom-hc-can-cooling-off-period-under-s-13-b2-of-hindu-marriage-act-be-waived-legal-position-discussed-in-a-case-of-pregnant-woman\/","url_meta":{"origin":311182,"position":3},"title":"Bom HC | Can &#8220;cooling-off period&#8221; under S. 13-B(2) of Hindu Marriage Act be waived? Legal position discussed in a case of pregnant woman","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 2, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0Nitin W. Sambre, J., allowed an application seeking waiver of the cooling-off period on an urgent basis in light of woman carrying pregnancy from another person. Parties to the instant matter tendered the joint petition for divorce by mutual consent pursuant to the provisions of Section 13B of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":100271,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/01\/19\/while-declaring-divorce-by-mutual-consent-the-court-has-to-follow-the-law-in-letter-and-spirit\/","url_meta":{"origin":311182,"position":4},"title":"While declaring divorce by mutual consent the court has to follow the law in letter and spirit","author":"Saba","date":"January 19, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Bombay:\u00a0While considering the appeal filed by the appellant\/wife against the impugned judgment and order passed by the Family Court at Mumbai, converting the marriage petition of the respondent\/husband for divorce into a petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":320192,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/17\/supreme-court-invokes-power-under-article-142-constitution-grant-mutual-consent-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":311182,"position":5},"title":"Supreme Court invokes power under Article 142 of the Constitution to grant mutual consent divorce","author":"Apoorva","date":"April 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court directed the parties to withdraw all the cases pending between them.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Article 142 of the Constitution","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Article-142-of-the-Constitution.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Article-142-of-the-Constitution.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Article-142-of-the-Constitution.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Article-142-of-the-Constitution.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311182","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=311182"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/311182\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/311183"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=311182"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=311182"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=311182"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}