{"id":310981,"date":"2024-01-08T18:00:58","date_gmt":"2024-01-08T12:30:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=310981"},"modified":"2024-02-21T15:55:33","modified_gmt":"2024-02-21T10:25:33","slug":"no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"No cognizance of offence u\/S. 188 IPC unless DM makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC: Gurgaon District Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Gurgaon District Court:<\/span> Vikrant, J. noted that a separate complaint under Section 195(1)(a)(i)<\/a> of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (‘CrPC’) was not registered in case where a First Information Report was registered against the accused under Section 188<\/a> of the Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (‘IPC’) for violation of the District Magistrate’s order under Section 144<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a>. The Court held that the District Magistrate, Gurugram, was duty bound to make a complaint to the Judicial Magistrate concerned of the area and the said refusal or non-compliance with this requirement to make the complaint is in violation of the law.<\/p>\n

In the matter at hand, a First Information Report was registered on 08-08-2023 against the accused under Section 188<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> for violation of the District Magistrate’s order under Section 144<\/a> of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (‘CrPC’). The said FIR was registered as the offence was cognizable. Arrest warrants were issued against the accused. However, the accused himself appeared before the Court and filed an application for recalling the arrest warrants issued against him.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that a separate complaint under Section 195(1)(a)(i) was not registered, which is inevitable for the purpose of taking cognizance and putting the accused to the trial. On perusal of Section 195<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a>, the Court noted that it provides that no Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under Section 172<\/a>–188<\/a> of the IPC<\/a>, except on the complaint in writing of the public servant concerned or of some other public servant to whom he is administratively subordinate.<\/span> The Court said that the District Magistrate, Gurugram was duty bound to make a complaint to the Judicial Magistrate of the area either under his own signature or through any authorized official subordinate to him. The said refusal or non-compliance with this requirement to make the complaint is in violation of the law. Further, the Court held that without the separate complaint under Section 195(1)(a)(i), the Court cannot take cognizance of the offence against the accused and put him to trial.<\/p>\n

Therefore, the Court discharged the accused for want of complaint under Section 195<\/a> CrPC<\/a> from the District Magistrate, Gurugram and recalled the arrest warrant issued against them.<\/p>\n

The Court also directed the District Magistrate, Gurugram, to pay compensation of Rs. 1000\/- to the accused under Section 358<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a> for making him undergo the police proceedings unnecessarily, joining investigation, without any intention to prosecute him.<\/p>\n

In case of non-payment of the compensation, the Court said that the accused is at liberty to approach the Court after 30 days for recovery of the amount.<\/p>\n

[State of Haryana v. Shagun, 2024 SCC OnLine P&H 1<\/a>, Order Dated: 06-01-2024<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case:<\/p>\n

For the accused:<\/span> Advocate Sahil Saini<\/p>\n

For the respondents:<\/span> Advocate Himanshu Yadav<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“No Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under Section 172-188 of the IPC, except on the complaint in writing of the public servant concerned or of some other public servant to whom he is administratively subordinate”.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67517,"featured_media":310984,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,4721],"tags":[58008,6881,11941,16121,55575,13961,33037,64195,51902],"class_list":["post-310981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-district-court","tag-cognizance-of-offence","tag-complaint","tag-crpc","tag-district-magistrate","tag-gurgaon-district-court","tag-ipc","tag-judicial-magistrate","tag-section-188","tag-section-195"],"yoast_head":"\nNo cognizance of offence U\/S. 188 IPC unless DM makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"No cognizance of offence under Section 188 IPC unless District Magistrate makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"No cognizance of offence u\/S. 188 IPC unless DM makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC: Gurgaon District Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"No cognizance of offence under Section 188 IPC unless District Magistrate makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-08T12:30:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-02-21T10:25:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Gurgaon-District-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"No cognizance of offence u\/S. 188 IPC unless DM makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC: Gurgaon District Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"No cognizance of offence U\/S. 188 IPC unless DM makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Gurgaon-District-Court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-08T12:30:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-02-21T10:25:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\"},\"description\":\"No cognizance of offence under Section 188 IPC unless District Magistrate makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Gurgaon-District-Court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Gurgaon-District-Court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Gurgaon District Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"No cognizance of offence u\/S. 188 IPC unless DM makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC: Gurgaon District Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"No cognizance of offence U\/S. 188 IPC unless DM makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC | SCC Blog","description":"No cognizance of offence under Section 188 IPC unless District Magistrate makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"No cognizance of offence u\/S. 188 IPC unless DM makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC: Gurgaon District Court","og_description":"No cognizance of offence under Section 188 IPC unless District Magistrate makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-01-08T12:30:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-02-21T10:25:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Gurgaon-District-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"No cognizance of offence u\/S. 188 IPC unless DM makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC: Gurgaon District Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/","name":"No cognizance of offence U\/S. 188 IPC unless DM makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Gurgaon-District-Court.webp","datePublished":"2024-01-08T12:30:58+00:00","dateModified":"2024-02-21T10:25:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624"},"description":"No cognizance of offence under Section 188 IPC unless District Magistrate makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Gurgaon-District-Court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Gurgaon-District-Court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Gurgaon District Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/no-cognizance-under-section-188-ipc-unless-dm-makes-complaint-to-judicial-magistrate-under-s-195-crpc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"No cognizance of offence u\/S. 188 IPC unless DM makes a complaint to Judicial Magistrate under S. 195 CrPC: Gurgaon District Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84913f82186a8dea042dc300d5751624","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d822f35f9fcd11386aa47345cde7945e45a64da7205eebe9784f21d0cd223603?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-online-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Gurgaon-District-Court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":207902,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/01\/10\/delhi-hc-defect-of-non-compliance-of-section-195-crpc-cannot-be-cured-by-filling-subsequent-chargesheet\/","url_meta":{"origin":310981,"position":0},"title":"Del HC | Defect of non-compliance of Section 195 CrPC cannot be cured by filling subsequent chargesheet","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 10, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0The Bench of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. allowed a petition filed against order of the trial court whereby it has taken cognizance of offence under Section 188 IPC (disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant) against the petitioner. The District Disaster Management Authority carried out an inspection of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":299124,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/11\/delhi-hc-emphasizes-on-non-compliance-of-s195-of-crpc-directs-issuance-of-guidelines\/","url_meta":{"origin":310981,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court directs issuance of guidelines to address non-compliance of Section 195 of CrPC","author":"Editor","date":"August 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe concerned public servant should have prepared a complaint under Section 195 CrPC and the same should have been filed before the Magistrate or the same could have been forwarded along with the chargesheet to the concerned Court.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":233658,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/10\/chh-hc-s-195-crpc-is-a-limitation-on-powers-of-magistrate-to-take-cognizance-for-an-offence-under-s-188-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":310981,"position":2},"title":"Chh HC | S. 195 CrPC is a limitation on powers of Magistrate to take cognizance for an offence under S. 188 IPC","author":"Editor","date":"August 10, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Arunima Bose, Editorial Assistant has put this story together","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":338392,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/01\/03\/non-mentioning-of-vital-facts-assault-in-fir-vitiate-cognizance-taken-by-cjm-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":310981,"position":3},"title":"\u2018Non-mentioning of vital facts of assault or criminal force in FIR\/ Complaint, would vitiate cognizance taken by CJM\u2019; SC quashes proceedings under S. 353 & 186 of IPC","author":"Editor","date":"January 3, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA written complaint by a public servant before the Court takes cognizance is sine qua non, absence of which would vitiate such cognizance being taken for any offence punishable under Section 186 of the IPC.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"vital facts in FIR","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/vital-facts-in-FIR.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/vital-facts-in-FIR.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/vital-facts-in-FIR.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/vital-facts-in-FIR.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352708,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/07\/jk-court-on-waheed-rehman-parras-mcc-violation-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":310981,"position":4},"title":"Read why J&K Court did not take cognizance against PDP MLA Waheed ur Rehman Parra for violating Model Code of Conduct","author":"Editor","date":"July 7, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Court opined that Waheed ur Rehman Parra is charged with violation of Model Code of Conduct which cannot be classified as an order under Section 188 IPC as it lacked statutory backing and many of its provisions are not legally enforceable.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Waheed ur Rehman Parra MCC violation case","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Waheed-ur-Rehman-Parra-MCC-violation-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Waheed-ur-Rehman-Parra-MCC-violation-case.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Waheed-ur-Rehman-Parra-MCC-violation-case.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Waheed-ur-Rehman-Parra-MCC-violation-case.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":146681,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/08\/01\/expression-the-public-servant-or-his-administrative-superior-under-section-195-crpc-includes-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":310981,"position":5},"title":"Expression \u201cthe public servant or his administrative superior\u201d under Section 195 CrPC includes High Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"August 1, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Explaining the scope of the expression \u201cthe public servant or his administrative superior\u201d under Section 195(1) (a)(i) CrPC, the bench of A.K. Goel and U.U. Lalit, JJ held that the expression cannot exclude High Courts. Interpreting Section 195(1) (a)(i) CrPC which says that cognizance in respect of offence\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=310981"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310981\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/310984"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=310981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=310981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=310981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}