{"id":310941,"date":"2024-01-08T12:00:17","date_gmt":"2024-01-08T06:30:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=310941"},"modified":"2024-01-12T12:00:35","modified_gmt":"2024-01-12T06:30:35","slug":"mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/","title":{"rendered":"Madras HC directs Patent Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendations"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madras High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition filed against the post grant opposition proceedings against petitioner&#8217;s Patent application and quash the same and consequently, direct the Controller of Patents and Designs (&#8216;Controller&#8217;) to constitute a fresh Opposition Board to give fresh recommendation in the post grant opposition proceedings against Patent after disposal of the Form 13, Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J. has directed the Controller of Patents and Designs to constitute within 30 days a fresh Opposition Board comprising officers other than the officers who formed the previous Opposition Board.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, it directed that the newly constituted Opposition Board should examine the entire evidence and the amended claims of the petitioner and provide its recommendations within a maximum period of two months from the date of constitution of such board. It also directed the Controller to fix and conclude the hearing in the opposition proceedings as expeditiously as possible.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner filed an application in April 2016 for the grant of patent to an invention entitled &#8220;An improved process for the preparation of Linezolid&#8221;. The patent was granted on 20-03-2017. On 05-03-2018, a competitor of the petitioner filed a post grant opposition to the patent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner submitted that he did not file evidence along with the reply statement to the opposition. Therefore, the competitor was not entitled to file additional evidence along with its rejoinder as per Rule 59 of the Patents Rules, 2003 (&#8216;Rules, 2003&#8217;). He further submitted that both parties filed evidence after receiving the recommendation of the Opposition Board. The Opposition Board is under an obligation to consider the additional evidence and issue fresh recommendations. Therefore, it is liable to be reconstituted and called upon to issue fresh recommendations after considering the complete evidence on record.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that both parties were permitted to submit evidence after the issuance of the recommendations of the Opposition Board. The Patents Rules envisage that evidence submitted under Rules 57 to 60 would be placed before the Opposition Board. However, pursuant to the writ petition filed by the petitioner before this Court earlier, the Controller agreed to receive further evidence and such evidence was not by way of publication. Sub-rule (5) of Rule 62 directs the Controller to decide the opposition after taking into consideration the recommendations of the Opposition Board.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court said that it would be meaningless for the Controller to take a decision based on the recommendations issued by the Opposition Board in May 2019, and natural justice clearly requires that the additional evidence placed on record by both parties should be considered by the Opposition Board. Thus, to preclude the possibility of confirmation bias, the Court viewed that the Opposition Board should be reconstituted.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Optimus Drugs Private Limited v Union of India, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9eE7lw17\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Mad 8013<\/a>, Order dated 12-12-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Petitioner:<\/span> Senior Counsel P.V. Balasubramaniam<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For Respondents<\/span>: Advocate Madanagopal Rao, Advocate S.Suba Shiny<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Madras High Court said that natural justice clearly requires that the additional evidence placed on record by both parties should be considered by the Opposition Board.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":298865,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[31986,64178,64177,2568,2567,2805,64176,3554,46415,64175,64174],"class_list":["post-310941","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-additional-evidence","tag-confirmation-bias","tag-controller-of-patent-and-designs","tag-Evidence","tag-Madras_High_Court","tag-natural_justice","tag-opposition-board","tag-patent","tag-patent-act","tag-post-grant-opposition","tag-reconstitute-opposition-board"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Madras HC directs Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendations | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Madras HC directed Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendation\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madras HC directs Patent Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendations\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madras HC directed Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-08T06:30:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-01-12T06:30:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Madras HC directs Patent Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendations\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/\",\"name\":\"Madras HC directs Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendations | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-08T06:30:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-12T06:30:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Madras HC directed Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendation\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"madras high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madras HC directs Patent Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendations\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madras HC directs Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendations | SCC Blog","description":"Madras HC directed Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendation","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madras HC directs Patent Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendations","og_description":"Madras HC directed Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendation","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-01-08T06:30:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-01-12T06:30:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Madras HC directs Patent Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendations","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/","name":"Madras HC directs Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendations | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2024-01-08T06:30:17+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-12T06:30:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Madras HC directed Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendation","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"madras high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/08\/mad-hc-directs-controller-reconstitute-opposition-board-evidence-filed-after-board-recommendations\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madras HC directs Patent Controller to reconstitute Opposition Board as evidence is filed after issuance of Board Recommendations"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":318425,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/opposition-board-creation-statute-mandates-how-it-should-do-job-madras-hc-directs-patent-controller-forward-papers-new-ob-recommendations\/","url_meta":{"origin":310941,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Opposition Board is creation of statute which mandates how it should do its job\u2019: Madras HC directs Patent Controller to forward papers to new OB for recommendations","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhen the statute mandates what an authority shall consider, then it is obligatory for the statutory authority to consider those materials which the statute mandates\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281943,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/19\/delhi-high-court-rules-principles-of-natural-justice-to-be-followed-by-indian-patent-office-in-pre-grant-opposition-stage-novartis-natco-hearing-both-sides-necessary-legalnews-legalresearch-legalupdat\/","url_meta":{"origin":310941,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court rules in the context of the procedure and principles of natural justice to be observed by the Indian Patent Office in a pre-grant opposition to a patent application","author":"Editor","date":"January 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In pharmaceutical patents, especially, additional care must be taken to ensure that, by being allowed to evergreen a patent beyond its expiry, the patent holder does not keep others, who may seek to deal in the patented product, out of the market. The ultimate sufferer, in such a situation, would\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":373282,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/20\/madras-hc-finds-flipkart-patent-novel-inventive\/","url_meta":{"origin":310941,"position":2},"title":"Madras High Court dismisses appeal against Controller&#8217;s order, finds Flipkart&#8217;s patent novel and inventive","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"January 20, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe entire case of Flipkart rested on the ground of lack of novelty and inventive features in the invention of the patentee.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Flipkart patent","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Flipkart-patent.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Flipkart-patent.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Flipkart-patent.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Flipkart-patent.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":270049,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/07\/14\/delhi-high-court-non-consideration-of-the-grounds-raised-in-a-pre-grant-opposition-while-granting-patent-per-se-constitutes-violation-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":310941,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court| Non-consideration of the grounds raised in a pre-grant opposition while granting patent per se constitutes violation of principles of natural justice","author":"Editor","date":"July 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Jyoti Singh, J. in a case where patent was granted without delving and dealing with the grounds raised in the pre-grant opposition stage remanded it back to the Deputy Controller of Patent for reconsideration of the pre-grant opposition as the impugned order violates principles of natural justice.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309533,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/17\/controller-failed-identify-basis-concluding-non-disclosure-madras-high-court-directs-grant-patent\/","url_meta":{"origin":310941,"position":4},"title":"Controller failed to identify basis for concluding non-disclosure: Madras HC directs to proceed application for grant of patent","author":"Apoorva","date":"December 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court said that the appellants have given complete specifications which also capture the results of the evaluation of the claimed invention against the parameters of penetration, nutrient permeability and root penetration test.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310076,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/","url_meta":{"origin":310941,"position":5},"title":"Madras High Court distinguishes between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications","author":"Apoorva","date":"December 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court directed the Controller of Patents and Designs to decide the patent application on merits and in accordance with law.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310941","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=310941"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310941\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/298865"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=310941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=310941"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=310941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}