{"id":310491,"date":"2024-01-02T09:00:34","date_gmt":"2024-01-02T03:30:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=310491"},"modified":"2024-01-02T09:10:52","modified_gmt":"2024-01-02T03:40:52","slug":"supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Expands the Scope of Section 35(1)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019: More than one Consumer can File a Joint Complaint"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Introduction<\/h4>\n

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019<\/a>1<\/sup><\/a> (2019 Act), as well as the old Act of 19862<\/sup><\/a>, provides for class-action litigation. Under Section 35(1)(c<\/span>) of the 2019 Act3<\/sup><\/a>, one or more consumers can file a complaint on behalf of other similarly placed consumers. This type of complaint (in common parlance, referred to as a “joint complaint\/group complaint”) mandatorily inherits the application of Order 1 Rule 8<\/a>4<\/sup><\/a> of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908<\/a>5<\/sup><\/a>. That being so, joint complaints initiated by groups of consumers who have joined hands for the redressal of only their grievances, have been previously disallowed by the consumer fora.<\/p>\n

Previous position in law<\/h4>\n

Joint complaints, but not in a representative capacity, have always been dismissed as being unsustainable under the consumer protection law. In a landmark ruling of the year 20166<\/sup><\/a>, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC<\/span>) observed that the legislative intent to permit a class action was not to allow only a group of consumers to club together and prefer a consumer complaint for themselves.<\/p>\n

Thereafter, this view was reiterated several times by the NCDRC<\/span> whilst dismissing complaints instituted by groups of consumers looking for the redressal of their individual grievances. In one such case7<\/sup><\/a>, the NCDRC<\/span> ruled that complaints wherein the prayer for relief is restricted only to the complainants therein are not maintainable under Section 12(1)(c<\/span>)8<\/sup><\/a> of the 1986 Act.<\/p>\n

In another case9<\/sup><\/a>, it was categorically held that there is no provision under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986<\/a>, that envisages a joint complaint filed by more than one complainant for the redressal of grievances restricted to themselves.<\/p>\n

Reversal of position by Supreme Court in Brigade Enterprises Ltd. v. Anil Kumar Virmani<\/h4>\n

Dismissal of joint\/group complaints wherein there was no undertaking of representation of other similarly placed consumers became the standard ruling of the NCDRC<\/span>. The position that joint\/group complaints have to be compulsorily preferred in a representative capacity stood solid, until on 17-12-2021, the Supreme Court, in Brigade Enterprises Ltd.<\/span> v. Anil Kumar Virmani<\/span>10<\/sup><\/a>, held that a “joint complaint” preferred by a few consumers, but not in a representative capacity, was maintainable under Section 35(1)(a<\/span>) of the 2019 Act. The premise was that Section 2(5)(i<\/span>)11<\/sup><\/a> of the Act, which defines a “consumer”, includes “consumers” by the conjoint virtue of Section 13(2)<\/a> of the General Clauses Act, 1897<\/a>12<\/sup><\/a>, and there being nothing repugnant in the 2019 Act to hold otherwise.<\/p>\n

Although the dismissal of the application under Section 35(1)(c<\/span>) by NCDRC<\/span> was upheld in that case, the supposedly doomed fate of the complaint therein was turned around and the same was directed to be entertained as a “joint complaint” under Section 35(1)(a<\/span>) of the 2019 Act.<\/p>\n

Difference between a “joint complaint” and a complaint under Section 35(1)(c)<\/h4>\n

Priorly, the terms “joint complaint” and “group complaint” were used interchangeably to refer to a complaint preferred under Section 35(1)(c<\/span>). However, the ruling in Brigade Enterprises<\/span>13<\/sup><\/a> has now set out a “joint complaint” to be different from a complaint filed in a representative capacity. The features of both are distinct and offer consumers two very different choices of litigation. A reading of the said judgment would highlight the key points of distinction between the two, as have been tabulated hereinbelow:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Sl. No.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Joint complaint<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Complaint in representative capacity<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

1.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

A joint complaint is preferred under Section 35(1)(a)<\/a> of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

A complaint in representative capacity is preferred under Section 35(1)(c)<\/a> of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

2.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

It is preferred by more than one consumer in their personal capacity.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

It is preferred by one or more consumers in a representative capacity.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

3.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Order 1 Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is not applicable.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Section 35(11) of the 2019 Act makes Order 1 Rule 8<\/a> of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908<\/a>, applicable.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

4.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

There is no requirement for paper publication (service of notice on other consumers) in a joint complaint.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Paper publication is required by Order 1 Rule 8<\/a> of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

5.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

There need not be sameness of interest of the complainants with other similarly placed consumers.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Sameness of interest with other similarly placed consumers is the sine qua non for a complaint in representative capacity.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

6.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Pleadings and reliefs are limited to the complainants.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Pleadings and reliefs have to showcase sameness of interest with other similarly placed consumers.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

7.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

There is no requirement to seek the leave of the consumer forum to institute a joint complaint, thus, no separate application under Section 35(1)(a<\/span>) is required.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

The leave of the consumer forum has to be sought to institute such a complaint, hence, a separate application under Section 35(1)(c<\/span>) is required.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

8.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Other consumers are allowed to seek impleadment in a joint complaint.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Impleadment of similarly placed consumers is the essence of a group complaint.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

9.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Multiple joint complaints can be instituted by different complainants with the same cause of action against the same opposite party. They may be adjudicated together by the consumer forum.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Only one group complaint can be entertained to address a cause of action against an opposite party. Any subsequently preferred group complaints that seek the same relief for the same cause of action against the same opposite party deserve to be dismissed.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Determination of pecuniary jurisdiction in joint complaints entertained under Section 35(1)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019<\/h4>\n

Although Brigade Enterprises<\/span>14<\/sup><\/a> provides for the entertainment of joint complaints under Section 35(1)(a<\/span>), it fails to lay down the method of computation for the purposes of determining pecuniary jurisdiction. It was left unclear if each complainant has to pay a consideration of Rs 2 crores or if the total value of consideration paid by all complainants has to meet the threshold of Rs 2 crores.<\/p>\n

To further obscure the issue, the NCDRC<\/span> stated on one instance15<\/sup><\/a>, that the complaint therein was maintainable as “the value of the consideration paid by each of the complainants is more than Rs 2 crores”. The usage of such language would demand the inference that the consideration paid by every complainant has to exceed Rs 2 crores. However, such an inference would defeat the purpose of a joint complaint as if a complainant has paid more than Rs 2 crores, he would be singly eligible to approach the NCDRC<\/span> and would then not be required to join hands with other similarly placed consumers to invoke the provisions of Section 35(1)(a<\/span>).<\/p>\n

Finally, a three-Member Bench of the NCDRC<\/span> settled the position of law in Akshay Kumar<\/span> v. Adani Brahma Synergy (P) Ltd.<\/span>16<\/sup><\/a>, by holding that for the purposes of meeting pecuniary jurisdiction, the total consideration paid by all the complainants has to exceed Rs 2 crores. In observing so, reliance was placed upon its earlier decision in Ambrish Kumar Shukla<\/span>17<\/sup><\/a>, which stated that the value of the goods purchased or the services hired and the compensation claimed by each complainant would be immaterial; the total value of the goods purchased or the services hired by all complainants and the compensation claimed by all of them shall be considered to determine pecuniary jurisdiction. However, it is to be borne in mind that prior to the enactment of the 2019 Act, pecuniary jurisdiction in joint complaints was computed by the value of the goods purchased or the services hired, and the compensation claimed by all the complainants. Nonetheless, the NCDRC<\/span> upheld the principle to apply to the total value of paid consideration for joint complaints under the 2019 Act.<\/p>\n

The judgment in Akshay Kumar<\/span>18<\/sup><\/a> recently served as a basis for the admission of a joint complaint19<\/sup><\/a> preferred by 30 complainants against M\/s Raheja Developers Pvt. Ltd., which was held to be maintainable “as the total consideration paid by these 30 persons exceeds Rs 2 crores”.<\/p>\n

Thus, it now stands clarified that the total value of consideration paid by all the complainants shall be considered while determining the pecuniary jurisdiction for a joint complaint under Section 35(1)(a<\/span>) of the 2019 Act.<\/p>\n

Further, the ruling in Akshay Kumar<\/span>20<\/sup><\/a> recently received affirmation from the Supreme Court in Alpha G184 Owners Assn.<\/span> v. Magnum International Trading Co. (P) Ltd.<\/span>21<\/sup><\/a>, which now concretes the position on the issue of pecuniary jurisdiction in joint complaints.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h4>\n

The judgments discussed in this article set the ground for groups of consumers to sue together, without undergoing the arduous procedure followed for complaints under Section 35(1)(c<\/span>), which includes pre-admission\/admission, service of notice\/paper publication, impleadment of parties, completion of pleadings, filing of individual affidavits and final arguments. If not for joint complaints, consumers who wished to seek redressal of their grievances in union, would be constrained to engage in a protracted class-action litigation. This would completely defeat the purpose of adopting a summary procedure to adjudicate consumer disputes.<\/p>\n

A liberal and harmonious interpretation of the provisions of the 2019 Act, like in the instance under discussion, would go a long way in easing access to justice for consumers who are likewise aggrieved. It incidentally also takes into account a very apparent social reality i.e. it is tedious for consumers to singularly pursue litigation against service providers (who are more than often corporate giants) but much easier with the collective power of a community.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n

\u2020Advocate. Author can be reached at <chandorkarnamrata@gmail.com<\/a>>.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

1.<\/a> Consumer Protection Act, 2019.<\/a><\/p>\n

2.<\/a> Consumer Protection Act, 1986<\/a>.<\/p>\n

3.<\/a> Consumer Protection Act, 2019, S. 35.<\/a><\/p>\n

4.<\/a> Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Or. 1 R. 8<\/a>.<\/p>\n

5.<\/a> Rameshwar Prasad Shrivastava<\/span> v. Dwarkadhis Projects (P) Ltd.<\/span>, (2019) 2 SCC 417.<\/a><\/p>\n

6.<\/a> Ambrish Kumar Shukla<\/span> v. Ferrous Infrastructure (P) Ltd.<\/span>, 2016 SCC OnLine NCDRC 1117.<\/a><\/p>\n

7.<\/a> Ajay Aggarwal<\/span> v. Unitech Reliable Projects (P) Ltd.<\/span>, 2017 SCC OnLine NCDRC 5<\/a>.<\/p>\n

8.<\/a> Consumer Protection Act, 1986, S. 12.<\/a><\/p>\n

9.<\/a> Sanjeev Kumar Yadav<\/span> v. Mantri Developers (P) Ltd.<\/span>, Consumer Complaint No. 2241 of 2016. order dt. 22-9-2017 [NCDRC].<\/p>\n

10.<\/a> (2022) 4 SCC 138<\/a>.<\/p>\n

11.<\/a> Consumer Protection Act, 2019, S. 2.<\/a><\/p>\n

12.<\/a> General Clauses Act, 1897, S. 13.<\/a><\/p>\n

13.<\/a> (2022) 4 SCC 138<\/a>.<\/p>\n

14.<\/a> (2022) 4 SCC 138<\/a>.<\/p>\n

15.<\/a> Himanshu Dewan<\/span> v. Experion Developers (P) Ltd.<\/span>, 2023 SCC OnLine NCDRC 17.<\/a><\/p>\n

16.<\/a> 2023 SCC OnLine NCDRC 189<\/a>.<\/p>\n

17.<\/a> 2016 SCC OnLine NCDRC 1117<\/a>.<\/p>\n

18.<\/a> 2023 SCC OnLine NCDRC 189<\/a>.<\/p>\n

19.<\/a> Harkirat Singh Bedi<\/span> v. Raheja Developers (P) Ltd.<\/span>, Consumer Complaint No. 27 of 2023, order dt. 20-3-2023 [NCDRC].<\/p>\n

20.<\/a> 2023 SCC OnLine NCDRC 189<\/a>.<\/p>\n

21.<\/a> 2023 SCC OnLine SC 625<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Namrata Chandorkar\u2020<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":310494,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42503,1191],"tags":[18321,41725,42479,64003,64002,17271,3095,64004],"class_list":["post-310491","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-legal-analysis","category-op-ed","tag-consumer-protection-act","tag-consumers","tag-general-clauses-act","tag-group-complaint","tag-joint-complaint","tag-national-consumer-disputes-redressal-commission","tag-NCDRC","tag-supreme-court-expands"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court Expands the Scope of Section 35(1)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019: More than one Consumer can File a Joint Complaint | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (2019 Act), as well as the old Act of 19862, provides for class-action litigation. Under Section 35(1)(c) of the 2019 Act\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Expands the Scope of Section 35(1)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019: More than one Consumer can File a Joint Complaint\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (2019 Act), as well as the old Act of 19862, provides for class-action litigation. Under Section 35(1)(c) of the 2019 Act\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-01-02T03:30:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-01-02T03:40:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Supreme-Court-Expands.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Expands the Scope of Section 35(1)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019: More than one Consumer can File a Joint Complaint\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Expands the Scope of Section 35(1)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019: More than one Consumer can File a Joint Complaint | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Supreme-Court-Expands.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-01-02T03:30:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-02T03:40:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (2019 Act), as well as the old Act of 19862, provides for class-action litigation. Under Section 35(1)(c) of the 2019 Act\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Supreme-Court-Expands.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Supreme-Court-Expands.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Supreme Court Expands\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court Expands the Scope of Section 35(1)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019: More than one Consumer can File a Joint Complaint\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Expands the Scope of Section 35(1)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019: More than one Consumer can File a Joint Complaint | SCC Times","description":"The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (2019 Act), as well as the old Act of 19862, provides for class-action litigation. Under Section 35(1)(c) of the 2019 Act","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Expands the Scope of Section 35(1)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019: More than one Consumer can File a Joint Complaint","og_description":"The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (2019 Act), as well as the old Act of 19862, provides for class-action litigation. Under Section 35(1)(c) of the 2019 Act","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2024-01-02T03:30:34+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-01-02T03:40:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Supreme-Court-Expands.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Supreme Court Expands the Scope of Section 35(1)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019: More than one Consumer can File a Joint Complaint","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/","name":"Supreme Court Expands the Scope of Section 35(1)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019: More than one Consumer can File a Joint Complaint | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Supreme-Court-Expands.webp","datePublished":"2024-01-02T03:30:34+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-02T03:40:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (2019 Act), as well as the old Act of 19862, provides for class-action litigation. Under Section 35(1)(c) of the 2019 Act","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Supreme-Court-Expands.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Supreme-Court-Expands.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Supreme Court Expands"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/02\/supreme-court-expands-scope-section-351a-of-consumer-protection-act-2019-consumer\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court Expands the Scope of Section 35(1)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019: More than one Consumer can File a Joint Complaint"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Supreme-Court-Expands.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":258863,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/22\/explained-can-more-than-one-consumer-institute-a-complaint-under-consumer-protection-act-2019-why-is-the-definition-of-complainant-misleading\/","url_meta":{"origin":310491,"position":0},"title":"Explained| Can more than one consumer institute a complaint under Consumer Protection Act 2019? Why is the definition of \u201ccomplainant\u201d misleading?\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 22, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where it was alleged that more than one consumer cannot institute a complaint unless they come within the definition of the word \u201ccomplainant\u201d of Section 2(5) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 and also satisfy the requirements of Section 38(11) read with Order I Rule\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-3-3.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":82351,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/10\/27\/class-action-suits-held-maintainable-under-consumer-protection-act-1986\/","url_meta":{"origin":310491,"position":1},"title":"\u201cClass action suits\u201d held maintainable under Consumer Protection Act, 1986","author":"Saba","date":"October 27, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission:\u00a0NCDRC has held that under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 a group of consumers having a common interest or a common grievance seeking same relief against the same person can file the \u201cclass action suit\u201d. It was also made clear that the pecuniary\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/NCDRC_.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":112891,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/07\/trust-cannot-file-a-complaint-under-the-consumer-protection-act-1986\/","url_meta":{"origin":310491,"position":2},"title":"Trust cannot file a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 7, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of Madan B. Lokur and P.C. Pant, JJ held that a Trust cannot file a complaint under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as a Trust is not a person and therefore not a consumer. The bench took note of the various definition provisions\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319380,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/04\/sc-clarifies-that-whether-company-can-file-consumer-complaint-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":310491,"position":3},"title":"Can a company file a consumer complaint under Consumer Protection Act, 1986? SC clarifies","author":"Editor","date":"April 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, a body corporate was brought within the definition of \u2018person\u2019, indicating that the legislature realized the incongruity in the unamended provision and rectified the anomaly by including the word \u2018company\u2019 in the definition of \u2018person\u2019.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"consumer complaint by company under Consumer Protection Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/company-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/company-2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/company-2.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/company-2.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":378982,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/03\/20\/sc-on-deposit-interest-commercial-purpose-under-consumer-protection-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":310491,"position":4},"title":"Interest earned on deposit by itself doesn\u2019t establish a \u2018commercial purpose\u2019 under Consumer Protection Act: Supreme Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 20, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Consumer complaint not maintainable where dispute involves alleged fraudulent pledge of fixed deposit and requires determination of complex facts beyond summary consumer proceedings.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"commercial purpose under Consumer Protection Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/commercial-purpose-under-Consumer-Protection-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/commercial-purpose-under-Consumer-Protection-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/commercial-purpose-under-Consumer-Protection-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/commercial-purpose-under-Consumer-Protection-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":372491,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/01\/13\/sc-landowners-in-joint-development-agreement-not-consumer\/","url_meta":{"origin":310491,"position":5},"title":"Landowners in Joint Development Agreement not “Consumer”; May approach Civil Court: SC upholds NCDRC’s order","author":"Ritu","date":"January 13, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court granted liberty to the appellants to institute a civil suit with entitlement to claim exemption from limitation under Order VII Rule 6 CPC read with the Limitation Act, 1963.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Landowners in Joint Development Agreement Not Consumers","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Landowners-in-Joint-Development-Agreement-Not-Consumers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Landowners-in-Joint-Development-Agreement-Not-Consumers.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Landowners-in-Joint-Development-Agreement-Not-Consumers.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Landowners-in-Joint-Development-Agreement-Not-Consumers.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310491","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=310491"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310491\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/310494"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=310491"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=310491"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=310491"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}