{"id":310367,"date":"2023-12-29T18:00:52","date_gmt":"2023-12-29T12:30:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=310367"},"modified":"2024-01-04T09:56:46","modified_gmt":"2024-01-04T04:26:46","slug":"delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi HC upholds constitutional validity of Section 115BBE of Income Tax Act, 1961; Says \u2018cannot be held unconstitutional on apprehension of misuse\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a writ petition filed to challenge the orders dated 25-07-2022, passed under Section 148A(d)<\/doclink> of the Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a> (‘the Act’), the Division Bench of Manmohan, ACJ*<\/span> and Mini Pushkarna, JJ., opined that, unless the contrary intention was proved, it must be presumed, that administration and application of a particular law would be done not with an evil eye and unequal hand. Thus, the Court opined that, at the present stage, Section 115-BBE<\/a> of the Act<\/a> could not be held unconstitutional on the ground that there was an apprehension of misuse of the provision.<\/p>\n

In an instant case, the petitioner stated that the notices issued under Section 148<\/a> of the Act<\/a> had been issued after three years from the end of the relevant Assessment Years and they could have been issued after obtaining the sanction from the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax and not from the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, as had been done in the present cases.<\/p>\n

However, the respondent contended that in the present cases, after passing the order under Section 148-A(d)<\/doclink> of the Act<\/a>, final assessment orders had been passed for assessment years. Further, issue of limitation, being a mixed question of fact and law should be raised before the Appellate Authorities. However, the petitioner stated that the constitutional validity of Section 115-BBE<\/a> of the Act<\/a> could not be adjudicated upon by the Appellate Authority.<\/p>\n

The Court opined that it was a settled law that statutory acts and their provisions were not to be declared unconstitutional on fanciful theory that the power would be exercised in an unrealistic fashion or on the ground that there was an apprehension of misuse of statutory provision or possibility of abuse of power. The Court relied on Maganlal Chhaganlal (P) Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay<\/span>, (1974) 2 SCC 402<\/a>, and Collector of Customs v. Nathella Sampathu Chetty<\/span>, 1962 SCC OnLine SC 30<\/a> and opined that, unless the contrary intention was proved, it must be presumed, that administration and application of a particular law would be done not with an evil eye and unequal hand. Thus, the Court opined that, at the present stage, Section 115-BBE<\/a> of the Act<\/a> could not be held unconstitutional on the ground that there was an apprehension of misuse of the provision.<\/p>\n

The Court further relied on CIT v. Chhabil Das Agarwal<\/span>, (2014) 1 SCC 603<\/a> and opined that it was settled law that the Act provided a complete machinery for assessment or re-assessment of tax and the assessee was not permitted to abandon that machinery to invoke the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226<\/doclink> of the Constitution<\/doclink>. Thus, the Court granted the liberty to the petitioner to raise all contentions and submissions before the Appellate Authority in accordance with the law.<\/p>\n

[Triveni Enterprises Ltd. v. CIT, 2023 SCC OnLine Del 8343<\/a>, decided on 18-12-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment authored by- Acting Chief Justice Manmohan<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Nishit Gandhi, Advocate;<\/p>\n

For the Respondents:<\/span> Aseem Chawla with Pratishtha Chaudhary and Aditya Gupta, Advocates.<\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“It is settled law that the Act provides a complete machinery for assessment or re-assessment of tax and the assessee is not permitted to abandon that machinery to invoke jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":303940,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[63943,8731,2543,13081,63944],"class_list":["post-310367","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-apprehension-of-misuse","tag-constitutional-validity","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-income-tax-act","tag-section-115bbe"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC upholds constitutional validity of Section 115BBE of Income Tax Act, 1961| SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court opined that at the present stage, Section 115BBE of the Act could not be held unconstitutional on the ground that there was an apprehension of misuse of the provision.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi HC upholds constitutional validity of Section 115BBE of Income Tax Act, 1961; Says \u2018cannot be held unconstitutional on apprehension of misuse\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court opined that at the present stage, Section 115BBE of the Act could not be held unconstitutional on the ground that there was an apprehension of misuse of the provision.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-12-29T12:30:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-01-04T04:26:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi HC upholds constitutional validity of Section 115BBE of Income Tax Act, 1961; Says \u2018cannot be held unconstitutional on apprehension of misuse\u2019\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC upholds constitutional validity of Section 115BBE of Income Tax Act, 1961| SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-29T12:30:52+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-04T04:26:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court opined that at the present stage, Section 115BBE of the Act could not be held unconstitutional on the ground that there was an apprehension of misuse of the provision.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi HC upholds constitutional validity of Section 115BBE of Income Tax Act, 1961; Says \u2018cannot be held unconstitutional on apprehension of misuse\u2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC upholds constitutional validity of Section 115BBE of Income Tax Act, 1961| SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court opined that at the present stage, Section 115BBE of the Act could not be held unconstitutional on the ground that there was an apprehension of misuse of the provision.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi HC upholds constitutional validity of Section 115BBE of Income Tax Act, 1961; Says \u2018cannot be held unconstitutional on apprehension of misuse\u2019","og_description":"Delhi High Court opined that at the present stage, Section 115BBE of the Act could not be held unconstitutional on the ground that there was an apprehension of misuse of the provision.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-12-29T12:30:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-01-04T04:26:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi HC upholds constitutional validity of Section 115BBE of Income Tax Act, 1961; Says \u2018cannot be held unconstitutional on apprehension of misuse\u2019","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC upholds constitutional validity of Section 115BBE of Income Tax Act, 1961| SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-12-29T12:30:52+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-04T04:26:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court opined that at the present stage, Section 115BBE of the Act could not be held unconstitutional on the ground that there was an apprehension of misuse of the provision.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-upholds-constitutional-validity-of-section-115bbe-of-income-tax-act-1961-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi HC upholds constitutional validity of Section 115BBE of Income Tax Act, 1961; Says \u2018cannot be held unconstitutional on apprehension of misuse\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":236212,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/09\/24\/pat-hc-court-upholds-the-constitutional-validity-of-s-234e-of-income-tax-act-petition-challenging-the-same-disposed\/","url_meta":{"origin":310367,"position":0},"title":"Pat HC | Court upholds the constitutional validity of S. 234E of Income Tax Act; petition challenging the same disposed","author":"Editor","date":"September 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Patna High Court: In a petition alleging Section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to be unconstitutional, ultra vires and in contravention of the Constitution of India, Division Bench of Sanjay Karol, CJ., and S. Kumar, J., disposed of the petition refuting all the said allegations and upholding Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":252278,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/08\/05\/section-144b-7-of-the-income-tax-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":310367,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Issuance of prior show cause notice and draft assessment order under S. 144B (7) of Income Tax Act: Is it a mandatory condition before issuing final assessment order? HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: The Division Bench of Manmohan and Navin Chawla, JJ., noted the mandatory condition provided under Section 144B (7) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Present petition challenged the Assessment order, notice of demand and notice of penalty passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B, Section 156 and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":381104,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2026\/04\/15\/itat-delhi-invalid-time-barred-section-1432-notice-assessment-quashed\/","url_meta":{"origin":310367,"position":2},"title":"ITAT Delhi quashes assessment over invalid and time-barred Section 143(2) notice and jurisdictional defect","author":"Ekta","date":"April 15, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA notice issued under Section 143(2) beyond the prescribed limitation period and without jurisdiction strikes at the root of the assessment, rendering the entire proceedings void ab initio.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"time barred Section 143(2) notice","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/time-barred-Section-1432-notice.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/time-barred-Section-1432-notice.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/time-barred-Section-1432-notice.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/time-barred-Section-1432-notice.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268414,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/15\/del-hc-sets-aside-assessment-notice-sent-under-s-148-income-tax-act-1961-to-a-dead-person-for-being-null-and-void\/","url_meta":{"origin":310367,"position":3},"title":"Del HC sets aside assessment notice sent under S. 148 Income Tax Act, 1961 to a dead person for being null and void","author":"Editor","date":"June 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench of Jyoti Singh and Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, JJ. sets aside notices sent to a deceased assessee in spite of being intimated about his death by the family.\u00a0 The instant petition was filed by the petitioner who is the son of Late Mr. Amrit Thapar,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Delhi-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Delhi-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Delhi-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Delhi-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Delhi-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250523,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/06\/30\/itat-validity-of-the-order-u-s-1433-of-income-tax-act-passed-by-an-officer-without-jurisdiction-the-limitation-of-second-statutory-notice-discussed\/","url_meta":{"origin":310367,"position":4},"title":"ITAT| Validity of the order u\/s 143(3) of Income Tax Act, passed by an officer without Jurisdiction & the Limitation of second Statutory notice, discussed","author":"Editor","date":"June 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Akshat Malpani\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281366,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/10\/kamal-nath-petition-challenge-order-principal-commissioner-of-income-tax-transfer-of-proceedings-petition-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":310367,"position":5},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses plea by Kamal Nath, Former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister challenging transfer of IT proceedings from Kolkata to New Delhi","author":"Editor","date":"January 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In a high profile case involving senior Congress leader and former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Kamal Nath, challenging the order of transfer of proceedings by Income Tax Department involving several transactions of large scale collection of illegal money, the Court opined that (i) there is no absolute right to be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image95.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310367","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=310367"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310367\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/303940"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=310367"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=310367"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=310367"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}