{"id":310076,"date":"2023-12-25T16:00:50","date_gmt":"2023-12-25T10:30:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=310076"},"modified":"2024-01-03T18:07:20","modified_gmt":"2024-01-03T12:37:20","slug":"madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/","title":{"rendered":"Madras High Court distinguishes between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madras High Court<\/span>: In a civil appeal filed against the impugned order rejecting the grant of patent, Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J. said that there is a distinction between the date of assignment and the date of declaration relating thereto, and the impugned order is the consequence of conflating the two. Therefore, the Court set aside the impugned order. Further, it directed the Controller of Patents and Designs to provide a reasonable opportunity to the appellant, and to issue a reasoned decision within a period of four months from the date of receipt of this order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant filed a patent application on 24-10-2014 before the Patent Office. The said application was the national phase application corresponding to PCT International Application. In the application, the appellant had stated that the inventors were Iskren Ianev, Yannick Lair and Kouhei Gotou and that the said inventors had assigned the invention to the appellant. Subsequently, the declaration of the inventors to the effect that they had assigned the invention was provided. The declaration issued by Yannick Lair in Form 1 was dated 07-02-2015, which was the date of declaration. On that ground, the patent application was rejected as being in violation of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001555886\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7(2)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002768478\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Patents Act, 1970<\/a>. Thus, the present appeal was filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant submitted that although the inventors had assigned the invention to the appellant earlier one of the inventors, Yannick Lair, put down the date of signing the declaration while signing. The inventor&#8217;s declarations were within the statutory timeframe, emphasizing that the date on Yannick Lair&#8217;s declaration was misconstrued as the assignment date.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court took note of Section 6 of the Patents Act which sets out the persons who are entitled to apply for a patent. Apart from the true and first inventor, clause (b) of sub-section (1) enables the assignee of the true and first inventor to make the application. If an application is made by the assignee, Section 7(2) requires the applicant to provide proof of the right to make the application within the prescribed period, that is six months from the date of filing of the application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that the appellant has provided declarations from the inventors within the prescribed period and the only question to be considered is whether the declaration of Yannick Lair is in consonance with the statutory prescription.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the declaration issued by the appellant on 14-10-2022 asserts that the inventors were employed by the company and that the invention was a work product in course of employment. In such declaration, each inventor, including Yannick Lair, has recorded that the invention has been assigned and that the assignee is entitled to claim rights in respect of the application filed before the US Patents office and any corresponding foreign patent office.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that the assignment was pre-dated from the declaration dated 07-02-2015 by Mr.Yannick Lair. Further, it said that there is a distinction between the date of assignment and the date of declaration relating thereto, and the impugned order is the consequence of conflating the two. Therefore, the impugned order is unsustainable and is set aside.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court also directed the Controller of Patents and Designs to decide the patent application on merits and in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">NEC Corporation v Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/SVTAZlYn\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Mad 7894<\/a>, decided on 19-12-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Patents Act, 1970 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1157\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1157\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/patents-act-1970.jpg\" alt=\"patents act, 1970\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-298107\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/patents-act-1970.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/patents-act-1970-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/patents-act-1970-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/patents-act-1970-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/patents-act-1970-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/patents-act-1970-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Madras High Court directed the Controller of Patents and Designs to decide the patent application on merits and in accordance with law.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":298865,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[63835,63834,2567,46415,35161],"class_list":["post-310076","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-date-of-assignment","tag-date-of-declaration","tag-Madras_High_Court","tag-patent-act","tag-patent-application"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Madras High Court distinguishes between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Madras High Court distinguished between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madras High Court distinguishes between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Madras High Court distinguished between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-12-25T10:30:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-01-03T12:37:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Madras High Court distinguishes between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/\",\"name\":\"Madras High Court distinguishes between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-25T10:30:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-01-03T12:37:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Madras High Court distinguished between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"madras high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madras High Court distinguishes between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Madras High Court distinguishes between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications | SCC Blog","description":"Madras High Court distinguished between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madras High Court distinguishes between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications","og_description":"Madras High Court distinguished between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-12-25T10:30:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-01-03T12:37:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Madras High Court distinguishes between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/","name":"Madras High Court distinguishes between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-12-25T10:30:50+00:00","dateModified":"2024-01-03T12:37:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Madras High Court distinguished between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"madras high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/25\/madras-high-court-distinguishes-between-date-of-assignment-date-of-declaration-patent-applications\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madras High Court distinguishes between date of assignment and date of declaration in patent applications"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":309843,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/21\/madras-hc-finds-controller-order-unreasoned-remands-patent-application-aluminum-trihydrate-particles-reconsideration\/","url_meta":{"origin":310076,"position":0},"title":"Madras HC remands patent application on &#8216;Aluminum Trihydrate Particles&#8217; for reconsideration; finds Controller&#8217;s order unreasoned","author":"Apoorva","date":"December 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While drawing the conclusion that the application does not fulfil the requirements of Section 16, the respondent has merely referred to the objections raised in the hearing notice.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308387,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/whether-any-application-for-grant-of-patent-for-an-invention-in-s-39-1-would-apply-to-patent-of-addition-mad-hc-answers\/","url_meta":{"origin":310076,"position":1},"title":"Whether expression \u201cany application for grant of a patent for an invention\u201d in S. 39 (1) applies to a patent of addition? Madras HC answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"December 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe application for grant of a patent of addition cannot be filed earlier than the date of filing of the application for grant of patent for the main invention; it cannot be granted before grant of the patent for the main invention; the term of the patent of addition shall\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322587,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/21\/no-teaching-suggestion-motivation-prior-art-make-obvious-psita-madras-hc-remands-patent-application-controller-reconsideration\/","url_meta":{"origin":310076,"position":2},"title":"\u2018No teaching, suggestion or motivation in prior art to make it obvious to a person skilled in art\u2019; Madras HC remands patent application to Controller for reconsideration","author":"Apoorva","date":"May 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Since about 12 years have elapsed from the date of application, Madras High Court directed that the Patent Application be disposed of within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":317971,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/21\/madras-high-court-directed-patent-protection-for-antibody-invention\/","url_meta":{"origin":310076,"position":3},"title":"\u201cOccurring in nature\u201d in S. 3(c) only qualifies the nearest reasonable referent \u201cnon-living substance\u201d: Madras HC directs patent protection for antibody invention","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 21, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe real challenge with a patent application in respect of a synthesized non-living substance is establishing novelty, technical advance and not patent eligibility\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madras High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Madras-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":310198,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/27\/invention-applicable-business-primarily-related-technical-process-not-business-method-madras-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":310076,"position":4},"title":"Invention applicable in business but primarily related to technical process is not a business method; Madras HC remanded patent application for reconsideration","author":"Apoorva","date":"December 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe monopoly claim is not in respect of a business method but in respect of a claimed invention deploying hardware, software and firmware for purposes of data privacy and protection\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":309533,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/17\/controller-failed-identify-basis-concluding-non-disclosure-madras-high-court-directs-grant-patent\/","url_meta":{"origin":310076,"position":5},"title":"Controller failed to identify basis for concluding non-disclosure: Madras HC directs to proceed application for grant of patent","author":"Apoorva","date":"December 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madras High Court said that the appellants have given complete specifications which also capture the results of the evaluation of the claimed invention against the parameters of penetration, nutrient permeability and root penetration test.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310076","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=310076"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310076\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/298865"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=310076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=310076"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=310076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}