{"id":309742,"date":"2023-12-20T12:00:31","date_gmt":"2023-12-20T06:30:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=309742"},"modified":"2023-12-22T17:14:06","modified_gmt":"2023-12-22T11:44:06","slug":"andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Andhra Pradesh HC acquits man convicted under NDPS Act as negative burden was placed on him to show he did not own the cultivated land"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Andhra Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In an appeal filed against the judgment dated 03-07-2009, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">A.V. Ravindra Babu, J.*<\/span>, opined that the Trial Court exonerated Accused 1 and 2 on the ground that no Adangal was filed to show that they cultivated the land, but the same logic was not applied to the appellant who was not even physically present in the land and the criminal liability against the appellant was fastened, based on the version of Accused 1 and 2. The Court opined that the whole approach of the Trial Court in appreciating the evidence on record was not in accordance with the law. Thus, the Court opined that there was no legally admissible evidence against the present appellant so as to convict him under Section 20(a)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (&#8216;NDPS Act&#8217;) and accordingly, acquitted the appellant of the charge and set aside the impugned judgement passed by the Trial Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On 28-08-2004, Prohibition and Excise Party (&#8216;Excise Party&#8217;) along with the mediators made a visit to the land owned by the appellant and found Accused 1 and 2 attending the agricultural work at 9.30 am. Thereafter, the Excise Party entered into the land and found the Ganja plants being raised as mixed crop in the cotton crop.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After the disclosure that the appellant was the owner of the land, the appellant was also brought to the land by the police. All the Ganja plants were uprooted, and two of them were separately taken up for sample. The sample Ganja plants were sent to the chemical examiner who opined that these samples were of Ganja. The Excise Party arrested Accused 1, 2 and the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Additional Sessions Judge (&#8216;the Trial Court&#8217;) framed a charge under Section 20(a)(i) of the NDPS Act and after considering all the oral and documentary evidence, found that Accused 1 and 2 were not guilty of charge and thus acquitted them under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519488\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">235(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;). The appellant was found guilty and was thus convicted under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519488\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">235(2)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>. Thus, the appellant filed the present appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the evidence on record disclosed that except the testimonies of the witnesses who were the Prohibition and Excise officials, there was nothing else in the support to convict the appellant. The Court opined that it was not a case where the appellant was physically found in the land cultivating Ganja along with Accused 1 and 2, and it was also not the case that the appellant was physically giving instructions to Accused 1 and 2 for carrying out agricultural operation. The Excise Party did not examine any revenue officials to ascertain as to who were in the possession of the land in question.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further opined that the judgment of the Trial Court revealed that the negative burden was put on the appellant stating that if the appellant was really not the owner or possessor of the land, he had to file the documentary proof to prove the said aspect. The Court took note of the Trial Court&#8217;s finding that there were specific recitals in the mahazarnama, wherein Accused 1 and 2 had disclosed that the land belonged to the appellant and thus opined that these findings of the Trial Court were not at all sustainable under the law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further opined that to prove that the appellant was the owner or possessor of the land, proper evidence was to examine the neighbouring land owners, revenue officials or to produce the relevant revenue records, however, these things were not compiled by the investigating officer. The Court opined that it was rather surprising that on the version of Accused 1 and 2, just by securing the appellant&#8217;s presence to the fields, criminal liability was fastened against the appellant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the gist of the offence under Section 20(a) of the NDPS Act coupled with the prohibition contained in Section 8 of the NDPS Act was that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;the cultivation of Ganja by any offender could be direct or indirect, that is, the offender might cultivate the land personally or through somebody else by employing some coolies or labourers&#8221;<\/span>. The Court opined that the Trial Court exonerated Accused 1 and 2 on the ground that no Adangal was filed to show that they cultivated the land, but the same logic was not applied to the appellant who was not even physically present in the land and the criminal liability against the appellant was fastened, based on the version of Accused 1 and 2. The Court opined that the whole approach of the Trial Court in appreciating the evidence on record was not in accordance with the law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that there was no legally admissible evidence against the appellant to convict him under Section 20(a)(i) of the NDPS Act and accordingly, acquitted the appellant of the charge and set aside the impugned judgement passed by the Trial Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">K. Chinna Rami Reddy v. State, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/G9yqWX6y\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine AP 3876<\/a>, decided on 14-12-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice A.V. Ravindra Babu<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Appellant:<\/span> Shaik Mohammed Ismail, Advocate;<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The criminal liability against the appellant is fastened basing on the so-called version of Accused 1 and 2 which is nothing but confession by exonerating the two accused. The whole approach of the Trial Court in appreciating the evidence on record is not in accordance with law.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":290507,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[63703,2553,63705,32212,51407,63704],"class_list":["post-309742","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-acquits","tag-Andhra_Pradesh_High_Court","tag-cultivated-land","tag-ganja","tag-narcotic-drugs-and-psychotropic-substances-act-1985","tag-negative-burden"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Andhra Pradesh HC acquits man convicted under NDPS Act where negative burden was placed on accused | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Andhra Pradesh HC opined that there was no legally admissible evidence against the appellant to convict him under Section 20(a)(i) of the NDPS Act and thus, acquitted the appellant.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Andhra Pradesh HC acquits man convicted under NDPS Act as negative burden was placed on him to show he did not own the cultivated land\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Andhra Pradesh HC opined that there was no legally admissible evidence against the appellant to convict him under Section 20(a)(i) of the NDPS Act and thus, acquitted the appellant.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-12-20T06:30:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-12-22T11:44:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Andhra Pradesh HC acquits man convicted under NDPS Act as negative burden was placed on him to show he did not own the cultivated land\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Andhra Pradesh HC acquits man convicted under NDPS Act where negative burden was placed on accused | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-20T06:30:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-22T11:44:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Andhra Pradesh HC opined that there was no legally admissible evidence against the appellant to convict him under Section 20(a)(i) of the NDPS Act and thus, acquitted the appellant.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"andhra pradesh high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Andhra Pradesh HC acquits man convicted under NDPS Act as negative burden was placed on him to show he did not own the cultivated land\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Andhra Pradesh HC acquits man convicted under NDPS Act where negative burden was placed on accused | SCC Blog","description":"Andhra Pradesh HC opined that there was no legally admissible evidence against the appellant to convict him under Section 20(a)(i) of the NDPS Act and thus, acquitted the appellant.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Andhra Pradesh HC acquits man convicted under NDPS Act as negative burden was placed on him to show he did not own the cultivated land","og_description":"Andhra Pradesh HC opined that there was no legally admissible evidence against the appellant to convict him under Section 20(a)(i) of the NDPS Act and thus, acquitted the appellant.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-12-20T06:30:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-12-22T11:44:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Andhra Pradesh HC acquits man convicted under NDPS Act as negative burden was placed on him to show he did not own the cultivated land","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/","name":"Andhra Pradesh HC acquits man convicted under NDPS Act where negative burden was placed on accused | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-12-20T06:30:31+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-22T11:44:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Andhra Pradesh HC opined that there was no legally admissible evidence against the appellant to convict him under Section 20(a)(i) of the NDPS Act and thus, acquitted the appellant.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"andhra pradesh high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/20\/andhra-pradesh-hc-acquits-man-convicted-under-ndps-act-where-negative-burden-was-placed-on-accused-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Andhra Pradesh HC acquits man convicted under NDPS Act as negative burden was placed on him to show he did not own the cultivated land"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":279738,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/16\/andhra-pradesh-high-court-acquits-a-man-accused-of-culpable-homicide-not-amounting-to-murder-set-aside-conviction-order-of-session-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":309742,"position":0},"title":"Andhra Pradesh High Court acquits a man accused of culpable homicide not amounting to murder; set aside conviction order of Session Court","author":"Editor","date":"December 16, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Without there being any evidence as to the presence of the accused in the house at the time of the death of the deceased, especially when the material witnesses turned hostile, convicting the accused basing on the assumptions and presumptions by the Sessions Court was erroneous.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Andhra Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-491.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":313953,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/13\/ap-hc-grants-bail-to-accused-who-allegedly-stabbed-chief-minister-ys-jagan-mohan-reddy-in-2018-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":309742,"position":1},"title":"Andhra Pradesh High Court grants bail to accused who allegedly stabbed Chief Minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy in 2018","author":"Arushi","date":"February 13, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRight to speedy trial is implicit in the broad sweep and content of Article 21 of the Constitution. A quest for speedy trial shall not remain as a desolate mirage but serve as an oasis.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"andhra pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299360,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/16\/andhra-pradesh-hc-stays-construction-of-houses-for-ews-in-amaravati-r5-zone-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":309742,"position":2},"title":"Andhra Pradesh High Court stays construction of houses for Economically Weaker Sections in Amaravati R5 Zone","author":"Editor","date":"August 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIf the construction is completed it will be a fait accompli. The loss will be irreparable. Balance of convenience is in favour of maintaining the status quo with respect to the construction of houses in R5 zone till the final judicial orders are passed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"andhra pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256324,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/31\/explained-what-invalidates-surrender-of-tenancy-under-the-andhra-pradesh-tenancy-andhra-area-act-1956\/","url_meta":{"origin":309742,"position":3},"title":"Explained| What invalidates surrender of tenancy under the Andhra Pradesh Tenancy (Andhra Area) Act, 1956?","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"October 31, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Interpreting the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Tenancy (Andhra Area) Act, 1956, the bench of UU Lalit and S. Ravindra Bhat*, JJ has laid down the twin conditions that make a valid surrender of tenancy, firstly, three months\u2019 notice in writing to the landlord, and the Special Officer\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299674,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/19\/andhra-pradesh-hc-divorce-petition-u-s27-the-special-marriage-act-can-be-heard-by-additional-district-judge\/","url_meta":{"origin":309742,"position":4},"title":"Divorce petition u\/s 27 of the Special Marriage Act can be heard by Additional District Judge: Andhra Pradesh High Court","author":"Editor","date":"August 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 11(2) of Andhra Pradesh Civil Courts Act, 1972 empowers the District Judge to transfer any case to the Additional District Judge who would have the same power as that of the District Judge in disposing of the transfer cases.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"andhra pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":284959,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/23\/rajasthan-high-court-acquits-district-transport-office-clerk-from-charges-of-demanding-bribery-after-38-years-of-conviction-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":309742,"position":5},"title":"Rajasthan High Court acquits District Transport Office clerk from the charges of demanding bribery after 38 years of conviction","author":"Editor","date":"February 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court stated that the prosecution had failed to prove the demand and acceptance of the bribe by the appellant and mere recovery of money could not be a grounds to consider it as a bribe.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Rajasthan High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-518.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309742","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=309742"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309742\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290507"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=309742"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=309742"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=309742"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}