{"id":309686,"date":"2023-12-19T16:00:36","date_gmt":"2023-12-19T10:30:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=309686"},"modified":"2023-12-21T18:13:21","modified_gmt":"2023-12-21T12:43:21","slug":"insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Insurance Company acts as indemnifier and has no contractual\/other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle: Delhi High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In the present case, appeals were filed challenging the Award dated 06-12-2018 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (West-01), Delhi (&#8216;Tribunal&#8217;), wherein the Tribunal while awarding compensation of Rs. 15,49,324 along with interest at the rate of 9% p.a., had further directed that Respondent 1 shall pay compensation to Respondents 2 to 6, however, would have a recovery right against appellants, to recover the said compensation from them. The appellants were thus aggrieved of this direction. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Navin Chawla, J.*<\/span>, opined that the registered owner of the vehicle could not absolve himself of his responsibility even more so, when he had taken no further steps to get the fact of such sale registered with the Registration Authority or at least, intimating this fact to the Registration Authority and the Insurance Company. The Court found no merit in the appeal and thus dismissed it and the impugned award, insofar as it allowed Respondent 1 to seek reimbursement of the claim amount from the minor boy, was set aside.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The claim petition was filed by Respondents 2 to 6 under Section 166 read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001569538\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">140<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726964\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Motor Vehicles Act, 1988<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;) claiming therein that on 30-05-2017, the deceased along with her husband was going towards their residence and while they were crossing the road, a motorcycle hit the deceased with a great force and due to the forceful impact, the deceased fell on the road and sustained grievous injuries and later she succumbed to her injuries.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Tribunal in its Impugned Award held that the accident took place due to the Offending Vehicle being driven in a rash and negligent manner and thus awarded compensation of Rs. 15,49,324 in favour of Respondents 2 to 6, directing Respondent 1 to pay the same at the first instance, however, granting a right to the Insurance Company to recover the same from the registered owner of the Offending Vehicle and the one who was driving the Offending Vehicle at the time of the accident.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that appellant was the registered owner of the Offending Vehicle as on the date of the accident. The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Naveen Kumar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Vijay Kumar<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/SearchResult.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2018) 3 SCC 1<\/a>, wherein the Supreme Court, while interpreting Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001569607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(30)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726964\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Act<\/a>, held that it was the registered owner of the vehicle who would be liable to pay the compensation to the victims of the road accident.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the Insurance Company merely steps in as an indemnifier of the compensation which the registered owner of the Offending Vehicle, as being a primary person liable, must pay to the victims of the road accident. The registered owner could not absolve himself of the liability by contending that he had transferred the offending vehicle to a third person prior to the date of the accident. Neither the victims of the road accident nor the Insurance Company could run after such persons whom the registered owner claimed to have transferred the offending vehicle and could not be burdened with following a trail of successive transfers, which were not registered with the Registering Authority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further opined that the Insurance Company had no contractual or other relationship with such transferee of the Offending Vehicle. The liability of the Insurance Company arose only because of the contract of insurance between the registered owner of the offending vehicle and itself. If the registered owner of the offending vehicle was to seek any benefit of such contract in form of indemnifying himself against the liability, such registered owner was also liable to reimburse the compensation that might be paid by the Insurance Company to the victims of the road accident, if the Insurance Company was otherwise entitled to the same.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the registered owner of the vehicle could not absolve himself of his responsibility even more so, when he had taken no further steps to get the fact of such sale registered with the Registration Authority or at least, intimating this fact to the Registration Authority and the Insurance Company. The Court also opined that if the registered owner had allowed a third person, might be under a contract of sale, to use the vehicle, he remained responsible for his action and if such third person further allowed a minor or a person not holding a valid driving license to drive the vehicle, vicariously, the registered owner becomes responsible for such action of the third party.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court found no merit in the appeal and thus dismissed it and the impugned award, insofar as it allowed Respondent 1 to seek reimbursement of the claim amount from the minor boy, was set aside.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Indiwar Parijat v. National Insurance Co. Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/CzaD3BP1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 8013<\/a>, decided on 14-12-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice Navin Chawla<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Appellant: Amit Kumar, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Respondents: Seema Gulati, Advocate<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The registered owner cannot absolve himself of the liability by contending that he has transferred the offending vehicle to a third person prior to the date of the accident.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":303940,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2735,2728,43130,2543,63681,25753,61971,43067],"class_list":["post-309686","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Accident","tag-compensation","tag-contractual-relationship","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-indemnifier","tag-insurance-company","tag-offending-vehicle","tag-transferee"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Insurance Company acts as indemnifier; has no contractual\/other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle: Delhi HC | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court opined that Insurance Company acts as indemnifier and had no contractual or any other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Insurance Company acts as indemnifier and has no contractual\/other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court opined that Insurance Company acts as indemnifier and had no contractual or any other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-12-19T10:30:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-12-21T12:43:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Insurance Company acts as indemnifier and has no contractual\/other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Insurance Company acts as indemnifier; has no contractual\/other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle: Delhi HC | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-19T10:30:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-21T12:43:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court opined that Insurance Company acts as indemnifier and had no contractual or any other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Insurance Company acts as indemnifier and has no contractual\/other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle: Delhi High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Insurance Company acts as indemnifier; has no contractual\/other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle: Delhi HC | SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court opined that Insurance Company acts as indemnifier and had no contractual or any other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Insurance Company acts as indemnifier and has no contractual\/other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle: Delhi High Court","og_description":"Delhi High Court opined that Insurance Company acts as indemnifier and had no contractual or any other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-12-19T10:30:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-12-21T12:43:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Insurance Company acts as indemnifier and has no contractual\/other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle: Delhi High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/","name":"Insurance Company acts as indemnifier; has no contractual\/other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle: Delhi HC | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-12-19T10:30:36+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-21T12:43:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Delhi High Court opined that Insurance Company acts as indemnifier and had no contractual or any other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/19\/insurance-company-acts-as-indemnifier-has-no-contractual-relationship-with-transferee-of-offending-vehicle-dhc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Insurance Company acts as indemnifier and has no contractual\/other relationship with transferee of offending vehicle: Delhi High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":304972,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/17\/non-possession-of-valid-permit-entitles-insurance-company-to-recover-compensation-paid-from-the-owner-of-vehicle-delhi-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":309686,"position":0},"title":"Non-possession of valid Permit entitles Insurance Company to recover compensation paid, from the owner of vehicle: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"October 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cRight to recover the compensation will also be available to the Insurance Company where the offending vehicle is being operated at the time of the accident at a place for which it does not have a valid Permit.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":288454,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/04\/delhi-high-court-reiterates-the-process-of-awarding-future-prospects-to-the-dependents-of-the-deceased-in-a-motor-accident-claim-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":309686,"position":1},"title":"Failure to take due care while driving and overtaking amount to rash and negligent driving: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"April 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While enhancing compensation in a motor accident claims case, the Delhi High Court opined that rash and negligent driving does not necessarily mean excessive speed. Not taking due care while driving and overtaking amounts to rash and negligent driving.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":240627,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/14\/mv-act-chh-hc-whether-gratuitous-passenger-is-covered-for-compensation-under-liability-only-policy-by-insurance-company-ambit-of-legal-representatives\/","url_meta":{"origin":309686,"position":2},"title":"[MV Act] Chh HC | Whether \u2018gratuitous passenger\u2019 is covered for compensation under \u2018Liability Only Policy\u2019 by insurance company? Ambit of \u201cLegal representatives\u2019 discussed","author":"Editor","date":"December 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: A Division Bench of P. R. Ramchandra Menon and Parth Prateem Sahu JJ., allowed the appeal and modified the impugned award. The facts of the case are such that on 18-05-2011, Karan along with other labourers was travelling on a Dumper i.e. 'offending vehicle' to village Badeli\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":219628,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/17\/del-hc-non-possession-of-valid-driving-license-by-itself-is-no-reason-for-not-granting-compensation-if-accident-proved-to-be-caused-by-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-offender\/","url_meta":{"origin":309686,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | Non-possession of valid driving license by itself is no reason for not granting compensation if accident proved to be caused by rash and negligent driving of offender","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 17, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Najmi Waziri, J. dismissed an appeal filed by the insurer against the award of compensation made by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, and also rejected insurer's claim to recover the amount so awarded from the owner of the offending vehicle. The insurer, represented by Hetu Arora Sethi, Advocate\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":240321,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/12\/08\/chh-hc-impugned-order-absolving-the-liability-on-insurance-company-was-set-aside-due-to-erroneous-dismissal-of-application-under-order-8-rule-13-cpc-regarding-production-of-license\/","url_meta":{"origin":309686,"position":4},"title":"Chh HC | Impugned order absolving the liability on insurance company was set aside due to erroneous dismissal of application under Order 8 Rule 1(3) CPC regarding production of license","author":"Editor","date":"December 8, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Chhattisgarh High Court: A Division Bench of P.R. Ramchandra Menon and Parth Prateem Sahu JJ., set aside the impugned order and fastened the liability for compensation on the insurance company. The facts of the case are such that on 16-11-2008 at about 06:30 p.m. Respondent 1\/ claimant was travelling on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":261457,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/10\/raj-hc-money-cannot-substitute-a-life-lost-but-an-effort-has-to-be-made-for-grant-of-just-compensation-having-uniformity-in-approach-court-observes-in-a-mv-accident-case-demanding-higher-compensati\/","url_meta":{"origin":309686,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC | Money cannot substitute a life lost but an effort has to be made for grant of just compensation having uniformity in approach; Court observes in a MV accident case demanding higher compensation","author":"Editor","date":"February 10, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Birendra Kumar J. allowed the appeal and enhanced the award considering the settled guidelines in the subsequent judgments to reach at \u201cjust compensation\u201d. The instant appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, was filed by the wife, minor daughter and parents of Late Ramavatar\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309686","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=309686"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309686\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/303940"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=309686"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=309686"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=309686"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}