{"id":309602,"date":"2023-12-18T17:30:15","date_gmt":"2023-12-18T12:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=309602"},"modified":"2023-12-20T17:28:48","modified_gmt":"2023-12-20T11:58:48","slug":"hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Parties cannot invoke Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC and call upon Court to generate evidence for them: Himachal Pradesh High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Himachal Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed under Article 227<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a> to challenge the order dated 17-04-2019, Ajay Mohan Goel, J.*<\/span>, opined that for specific allegation made by the petitioner, he had to stand on his own legs by adducing independent and reliable evidence and he could not invoke the provisions of Order 26, Rule 9 of the CPC and call upon the Court to generate evidence for him. Thus, the Court opined that the petitioner could not be permitted to call upon the Court by way of appointment of a Local Commissioner to create evidence to prove his allegation that the said suit land was encroached upon by the respondent.<\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

In May, 2017, the petitioner filed a suit against the respondent for permanent injunction to the effect that the respondent did not interfere or encroach upon or carry out any construction on the suit land by dispossessing the petitioner forcibly. Thereafter, an application was filed by the petitioner under Order 26, Rule 9<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (‘CPC’) for the appointment of a Local Commissioner being a revenue expert to visit the spot to demarcate the suit land and report whether the defendant had encroached upon the area that was referred to in the application or not.<\/p>\n

However, the Trial Court dismissed the application vide order dated 17-04-2019, and opined that the petitioner was now taking a destructive plea by moving the application for appointment of the Local Commissioner, as it implied that the petitioner was not aware of his own boundaries and rather, he was dragging the Court for collecting evidence on his behalf to prove that the certain portion of land stood encroached upon by the respondent.<\/p>\n

Thus, the petitioner filed the present petition to challenge the order dated 17-04-2019.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n

The Court upon perusal of the order passed by the Trial Court opined that it did not find any perversity in the impugned order. The Court opined that when it was a matter of record that the petitioner had sought amendment in the suit on the ground that during the pendency of the suit, certain part of the suit land was encroached by the respondent, which implied that the petitioner was aware of his boundaries and after that, he levelled allegations against the respondent. Thus, the petitioner could not be permitted to call upon the Court by way of appointment of a Local Commissioner to create evidence to prove his allegation that the said suit land was encroached upon by the defendant or not.<\/p>\n

The Court reiterated that for specific allegation made by the petitioner, he had to stand on his own legs by adducing independent and reliable evidence and he could not invoke the provisions of Order 26, Rule 9 of the CPC and call upon the Court to generate evidence for him and accordingly, dismissed the petition.<\/p>\n

[Sanjeev Kumar v. Yudhvir Singh, 2023 SCC OnLine HP 1650<\/a>, decided on 08-12-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment authored by: Justice Ajay Mohan Goel<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Petitioner:<\/span> Ashok Sud, Senior Advocate with Khem Raj, Advocate;<\/p>\n

For the Respondent:<\/span> Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate.<\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“When it is a matter of record that the petitioner had sought amendment in the suit on the ground that during the pendency of the suit, certain part of the suit land stood encroached by the respondent, this pre-supposes that the petitioner was aware of his boundaries.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":292797,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[6111,2568,2929,63655,63654],"class_list":["post-309602","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appointment","tag-Evidence","tag-Himachal_Pradesh_High_Court","tag-local-commissioner-civil-procedure-code-1908","tag-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc"],"yoast_head":"\nParties cannot invoke Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC and call upon Court to generate evidence for them: HP HC| SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court opined that the petitioner could not be permitted to call upon the Court by way of appointment of a Local Commissioner to create evidence for him.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Parties cannot invoke Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC and call upon Court to generate evidence for them: Himachal Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Himachal Pradesh High Court opined that the petitioner could not be permitted to call upon the Court by way of appointment of a Local Commissioner to create evidence for him.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-12-18T12:00:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-12-20T11:58:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Parties cannot invoke Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC and call upon Court to generate evidence for them: Himachal Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Parties cannot invoke Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC and call upon Court to generate evidence for them: HP HC| SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-18T12:00:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-20T11:58:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Himachal Pradesh High Court opined that the petitioner could not be permitted to call upon the Court by way of appointment of a Local Commissioner to create evidence for him.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"himachal pradesh high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Parties cannot invoke Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC and call upon Court to generate evidence for them: Himachal Pradesh High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Parties cannot invoke Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC and call upon Court to generate evidence for them: HP HC| SCC Blog","description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court opined that the petitioner could not be permitted to call upon the Court by way of appointment of a Local Commissioner to create evidence for him.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Parties cannot invoke Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC and call upon Court to generate evidence for them: Himachal Pradesh High Court","og_description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court opined that the petitioner could not be permitted to call upon the Court by way of appointment of a Local Commissioner to create evidence for him.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-12-18T12:00:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-12-20T11:58:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Parties cannot invoke Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC and call upon Court to generate evidence for them: Himachal Pradesh High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/","name":"Parties cannot invoke Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC and call upon Court to generate evidence for them: HP HC| SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-12-18T12:00:15+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-20T11:58:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Himachal Pradesh High Court opined that the petitioner could not be permitted to call upon the Court by way of appointment of a Local Commissioner to create evidence for him.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"himachal pradesh high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/18\/hp-hc-parties-cannot-invoke-order-26-rule-9-of-cpc-and-call-upon-court-to-generate-evidence-for-them-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Parties cannot invoke Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC and call upon Court to generate evidence for them: Himachal Pradesh High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/himachal-pradesh-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":350862,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/18\/ori-hc-order-39-rule-7-cpc-commissioner-report-not-evidence\/","url_meta":{"origin":309602,"position":0},"title":"[Order 39 Rule 7 CPC] Why Pleader Commissioner\u2019s Report cannot be taken as evidence in civil suit: Orissa HC explains","author":"Editor","date":"June 18, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The opposite parties requested to appoint a Pleader Commissioner under Order 39 Rule 7 CPC to inspect the suit land and report whether it is being used as a school or remained a paddy field, as claimed by the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Orissa High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Orissa-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":198764,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/20\/court-cannot-be-used-as-a-tool-to-create-evidence-application-under-order-10-rules-9-and-10a-cpc-rejected\/","url_meta":{"origin":309602,"position":1},"title":"Court cannot be used as a tool to create evidence; application under Order 10 Rules 9 and 10A CPC rejected","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ajay Mohan Goel, J. dismissed a petition filed against the order of trial court whereby petitioner\u2019s application under Order 10 Rules 9 and 10A CPC was rejected. In the abovesaid application, the petitioner had prayed to the court that a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217244,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/24\/hp-hc-provision-to-issue-a-commission-to-make-local-investigation-is-not-a-tool-to-create-evidence-in-favor-of-parties-order-made-under-or-26-r-9-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":309602,"position":2},"title":"HP HC | Provision to \u2018issue a Commission to make local investigation\u2019 is not a tool to create evidence in favor of parties; order made under Or. 26 R. 9 set aside","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 24, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Ajay Mohan Goel, J. entertained a writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, where the petitioner had challenged the order passed by the Civil Judge, where the application for appointment of a Revenue Officer as a Local Commissioner under Order 26 Rule\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365880,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/06\/application-for-consolidation-of-suits-under-section-10-cpc-not-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":309602,"position":3},"title":"Application for consolidation of multiple suits is not maintainable under S. 10 CPC: Himachal Pradesh HC","author":"Editor","date":"November 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 10 CPC relates to the principle of res subjudice wherein, a subsequent suit filed between the same parties on the same cause must be stayed in the light of the pendency of the earlier suit. It is not concerned with the issue of clubbing or consolidating the cases.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"consolidation of suits under Section 10","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/consolidation-of-suits-under-Section-10.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/consolidation-of-suits-under-Section-10.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/consolidation-of-suits-under-Section-10.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/consolidation-of-suits-under-Section-10.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300885,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/06\/andhra-pradesh-hc-upholds-the-order-dismissing-application-under-order-viii-rule-2-of-cpc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":309602,"position":4},"title":"Relevance of the documents sought under Order VII Rule 2 of CPC should be stated in the affidavit: Andhra Pradesh High Court upholds Order dismissing application","author":"Editor","date":"September 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is not stated in the affidavit as to how the documents are relevant to the suit except stating that, the documents are important and crucial documents to prove that the promissory note suit is a rank forged and materially altered.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"andhra pradesh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/andhra-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":155204,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/09\/11\/high-court-refuses-to-invoke-revisional-jurisdiction-as-impugned-plaint-doesnt-suffer-from-any-irregularity\/","url_meta":{"origin":309602,"position":5},"title":"High Court refuses to invoke revisional jurisdiction as impugned plaint doesn\u2019t suffer from any irregularity","author":"Saba","date":"September 11, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court:\u00a0The petitioner aggrieved by an order of rejection of his application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC by the Senior Civil Judge, Rajgarh preferred a petition. The respondent filed a suit for eviction and mesne profit against the petitioner-defendant before the Civil Judge, Rajgarh, Churu. During the pendency\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309602","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=309602"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309602\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/292797"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=309602"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=309602"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=309602"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}