{"id":309355,"date":"2023-12-15T11:00:40","date_gmt":"2023-12-15T05:30:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=309355"},"modified":"2023-12-20T12:29:58","modified_gmt":"2023-12-20T06:59:58","slug":"dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Puma cats and lion belong to same family, Felidae\u2019; Delhi HC cancels \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a case wherein a rectification petition was filed by Petitioner, PUMA SE seeking cancellation or rectification of the trade mark registered in the name of Respondent, Gajari Online Services (P) Ltd., <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Prathiba M. Singh, J.*<\/span>, after considering the clear imitation of the Petitioner&#8217;s leaping cat device mark and the identity between both marks, opined that the Respondent&#8217;s mark was liable to be cancelled.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Petitioner claimed to be one of the leading sporting brands in the world, which was engaged in designing, developing, selling, and marketing footwear, apparels and accessories for sports. The Petitioner sold products under the mark &#8216;PUMA&#8217; with the leaping cat device mark worldwide and in India through its wholly owned subsidiary Puma Sports India (P) Ltd. The mark <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/11_puma-gajari-1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/11_puma-gajari-1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"93\" height=\"54\"\/><\/a> was registered in India in 1977 and the mark <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/11_puma-gajari-2.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/11_puma-gajari-2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"77\" height=\"53\"\/><\/a> was registered in 1986 under Class 25.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Petitioner submitted that the Respondent&#8217;s trade mark <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/11_puma-gajari-3.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/11_puma-gajari-3.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"93\" height=\"55\"\/><\/a> was registered on 23-11-2017 and it could lead to confusion if used on apparel, shoes, and other sporting good as puma cats and lion share same family and had a visual similarity. The Petitioner thus was a &#8216;person aggrieved&#8217; within the meaning of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563709\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">57<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Trade Marks Act, 1999<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;). The Petitioner&#8217;s mark was declared as a &#8216;well-known mark&#8217; in terms of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563661\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2(1)(zg)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Comparison of Petitioner&#8217;s and Respondent&#8217;s marks<\/p>\n<table style=\"border-bottom-width: 0.5pt; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: #000000; border-left-width: 0.5pt; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: #000000; border-right-width: 0.5pt; border-right-style: solid; border-right-color: #000000; border-collapse: collapse; border-top-width: 0.5pt; border-top-style: solid; border-top-color: #000000; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; table-layout: fixed; width: 165.11mm; margin-bottom: 3%;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"312\"\/>\n<col width=\"312\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" colspan=\"1\" style=\"border-bottom-width: 1.0pt; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: #000000; border-left-width: 1.0pt; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: #000000; border-right-width: 1.0pt; border-right-style: solid; border-right-color: #000000; border-top-width: 1.0pt; border-top-style: solid; border-top-color: #000000; padding-bottom: 0.0mm; padding-left: 1.91mm; padding-right: 1.91mm; padding-top: 0.0mm; vertical-align: top; width: 82.56mm;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0mm; margin-top: 4.23mm; text-align: center; font-weight: bold;\">Petitioner&#8217;s device mark<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" colspan=\"1\" style=\"border-bottom-width: 1.0pt; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: #000000; border-left-width: 1.0pt; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: #000000; border-right-width: 1.0pt; border-right-style: solid; border-right-color: #000000; border-top-width: 1.0pt; border-top-style: solid; border-top-color: #000000; padding-bottom: 0.0mm; padding-left: 1.91mm; padding-right: 1.91mm; padding-top: 0.0mm; vertical-align: top; width: 82.56mm;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0mm; margin-top: 4.23mm; text-align: center; font-weight: bold;\">Respondent&#8217;s device mark<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" colspan=\"1\" style=\"border-bottom-width: 1.0pt; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: #000000; border-left-width: 1.0pt; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: #000000; border-right-width: 1.0pt; border-right-style: solid; border-right-color: #000000; border-top-width: 1.0pt; border-top-style: solid; border-top-color: #000000; padding-bottom: 0.0mm; padding-left: 1.91mm; padding-right: 1.91mm; padding-top: 0.0mm; vertical-align: top; width: 82.56mm;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0mm; margin-top: 4.23mm; text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/11_puma-gajari-4.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/11_puma-gajari-4.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"296\" height=\"170\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" colspan=\"1\" style=\"border-bottom-width: 1.0pt; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: #000000; border-left-width: 1.0pt; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: #000000; border-right-width: 1.0pt; border-right-style: solid; border-right-color: #000000; border-top-width: 1.0pt; border-top-style: solid; border-top-color: #000000; padding-bottom: 0.0mm; padding-left: 1.91mm; padding-right: 1.91mm; padding-top: 0.0mm; vertical-align: top; width: 82.56mm;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0mm; margin-top: 4.23mm; text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/11_puma-gajari-5.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/11_puma-gajari-5.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"232\" height=\"138\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court considered both marks and opined that the Respondent&#8217;s mark was an imitation of the Petitioner&#8217;s mark as the angle and structure of leaping animal and depiction of font were almost identical. The Court opined that the continuous use of the mark would affect the purity of the Petitioner&#8217;s mark as it was likely to cause confusion in accordance with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563602\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">11(2)<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563602\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">11(3)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Act<\/a>. The Court further opined that the impugned registration would also contravene Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563602\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">11(2)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Act<\/a>, since the detailed services for which the Respondent had obtained the registration were general in nature and would affect the Petitioner&#8217;s business.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court took note of the Petitioner&#8217;s opposition filed against the Respondent&#8217;s marks <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/11_puma-gajari-6.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/11_puma-gajari-6.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"191\" height=\"63\"\/><\/a>, in 2018 under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563663\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">21<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Act<\/a>, filed under class 25. The Court further noted that the Petitioner was clearly, a prior user of the leaping cat device since 1967 and the first registration in India dated back to 1977.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court after considering the clear imitation of the Petitioner&#8217;s leaping cat device mark and the identity between both marks, opined that the Respondent&#8217;s mark was liable to be cancelled in accordance with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001563709\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">57<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002776236\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">PUMA SE v. Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/XSDs0hNq\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 7808<\/a>, decided on 08-12-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice Prathiba M. Singh<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Petitioner: Ranjan Narula, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Respondent: Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, CGSC; Srish Kumar Mishra, Alexander Mathai Paikaday and Krishnan V., Advocates<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Trade Marks Act, 1999 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1218\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1218\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"trade marks act, 1999\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-296380\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-2048x1365.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-886x590.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/trade-marks-act-1999-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The continued use of the impugned mark will affect the purity of the registered trade mark as the same is likely to cause deception and confusion, in terms of Section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":303940,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[30327,63546,2543,53066,39065,63545,60018,57135,63544,2616],"class_list":["post-309355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-cancellation","tag-cat-family","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-device-mark","tag-ipab","tag-leaping-cat","tag-puma","tag-rectification-petition","tag-sporting-brand","tag-Trade_Mark"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.4 (Yoast SEO v27.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC cancels \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court cancelled \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Puma cats and lion belong to same family, Felidae\u2019; Delhi HC cancels \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court cancelled \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-12-15T05:30:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-12-20T06:59:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Puma cats and lion belong to same family, Felidae\u2019; Delhi HC cancels \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/15\\\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/15\\\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"headline\":\"\u2018Puma cats and lion belong to same family, Felidae\u2019; Delhi HC cancels \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-15T05:30:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-20T06:59:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/15\\\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":522,\"commentCount\":1,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/15\\\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"cancellation\",\"cat family\",\"Delhi High Court\",\"device mark\",\"IPAB\",\"leaping cat\",\"PUMA\",\"rectification petition\",\"sporting brand\",\"Trade Mark\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/15\\\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/15\\\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/15\\\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\\\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC cancels \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/15\\\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/15\\\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-15T05:30:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-20T06:59:58+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court cancelled \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/15\\\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/15\\\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/15\\\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/15\\\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Puma cats and lion belong to same family, Felidae\u2019; Delhi HC cancels \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/scc\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC cancels \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA | SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court cancelled \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Puma cats and lion belong to same family, Felidae\u2019; Delhi HC cancels \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA","og_description":"Delhi High Court cancelled \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-12-15T05:30:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-12-20T06:59:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Puma cats and lion belong to same family, Felidae\u2019; Delhi HC cancels \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/"},"author":{"name":"Simranjeet","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"headline":"\u2018Puma cats and lion belong to same family, Felidae\u2019; Delhi HC cancels \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA","datePublished":"2023-12-15T05:30:40+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-20T06:59:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/"},"wordCount":522,"commentCount":1,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","keywords":["cancellation","cat family","Delhi High Court","device mark","IPAB","leaping cat","PUMA","rectification petition","sporting brand","Trade Mark"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC cancels \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-12-15T05:30:40+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-20T06:59:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Delhi High Court cancelled \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/15\/dhc-cancels-leaping-lion-mark-of-gajari-online-services-p-ltd-in-rectification-petition-filed-by-puma-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Puma cats and lion belong to same family, Felidae\u2019; Delhi HC cancels \u2018leaping lion\u2019 mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309355","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=309355"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309355\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/303940"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=309355"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=309355"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=309355"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}