{"id":309134,"date":"2023-12-13T12:00:12","date_gmt":"2023-12-13T06:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=309134"},"modified":"2023-12-15T11:04:51","modified_gmt":"2023-12-15T05:34:51","slug":"dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Not innocent adopters, but conscious imitators of Johnson &amp; Johnson\u2019s mark \u2018ORSL\u2019; Delhi High Court restrains usage of \u2018OSRI\u2019 mark for electrolyte drinks"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court: C. Hari Shankar, J.*<\/span>, restrained defendants and all others acting on their behalf from using the marks <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-1.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"144\" height=\"54\"\/><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-2.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-2.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"70\" height=\"150\"\/><\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-3.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-3.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"70\" height=\"150\"\/><\/a> or any other confusingly or deceptively similar marks, for fruit drinks or any other allied or cognate goods or services.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Plaintiff, Johnson &amp; Johnson Pte. Ltd. was the proprietor of the marks, ORS, ORS-O, ORS-P, ORS-L, ORSL, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-4.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-4.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"60\" height=\"60\"\/><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-5.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-5.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"80\" height=\"80\"\/><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-6.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-6.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"80\" height=\"80\"\/><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-7.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-7.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"90\" height=\"70\"\/><\/a>, ORSL REHYDRATE (collectively as &#8216;ORSL&#8217;). Under the mark &#8216;ORSL&#8217;, plaintiff manufactured and sold electrolyte drinks. Plaintiff was aggrieved by the use, by defendants, of a deceptively similar mark &#8220;ORSI&#8221;, under which it manufactured and sold fruit drinks, in similar flavours. The adoption, by defendants, of a deceptively similar mark, printed in a deceptively similar manner using the trade dress, which was nearly identical to that of plaintiff, indicated that defendants had consciously sought to imitate plaintiff.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Comparison of the packs of plaintiff&#8217;s and defendants&#8217; products<\/p>\n<table style=\"border-bottom-width: 0.5pt; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: #000000; border-left-width: 0.5pt; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: #000000; border-right-width: 0.5pt; border-right-style: solid; border-right-color: #000000; border-collapse: collapse; border-top-width: 0.5pt; border-top-style: solid; border-top-color: #000000; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; table-layout: fixed; width: 165.11mm; margin-bottom: 3%;\">\n<colgroup>\n<col width=\"312\"\/>\n<col width=\"312\"\/>\n<\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" colspan=\"1\" style=\"border-bottom-width: 0.5pt; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: #000000; border-left-width: 0.5pt; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: #000000; border-right-width: 0.5pt; border-right-style: solid; border-right-color: #000000; border-top-width: 0.5pt; border-top-style: solid; border-top-color: #000000; padding-bottom: 0.0mm; padding-left: 1.91mm; padding-right: 1.91mm; padding-top: 0.0mm; vertical-align: top; width: 82.56mm;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0mm; text-align: center; font-weight: bold;\">Plaintiff&#8217;s Trade marks and Trade dress<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" colspan=\"1\" style=\"border-bottom-width: 0.5pt; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: #000000; border-left-width: 0.5pt; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: #000000; border-right-width: 0.5pt; border-right-style: solid; border-right-color: #000000; border-top-width: 0.5pt; border-top-style: solid; border-top-color: #000000; padding-bottom: 0.0mm; padding-left: 1.91mm; padding-right: 1.91mm; padding-top: 0.0mm; vertical-align: top; width: 82.56mm;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0mm; text-align: center; font-weight: bold;\">Defendant&#8217;s Trade marks and Trade dress<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" colspan=\"1\" style=\"border-bottom-width: 0.5pt; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: #000000; border-left-width: 0.5pt; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: #000000; border-right-width: 0.5pt; border-right-style: solid; border-right-color: #000000; border-top-width: 0.5pt; border-top-style: solid; border-top-color: #000000; padding-bottom: 0.0mm; padding-left: 1.91mm; padding-right: 1.91mm; padding-top: 0.0mm; vertical-align: top; width: 82.56mm;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0mm; text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-8.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-8.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"90\" height=\"150\"\/><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-9.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-9.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"90\" height=\"150\"\/><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-10.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-10.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"90\" height=\"150\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" colspan=\"1\" style=\"border-bottom-width: 0.5pt; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: #000000; border-left-width: 0.5pt; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: #000000; border-right-width: 0.5pt; border-right-style: solid; border-right-color: #000000; border-top-width: 0.5pt; border-top-style: solid; border-top-color: #000000; padding-bottom: 0.0mm; padding-left: 1.91mm; padding-right: 1.91mm; padding-top: 0.0mm; vertical-align: top; width: 82.56mm;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0.0mm; text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-11.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-11.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"90\" height=\"150\"\/><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-12.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-12.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"100\" height=\"150\"\/><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-13.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-13.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"80\" height=\"150\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the marks of plaintiff and defendants were so similar that, when used for similar products, they were bound to result in confusion in the minds of a consumer between the two products. The Court observed that defendants were not innocent adopters of a similar mark, but conscious imitators of plaintiff, was also apparent from the stark similarity between the trade dresses of the products of defendants and plaintiff. Defendants had also chosen to pack and sell their products in tetra packs which had images similar to those used by plaintiff, with clear intention of confusing the consumer. Thus, the Court opined that prima facie, a case of both passing off and infringement was made out.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the products in question being electrolyte drinks were consumables and therefore, any possibility of confusion in the mind of the consumer between one product and the other had to be avoided. The Court further opined that balance of convenience was also in favour of grant of injunction as there was no absolute bar on defendants manufacturing and selling their products, provided they adopted a trade mark and trade dress which did not imitate the plaintiff.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court restrained defendants and all others acting on their behalf from using the marks <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-14.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-14.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"50\"\/><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-15.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-15.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"70\" height=\"150\"\/><\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-16.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-16.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"90\" height=\"150\"\/><\/a> or any other confusingly or deceptively similar marks, for fruit drinks or any other allied or cognate goods or services. The Court further restrained defendants from releasing into market any stock of manufactured infringing goods which might have already been manufactured by them and lying in stock. Defendants were also directed to remove, from all physical and virtual sites, reference to the impugned marks ORSI\/<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-17.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-17.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"70\"\/><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-18.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-18.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"70\" height=\"150\"\/><\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-19.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/12_johnson-and-johnson-19.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"90\" height=\"150\"\/><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Johnson &amp; Johnson Pte. Ltd. v. Abbireddi Satish Kumar, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/c86L3kHa\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 7786<\/a>, decided on 07-12-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice C. Hari Shankar<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Plaintiff: Nancy Roy, Raghav Malik, Lalit Alley, Prakriti Vaishney, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Defendants&#8217; act of adopting mark which is structurally and visually nearly identical to that of plaintiff along with a trade dress which is also imitative of that of plaintiff, indicates that defendants have strained every nerve to come as close to plaintiff as possible.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":303940,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2543,63461,59531,63462,63460,33840,46073,2616],"class_list":["post-309134","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-johnson-johnson","tag-mark","tag-orsi","tag-orsl","tag-restrain","tag-trade-dress","tag-Trade_Mark"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC restrains usage of \u2018OSRI\u2019 mark for electrolyte drinks in trade mark infringement suit filed by Johnson &amp; Johnson | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court restrained Abbireddi Satish Kumar from using OSRI mark for electrolyte drinks as he consciously imitated Johnson &amp; Johnson\u2019s mark ORSL.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Not innocent adopters, but conscious imitators of Johnson &amp; Johnson\u2019s mark \u2018ORSL\u2019; Delhi High Court restrains usage of \u2018OSRI\u2019 mark for electrolyte drinks\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court restrained Abbireddi Satish Kumar from using OSRI mark for electrolyte drinks as he consciously imitated Johnson &amp; Johnson\u2019s mark ORSL.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-12-13T06:30:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-12-15T05:34:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Not innocent adopters, but conscious imitators of Johnson &amp; Johnson\u2019s mark \u2018ORSL\u2019; Delhi High Court restrains usage of \u2018OSRI\u2019 mark for electrolyte drinks\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC restrains usage of \u2018OSRI\u2019 mark for electrolyte drinks in trade mark infringement suit filed by Johnson & Johnson | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-13T06:30:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-15T05:34:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court restrained Abbireddi Satish Kumar from using OSRI mark for electrolyte drinks as he consciously imitated Johnson & Johnson\u2019s mark ORSL.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Not innocent adopters, but conscious imitators of Johnson &amp; Johnson\u2019s mark \u2018ORSL\u2019; Delhi High Court restrains usage of \u2018OSRI\u2019 mark for electrolyte drinks\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC restrains usage of \u2018OSRI\u2019 mark for electrolyte drinks in trade mark infringement suit filed by Johnson & Johnson | SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court restrained Abbireddi Satish Kumar from using OSRI mark for electrolyte drinks as he consciously imitated Johnson & Johnson\u2019s mark ORSL.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Not innocent adopters, but conscious imitators of Johnson & Johnson\u2019s mark \u2018ORSL\u2019; Delhi High Court restrains usage of \u2018OSRI\u2019 mark for electrolyte drinks","og_description":"Delhi High Court restrained Abbireddi Satish Kumar from using OSRI mark for electrolyte drinks as he consciously imitated Johnson & Johnson\u2019s mark ORSL.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-12-13T06:30:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-12-15T05:34:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Not innocent adopters, but conscious imitators of Johnson &amp; Johnson\u2019s mark \u2018ORSL\u2019; Delhi High Court restrains usage of \u2018OSRI\u2019 mark for electrolyte drinks","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC restrains usage of \u2018OSRI\u2019 mark for electrolyte drinks in trade mark infringement suit filed by Johnson & Johnson | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-12-13T06:30:12+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-15T05:34:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Delhi High Court restrained Abbireddi Satish Kumar from using OSRI mark for electrolyte drinks as he consciously imitated Johnson & Johnson\u2019s mark ORSL.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/13\/dhc-restrains-usage-of-osri-mark-for-electrolyte-drinks-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Not innocent adopters, but conscious imitators of Johnson &amp; Johnson\u2019s mark \u2018ORSL\u2019; Delhi High Court restrains usage of \u2018OSRI\u2019 mark for electrolyte drinks"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":298881,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/08\/delhi-high-court-restrains-cipla-from-using-marks-glucoc-glucod-prolyte-legal-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":309134,"position":0},"title":"[Glucon-D v Gluco-D] Delhi High Court restrains Cipla from using GLUCO-C and GLUCO-D for its energy drinks","author":"Arunima","date":"August 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court grants injunction against Cipla Healthcare from using the marks Gluco-C or Gluco-D either by themselves or as part of the marks Prolyte Gluco-C ++ or Prolyte Gluco-D ++ being deceptively similar to the plaintiff registered marks GLUCON-C or GLUCON-D respectively.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"glucon d and prolyte gluco d","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/glucon-d-and-prolyte-gluco-d.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/glucon-d-and-prolyte-gluco-d.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/glucon-d-and-prolyte-gluco-d.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/glucon-d-and-prolyte-gluco-d.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281267,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/09\/delhi-high-court-confirms-ex-parte-ad-interim-injunction-favour-aiwa-japan-company-mark-in-trade-mark-infringement-suit-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":309134,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court confirms ex-parte ad interim injunction in favour of AIWA Co. Ltd., a Japan company for its mark \u201cAIWA\u201d in a trade mark infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"January 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court held that the use of mark \u201cAIVVA\u201d by Aivva Enterprises (P) Ltd. was phonetically similar to the mark \u201cAIWA\u201d of Aiwa Co. Ltd. and thus, caused confusion in the market. Therefore, the Court confirmed ex-parte ad interim injunction in favour of the mark \u201cAIWA\u201d in a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":280579,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/29\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-to-rpg-enterprises-ltd-for-its-mark-rpg-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-awards-rs-3-lakhs-as-damages\/","url_meta":{"origin":309134,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to RPG Enterprises Ltd. for its mark \u2018RPG\u2019 in a trade mark infringement suit; awards Rs. 3 lakhs as damages","author":"Editor","date":"December 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to RPG Enterprises Ltd. for its mark \u2018RPG\u2019. Further, RPG Developers (P) Ltd. were restrained from offering\/rendering any services using the impugned trade mark \u2018RPG\u2019 and\/or \u2018RPG DEVELOPERS\u2019 and\/or artistic work which was a colourable imitation of the plaintiff's artistic work or any\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":277907,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/23\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-along-with-2-lakhs-damages-in-favour-of-ebay-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":309134,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction along with 2 lakhs damages in favour of eBay in a trade mark infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"November 23, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from using the mark \u2018Shopibay\u2019 which was similar to the plaintiff's mark \u2018eBay\/EBAY\u2019, the Single Judge Bench of Navin Chawla, J. granted permanent injunction to \u2018eBay\u2019 and held that the adoption of mark by the defendant\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278897,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/delhi-high-court-directs-registrar-of-trade-marks-to-add-bukhara-mark-to-the-list-of-well-known-trade-marks\/","url_meta":{"origin":309134,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court directs Registrar of Trade Marks to add \u2018BUKHARA&#8217; mark to the list of \u2018well-known trade marks&#8217;","author":"Editor","date":"December 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a case filed by ITC Ltd. seeking protection of the trade mark \u2018BUKHARA', the Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J. declared \u2018BUKHARA' as a well-known trade mark under Section 2(zg) read with Section 11(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and directed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":297587,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/25\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-calvin-klein-for-its-marks-used-for-perfumes-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":309134,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to Calvin Klein for marks \u2018CK\u2019, \u2018Calvin Klein\u2019, \u2018ck one\u2019 used for perfumes","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cTesters are being sold by the defendants, Xeryus Retail (P) Ltd. masquerading them as perfumes of the plaintiff, Coty Germany GMBH for sale, thereby, luring customers into paying money for such testers which are otherwise, not to be commercially dispensed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309134","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=309134"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309134\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/303940"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=309134"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=309134"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=309134"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}