{"id":309057,"date":"2023-12-12T13:00:17","date_gmt":"2023-12-12T07:30:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=309057"},"modified":"2023-12-13T17:18:13","modified_gmt":"2023-12-13T11:48:13","slug":"cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision considering time lapse and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) CrPC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Calcutta High Court:<\/span> In a revision seeking quashing of proceedings under Section 144(2)<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a> before the Metropolitan and Executive Magistrate, Calcutta, a single-judge bench comprising of Shampa Dutt (Paul),* J.<\/span>, dismissed the revision, stating that the interference of the Court is not required at this stage, considering the lapse of time and the availability of legal recourse for altering the prior order under Section 144(5)<\/a> CrPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the petitioner’s mother resides in ancestral property with the petitioner’s youngest brother. The eldest brother, Opposite Party 2, allegedly illegally lets out portions of the property for unlawful business, leading to security concerns and thefts. The petitioner reported the matter to the local police, leading to the initiation of proceedings under Section 144(2)<\/a> CrPC<\/a> on 29-09-2020.<\/p>\n

The Court, on 29-09-2020, directed a police report and maintenance of peace, fixing the next date for 09-11-2020. The petitioner communicated this order to Opposite Party 2 through registered post on 05-10-2020. Despite knowledge of the order, Opposite Party 2 filed a case under Section 144(2)<\/a> CrPC<\/a>, suppressing facts and obtaining an order on 16-10-2020 for an inquiry and police report.<\/p>\n

The petitioner preferred the present petition seeking to quash the proceedings filed by Opposite Party 2. The petitioner challenged the subsequent order of 16-10-2020, contending that it was obtained without disclosing the prior order of 29-09-2020. The petitioner invoked Section 144(5)<\/a> CrPC<\/a>, arguing that the subsequent order should be rescinded or altered, as it was passed when the prior order was still in force. Opposite Party 2 failed to appear despite service.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the subsequent order was passed ex-parte in a separate proceeding for the same property when the prior order was still valid. It was observed that Section 144(5)<\/a> CrPC<\/a> empowers a magistrate to rescind or alter an order, but the petitioner failed to bring the prior order to the Court’s notice. The Court suggested that the petitioner could have taken recourse to Section 144(5)<\/a> CrPC<\/a> to alter the prior order, which was not done.<\/p>\n

As proceedings under Section 144<\/a> CrPC<\/a> remain in force for not more than two months, and both cases were initiated in 2020, the Court found no need for interference at this stage. The Court concluded that interference is not required, as both proceedings were initiated in 2020. The Court disposed of the present petition with no order as to costs, and all connected applications are disposed of.<\/p>\n

[Pranab Roy<\/span> v. State of W.B.<\/span>, 2023 SCC OnLine Cal 4813<\/a>, order dated 05-12-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Mayukh Mukherjee, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n

Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Mr. Sanjib Kumar Dan, Counsel for the State<\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Section 144(5) of the CrPC empowers any Magistrate can rescind or alter an order made under this section.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[63422,2689,59921,34988,63421],"class_list":["post-309057","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-availability-of-legal-recourse","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-justice-shampa-dutt-paul","tag-lapse-of-time","tag-section-1445-of-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\nCalcutta High Court dismisses revision considering time lapse and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) CrPC | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court deemed interference unnecessary considering lapse of time and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) of CrPC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision considering time lapse and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) CrPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court deemed interference unnecessary considering lapse of time and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) of CrPC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-12-12T07:30:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-12-13T11:48:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision considering time lapse and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) CrPC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision considering time lapse and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) CrPC | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-12T07:30:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-13T11:48:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court deemed interference unnecessary considering lapse of time and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) of CrPC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision considering time lapse and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) CrPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision considering time lapse and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) CrPC | SCC Blog","description":"Calcutta High Court deemed interference unnecessary considering lapse of time and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) of CrPC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision considering time lapse and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) CrPC","og_description":"Calcutta High Court deemed interference unnecessary considering lapse of time and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) of CrPC.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-12-12T07:30:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-12-13T11:48:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision considering time lapse and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) CrPC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/","name":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision considering time lapse and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) CrPC | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-12-12T07:30:17+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-13T11:48:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court deemed interference unnecessary considering lapse of time and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) of CrPC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/12\/cal-hc-dismisses-revision-considering-time-lapse-and-availability-of-legal-recourse-under-section-1445-crpc-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision considering time lapse and availability of legal recourse under Section 144(5) CrPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":299796,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/calcutta-hc-refuses-to-quash-proceeding-against-teacher-for-involvement-in-communal-disturbance-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":309057,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court refuses to quash proceeding against teacher for involvement in Communal Disturbance case","author":"Ritu","date":"August 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Considering the nature of the alleged offences and the available evidence, the Calcutta High Court found a prima facie case against the petitioner to proceed to trial.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299162,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/12\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-revision-seeking-cancellation-of-bail-in-assault-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":309057,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revision seeking cancellation of bail in assault case","author":"Ritu","date":"August 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court criticized the trial court for solely relying on party's submissions and not calling for injury report.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282054,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/20\/wife-infertility-husband-mutual-divorce-fir-cruelty-calcutta-high-court-revision-petition-quash-fir-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":309057,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court | Infertility cannot be a ground for divorce","author":"Editor","date":"January 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Dismissing the revision petition filed for quashing of FIR and criminal proceeding against the petitioner\/husband, the Court held that prima facie case of a cognizable offence of cruelty can be make out against the petitioner\/husband therefore inherit power of High Court under S. 482 CrPC cannot be exercised.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image95.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":312019,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/23\/no-conviction-solely-based-on-accuseds-statements-under-section-313-of-crpc-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":309057,"position":3},"title":"\u2018No conviction solely based on accused\u2019s statements under Section 313 of CrPC\u2019; Calcutta High Court sets aside conviction","author":"Ritu","date":"January 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court noted that the impugned notice has not been produced before the Court, thus not proved, the case's foundation is wrong and thus not maintainable.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224799,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/31\/del-hc-ss-143-147-ni-act-lay-down-special-code-for-trial-recourse-to-s-482-crpc-as-a-substitute-for-initiating-second-revision-petition-denied\/","url_meta":{"origin":309057,"position":4},"title":"Del HC | Ss. 143-147 NI Act lay down Special Code for trial, recourse to S. 482 CrPC as a substitute for initiating second revision petition denied","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 31, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0Rajnish Bhatnagar, J., dismissed a petition filed against the order of the Sessions Court whereby it had dismissed the review petition filed by the petitioners against the order of the Metropolitan Magistrate taking cognizance of offences under Section 138 and Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":298297,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/02\/woman-has-right-maintenance-from-her-partner-who-contract-second-marriage-under-personal-law-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":309057,"position":5},"title":"Women entitled to care and support from partners who contract second marriage under personal law: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court set aside the impugned order and modified the maintenance amount to Rs. 6,000 per month.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309057","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=309057"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/309057\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=309057"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=309057"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=309057"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}