{"id":308489,"date":"2023-12-06T09:00:40","date_gmt":"2023-12-06T03:30:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=308489"},"modified":"2023-12-08T12:33:27","modified_gmt":"2023-12-08T07:03:27","slug":"quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR in contractual dispute due to \u2018lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court:<\/span> In a petition filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> seeking to quash FIR alleging criminal breach of trust under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561745\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">409<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>, stating misappropriation of toll funds by the petitioner, a single-judge bench comprising of Sanjay Dwivedi, J., allowed the petitioner&#8217;s plea, quashing the FIR and related proceedings, emphasising the absence of specific allegations and the civil nature of the dispute.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Brief Facts<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, M\/s. Transstroy Bhopal Bypass Tollways (P) Ltd. entered into a 15-year contract (BOT) in 2010 for the construction of Bhopal Bypass Toll. A FIR was filed against the petitioner based on the Advocate General&#8217;s opinion that they misappropriated toll funds by not depositing the total collected amount in the escrow account, violating the terms of the contract.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner preferred the present petition seeking to quash FIR, which alleged a criminal breach of trust under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561745\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">409<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> along with subsequent criminal proceedings arising from the said FIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Moot Point<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>Whether the FIR and subsequent criminal proceedings against the petitioner, seeking to quash the FIR, are sustainable?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the dispute, arising from the termination of a contract between M\/s. Transstroy Bhopal Bypass Tollways (P) Ltd. and respondent 2, is of a civil or criminal nature?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Parties&#8217; Contentions<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Petitioner contended that the FIR is based on an illegal survey, not conducted jointly as per the agreement. It was contended that the contract termination occurred in 2018, and the petitioner is no longer a legal entity, making the FIR an abuse of process. It was contended that the Advocate General&#8217;s opinion, without specific allegations, does not justify criminal proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Respondent 2 contended that FIR is valid, alleging misappropriation of toll collections, breach of contract, and violation of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561745\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">409<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>. It was contended that the traffic survey\/sampling was conducted by an expert, revealing a significant discrepancy in toll collections. It was contended that the petitioner&#8217;s refusal to deposit the full amount in the escrow account justifies criminal proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Legal Principles<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>Disputes arising from contracts with specific arbitration remedies are civil in nature.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Criminal proceedings should not be used as a tool to pressure parties to settle civil disputes.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">FIRs and criminal proceedings can be quashed if the allegations, even if true, do not constitute a prima facie offense.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the dispute is civil in nature, arising from a terminated contract, and there is a specific remedy available through arbitration. The Court noted that the FIR was lodged almost two years after contract termination, lacks specific allegations against the petitioner for criminal breach of trust.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Emphasising the lack of specific allegations against the petitioner and absence of incriminating material, the Court concluded that the FIR was an abuse of process. Therefore, relying on precedent and categorizing the dispute as civil, the Court invoked its powers under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> to quash the FIR and subsequent proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitions are allowed, and FIR along with subsequent proceedings is quashed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Kalyan Sunder v. State of M.P., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/jIy61x2X\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine MP 4592<\/a>, order dated 28-11-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Sanjay Dwivedi<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Siddharth Sharma, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Alok Agnihotri, Govt. Advocate, Counsel for the Respondent No. 1<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Shri Anvesh Shrivastava, Counsel for the Respondent No. 2<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Madhya Pradesh High Court emphasised that a purely civil dispute should not be converted into a criminal prosecution.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":291010,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[63251,63252,58674,63253,7201,50352],"class_list":["post-308489","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-contractual-dispute","tag-delay-in-lodging","tag-justice-sanjay-dwivedi","tag-lack-of-specific-allegation","tag-madhya-pradesh-high-court","tag-quashment-of-fir"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Quashment of FIR in contractual dispute due to lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint: Madhya Pradesh High Court | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Quashment of FIR in contractual dispute due to \u2018lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint\u2019: Madhya Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR in contractual dispute due to \u2018lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Quashment of FIR in contractual dispute due to \u2018lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint\u2019: Madhya Pradesh High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-12-06T03:30:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-12-08T07:03:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR in contractual dispute due to \u2018lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint\u2019\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"Quashment of FIR in contractual dispute due to lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint: Madhya Pradesh High Court | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-06T03:30:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-08T07:03:27+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Quashment of FIR in contractual dispute due to \u2018lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint\u2019: Madhya Pradesh High Court\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR in contractual dispute due to \u2018lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint\u2019\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Quashment of FIR in contractual dispute due to lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint: Madhya Pradesh High Court | SCC Blog","description":"Quashment of FIR in contractual dispute due to \u2018lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint\u2019: Madhya Pradesh High Court","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR in contractual dispute due to \u2018lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint\u2019","og_description":"Quashment of FIR in contractual dispute due to \u2018lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint\u2019: Madhya Pradesh High Court","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-12-06T03:30:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-12-08T07:03:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR in contractual dispute due to \u2018lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint\u2019","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/","name":"Quashment of FIR in contractual dispute due to lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint: Madhya Pradesh High Court | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-12-06T03:30:40+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-08T07:03:27+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Quashment of FIR in contractual dispute due to \u2018lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint\u2019: Madhya Pradesh High Court","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Madhya Pradesh High Court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/06\/quashment-of-fir-in-contractual-dispute-due-to-lack-of-specific-allegations-and-delay-in-lodging-complaint-mp-hc-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR in contractual dispute due to \u2018lack of specific allegations and delay in lodging complaint\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":326178,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/10\/mp-high-court-quashes-fir-for-rape-lodged-by-honey-trap-racket-operator-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":308489,"position":0},"title":"MP High Court quashes Rape case lodged by Honey trap racket operator","author":"Ritu","date":"July 10, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court held that while delay in reporting rape is not always material, in the present case, it is crucial due to the complainant\u2019s history and the timing of her allegations.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":319968,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/04\/12\/not-providing-food-to-wife-over-dowry-demands-constitutes-physical-mental-harassment-madhya-pradesh-high-court-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":308489,"position":1},"title":"Not providing food to married woman over dowry demands constitutes physical &amp; mental harassment: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 12, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Regarding the timing of the FIR in relation to the divorce petition, the Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the pendency of a civil proceeding does not bar criminal proceedings.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Madhya-Pradesh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295094,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/21\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quash-fir-section-377-ipc-against-former-minister-raghavji-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":308489,"position":2},"title":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes FIR lodged under Section 377 IPC against Former Minister Raghavji","author":"Ritu","date":"June 21, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The present case is \u201cnothing but the assimilation of personal and political antipathies, more precisely, a politically oriented-animosity, which makes the petitioner's prosecution malicious.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300297,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/29\/madhya-pradesh-hc-quashed-fir-and-criminal-proceeding-due-to-misuse-section-498a-of-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":308489,"position":3},"title":"Misuse of Section 498-A IPC| Madhya Pradesh High Court quashes criminal case against in-laws, calls it \u201ca case of reverse cruelty\u201d","author":"Ritu","date":"August 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cNow a day it is very common for the husband and wife to reside or do jobs outside of India and their parents are made to suffer in India by way of criminal or matrimonial litigation.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268359,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/14\/mp-hc-%e2%94%82-court-finds-rape-charges-vexatious-and-frivolous-fir-quashed-after-delay-of-18-years-to-file-a-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":308489,"position":4},"title":"MP HC \u2502 Court finds rape charges &#8220;vexatious and frivolous &#8220;; FIR quashed after delay of 18 years to file a case","author":"Editor","date":"June 14, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: Anand Pathak, J. allowed a petition which was preferred under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashment of FIR registered against the petitioner and consequential\u00a0 criminal proceedings for offence under Sections 376, 506 of Penal Code, 1860.\u00a0 \u00a0 An FIR was registered by respondent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/MicrosoftTeams-image-250.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":295003,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/20\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-fir-allegation-against-rape-accused-not-abetment-of-suicide\/","url_meta":{"origin":308489,"position":5},"title":"Allegations in FIR against rape accused cannot be considered as abetment of suicide: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"June 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court quashed the FIR and consequential criminal proceedings arising thereafter.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/madhya-pradesh-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308489","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=308489"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308489\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/291010"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=308489"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=308489"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=308489"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}