{"id":308348,"date":"2023-12-04T12:30:21","date_gmt":"2023-12-04T07:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=308348"},"modified":"2023-12-06T16:39:57","modified_gmt":"2023-12-06T11:09:57","slug":"dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court dismisses India-Pakistan \u2018Super Basmati\u2019 Rice Dispute for non-prosecution"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a suit filed by Plaintiff 1, Trading Corporation of Pakistan Pvt. Ltd., Plaintiff 2, Rice Exporters Association of Pakistan and Plaintiff 3, Basmati Growers Association, for grant of permanent injunction against the Defendant, Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry (‘GOI’) to restrain the Defendant from permitting exports of rice under the name ‘SUPER BASMATI’ and infringement of Plaintiffs’ trade name, label, classification, brand or variety of ‘SUPER BASMATI’, Prathiba M. Singh, J.*<\/span>, dismissed the suit for non-prosecution as there was no appearance on behalf of the Plaintiffs, and the suit had not been prosecuted effectively since 2020.<\/p>\n

Plaintiffs filed the suit seeking an order permanent injunction directing the Defendant to not give effect to the Gazette Notification dated 24-05-2006 which permitted the export of evolved Basmati rice or any rice from India under the name, variety, classification or trade name of ‘SUPER BASMATI’ and also to restrain the Defendant, their partners, servants, agents, representatives, exporters from India and all other who acted in concert with them to take legislative, regulatory or administrative action in furtherance of this Notification and from using the name ‘SUPER BASMATI’ in relation to export of rice from India.<\/p>\n

Plaintiffs submitted that the export of rice under name ‘SUPER BASMATI’ constituted ‘passing off’ of the Plaintiffs’ transborder reputation. However, the Plaintiffs stopped appearing before the Court, with effect from 3-9-2020. The Defendant submitted that Basmati had also been registered as a geographical indication (GI) under the provisions of the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999<\/a> in India on 15-2-2016. The Defendant submitted that as per Notification dated 18-9-2017 issued by the Ministry of Agriculture, the seed production of all varieties of Basmati rice notified under Section 5<\/a> of the Seeds Act, 1966<\/a> was restricted to the GI registered rice growing areas of Delhi, Punjab, Haryana, parts of Uttar Pradesh and State of Jammu and Kashmir.<\/p>\n

The Court dismissed the suit for non-prosecution as there was no appearance on behalf of the Plaintiffs, and the suit had not been prosecuted effectively since 2020.<\/p>\n

[Trading Corporation of Pakistan Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India, 2023 SCC OnLine Del 7562<\/a>, decided on 28-11-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgement authored by: Justice Prathiba M. Singh<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Defendant: Akshay Amritanshu, Rajendra Kumar, Jithin George, Ashutosh Jain and Anjali Kumari Advocates with Sandeep Verma, Under Secretary, Department of Commerce and Tarun Bajaj, Director, APEDA<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Basmati has also been registered as a geographical indication under the provisions of the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 in India.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":303940,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[27874,2543,34637,31300,53991,63190,24974,63189],"class_list":["post-308348","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appearance","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-geographical-indication","tag-non-prosecution","tag-rice","tag-super-basmati","tag-trade-name","tag-variety"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC dismisses India-Pakistan \u2018Super Basmati\u2019 Rice Dispute for non-prosecution | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court dismissed suit for non-prosecution as there was no appearance on Plaintiffs\u2019 behalf, and suit was not prosecuted effectively since 2020.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court dismisses India-Pakistan \u2018Super Basmati\u2019 Rice Dispute for non-prosecution\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court dismissed suit for non-prosecution as there was no appearance on Plaintiffs\u2019 behalf, and suit was not prosecuted effectively since 2020.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-12-04T07:00:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-12-06T11:09:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court dismisses India-Pakistan \u2018Super Basmati\u2019 Rice Dispute for non-prosecution\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC dismisses India-Pakistan \u2018Super Basmati\u2019 Rice Dispute for non-prosecution | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-12-04T07:00:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-06T11:09:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court dismissed suit for non-prosecution as there was no appearance on Plaintiffs\u2019 behalf, and suit was not prosecuted effectively since 2020.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court dismisses India-Pakistan \u2018Super Basmati\u2019 Rice Dispute for non-prosecution\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC dismisses India-Pakistan \u2018Super Basmati\u2019 Rice Dispute for non-prosecution | SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court dismissed suit for non-prosecution as there was no appearance on Plaintiffs\u2019 behalf, and suit was not prosecuted effectively since 2020.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court dismisses India-Pakistan \u2018Super Basmati\u2019 Rice Dispute for non-prosecution","og_description":"Delhi High Court dismissed suit for non-prosecution as there was no appearance on Plaintiffs\u2019 behalf, and suit was not prosecuted effectively since 2020.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-12-04T07:00:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-12-06T11:09:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court dismisses India-Pakistan \u2018Super Basmati\u2019 Rice Dispute for non-prosecution","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC dismisses India-Pakistan \u2018Super Basmati\u2019 Rice Dispute for non-prosecution | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-12-04T07:00:21+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-06T11:09:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Delhi High Court dismissed suit for non-prosecution as there was no appearance on Plaintiffs\u2019 behalf, and suit was not prosecuted effectively since 2020.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/04\/dhc-dismisses-india-pakistan-super-basmati-rice-dispute-for-non-prosecution-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court dismisses India-Pakistan \u2018Super Basmati\u2019 Rice Dispute for non-prosecution"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":278661,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/17\/delhi-high-court-awards-rs-25-lakhs-damages-to-daawat-basmati-rice-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit-restrains-manufacturer-from-selling-counterfeit-daawat-products\/","url_meta":{"origin":308348,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court awards Rs. 25 lakhs damages to \u2018Daawat\u2019 Basmati Rice in a trade mark infringement suit; restrains manufacturer from selling counterfeit \u2018Daawat\u2019 Products","author":"Editor","date":"November 17, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Delhi High Court: In a suit for permanent injunction and damages for infringement of marks, passing off and unfair competition in relation to the mark \u2018DAWAT\/DAWAAT\u2019, the Single Judge Bench of Prathiba M. Singh, J. awarded Rs. 25 lakhs as damages and costs in favour of the plaintiff\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"competitive exam","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280659,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/29\/delhi-high-court-grants-ad-interim-injunction-to-new-bharat-overseas-for-its-mark-taj-mahal-in-a-trademark-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":308348,"position":1},"title":"Delhi High Court grants ad-interim injunction to New Bharat Overseas for its mark \u2018TAJ MAHAL\u2019 in a trademark infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"December 29, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court granted ad-interim injunction to New Bharat Overseas for its mark \u2018TAJ MAHAL\u2019 and restrained Kian Agro Processing (P) Ltd. from affixing the mark \u2018TAJ MAHAL\u2019 or any other mark deceptively similar to the registered marks for the purposes of selling or marketing rice in India or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":286536,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/07\/delhi-high-court-discusses-distinction-between-suggestive-marks-descriptive-trademarks-in-the-context-of-word-royal-in-related-to-rice-legal-news-research-awareness-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":308348,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court discusses on the distinction between \u2018descriptive\u2019 and \u2018suggestive\u2019 trademarks in the context of the mark ROYAL and its use in relation to rice","author":"Arunima","date":"March 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court observed that the use of the word \u2018ROYAL\u2019 appears to be only in the form of depicting the quality of the rice. The use of the word \u2018ZABREEN\u2019 prominently on its packaging is sufficient to take the defendant out of the mischief of infringement and passing off.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":273614,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/13\/surprising-that-a-product-imported-from-pakistan-is-sold-on-amazon-without-any-details-delhi-high-court-directs-amazon-to-remove-infringing-links-within-48-hours\/","url_meta":{"origin":308348,"position":3},"title":"Surprising that a product imported from Pakistan is sold on Amazon without any details; Delhi High Court directs Amazon to remove infringing links within 48 hours","author":"Editor","date":"September 13, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Hamdard National Foundation (India) (\u2018plaintiff 1') and Hamdard Dawakhana (\u2018plaintiff 2') relating to the product and mark of the Plaintiffs \u2018ROOH AFZA' being sold on defendant's website \u2018Amazon' not belonging to the plaintiff's, Prathiba M Singh J. granted an ad-interim injunction in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278920,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/01\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-in-favour-of-dream-11-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":308348,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction in favour of Dream 11 in a trade mark infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"December 1, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction in favour of Dream 11 against the person who was operating under the domain name \u2018www.dream11.bet\u2019 and held that the domain name adopted by the defendant was deceptively similar to that of the plaintiffs and was clearly intended to ride on the goodwill and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":214084,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/04\/29\/del-hc-seeds-act-not-concerned-with-where-and-how-the-seeds-are-used-scope-explained\/","url_meta":{"origin":308348,"position":5},"title":"Del HC| Seeds Act not concerned with where and how the seeds are used; Scope explained","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Dealing with the scope and ambit of the Seeds Act, 1966, Vibhu Bakhru, J held that the Seeds Act is not concerned with where and how the seeds are used. He said, \u201cOnce a person dealing with notified variety of seeds conforms to the requirement of Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308348","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=308348"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308348\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/303940"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=308348"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=308348"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=308348"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}