{"id":307734,"date":"2023-11-24T11:00:12","date_gmt":"2023-11-24T05:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=307734"},"modified":"2023-12-01T12:01:44","modified_gmt":"2023-12-01T06:31:44","slug":"section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is gender neutral\u2019, Delhi High Court reduces maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a case wherein an appeal was filed challenging the impugned order under Section 24<\/a> of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955<\/a> (‘the HMA’) dated 24-04-2022 passed by the Judge, Family Court (South), Saket, New Delhi, whereby appellant was directed to pay Rs. 30,000 per month to respondent towards maintenance pendente lite from the date of filing of the petition till its disposal along with litigation expenses of Rs. 51,000. The Division Bench of V. Kameswar Rao and Anoop Kumar Mendiratta*<\/span>, JJ., opined that maintenance pendente lite at the rate of Rs. 21,000 per month to respondent, as paid in the proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005<\/a> (‘the PWVD Act’) from the date of filing of the petition before the Family Court till its disposal would be reasonable and the same shall be paid along with litigation expenses\/arrears in terms of impugned order passed by the Judge, Family Court.<\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

Appellant married respondent in 2018 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies, but in 2020, respondent returned to her parental home owing to differences between the parties. Thereafter, respondent filed a complaint under Section 12<\/a> of the PWVD Act<\/a> against appellant and his family members in 2021, wherein appellant was directed to pay Rs. 21,000 per month to respondent as maintenance vide order dated 12-12-2022. Appellant also filed a divorce petition against respondent before the Family Court wherein the impugned order was passed under Section 24 of the HMA, directing appellant to pay Rs. 30,000 per month towards maintenance pendente lite to respondent along with litigation expenses.<\/p>\n

Appellant contended that he was directed to pay a sum of Rs. 21,000 per month as maintenance in the proceedings under PWDV Act<\/a>, which was enhanced to Rs. 30,000 in the proceedings under Section 24 of HMA without any change in circumstances. Appellant submitted that the Trial Court failed to appreciate that appellant was the only earning member in the family and had to support his sisters, brothers, and aged parents and further that appellant had also borrowed a loan of Rs. 4 lakhs from his employer for marriage of his younger brother and was paying instalments towards the same.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n

The Court noted that as per the copy of appellant’s pay slip for May 2022, out of gross salary of Rs. 1,04,276, deduction of Rs. 25,000 was reflected against ‘court recovery’, Rs. 17,425 against ‘society recovery’ apart from other statutory deductions. Thus, the net salary received by appellant after deductions and recoveries was Rs. 56,492. The Court observed that the reasons for granting higher maintenance pendente lite of Rs. 30,000 per month when compared to maintenance of Rs. 21,000 per month awarded in the proceedings under PWDV Act<\/a> initiated by respondent, were not mentioned in the impugned order and even, no substantial change of circumstances after passing of order in proceedings under PWDV Act<\/a> was brought to its notice.<\/p>\n

The Court opined that there was nothing to infer that deductions as per the pay slip had been initiated by appellant only after the commencement of litigation between the parties to escape maintenance. The Court further opined that “while considering the quantum of maintenance, the liabilities of appellant along with his duties towards other family members could not be ignored”<\/span>. The Court observed that though respondent claimed to have no independent source of income but had reasonable educational background being a graduate from Delhi University and she appeared to have voluntarily undertaken social work as claimed despite there being no impediment for undertaking a meaningful employment.<\/p>\n

The Court further opined that “the spouse having a reasonable capacity of earning but who chose to remain unemployed and idle without any sufficient explanation or indicating sincere efforts to gain employment should not be permitted to saddle the other party with one sided responsibility of meeting out the expenses. The equivalence did not have to be with mathematical precision but with the objective to provide relief to the spouse by way of maintenance pendente lite and litigation expenses, who was unable to maintain and support during the pendency of proceedings and to ensure that party should not suffer due to paucity of source of income. The provision was gender neutral and Sections 24 and 25 of the HMA provided for the rights, liabilities and obligations arising from marriage between the parties under HMA”<\/span>.<\/p>\n

The Court thus opined that maintenance pendente lite at the rate of Rs. 21,000 per month to respondent, as paid in the proceedings under PWDV Act<\/a> from the date of filing of the petition before the Family Court till its disposal would be reasonable and the same shall be paid along with litigation expenses\/arrears in terms of impugned order passed by the Judge, Family Court. The Court, after considering the inflation and rising prices, directed that maintenance pendente lite during the pendency of divorce proceedings should be enhanced with Rs. 1,500 per month for each succeeding year, till disposal of the petition.<\/p>\n

[Chetram Mali v. Karishma Saini, 2023 SCC OnLine Del 7318<\/a>, decided on 21-11-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment authored by: Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Appellant: Aditya Gaur, Krishan Bhardwaj, Advocates<\/p>\n

For the Respondent: Sachin Bansal, Arti Sharma, Sakshi Mahajan, Gaurav Chauhan, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“The spouse having reasonable capacity of earning but chooses to remain unemployed without indicating sincere efforts to gain employment, should not be permitted to saddle other party with one sided responsibility of meeting out expenses.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":307737,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2543,30497,4031,42790,51983,25994,62977],"class_list":["post-307734","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-gender-neutral","tag-hindu-marriage-act","tag-hma","tag-maintenance-pendente-lite","tag-section-24","tag-section-25"],"yoast_head":"\n\u2018Section 24 of HMA is gender neutral\u2019, Delhi HC reduces maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000 | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was gender neutral and thus reduced maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is gender neutral\u2019, Delhi High Court reduces maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was gender neutral and thus reduced maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-11-24T05:30:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-12-01T06:31:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Section-24-HMA-gender-neutral.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is gender neutral\u2019, Delhi High Court reduces maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"\u2018Section 24 of HMA is gender neutral\u2019, Delhi HC reduces maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000 | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Section-24-HMA-gender-neutral.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-24T05:30:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-01T06:31:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court held that Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was gender neutral and thus reduced maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Section-24-HMA-gender-neutral.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Section-24-HMA-gender-neutral.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Section 24 HMA gender neutral\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is gender neutral\u2019, Delhi High Court reduces maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018Section 24 of HMA is gender neutral\u2019, Delhi HC reduces maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000 | SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court held that Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was gender neutral and thus reduced maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is gender neutral\u2019, Delhi High Court reduces maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000","og_description":"Delhi High Court held that Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was gender neutral and thus reduced maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-11-24T05:30:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-12-01T06:31:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Section-24-HMA-gender-neutral.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is gender neutral\u2019, Delhi High Court reduces maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/","name":"\u2018Section 24 of HMA is gender neutral\u2019, Delhi HC reduces maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000 | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Section-24-HMA-gender-neutral.webp","datePublished":"2023-11-24T05:30:12+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-01T06:31:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Delhi High Court held that Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was gender neutral and thus reduced maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Section-24-HMA-gender-neutral.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Section-24-HMA-gender-neutral.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Section 24 HMA gender neutral"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/24\/section24-of-hma-is-gender-neutral-dhc-reduces-maintenance-pendente-lite-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is gender neutral\u2019, Delhi High Court reduces maintenance pendente lite from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 21,000"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Section-24-HMA-gender-neutral.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":198452,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/07\/12\/estimation-of-husbands-income-is-permissible-while-granting-maintenance-pendente-lite-under-section-24-hindu-marriage-act-1955\/","url_meta":{"origin":307734,"position":0},"title":"Estimation of husband’s income is permissible while granting maintenance pendente lite under Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 12, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Division Bench comprising of M.M.S. Bedi and Anupinder Singh Grewal, JJ. allowed an application filed by the respondent-wife for maintenance pendente lite. The appellant-husband had preferred an appeal against the dismissal of his divorce petition. The respondent-wife had filed the application under Section 24\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":218674,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/raj-hc-wife-earning-a-certain-amount-will-not-absolve-husbands-liability-to-provide-maintenance-under-s-24-hma-act-1955\/","url_meta":{"origin":307734,"position":1},"title":"Raj HC |\u00a0Wife earning a certain amount will not absolve husband’s liability to provide maintenance under S. 24 HMA Act, 1955","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: The Division Bench comprising of Mohammad Rafiq and Narendra Singh Dhaddha, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by an aggrieved husband stating that, \u201cEven if the wife earns a certain amount, that does not absolve the husband of his liability to maintain her in the meaning of Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":243444,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/05\/del-hc-can-an-application-under-s-24-hma-survive-beyond-dismissal-of-the-main-divorce-proceeding-read-why-hc-dismissed-the-applicant-for-maintenance-pendente-lite\/","url_meta":{"origin":307734,"position":2},"title":"Del HC | Can an application under S. 24 HMA survive beyond dismissal of the main divorce proceeding? Read why HC dismissed the application for maintenance pendente lite","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 5, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Prathiba M. Singh, J., dismissed an application filed under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act on finding no interest in the same by the wife. Petitioner filed a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking divorce from his wife. To which\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":212443,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/27\/del-hc-s-24-hma-not-meant-to-equalise-income-of-wife-with-that-of-husband-wife-cannot-convert-husbands-income-in-indian-currency-and-seek-enhancement\/","url_meta":{"origin":307734,"position":3},"title":"Del HC | S. 24 HMA not meant to equalise income of wife with that of husband; wife cannot convert husband’s income in Indian currency and seek enhancement","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Bench of Jyoti Singh and G.S. Sistani, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the family court rejecting the appellant-wife's\u00a0application for grant of maintenance pendente\u00a0lite under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1951. The parties married to each-other in June 2012 and had been\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":247072,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/15\/maintenance-7\/","url_meta":{"origin":307734,"position":4},"title":"Cal HC | Pre-requisite for awarding maintenance under Hindu Marriage Act: Independent income of husband or wife to support either is enough? Read on","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 15, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: Shampa Sarkar, J., expressed that Hindu Marriage Act is a gender-neutral provision and further expressed the scope of maintenance. In the present revisional application, the issue was with respect to the wife being aggrieved with the quantum of maintenance. Wife had filed an application under Section 24\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":200908,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/08\/30\/husband-not-allowed-to-take-benefit-of-non-disclosure-of-income-and-defeat-legitimate-right-of-wife-no-reduction-in-amount-of-maintenance-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":307734,"position":5},"title":"Husband not allowed to take benefit of non-disclosure of income and defeat legitimate right of wife; no reduction in amount of maintenance: Delhi HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 30, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Sangita Dhingra Sehgal and G.S. Sistani, JJ. dismissed an appeal filed by the husband against the award of maintenance pendente lite awarded to the wife by the family court. The instant appeal was filed by the husband under Section 19 of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307734","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=307734"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307734\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/307737"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=307734"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=307734"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=307734"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}