{"id":307526,"date":"2023-11-21T11:00:14","date_gmt":"2023-11-21T05:30:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=307526"},"modified":"2023-11-21T11:11:46","modified_gmt":"2023-11-21T05:41:46","slug":"even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Even a voluntarily signed blank cheque leaf would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act: Kerala High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Kerala High Court:<\/span> The instant petition challenged the decision of Sessions Court upholding conviction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">138<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881<\/a> (&#8216;NI Act&#8217;) while reducing the substantive sentence to one day, Sophy Thomas, J. upheld the High Court&#8217;s findings and clarified that a blank cheque signed without any threat or coercion would be attract presumption under section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544367\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">139<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NI Act<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>Factual Background<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The original complaint stated that the revision petitioner borrowed Rs 4 lakhs from the complainant on 27-09-2006 and issued a cheque on 13-10-2006 towards the discharge of debt, assuring sufficient funds in his bank account for honouring the same. When the said cheque was presented before the drawee bank, it was dishonoured due to insufficiency of funds, returned with memo dated 17-10-2006. The said fact led the complainant to send a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/11\/ni-act-cheque-bounce-notice-explainer-legal-research-knowledge\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">legal notice for cheque dishonour<\/a> at his place of business and residence, intimating dishonour and demanding the said amount, which he failed to repay and therefore, a complaint under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">138<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NI Act<\/a> was filed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the absence of any defence evidence, the Trial Court found the revision petitioner guilty under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544366\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">138<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NI Act<\/a> and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for 6 months and pay compensation of Rs. 4 lakhs with interest @9% p.a. The Appellate Court confirmed his conviction but reduced the substantive sentence to imprisonment till rising of court and the compensation amount was converted into fine amount, with direction for the fine amount to be paid to the complainant as compensation under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519638\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">357(1)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a>. The same was assailed in the instant revision petition.<\/p>\n<h2>Revisional Jurisdiction of High Court<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court in the instant matter clarified that while exercising revisional jurisdiction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519692\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">401<\/a> r.w. Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519685\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">397<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>, it was &#8220;exercising its supervisory jurisdiction for correcting miscarriage of justice, after verifying the correctness, legality or propriety of the finding sentence or order of the courts below, and neither it can be equated with the power of an appellate court, nor it can be treated as a second appellate jurisdiction.&#8221; It said that the limited power under the revisional jurisdiction was to do justice as per the principles of criminal jurisprudence and won&#8217;t re-appreciate evidence for a contrary finding based on its own conclusions unless a glaring feature was brought to the Court&#8217;s notice tantamounting to gross miscarriage of justice.<\/p>\n<h2>Allegations of blank cheque with signature misuse case<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The main reason for revision petition was the contention that the said cheque was not issued for discharging any legally enforceable debt but that he had availed a vehicle loan from the financial institution run by the respondent and some blank documents were signed by him which also included a blank cheque, and that the rest of documents were returned except the cheque, saying that the same got misplaced. The Court highlighted that the revision petitioner did not produce any document to prove that the respondent was running a financial institution, or document to prove availing a vehicle loan. The Court therefore rejected the contention regarding issuance of cheque for availing vehicle loan. The Court further perused the evidence which showed payment of amount of Rs 4 lakhs by cheque.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While the revision petition contended that although the cheque was signed by him, it was given as a blank cheque, as a security for the vehicle loan availed by him, which was allegedly filled by the respondent in a different ink in a different handwriting. The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bir Singh<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mukesh Kumar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/6OP37YmW\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2019) 4 SCC 197<\/a> wherein, the Court held that &#8220;when a signed blank cheque is voluntarily given to a payee, towards some payment, the payee may fill up the amount and other particulars, and that will not invalidate the cheque.&#8221; The Court clarified that the onus to rebut presumption under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544367\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">139<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NI Act<\/a> regarding issuance of cheque to discharge a debt or liability was upon the revision petitioner.<\/p>\n<h3>Court&#8217;s Clarification on pre-signed blank cheque<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court explained that &#8220;Even if a blank cheque leaf is voluntarily signed and handed over by the accused, towards some payment, it would attract the presumption under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544367\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">139<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726957\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">N.I Act<\/a>, in the absence of any cogent evidence to show that the cheque was not issued in discharge of a debt.&#8221; The Court further pointed towards the revision petitioner&#8217;s failure to adduce any cogent evidence to prove that the cheque in question was not aimed at discharging any legally enforceable debt since the same was given voluntarily and not under any threat or coercion, the Court rejected the contentions surrounding vehicle loan.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Asraf Ali<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Assam<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/FPm9221J\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2008) 16 SCC 328<\/a> regarding examination under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519590\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">313<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> to clarify the mode of payment may be a circumstance to challenge the genuineness of transaction, but the same could not be treated as an incriminating circumstance brought out against the revision petitioner and the Section 313 examination would not vitiate the trial.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court therefore dismissed the instant petition and upheld the impugned judgment, and directed the revision petitioner to surrender before the Trial Court on or before 28-11-2023.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">P.K. Uthuppu v. N.J. Varghese, Criminal Revision Petition No. 1374 of 2010, Order dated 7-11-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Petitioner: Advocate S. Rajeev<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Respondent: Advocate R. Bindu Sasthamangalam, Senior Public Prosecutor Renjit George<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kerala High Court stated that the petitioner failed to adduce any cogent evidence to prove that the cheque in question was not aimed at discharging any legally enforceable debt.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67513,"featured_media":307529,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[33447,29922,2523,30606,6701,37265],"class_list":["post-307526","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-blank-cheque","tag-cheque-dishonour","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-ni-act","tag-presumption","tag-section-138-of-ni-act"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Even a voluntarily signed blank cheque leaf would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act: Kerala HC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala High Court clarified that even a blank cheque voluntarily signed by the drawer would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Even a voluntarily signed blank cheque leaf would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act: Kerala High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court clarified that even a blank cheque voluntarily signed by the drawer would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-11-21T05:30:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-21T05:41:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/presumption-under-section-139-of-NI-Act.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Even a voluntarily signed blank cheque leaf would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act: Kerala High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/\",\"name\":\"Even a voluntarily signed blank cheque leaf would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act: Kerala HC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/presumption-under-section-139-of-NI-Act.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-21T05:30:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-21T05:41:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\"},\"description\":\"Kerala High Court clarified that even a blank cheque voluntarily signed by the drawer would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/presumption-under-section-139-of-NI-Act.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/presumption-under-section-139-of-NI-Act.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"presumption under section 139 of NI Act\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Even a voluntarily signed blank cheque leaf would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act: Kerala High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\",\"name\":\"Ridhi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ridhi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Even a voluntarily signed blank cheque leaf would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act: Kerala HC","description":"Kerala High Court clarified that even a blank cheque voluntarily signed by the drawer would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Even a voluntarily signed blank cheque leaf would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act: Kerala High Court","og_description":"Kerala High Court clarified that even a blank cheque voluntarily signed by the drawer would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-11-21T05:30:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-21T05:41:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/presumption-under-section-139-of-NI-Act.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ridhi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Even a voluntarily signed blank cheque leaf would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act: Kerala High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ridhi","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/","name":"Even a voluntarily signed blank cheque leaf would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act: Kerala HC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/presumption-under-section-139-of-NI-Act.webp","datePublished":"2023-11-21T05:30:14+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-21T05:41:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea"},"description":"Kerala High Court clarified that even a blank cheque voluntarily signed by the drawer would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/presumption-under-section-139-of-NI-Act.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/presumption-under-section-139-of-NI-Act.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"presumption under section 139 of NI Act"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/21\/even-voluntarily-signed-blank-cheque-leaf-attract-presumption-under-section-139-of-ni-act-kerala-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Even a voluntarily signed blank cheque leaf would attract presumption under section 139 of NI Act: Kerala High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea","name":"Ridhi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ridhi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/presumption-under-section-139-of-NI-Act.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":364043,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/10\/16\/rajasthan-hc-section-138-ni-act-on-cheque-for-time-barred-debt-revives-enforceability-under-contract-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":307526,"position":0},"title":"Cheque for Time-Barred Debt Revives Enforceability Under S. 25(3) Contract Act; Dishonour attracts Section 138 NI Act: Rajasthan High Court","author":"Editor","date":"October 16, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA meaningful reading of Sections 20, 118 and 139 of the NI Act makes it clear that a person who signs a cheque and delivers it to the payee remains liable unless he successfully rebuts the statutory presumptions.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 138 NI Act on Cheque for Time-Barred Debt","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-on-Cheque-for-Time-Barred-Debt.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-on-Cheque-for-Time-Barred-Debt.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-on-Cheque-for-Time-Barred-Debt.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act-on-Cheque-for-Time-Barred-Debt.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":304445,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/explained-supreme-court-verdict-principles-of-presumption-evidential-burden-under-ni-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":307526,"position":1},"title":"Explained | Supreme Court verdict on principles relating to presumption and evidential burden under Ss. 138 &amp; 139 of NI Act","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 12, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe accused has miserably failed to discharge his evidential burden, that fact will have to be taken to be proved by force of the presumption, without requiring anything more from the complainant\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Section 138 NI Act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Section-138-NI-Act.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":370991,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/26\/hc-roving-enquiry-debt-liability-quashing-section-138-ni-act-complaint-supreme-court-section-482-crpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":307526,"position":2},"title":"High Court Cannot Conduct Roving Enquiry into Debt or Liability While Quashing Section 138 NI Act Complaint: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"December 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cUnder Section 139 of the NI Act, there is a presumption that the holder of a cheque received the cheque of the nature referred to in Section 138 NI Act for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability. This presumption can be rebutted by\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Enquiry into Debt or Liability","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Enquiry-into-Debt-or-Liability.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Enquiry-into-Debt-or-Liability.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Enquiry-into-Debt-or-Liability.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Enquiry-into-Debt-or-Liability.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266987,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/18\/a-blank-cheque-leaf-voluntarily-signed-and-handed-over-towards-some-payment-dishonour-of-cheque-section-138-ni-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":307526,"position":3},"title":"A blank cheque leaf voluntarily signed and handed over towards some payment: Would it attract presumption under S. 139 NI Act in absence of cogent evidence? Dwarka Courts explains","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 18, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Dwarka Courts, New Delhi: Deeksha Sethi, MM (NI Act)\u201406, reiterated that, even a blank cheque leaf, voluntarily signed and handed over by the accused, which is towards some payment, would attract presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. In the present matter, Raj Singh was referred to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Dwarka-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Dwarka-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Dwarka-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Dwarka-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/Dwarka-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":216358,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/02\/ker-hc-any-acknowledgment-voluntarily-signed-towards-some-payment-attracts-presumption-under-s-139-of-ni-act-acquittal-set-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":307526,"position":4},"title":"Ker HC | Any acknowledgment voluntarily signed towards some payment, attracts presumption under S. 139 of NI Act; acquittal set aside","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court: Instant appeal was contemplated against acquittal order of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by a Single Judge Bench of N. Anil Kumar, J. The accused borrowed a certain amount from the complainant and also issued a cheque towards repayment in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":308042,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/29\/calcutta-high-court-upholds-acquittal-under-section-138-of-negotiable-instruments-act-1881-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":307526,"position":5},"title":"Calcutta High Court upholds acquittal under Section 138 of NI Act on failure to prove existence of legally enforceable debt","author":"Ritu","date":"November 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court delved into the legalities surrounding the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, emphasizing that it is a \u201crebuttable presumption\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307526","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67513"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=307526"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307526\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/307529"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=307526"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=307526"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=307526"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}