{"id":306785,"date":"2023-11-08T09:00:18","date_gmt":"2023-11-08T03:30:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=306785"},"modified":"2023-11-10T15:03:00","modified_gmt":"2023-11-10T09:33:00","slug":"delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Making unsubstantiated allegations and waging legal war against husband and his family member amounts to extreme cruelty: Delhi High Court sets aside divorce decree"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In an appeal filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001572296\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">19<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002808783\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Family Courts Act, 1984<\/a> against the judgment dated 10-02-2020, whereby the Principal Judge, Family Court (&#8216;Family Court&#8217;) had dismissed the divorce petition, the Division Bench of Suresh Kumar Kait and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Neena Bansal Krishna*<\/span>, JJ., opined that the Family Court had erred in ignoring the overwhelming evidence of false and defamatory accusations made by the respondent-wife and also, the multifarious litigations initiated by the wife against the appellant-husband and his family members, clearly established the cruelty by the wife and thus, the Court set aside the impugned judgment and granted divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 2005.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant case, the parties got married on 19-04-1998 and two sons from their wedlock was born on 26-05-2002 and 17-11-2003, respectively. The husband alleged that the wife&#8217;s behaviour was rude and abnormal towards him, and she regularly picked quarrels with him on petty matters. The wife used to insult the husband, his family members, friends and also, refused to discharge her matrimonial obligations. In 1999, on the occasion of Diwali, the wife left the matrimonial home and returned after eleven months. Thereafter, in 2001, she came to Delhi and made a false complaint to the police alleging sexual harassment by her father-in-law and attempt to rape against the brother-in-law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Subsequently, in 2006, the wife attempted to commit suicide by pouring kerosene over herself with the sole objective of falsely implicating the wife and his family members and since October 2006, the parties had been living separately.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thereafter, the husband sought divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001543733\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">13(1)(ia)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726956\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hindu Marriage Act, 1955<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;). The Family Court vide impugned judgment dated 10-02-2020 observed that all the allegations of misconduct against the wife were general, vague and non-specific. Further, there was contradiction in the husband&#8217;s testimony as to whether the allegations of attempt to rape and sexual harassment was made against his father or brother and concluded that the husband had failed to prove the acts of cruelty by the wife and accordingly, the divorce petition was dismissed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the husband filed the present appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the husband&#8217;s testimony showed that the parties marriage was on the rocks since beginning as the wife was rude, insulting and derogatory towards his family members. The Court also observed that the wife had relied on a complaint dated 12-04-2009, wherein she claimed that the husband was living with another woman for the last four years. She made serious allegations of the husband being in an illicit relationship with a woman, but the Court opined that the wife had not been able to substantiate her allegations of such illicit relationship by any evidence.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the parties entered into settlement agreement dated 26-11-2010, whereby they agreed to amicably resolve the disputes and withdraw the cases filed by them. However, the mediation settlement failed because the wife refused to withdraw the complaint, whereby she alleged that the husband got her to fraudulently quash the FIR registered under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001560359\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">31<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002829238\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005<\/a> (&#8216;DV Act&#8217;). The wife also made complaint dated 27-04-2012 under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519391\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">156<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> against the husband and his family members making serious allegations of committing offences punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561614\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">307<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561850\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">498-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561742\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">406<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561857\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">503<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561860\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">506<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561863\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">509<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561375\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">120-B<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a>. However, this application was dismissed on 05-03-2018 as it was without any merit. Thereafter, other complaints filed by her including the complaint filed under Section 12 of the DV Act was also dismissed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that these complaints and litigations clearly indicated that the wife had made allegations of dowry harassment, scandalous allegations against the husband regarding his involvement with a third woman and also, alleged her sexual exploitation by the husband&#8217;s brother. However, none of these allegations were substantiated by any cogent evidence and several complaints filed by her were also dismissed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that every aggrieved person had the absolute right to initiate appropriate legal action and right to approach the state machinery. However, it was for the wife to establish that she was subjected to cruelty by placing forth cogent evidence, in support of her allegations. The Court opined that though filing of a criminal complaint could not amount to cruelty, but such grave and incident allegations of cruelty should be substantiated during divorce proceedings and in the present case, the wife had neither substantiated her allegations, nor justified her conduct.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">K. Srinivas<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">K. Sunita<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=KDIwMTQpIDE2IFNDQyAzNCYmJiYmNDAmJiYmJlNlYXJjaFBhZ2U=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2014) 16 SCC 34<\/a>; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Raj Talreja<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kavita Talreja<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC0wMDAyNzg0ODgyJiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZmYWxzZSYmJiYmKDIwMTcpIDE0IFNDQyAxOTQmJiYmJlBocmFzZSYmJiYmRmluZEJ5Q2l0YXRpb24mJiYmJmZhbHNl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2017) 14 SCC 194<\/a>; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Mangayakarasi<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">M.M. Yuvaraj<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC05MDAwNTEzOTc0JiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZmYWxzZSYmJiYmKDIwMjApIDMgU0NDIDc4NiYmJiYmUGhyYXNlJiYmJiZGaW5kQnlDaXRhdGlvbiYmJiYmZmFsc2U=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2020) 3 SCC 786<\/a>; <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ravi Kumar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Julmidevi<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC0wMDAwMDQ1MDY3JiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZmYWxzZSYmJiYmKDIwMTApIDQgIFNDQyA0NzYgJiYmJiZQaHJhc2UmJiYmJkZpbmRCeUNpdGF0aW9uJiYmJiZmYWxzZQ==\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2010) 4 SCC 476<\/a>, and opined that making such serious and unsubstantiated allegations and waging legal war against the husband by implicating him and his family members clearly showed the vindictive nature of the wife and amounts to extreme cruelty towards the husband. Further, the attempted mediation settlement was also violated by the wife, as she only wanted to enjoy the monetary benefits arising out of settlement and never wanted to fulfil her end of the bargain. The Court opined that the wife&#8217;s conduct of resorting to filing other vexatious complaints against the husband and his family only reflected her keenness in not attempting to amicably resolve her differences.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court opined that Family Court had erred in ignoring the overwhelming evidence of false and defamatory accusations made by the wife and also, the multifarious litigations initiated by the wife against the husband and his family members, clearly established the cruelty by the wife and accordingly, set aside the judgment dated 10-02-2020 and granted divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Shiv Nath Thakur v. Nutan Thakur, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0532MSQk\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 7083<\/a>, decided on 02-11-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by- Justice Neena Bansal Krishna<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Appellant:<\/span> Amit Chadha, Atin Chadha, Munisha Chadha, Swati Chawla, Smriti Shrivastava and Aeshana Singh, Advocates;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondent:<\/span> Indu Kaul and Mehak Sharma, Advocates<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Additionally, the attempted mediation settlement was also violated by the wife, who only wanted to enjoy the monetary benefits arising out of the settlement but never wanted to fulfil her end of the bargain&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":303940,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2570,2543,2846,12431,30971,2641,62563,62564],"class_list":["post-306785","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Cruelty","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-divorce","tag-family-member","tag-hindu-marriage-act-1955","tag-husband","tag-unsubstantiated-allegations","tag-waging-legal-war"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Making unsubstantiated allegations against husband and his family member amounts to extreme cruelty: Delhi HC| SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court set aside the impugned judgment and granted divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 2005.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Making unsubstantiated allegations and waging legal war against husband and his family member amounts to extreme cruelty: Delhi High Court sets aside divorce decree\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court set aside the impugned judgment and granted divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 2005.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-11-08T03:30:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-10T09:33:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Making unsubstantiated allegations and waging legal war against husband and his family member amounts to extreme cruelty: Delhi High Court sets aside divorce decree\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Making unsubstantiated allegations against husband and his family member amounts to extreme cruelty: Delhi HC| SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-08T03:30:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-10T09:33:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court set aside the impugned judgment and granted divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 2005.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Making unsubstantiated allegations and waging legal war against husband and his family member amounts to extreme cruelty: Delhi High Court sets aside divorce decree\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Making unsubstantiated allegations against husband and his family member amounts to extreme cruelty: Delhi HC| SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court set aside the impugned judgment and granted divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 2005.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Making unsubstantiated allegations and waging legal war against husband and his family member amounts to extreme cruelty: Delhi High Court sets aside divorce decree","og_description":"Delhi High Court set aside the impugned judgment and granted divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 2005.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-11-08T03:30:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-10T09:33:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Making unsubstantiated allegations and waging legal war against husband and his family member amounts to extreme cruelty: Delhi High Court sets aside divorce decree","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/","name":"Making unsubstantiated allegations against husband and his family member amounts to extreme cruelty: Delhi HC| SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-11-08T03:30:18+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-10T09:33:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court set aside the impugned judgment and granted divorce on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 2005.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/08\/delhi-hc-making-unsubstantiated-allegations-against-husband-and-his-family-member-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Making unsubstantiated allegations and waging legal war against husband and his family member amounts to extreme cruelty: Delhi High Court sets aside divorce decree"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":310318,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/29\/delhi-hc-unilateral-withdrawal-from-attempted-divorce-settlement-amounts-to-cruelty-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":306785,"position":0},"title":"Unilateral withdrawal from attempted divorce settlement can cause disquiet and uncertainty in husband\u2019s mind, thus amounts to cruelty: Delhi High Court upholds divorce","author":"Editor","date":"December 29, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIt is evident that the fight inter se the parties was not on any justifiable grounds, but was a war between the egos prompted by the desire to wreak vengeance against the spouse.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":257037,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/12\/cruelty-by-wife\/","url_meta":{"origin":306785,"position":1},"title":"Cruelty by Wife | Wife made serious criminal allegations against husband and his parents but couldn&#8217;t prove: Would this amount to cruelty against husband to grant divorce? Del HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 12, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While addressing a matrimonial matter wherein a wife caused cruelty to husband, Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi and Jasmeet Singh, JJ., expressed that, For a man to see his parents to be taken into custody and being incarcerated even for a single day would have caused immense\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":264174,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/24\/accusation-of-extra-marital-relationship-is-a-grave-assault-on-character-status-reputation-as-well-as-health-of-spouse-against-whom-such-allegations-are-made\/","url_meta":{"origin":306785,"position":2},"title":"Accusation of extra-marital relationship is a grave assault on character, status, reputation as well as health of spouse against whom such allegations are made: Would this come under ambit of cruelty? Del HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 24, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While addressing a matter surrounding the issue of cruelty by wife, the Division Bench of Vipin Sanghi, ACJ and Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J., expressed that, \u201cIt has repeatedly been held that accusations of unchastity or extra marital relationship is a grave assault on character, status, reputation as\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":205989,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/30\/repeated-attempts-by-wife-to-commit-suicide-amounts-to-extreme-cruelty-divorce-granted\/","url_meta":{"origin":306785,"position":3},"title":"Repeated attempts by wife to commit suicide amounts to extreme cruelty; divorce granted","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 30, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench comprising of G.S. Sistani and Jyoti Singh, JJ. dismissed an appeal against the judgment of Family Court whereby it had decreed a divorce petition filed by the husband on grounds of cruelty by the wife. The parties got married in 2006. A divorce petition was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6731,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/08\/07\/serious-and-unsubstantiated-allegations-of-adultery-amount-to-cruelty-offering-a-ground-for-divorce\/","url_meta":{"origin":306785,"position":4},"title":"Serious and unsubstantiated allegations of adultery amount to cruelty offering a ground for divorce","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 7, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court- While deciding the present divorce matter wherein repeated false and frivolous allegation of adultery were made by the appellant wife against the respondent husband, a bench of Sanjay Karol, J., held that the said allegations were made out of vengeance and were unverified and unsubstantiated. The\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":244319,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/02\/24\/cruelty-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":306785,"position":5},"title":"Bom HC | Husband making wild allegations that wife, her relatives, secured false certificates to get employment. Does husband&#8217;s conduct amount to &#8216;Mental Cruelty&#8217; to wife? HC explains while upholding Family Court&#8217;s decision","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 24, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: The Division bench of A.S. Chandurkar and Pushpa V. Ganediwala, JJ., upheld the family court\u2019s finding that \u201cthe behaviour and the conduct of the husband of making wild and unsubstantiated allegations resulted in causing mental cruelty to the wife.\u201d Factual Matrix Appellant and the respondent were married\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=306785"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306785\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/303940"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=306785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=306785"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=306785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}