{"id":306223,"date":"2023-11-02T18:00:16","date_gmt":"2023-11-02T12:30:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=306223"},"modified":"2023-11-06T13:14:49","modified_gmt":"2023-11-06T07:44:49","slug":"up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"[UP Revenue Code] Plaint cannot be rejected in an Injunction suit not seeking demarcation of boundaries: Allahabad HC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Allahabad High Court:<\/span> In a matter under Article 227<\/a> of the Constitution of India<\/a>, against the order dated 03-03-2023 passed by District Judge and order dated 17-05-2022 passed by the Civil Judge declining the Application for rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11<\/a> of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908<\/a> (‘CPC’), Jayant Banerji, J. while upholding the impugned orders, said that the respondent in the suit for injunction is not seeking correction of the boundaries but has sought a decree of permanent injunction. If the plot of the respondent is not demarcated, then she would not be entitled to injunction. However, it is a completely different thing to state that in the suit for injunction, the plaint is liable to be rejected on that ground. Thus, the Court found no error or illegality in the impugned orders.<\/p>\n

The petitioners contended that proceedings under Section 24<\/a> of the UP Revenue Code, 2006<\/a>, (‘Code, 2006’) were instituted by them against the Kanpur Development Authority, Public Works Department and Vishwakarma Nagar Sahkari Awas Samiti in the year 2016, seeking demarcation of plot situated in Village Daheli, Sujanpur, and for granting possession. He stated that the application for demarcation was rejected by the Sub-Divisional Officer and the appeal filed before the Commissioner was dismissed. Thereafter, the petitioners filed a revision before the Board of Revenue, which is pending and in which an interim order directing the parties to maintain the status quo was passed. Thereafter, the respondent filed a suit against the petitioners seeking a decree of permanent injunction in respect of plot.<\/p>\n

The petitioner contended that in view of the pendency of the revision before the Board of Revenue that arose out of the proceedings under Section 24<\/a> of Code, 2006<\/a> and given the bar operating in view of the provisions of Section 206<\/doclink> of Code, 2006<\/doclink>, the civil suit filed by the respondent was barred. Accordingly, application 63C was filed by the petitioners under Order 7, Rule 11(d) CPC, seeking rejection of the plaint. Further, another application 64C was filed seeking stay of the proceedings of the suit as the same was subsequently instituted. It was contended that the suit for injunction is liable to be rejected or at least, the proceedings ought to be stayed in view of Section 10 CPC. Further, the Trial Court and the Revisional Court have misdirected themselves in rejecting the applications 63C and 64C filed on behalf of the petitioners.<\/p>\n

The Court said that application 63C is an application under Section 151, Section 10 and under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. After perusing the said application, the Court noted that the first ground taken was that the respondent had no cause of action. The second ground was that the suit was barred under Section 10 of the CPC, as with regard to the same subject matter and between the same parties the matter is pending before the Board of Revenue. The third ground was that the suit is an abuse of the process of law. The fourth ground is that the suit is barred by non-rejoinder of parties and the fifth ground is that the plaintiff ought to pay the ad valorem court fee in the valuation of the property in issue.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that Section 24<\/a> of the Code, 2006<\/a>, provides for the Sub-Divisional Officer to decide by summary inquiry any dispute regarding boundaries on the basis of the existing survey maps or, where the same is not possible, in accordance with the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, on the basis of such maps. But if this is not possible, boundaries shall be fixed on the basis of actual possession. The Sub-Divisional Officer is also empowered to put into possession a party who has been wrongly dispossessed and a period of three months is prescribed for conclusion of the proceedings for demarcation.<\/p>\n

The Court further noted that in Section 24(4), an appeal has been provided before the Commissioner. Section 206<\/a> of the Code, 2006<\/doclink>, bars the jurisdiction of the Civil Courts to entertain any suit, application or proceeding to obtain a decision or order on any matter which the State Government, the Board of Revenue, any revenue court or revenue officer is, by or under the Code, 2006<\/doclink>, empowered to determine. The Second Schedule provides for matters excluded from the jurisdiction of the Civil Court and clause (1) thereof provides any question regarding the demarcation of the boundaries or fixing of boundary marks.<\/p>\n

It further noted that in the third Schedule, the Sub-Divisional Officer is the Court or officer of original jurisdiction who would decide any application under Section 24. The petitioners have instituted proceedings against three parties and specifically in respect of a plot. The respondent is not a party therein. However, it has been pointed out by the petitioner that the respondent had filed a restoration application before the Sub-Divisional Officer in the aforesaid proceedings under Section 24.<\/p>\n

The Court said that the proceedings under Section 24<\/a> of the Code, 2006<\/a>, are summary in nature while an injunction suit filed by the respondent is a regular suit.<\/p>\n

After perusing the plaint, the Trial Court order dated 17-5-2022 and the judgment and order of the Revisional Court dated 03-03-2023, said that while dismissing the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC read with Section 10 CPC, the courts have noticed that the plot in dispute are different and therefore, it would not be barred under Section 10 CPC. It was further found that the plaint is not liable to be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.<\/p>\n

Further, it said that the Revisional Court had noticed that the respondent in the suit for injunction is not seeking correction of the boundaries but has sought a decree of permanent injunction. It was also observed that given the nature of the suits filed between the parties, the distinction in plot number concerned, the suit would also not be barred under Section 10 of the CPC. It was stated that the relief sought in the proceedings under Section 24<\/a> of the Code, 2006<\/a>, and the relief sought in the plaint filed by the respondent were different.<\/p>\n

The Court mentioned that if the plot of the respondent is not demarcated, then she would not be entitled to injunction. However, it is a completely different thing to state that in the suit for injunction, the plaint is liable to be rejected on that ground. Thus, the Court found no error or illegality in the impugned orders.<\/p>\n

[Pankaj Srivastava v Malti Devi, 2023 SCC OnLine All 2155<\/a>, Order dated 28-10-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Counsel for Petitioner<\/span> :- Advocate Ram M. Kaushik, Advocate Abhishek Ghosh, Advocate Ashish Agrawal, Umesh Tripathi<\/p>\n

Counsel for Respondent<\/span> :- Chief Standing Counsel Arun Kumar<\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Proceedings under Section 24 of the UP Revenue Code, 2006, are summary in nature while an injunction suit filed by the respondent is a regular suit.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":290504,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2822,45233,10551,59975,62445,2943,3686,60553,14201,36002,60698],"class_list":["post-306223","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-board-of-revenue","tag-civil-court","tag-demarcation","tag-demarcation-of-boundaries","tag-injunction","tag-Jurisdiction","tag-kanpur-development-authority","tag-permanent-injunction","tag-revisional-court","tag-up-revenue-code"],"yoast_head":"\n[UP Revenue Code] Plaint cannot be rejected in suit for injunction not seeking demarcation of boundaries: Allahabad HC | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabad HC held that plaint cannot be rejected in a suit for injunction not seeking demarcation of boundaries\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[UP Revenue Code] Plaint cannot be rejected in an Injunction suit not seeking demarcation of boundaries: Allahabad HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabad HC held that plaint cannot be rejected in a suit for injunction not seeking demarcation of boundaries\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-11-02T12:30:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-06T07:44:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"[UP Revenue Code] Plaint cannot be rejected in an Injunction suit not seeking demarcation of boundaries: Allahabad HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/\",\"name\":\"[UP Revenue Code] Plaint cannot be rejected in suit for injunction not seeking demarcation of boundaries: Allahabad HC | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-02T12:30:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-06T07:44:49+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Allahabad HC held that plaint cannot be rejected in a suit for injunction not seeking demarcation of boundaries\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"allahabad high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[UP Revenue Code] Plaint cannot be rejected in an Injunction suit not seeking demarcation of boundaries: Allahabad HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"[UP Revenue Code] Plaint cannot be rejected in suit for injunction not seeking demarcation of boundaries: Allahabad HC | SCC Blog","description":"Allahabad HC held that plaint cannot be rejected in a suit for injunction not seeking demarcation of boundaries","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[UP Revenue Code] Plaint cannot be rejected in an Injunction suit not seeking demarcation of boundaries: Allahabad HC","og_description":"Allahabad HC held that plaint cannot be rejected in a suit for injunction not seeking demarcation of boundaries","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-11-02T12:30:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-06T07:44:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"[UP Revenue Code] Plaint cannot be rejected in an Injunction suit not seeking demarcation of boundaries: Allahabad HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/","name":"[UP Revenue Code] Plaint cannot be rejected in suit for injunction not seeking demarcation of boundaries: Allahabad HC | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-11-02T12:30:16+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-06T07:44:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Allahabad HC held that plaint cannot be rejected in a suit for injunction not seeking demarcation of boundaries","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"allahabad high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/11\/02\/up-revenue-code-plaint-cannot-rejected-suit-injunction-not-seeking-demarcation-plot-boundaries-all-hc\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[UP Revenue Code] Plaint cannot be rejected in an Injunction suit not seeking demarcation of boundaries: Allahabad HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":287139,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/patiala-house-court-delhi-denies-injunction-on-publication-of-harper-collins-book-on-asaram-bapu-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":306223,"position":0},"title":"Delhi’s Patiala House Court declines injunction on publication of Harper Collins\u2019 book on Asaram Bapu","author":"Editor","date":"March 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court stated that the doctrine of merger of judgement and orders in common law doctrine are founded on the principles of propriety in the hierarchy of justice delivery system.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Patiala House Courts","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-774.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-774.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-774.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-774.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298483,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/03\/ex-parte-order-recalled-necessary-party-non-party-to-case-allahabad-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":306223,"position":1},"title":"Can an ex parte order be recalled by a necessary party that is a non-party to the case? Allahabad High Court answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"August 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Apart from the statutory power of recall of an ex parte order conferred under the first proviso to Section 209 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, every Court or Tribunal would have an inherent power to recall an ex parte order to secure the ends of justice.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217706,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/05\/hp-hc-exemption-for-not-giving-prior-notice-under-s-80-cpc-granted-to-petitioner-as-the-matter-was-of-urgent-importance-prohibitory-injunction-granted\/","url_meta":{"origin":306223,"position":2},"title":"HP HC | Exemption for not giving prior notice under S. 80 CPC granted to petitioner as the matter was of urgent importance; prohibitory injunction granted","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Himachal Pradesh High Court: Sandeep Sharma, J. contemplated the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India where the order passed by the Civil Judge was challenged. The factual matrix of the case was that the application under Section 80(2) CPC was filed by the petitioner to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/Himachal-HC_1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274438,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/26\/plaintiff-cannot-get-relief-by-clever-drafting-substantive-relief-permanent-injunction-unregistered-document-supreme-court-legal-researchupdates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":306223,"position":3},"title":"Clever drafting cannot result into Plaintiff getting relief indirectly which otherwise cannot be given: Supreme Court","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a case where a plaintiff had sought for permanent injunction without applying for the substantive relief of specific performance of the unregistered agreement to sell, the bench of MR Shah* and Krishna Murari, JJ has held that the plaintiff cannot get the relief by clever drafting. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Clever-drafting-cannot-result-into-Plaintiff-getting-relief-indirectly-which-otherwise-cannot-be-given-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Clever-drafting-cannot-result-into-Plaintiff-getting-relief-indirectly-which-otherwise-cannot-be-given-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Clever-drafting-cannot-result-into-Plaintiff-getting-relief-indirectly-which-otherwise-cannot-be-given-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Clever-drafting-cannot-result-into-Plaintiff-getting-relief-indirectly-which-otherwise-cannot-be-given-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Clever-drafting-cannot-result-into-Plaintiff-getting-relief-indirectly-which-otherwise-cannot-be-given-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313386,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/08\/notice-under-s-326-of-u-p-municipalities-act-not-mandatory-if-defeats-the-purpose-of-injunction-suit-allahabad-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":306223,"position":4},"title":"Suit not barred for want of Notice under S. 326 of U.P. Municipalities Act if it defeats the purpose of Injunction suit; Allahabad HC upholds Civil Judge order","author":"Apoorva","date":"February 8, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhether the suit is barred by any law must be determined from the statements in the plaint and it is not open to decide the issue on the basis of any other material including the written statement in the case.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"allahabad high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":260570,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/01\/25\/objection-with-regard-to-pecuniary-jurisdiction-shall-be-taken-at-the-first-instance-at-the-earliest-possible-opportunity-in-accordance-with-s-21-cpc\/","url_meta":{"origin":306223,"position":5},"title":"Raj HC | Objection with regard to pecuniary jurisdiction shall be taken at the first instance at the earliest possible opportunity in accordance with S. 21 CPC","author":"Editor","date":"January 25, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Rajasthan High Court: Anoop Kumar Dhand J. allowed the appeal and quashed the impugned order dated 17-08-2021 passed by the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge No. 9, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, Jaipur. The facts of the case are such that the disputed property was purchased by the plaintiff from one\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306223","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=306223"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306223\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290504"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=306223"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=306223"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=306223"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}