{"id":30591,"date":"2015-12-25T17:31:15","date_gmt":"2015-12-25T12:01:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=30591"},"modified":"2015-12-31T14:29:32","modified_gmt":"2015-12-31T08:59:32","slug":"charges-under-sections-124-a-and-121-a-of-ipc-lodged-against-patidar-anamat-andolan-samiti-paas-convener-upheld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/25\/charges-under-sections-124-a-and-121-a-of-ipc-lodged-against-patidar-anamat-andolan-samiti-paas-convener-upheld\/","title":{"rendered":"Charges under Sections 124-A and 121-A of IPC lodged against Patidar Anamat Andolan Samiti (PAAS) Convener, upheld"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Gujarat High Court:<\/strong>\u00a0Deciding on an application wherein the applicants have prayed for quashing of FIR filed against the applicant for commission of offences of sedition punishable under Section 124-A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), waging of war punishable under Section 121 of the IPC, hatching conspiracy to commit offence punishable under Section 121-A of the IPC, and promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, etc. punishable under Section 153-A of the IPC, a bench of J.B.Pardiwala J. quashed the FIR so far as the offences punishable Sections 121, 153-A are concerned and allowed for investigation in accordance with law so far as the offence punishable under Sections 124-A and 121-A is concerned<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">According to the facts, about four months back, there was a strong and violent agitation going on in the State of Gujarat as regards the reservation for the members of the Patidar Patel Community. The applicant accused in the FIR was the Convener of a committee known as the Patidar Anamat Andolan Samiti who declared bandhs, convened public meetings and various other programmes as a part of the agitation. Riots also broke out, in which extensive damage was caused by the members of the organization and others to the public property. It is the case of the prosecution that the applicants herein have committed the offences of sedition, waging of war punishable, hatching conspiracy to commit offence punishable under Section 121-A of the IPC, and promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, etc. punishable under Section 153-A of the IPC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">B.M. Mangukiya, the learned counsel appearing for the applicants contended that lodging the FIR was a mala fide act and agitation for reservation would not constitute the offence of sedition. He further submitted that mere violent activities, like torching public transport buses, police stations, etc. by itself, would not amount to waging war against the Government. While, Mitesh Amin, the learned Public Prosecutor, opposed the application and submitted that organizing or joining an insurrection against the Government of Gujarat is also a form of war.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">After perusal of the arguments, the Court held that a prima facie case is made out for the offence of sedition. The Court further observed relying on the standard laid by the Supreme Court in <em>State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan Guru<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2005_11_SCC_600\">(2005) 11 SCC 600<\/a> and <em>Jamiludin Nasir vs. State of West Bengal<\/em>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2014_7_SCC_443\">(2014) 7 SCC 443<\/a>, that it is difficult to hold whether there has been a conspiracy to wage war against the Government of Gujarat, or that there are the necessary elements in this case to constitute the offence of waging war against the Government of Gujarat. Accordingly the Court concluded that the basic ingredients to constitute the offence of \u201cwaging war\u201d punishable under section 121 of the IPC are lacking but a prima facie case of conspiracy to overawe by means of criminal force is made out. [Hardik Bharatbhai Patel \u00a0v. State of Gujarat, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_SCC_OnLine_Guj_2086\">2015 SCC OnLine Guj 2086<\/a>, decided on 01.12.2015]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court:\u00a0Deciding on an application wherein the applicants have prayed for quashing of FIR filed against the applicant for commission of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30591","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Charges under Sections 124-A and 121-A of IPC lodged against Patidar Anamat Andolan Samiti (PAAS) Convener, upheld | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/25\/charges-under-sections-124-a-and-121-a-of-ipc-lodged-against-patidar-anamat-andolan-samiti-paas-convener-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Charges under Sections 124-A and 121-A of IPC lodged against Patidar Anamat Andolan Samiti (PAAS) Convener, upheld\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Gujarat High Court:\u00a0Deciding on an application wherein the applicants have prayed for quashing of FIR filed against the applicant for commission of\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/25\/charges-under-sections-124-a-and-121-a-of-ipc-lodged-against-patidar-anamat-andolan-samiti-paas-convener-upheld\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-12-25T12:01:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-31T08:59:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/25\/charges-under-sections-124-a-and-121-a-of-ipc-lodged-against-patidar-anamat-andolan-samiti-paas-convener-upheld\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/25\/charges-under-sections-124-a-and-121-a-of-ipc-lodged-against-patidar-anamat-andolan-samiti-paas-convener-upheld\/\",\"name\":\"Charges under Sections 124-A and 121-A of IPC lodged against Patidar Anamat Andolan Samiti (PAAS) Convener, upheld | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-12-25T12:01:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-31T08:59:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/25\/charges-under-sections-124-a-and-121-a-of-ipc-lodged-against-patidar-anamat-andolan-samiti-paas-convener-upheld\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/25\/charges-under-sections-124-a-and-121-a-of-ipc-lodged-against-patidar-anamat-andolan-samiti-paas-convener-upheld\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/25\/charges-under-sections-124-a-and-121-a-of-ipc-lodged-against-patidar-anamat-andolan-samiti-paas-convener-upheld\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Charges under Sections 124-A and 121-A of IPC lodged against Patidar Anamat Andolan Samiti (PAAS) Convener, upheld\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Charges under Sections 124-A and 121-A of IPC lodged against Patidar Anamat Andolan Samiti (PAAS) Convener, upheld | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/25\/charges-under-sections-124-a-and-121-a-of-ipc-lodged-against-patidar-anamat-andolan-samiti-paas-convener-upheld\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Charges under Sections 124-A and 121-A of IPC lodged against Patidar Anamat Andolan Samiti (PAAS) Convener, upheld","og_description":"Gujarat High Court:\u00a0Deciding on an application wherein the applicants have prayed for quashing of FIR filed against the applicant for commission of","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/25\/charges-under-sections-124-a-and-121-a-of-ipc-lodged-against-patidar-anamat-andolan-samiti-paas-convener-upheld\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-12-25T12:01:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-31T08:59:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/25\/charges-under-sections-124-a-and-121-a-of-ipc-lodged-against-patidar-anamat-andolan-samiti-paas-convener-upheld\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/25\/charges-under-sections-124-a-and-121-a-of-ipc-lodged-against-patidar-anamat-andolan-samiti-paas-convener-upheld\/","name":"Charges under Sections 124-A and 121-A of IPC lodged against Patidar Anamat Andolan Samiti (PAAS) Convener, upheld | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-12-25T12:01:15+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-31T08:59:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/25\/charges-under-sections-124-a-and-121-a-of-ipc-lodged-against-patidar-anamat-andolan-samiti-paas-convener-upheld\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/25\/charges-under-sections-124-a-and-121-a-of-ipc-lodged-against-patidar-anamat-andolan-samiti-paas-convener-upheld\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/25\/charges-under-sections-124-a-and-121-a-of-ipc-lodged-against-patidar-anamat-andolan-samiti-paas-convener-upheld\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Charges under Sections 124-A and 121-A of IPC lodged against Patidar Anamat Andolan Samiti (PAAS) Convener, upheld"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":204682,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/11\/02\/convict-under-section-354-a-ipc-and-section-8-pocso-acquitted-from-offence-under-section-450-ipc-as-former-not-punishable-with-imprisonment-of-life-bombay-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":30591,"position":0},"title":"Convict under Section 354-A IPC and Section 8 POCSO acquitted from offence under Section 450 IPC as former not punishable with imprisonment of life: Bombay HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"November 2, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: A Single judge Bench comprising of K.L. Wadane, J. partly allowed a criminal appeal filed against the judgment of the trial court whereby the appellant was convicted under Sections 450 and 354-A IPC along with Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2000.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":91311,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/12\/fir-to-be-quashed-under-section-482-crpc-if-allegations-are-absurd\/","url_meta":{"origin":30591,"position":1},"title":"FIR to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC, if allegations are absurd","author":"Saba","date":"December 12, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: While relying upon the decision of Supreme Court in Ramesh Rajagopal v.\u00a0Devi Polymers (P) Ltd., (2016) 6 SCC 310, the Single Bench of S.K. Awasthi, J. found that the allegations\u00a0made in FIR against applicants were absurd and thereby allowed their application seeking quashing of\u00a0FIR under Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":333302,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/17\/having-sexual-intercourse-naked-minor-amounts-sexual-harassment-punishable-under-pocso-kerala-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":30591,"position":2},"title":"Having sexual intercourse, being naked in front of minor amounts to sexual harassment, punishable under POCSO Act: Kerala High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court noted that accused 2 had abused and thrashed the minor victim and concluded that the offense falls under Section 323 of IPC in conjunction with Section 34 IPC.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278832,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/11\/30\/a-woman-can-be-held-guilty-for-committing-offence-under-section-354-ipc-bombay-court-convicts-a-woman-for-outraging-modesty-of-another-woman\/","url_meta":{"origin":30591,"position":3},"title":"A woman can be held guilty for committing offence under Section 354 IPC; Bombay Court convicts a woman for outraging modesty of another woman","author":"Editor","date":"November 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Metropolitan Magistrate, 70th Court, Mazgaon, Mumbai: In a case filed against the accused for offences punishable under Section 324, 354, 504, 509 of the Penal Code, 1860, M.V. Chavhan, J., acquitted the accused of the offences punishable under section 324, 504 and 509 of IPC and convicted of the offences\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Metropolitan Magistrate","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image41.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":216304,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/01\/mp-hc-in-absence-of-any-offence-punishable-under-companies-act-special-court-doesnt-have-jurisdiction-to-try-the-case-which-is-punishable-under-ipc\/","url_meta":{"origin":30591,"position":4},"title":"MP HC | In absence of any offence punishable under Companies Act, Special Court doesn&#8217;t have jurisdiction to try the case which is punishable under IPC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 1, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Madhya Pradesh High Court: S.K. Awasthi, J.\u00a0 dismissed the petition on the ground that trial court and not Special Court are competent to take cognizance when offences were made under the Penal Code, 1860. A petition was made under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":262203,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/22\/ap-hc-if-the-de-facto-complainant-feels-insulted-as-he-was-beaten-in-front-of-public-and-if-he-takes-a-hasty-decision-to-commit-suicide-will-the-accused-be-held-responsible-in-the-eyes-of-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":30591,"position":5},"title":"AP HC | If the de facto complainant feels insulted as he was beaten in front of public and if he takes a hasty decision to commit suicide; will the accused be held responsible in the eyes of law?","author":"Editor","date":"February 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Andhra Pradesh High Court: Cheekati Manavendranath Roy J. partly allowed the petition by quashing FIR for the offence punishable under Section 306 r\/w 116 IPC. The facts of the case are such that the petitioner is the sole accused in a case under Sections 323, 306 r\/w 116 Penal Code,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Andhra-Pradesh-High-Court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30591","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30591"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30591\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30591"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30591"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30591"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}