{"id":305669,"date":"2023-10-26T09:00:55","date_gmt":"2023-10-26T03:30:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=305669"},"modified":"2023-10-25T18:18:54","modified_gmt":"2023-10-25T12:48:54","slug":"disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/","title":{"rendered":"Disclosures in criminal matter cannot unreasonably step over right to privacy: Supreme Court acquits woman accused of killing newborn"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Supreme Court:<\/span> In a criminal appeal filed by the convict against the impugned judgment passed by the Chhattisgarh High Court, wherein the Court convicted the accused under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;), the division bench of Abhay S. Oka and <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sanjay Karol*<\/span>, JJ. while setting aside the impugned judgment, has observed that the High Court has confirmed the view of the Trial Court awarding life imprisonment without supplying any cogent reasons. Further, acquitted the convict of all charges and set her at liberty. Further, it said that although there is a requirement by law to disclose the aspects required to adjudicate in a criminal matter, such duty cannot unreasonably and unwarrantedly step over the fundamental right of privacy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The convict had relations with a co-villager, as a result of which she conceived a child. She, upon giving birth, allegedly killed this child and threw the corpse into a pond. After due investigation, the chargesheet was filed and eventually, the convict was charged with committing an offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Issues:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"list-style-type: disc;\">\n<li>\n<p>To what extent does the right to privacy, shield the matters concerning the personal life of a woman accused of committing a crime, particularly when the prosecution has failed to discharge its duty?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">To what extent are the rights or duties of the accused to explain the incriminating circumstances appearing against them in a statement under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519590\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">313<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;)?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the Courts below, in holding the convict guilty, primarily relied on the testimonies of eight independent witnesses, the testimony of the doctor, and the statement of the convict under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519590\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">313<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that awarding the punishment of life imprisonment requires due appreciation of evidence and cannot be awarded mechanically and in a perfunctory manner. The law requires that the High Court must, only after re-appreciation of evidence, confirm or overturn the findings of fact returned by the Trial Court.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, it said that the impugned judgment makes only general and sketchy observations, unlike the appreciation of evidence as is required by law, in respect of testimonies of the witnesses and other evidence. This approach cannot be appreciated, especially when the conviction rendered is for a serious offence, that is, Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561607\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">302<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After examining the witness testimonies, the Court said that none of these witnesses could prove, much less beyond a reasonable doubt, the prosecution case of the accused having thrown the child in the dabri after delivery or having caused the death.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that the convict in her defense, denied the accusation of having killed any child, much less the child in question. She states that the father of the child was in an endeavor to get rid of the child, forcibly tried to have her take some medicine. On her refusal, he pushed her into &#8216;Suraj ki dabri&#8217; leading to her miscarriage. Thus, she had not killed the child and was being falsely implicated.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Concerning the question that whether the convict has no right of privacy of not disclosing the prosecution or the Court as to what happened to her child which she was carrying in her womb, particularly when the prosecution failed to discharge the initial burden and onus of establishing the deceased, in any manner to be related to the convict, the Court said that Right to Privacy is regarded as one of the most crucial human rights in the contemporary day. The essence of a woman&#8217;s fundamental right to equality and privacy, regarding private matters of bodily and psychological integrity is the ability to make autonomous decisions about her own body and reproductive choices. It is entirely within the realm of privacy of a woman to decide whether or not to bear a child or abort her pregnancy within the framework of law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that it is apparent that the guilt has been placed on her without any solid foundation thereto, since no relationship of any nature whatsoever could be established between her, and the deceased child discovered in the dabri. The conclusion drawn is simply on the basis that the convict was a woman living alone and had been pregnant.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">As per the Court, thrusting upon a woman the guilt of having killed a child without any proper evidence, simply because she was living alone in the village, thereby connecting with one another two unrelated aspects; reinforces the cultural stereotypes and gendered identities which the Court has explicitly warned against.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Concerning the second issue, the Court said that the object of the Section is to enable the convict to explain to themselves any circumstances appearing in the evidence against them. This process benefits the accused and aids the Court in arriving at the final verdict.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Bench said that the process enshrined is not a matter of procedural formality but is based on the cardinal principle of natural justice, i.e., <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">audi alteram partem<\/span>. In such a statement, the accused may or may not admit involvement or any incriminating circumstance or may even offer an alternative version of events or interpretation. The accused may not be put to prejudice by any omission or inadequate questioning. The right to remain silent or any answer to a question which may be false shall not be used to his detriment, being the sole reason.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court said that this statement cannot form the sole basis of conviction and is neither a substantive nor a substitute piece of evidence. It does not discharge but reduces the prosecution&#8217;s burden of leading evidence to prove its case. They are to be used to examine the veracity of the prosecution&#8217;s case. This statement is to be read as a whole. One part cannot be read in isolation. Such a statement, as not on oath, does not qualify as a piece of evidence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001516771\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Evidence Act, 1872<\/a>; however, the inculpatory aspect as may be borne from the statement may be used to lend credence to the case of the prosecution.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Further, the Court said that the circumstances not put to the accused while rendering his statement under the Section are to be excluded from consideration, as no opportunity has been afforded to him to explain them The Court is obligated to put, in the form of questions, all incriminating circumstances to the accused so as to give him an opportunity to articulate his defence. The defence so articulated must be scrutinized and considered. Non-compliance with the Section may cause prejudice to the accused and may impede the process of arriving at a fair decision.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Bench said that is established that negative inferences cannot be drawn for a question or incriminating circumstance not put to an accused while making a statement under Section <doclink docname=\"Evidence Act, 1872\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"313\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">313<\/doclink> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726934\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a>. As pe the Court, her statement nowhere reflects an answer to a question concerning the particulars of the child that she was carrying but denied that the deceased was not the one recovered from the dabri. Although there is a requirement by law to disclose the aspects required to adjudicate in a criminal matter, such duty cannot unreasonably and unwarrantedly step over the fundamental right of privacy.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that none of the witnesses has seen the convict throwing the deceased child into the dabri; no conclusive proof, of any nature, of relationship had been put forth by the prosecution; no evidence has been led to cast doubt upon the version of the convict. The statement of the doctor is silent on the death of the deceased having occurred prior to or after birth, although in examination in chief, the doctor has deposed that the death of the deceased child was homicidal in nature; however, in the cross-examination, it is admitted that such fact does not form part of the record. Thus, it said there were gaps in the prosecution case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the Court disagreed with the Courts below, that the circumstances conclusively point to the guilt of the convict, and the conviction was entirely based on mere presumption, with the actual evidence on record failing to establish the prosecution case much less beyond reasonable doubt.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Indrakunwar v. State of Chhattisgarh, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/fPwbZXGE\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 1364<\/a>, decided on 19-10-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment Authored by: Justice Sanjay Karol<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"nZTXqNZ7Iv\"><p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/know-your-judge-supreme-court-judge-sanjay-karol-legal-news\/\">Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Sanjay Karol<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;Know Thy Judge | Supreme Court of India: Justice Sanjay Karol&#8221; &#8212; SCC Blog\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/23\/know-your-judge-supreme-court-judge-sanjay-karol-legal-news\/embed\/#?secret=GiuY8wiWvA#?secret=nZTXqNZ7Iv\" data-secret=\"nZTXqNZ7Iv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Thrusting upon a woman the guilt of having killed a child without any proper evidence, simply because she was living alone in the village, thereby connecting with one another two unrelated aspects; reinforces the cultural stereotypes and gendered identities which the Court has explicitly warned against.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":305672,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[4561,3468,9121,2568,9291,44762,3156,62256,38461,9871,62257,5363,61532],"class_list":["post-305669","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-supremecourt","tag-acquittal","tag-conviction","tag-cross-examination","tag-Evidence","tag-life-imprisonment","tag-miscarriage","tag-murder","tag-newborn","tag-proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt","tag-right-to-privacy","tag-section-313crpc","tag-supreme-court","tag-witness-testimony"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Disclosures in criminal matter cannot step over right to privacy: SC acquits woman accused of killing newborn | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Supreme Court acquits woman accused of killing newborn and held that disclosures in criminal matter cannot unreasonably step over right to privacy\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Disclosures in criminal matter cannot unreasonably step over right to privacy: Supreme Court acquits woman accused of killing newborn\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Supreme Court acquits woman accused of killing newborn and held that disclosures in criminal matter cannot unreasonably step over right to privacy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-26T03:30:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/MURDER-6.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Disclosures in criminal matter cannot unreasonably step over right to privacy: Supreme Court acquits woman accused of killing newborn\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/\",\"name\":\"Disclosures in criminal matter cannot step over right to privacy: SC acquits woman accused of killing newborn | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/MURDER-4.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-26T03:30:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Supreme Court acquits woman accused of killing newborn and held that disclosures in criminal matter cannot unreasonably step over right to privacy\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/MURDER-4.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/MURDER-4.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"MURDER (4)\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Disclosures in criminal matter cannot unreasonably step over right to privacy: Supreme Court acquits woman accused of killing newborn\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Disclosures in criminal matter cannot step over right to privacy: SC acquits woman accused of killing newborn | SCC Blog","description":"Supreme Court acquits woman accused of killing newborn and held that disclosures in criminal matter cannot unreasonably step over right to privacy","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Disclosures in criminal matter cannot unreasonably step over right to privacy: Supreme Court acquits woman accused of killing newborn","og_description":"Supreme Court acquits woman accused of killing newborn and held that disclosures in criminal matter cannot unreasonably step over right to privacy","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-10-26T03:30:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/MURDER-6.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Disclosures in criminal matter cannot unreasonably step over right to privacy: Supreme Court acquits woman accused of killing newborn","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/","name":"Disclosures in criminal matter cannot step over right to privacy: SC acquits woman accused of killing newborn | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/MURDER-4.webp","datePublished":"2023-10-26T03:30:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Supreme Court acquits woman accused of killing newborn and held that disclosures in criminal matter cannot unreasonably step over right to privacy","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/MURDER-4.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/MURDER-4.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"MURDER (4)"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/26\/disclosures-criminal-matter-cannot-unreasonably-step-over-right-of-privacy-supreme-court-acquits-woman-accused-killing-newborn\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Disclosures in criminal matter cannot unreasonably step over right to privacy: Supreme Court acquits woman accused of killing newborn"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/MURDER-4.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":273095,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/06\/murder-convict-sentence-reduced-to-that-already-undergoe-less-than-life-imprisonment-imperssible-supreme-court-legal-research-criminal-law-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":305669,"position":0},"title":"Explained| Can sentence of a murder convict be reduced to sentence already undergone which was less than life imprisonment?\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"September 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In a murder case, where the Madhya Pradesh High Court had reduced the sentence to sentence already undergone which was less than imprisonment for life, the bench of MR Shah* and Krishna Murari, JJ has held that such order is contrary to Section 302 IPC as there cannot\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Explained-Can-sentence-of-a-murder-convict-be-reduced-to-sentence-already-undergone-which-was-less-than-life-imprisonment-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Explained-Can-sentence-of-a-murder-convict-be-reduced-to-sentence-already-undergone-which-was-less-than-life-imprisonment-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Explained-Can-sentence-of-a-murder-convict-be-reduced-to-sentence-already-undergone-which-was-less-than-life-imprisonment-1.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Explained-Can-sentence-of-a-murder-convict-be-reduced-to-sentence-already-undergone-which-was-less-than-life-imprisonment-1.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Explained-Can-sentence-of-a-murder-convict-be-reduced-to-sentence-already-undergone-which-was-less-than-life-imprisonment-1.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287201,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/18\/supreme-court-remarks-judgment-by-chhattisgarh-high-court-as-sketchy-acquits-murder-convict-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":305669,"position":1},"title":"Supreme Court finds Chhattisgarh High Court&#8217;s judgment \u2018Sketchy\u2019; Acquits murder convict in a 20-year-old case","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court said that the cherished principles or golden threads of proof beyond reasonable doubt which runs through the web of our law should not be stretched morbidly which was done by the Courts below.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Sketchy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-783.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":345307,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/04\/07\/meghalaya-hc-allows-remission-of-murder-convict-life-sentence\/","url_meta":{"origin":305669,"position":2},"title":"\u2018Failed to seek report of Prison Superintendent; District Judge&#8217;s opinion reflected Trial Court\u2019s order\u2019; Meghalaya HC allows remission of murder convict&#8217;s life sentence","author":"Editor","date":"April 7, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"While passing the impugned remission decision, the Presiding Officer could not have relied on the opinion of the District Judge, and such impugned order was passed on a wrong premise.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Meghalaya High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Meghalaya-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301912,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/20\/court-cannot-convict-accused-acquit-other-when-similar-evidence-against-them-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":305669,"position":3},"title":"Court cannot convict one accused and acquit other when there is similar evidence against them: Supreme Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"September 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe Criminal Court should decide like cases alike, and in such cases, the Court cannot make a distinction between the two accused, which will amount to discrimination\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"similar evidence","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/similar-evidence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/similar-evidence.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/similar-evidence.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/similar-evidence.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":202007,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/09\/20\/evidentiary-value-duty-of-judge-sentencing-in-criminal-trial-discussed-and-reiterated-conviction-of-murder-convict-upheld-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":305669,"position":4},"title":"Evidentiary value, duty of Judge, sentencing in criminal trial discussed and reiterated; conviction of murder convict upheld: SC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 20, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Each criminal trial is but a quest for search of the truth. Supreme Court: The Bench comprising of Ranjan Gogoi, Navin Sinha and K.M. Joseph, JJ. disposed of a criminal appeal filed against the judgment of Delhi High Court whereby the order of the trial court acquitting the appellant was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":290102,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/20\/section-192-food-adulteration-act-protects-vendor-from-criminal-liability-if-food-item-is-purchased-with-warranty-from-manufacturer-sc-legal-research-legal-news-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":305669,"position":5},"title":"Written warranty from manufacturer can protect Vendor from criminal liability under Food Adulteration Act: SC","author":"Editor","date":"April 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 19(2)(a)(ii) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 provides that a vendor shall not be deemed to have committed an offence pertaining to the sale of any adulterated or misbranded article of food if he proves that he purchased the article of food from any manufacturer with a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"food adulteration act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/food-adulteration-act.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/food-adulteration-act.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/food-adulteration-act.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/food-adulteration-act.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305669","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=305669"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305669\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/305672"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=305669"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=305669"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=305669"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}