{"id":305636,"date":"2023-10-25T16:00:29","date_gmt":"2023-10-25T10:30:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=305636"},"modified":"2023-11-08T17:21:45","modified_gmt":"2023-11-08T11:51:45","slug":"nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Timelines are of great significance in IBC\u2019; NCLAT dismisses condonation of delay application"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">National Company Law Appellate Tribunal:<\/span> While deciding an application for condonation of delay, a 3-member bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson, Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member) and Mr. Arun Baroka (Technical Member) dismissed the application for condonation of delay and rejected the appeal due to the failure to file within the prescribed 30-day period.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, an application has been filed seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal against the impugned order dated 03-12-2020. The appellant (Operational Creditor) being aggrieved by the impugned order, filed the appeal on 01-09-2023. The appellant contended that the delay occurred because the appellant was unaware of the order until 31-07-2023, when they came to know about it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The NCLAT acknowledged that under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549797\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">61<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (IBC), an appeal must be filed within 30 days from the date of the order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The NCLAT referenced <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">V. Nagarajan<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">SKS Ispat &amp; Power Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/2SP188g9\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2022) 2 SCC 244<\/a>, where the Supreme Court highlighted the deliberate omission of the provision allowing appeals from the date when a copy of the order is made available to the aggrieved party in Section 61 of the TBC.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellant contended that the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">V. Nagarajan<\/span> (Supra) involved a situation where the party was present when the judgment was pronounced, whereas the appellant in this case was not present during the judgment and was not a party to the proceedings. The counsel relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Prowess International (P) Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Action Ispat &amp; Power (P) Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/9QDXenos\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2018 SCC OnLine NCLAT 644<\/a>, where the Tribunal allowed for appeals to be filed within 30 days from the date of knowledge of the order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">However, while acknowledging the appellant&#8217;s argument, the NCLAT held that they were bound by the precedent set in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">V. Nagarajan<\/span> (Supra) and therefore could not follow the judgment in <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Prowess International<\/span> (Supra).<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The NCLAT emphasized the importance of timelines in the IBC and stated that filing an appeal within 30 days from the date of the order is crucial for all concerned parties.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;In event, such contention is accepted, the resolution under the Code will become indefinite and uncertain, that is why timelines prescribed are important and for filing an appeal prescribed period is 30 days from the date of order.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While rejected appellant&#8217;s contention that the limitation period should commence only from the date when they became aware of the order, the NClAT held that the limitation period should begin from the date when the order was passed, and it should not depend on when the appellant became aware of the order.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Consequently, the NCLAT ruled that the inordinate delay in filing the appeal could not be condoned, and the condonation of delay application was dismissed. As a result, the Memo of Appeal was rejected as well.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corpn.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Reliance Infratel Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/x5ViB343\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine NCLAT 1416<\/a>, order dated 04-10-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Rahul Chitnis and Mr. Samrat K. Shinde, Counsel for the Appellant<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Limitation shall commence from the date when order is passed and shall not depend on the date when Appellant came to know of the order.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":293392,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[8991,2552,30361,31387,30182,22014],"class_list":["post-305636","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-appeal","tag-Condonation_of_delay","tag-ibc","tag-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>NCLAT dismisses condonation of delay application as timelines are important under IBC | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While dismissing application for condonation of delay, NCLAT held that timelines are of great significance in the IBC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Timelines are of great significance in IBC\u2019; NCLAT dismisses condonation of delay application\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While dismissing application for condonation of delay, NCLAT held that timelines are of great significance in the IBC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-25T10:30:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-08T11:51:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Timelines are of great significance in IBC\u2019; NCLAT dismisses condonation of delay application\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"NCLAT dismisses condonation of delay application as timelines are important under IBC | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-25T10:30:29+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-08T11:51:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"While dismissing application for condonation of delay, NCLAT held that timelines are of great significance in the IBC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"national company law appellate tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Timelines are of great significance in IBC\u2019; NCLAT dismisses condonation of delay application\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"NCLAT dismisses condonation of delay application as timelines are important under IBC | SCC Blog","description":"While dismissing application for condonation of delay, NCLAT held that timelines are of great significance in the IBC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Timelines are of great significance in IBC\u2019; NCLAT dismisses condonation of delay application","og_description":"While dismissing application for condonation of delay, NCLAT held that timelines are of great significance in the IBC.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-10-25T10:30:29+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-08T11:51:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Timelines are of great significance in IBC\u2019; NCLAT dismisses condonation of delay application","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/","name":"NCLAT dismisses condonation of delay application as timelines are important under IBC | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","datePublished":"2023-10-25T10:30:29+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-08T11:51:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"While dismissing application for condonation of delay, NCLAT held that timelines are of great significance in the IBC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"national company law appellate tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/nclat-dismisses-condonation-of-delay-application-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Timelines are of great significance in IBC\u2019; NCLAT dismisses condonation of delay application"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":295557,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/28\/nclat-condonation-of-delay-filing-claim-wrong-catergory-no-ground-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":305636,"position":0},"title":"[Condonation of Delay] Filing of claim under wrong category is not substantial ground for condoning delay: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"June 28, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT rejected an application seeking Condonation of Delay of 49 days (about 1 and a half months) on the ground of want of sufficient cause.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283000,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/03\/financial-creditor-nclt-corporate-detor-cirp-allowed-appeal-application-condonation-of-delay-nclat-ibc-override-limitation-act-tribunal-no-power-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":305636,"position":1},"title":"NCLAT | IBC overrides Limitation Act; Delay beyond period of 45 days cannot be condoned","author":"Editor","date":"February 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While adjudicating an appeal file with a delay of 55 days, the Tribunal held that S. 238 IBC overrides S. 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and therefore this Tribunal does not have power to condone a delay beyond a period of 45 days.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":288833,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/08\/nclt-section7-application-admitted-appeal-nclat-delay-beyond-45-days-lack-of-jurisdiction-ibc-section-61-precedent-scc-blog-legal-news-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":305636,"position":2},"title":"NCLAT cannot condone delay beyond 15 days in appeal due to lack of jurisdiction even if fraud has been played","author":"Ritu","date":"April 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal observed that as per S. 61(2) every appeal must be filed within 30 days before the Appellate Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal has the jurisdiction to extend the period of 15 days if it is satisfied that there is a sufficient cause for not filing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300573,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/02\/nclat-dismisses-appeal-due-to-delayed-defect-rectification-and-insufficient-justification-for-delay\/","url_meta":{"origin":305636,"position":3},"title":"NCLAT dismisses appeal due to delayed defect rectification and insufficient justification for delay","author":"Ritu","date":"September 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn application for condonation of delay in refiling of appeal, the applicant\/appellant has to give sufficient reason for not re-filing the appeal within the time prescribed.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":332718,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/09\/free-paid-certified-final-order-copy-nclt-condonation-of-delay-nclat-sc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":305636,"position":4},"title":"Condonation of delay by NCLAT | Free &amp; paid certified copy of final orders are on the same footing as per Rule 50 of NCLT Rules: SC","author":"Sucheta","date":"October 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Entry 31 of Schedule of Fees prescribed by the NCLT Rules stipulates that the fee for obtaining true certified copies of final orders passed to parties other than the concerned parties under Rule 50 shall be Rs 5 per page. The stipulation of Rupees five per page in Entry 31\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"free certified copy final order paid certified copy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/free-certified-copy-final-order-paid-certified-copy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/free-certified-copy-final-order-paid-certified-copy.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/free-certified-copy-final-order-paid-certified-copy.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/free-certified-copy-final-order-paid-certified-copy.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297687,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/26\/irp-rp-cannot-seek-unpaid-fees-costs-members-corporate-debtor-insolvency-nclat-scc-blog-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":305636,"position":5},"title":"In project wise insolvency, IRP\/RP cannot seek unpaid Fees\/Costs from members of CoCs of another project of Corporate Debtor: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"July 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT held that the appellant has no Locus Standi to make claim for any unpaid Fees\/Costs from the members of the CoCs, as he is neither the RP in the project nor is connected with another project.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305636","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=305636"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305636\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293392"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=305636"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=305636"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=305636"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}