{"id":305373,"date":"2023-10-20T18:30:10","date_gmt":"2023-10-20T13:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=305373"},"modified":"2023-12-22T17:05:37","modified_gmt":"2023-12-22T11:35:37","slug":"bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/","title":{"rendered":"Bail under PMLA-Presumed Guilty Until Proven Guilty"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The twin conditions<\/h4>\n

Can the presumption of innocence of an accused, which has been considered a human right and juxtaposed with the right to life guaranteed under Article 21<\/a> of the Constitution of India<\/a>,1<\/sup><\/a> be turned on its head by way of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002<\/a> (PMLA)?<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court is currently considering a review2<\/sup><\/a> of its decision in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>3<\/sup><\/a> (Vijay Madanlal Choudhary<\/span>) which had inter alia held Section 45 of the PMLA to be constitutional. Section 45 of the PMLA, which deals with conditions for bail pending trial, completely overlooks the general principle of criminal law i.e. an accused is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. Section 45 however provides that a court may grant bail to an accused if the court is satisfied that: (i<\/span>) there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is \u201cnot guilty of such offence\u201d; and (ii<\/span>) that the accused is \u201cnot likely to commit any offence while on bail\u201d (commonly referred to as the \u201ctwin conditions\u201d).<\/p>\n

A perusal of the above makes it manifest that the first of these conditions reverses the burden on the accused to demonstrate that he is \u201cnot guilty\u201d. As such, this burden placed on the accused is in direct conflict with the presumption of innocence.<\/p>\n

It is the view of the authors that while provisions similar to Section 45 are contained in other criminal legislations, such as those pertaining to drug trafficking and terrorism \u2014 the constitutional validity of provisions that limit the presumption of innocence and impinge upon the constitutional right to life and liberty in each legislation has to be examined and tested independently. The present article is accordingly limited to considering whether the twin conditions can be constitutionally sustained for offences committed within the PMLA.<\/p>\n

In Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case<\/span>4<\/sup><\/a>, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 45 by, inter alia, placing reliance on \u201cpurposes and objects of the PMLA\u201d and India\u2019s \u201ccommitments\u201d made to international bodies and their recommendations.<\/p>\n

With respect, such reliance, in specific relation to Section 45, requires reconsideration by the Supreme Court. No useful evidence of the rationale for the twin conditions for bail is found in the purposes and object of the PMLA. The twin conditions also do not find any mention in the recommendations of international bodies relevant to the issue of money laundering, such as the financial action task force (FATF), which had been relied on by the Union of India in its submissions in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case<\/span>5<\/sup><\/a>.<\/p>\n

To the contrary, the FATF itself acknowledges the presumption of innocence as a fundamental principle of domestic law and has acknowledged that its recommendations and standards are misapplied by jurisdictions, adversely impacting the right to a fair trial in money laundering cases.<\/p>\n

The 2017 decision of the Supreme Court in Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India<\/h4>\n

The constitutionality of the said twin conditions fell for the consideration of the Supreme Court in Nikesh Tarachand Shah<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>6<\/sup><\/a> (Nikesh Tarachand Shah<\/span>). In the said decision, the Supreme Court struck down Section 45 of the PMLA as being unconstitutional.<\/p>\n

Section 45, as it then was, prior to legislative amendments made in 2018, required the accused to demonstrate that he\/she was not guilty of the predicate\/\u201cscheduled offence\u201d. This was held to be manifestly arbitrary by the Supreme Court, since in a proceeding under the PMLA for the offence of money laundering, the bail provision required an accused to prove he\/she was not guilty of a completely different offence (i.e. the scheduled offence) and not the offence of money laundering under the PMLA.7<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

The Supreme Court further noted that Section 45 is a drastic provision that reverses the presumption of innocence of an accused, contrary to the fundamental right to life granted under Article 21<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a>.8<\/sup><\/a> The Supreme Court observed that while other statutes that contained provisions similar to Section 45 were shown to be furthering a compelling State interest for tackling serious crime \u2014 the Supreme Court was not convinced that the same compelling State interest existed with respect to offences under the PMLA.<\/p>\n

Therefore, in 2017, the Supreme Court recognised the primacy of the general rule of presumption of innocence and held that, as a general principle, the legislature cannot turn this presumption on its head by casting the burden on the accused to prove innocence at the stage of bail. Pertinently, though the Supreme Court recognised the power of the legislature to restrict the applicability of the general rule, it was clarified that this could only be done by demonstrating a \u201ccompelling State interest\u201d.<\/p>\n

Subsequent to the decision in Nikesh Tarachand Shah case<\/span>9<\/sup><\/a>, Parliament amended the PMLA in 2018 to remove certain specific defects noted by the Supreme Court. Section 45 no longer requires an accused to prove that he\/she is not guilty of the \u201cscheduled offence\u201d and instead requires the accused to demonstrate that he is not guilty of the offence of money laundering under the PMLA.<\/p>\n

The 2022 decision of the Supreme Court in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary v. Union of India<\/h4>\n

The constitutionality of the provisions of Section 45 of the PMLA was once again challenged before the Supreme Court in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case<\/span>10<\/sup><\/a>. In the said decision, a Bench of 3 Judges, held that Parliament had removed the defects noted in Nikesh Tarachand Shah case<\/span>11<\/sup><\/a> decision by way of amendments in 2018 and 2019.12<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

Submissions against the constitutional validity of the twin conditions<\/i><\/h4>\n

In Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case<\/span>13<\/sup><\/a>, it was argued by the petitioners that even after the amendments, the reversal of the presumption of innocence under Section 45 of the PMLA was arbitrary and in violation of various fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India<\/a>, particularly the right to life and liberty under Article 21.14<\/sup><\/a> It was further argued that the twin conditions under the PMLA can never be satisfied since an accused at the pre-trial stage of bail can never show that he is not guilty, thus amounting to disproportionate and excessive conditions for bail.15<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

The decision in Nikesh Tarachand Shah case<\/span>16<\/sup><\/a> was relied upon to submit that, apart from the two defects noticed in the said decision (which were held to be cured by subsequent amendments), the Supreme Court had also held that Section 45 had turned the presumption of innocence on its head, in violation of Article 21<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a>.17<\/sup><\/a> It was thus argued that Section 45 continued to remain unconstitutional on this ground even after the amendments.<\/p>\n

Submissions by the Union of India<\/i><\/h4>\n

Defending the constitutionality of the provisions of the PMLA, the Union of India argued that the Supreme Court must adjudge the constitutionality of various provisions of the PMLA \u201cfrom the standpoint of the country\u2019s obligations and evolving responsibilities internationally\u201d.18<\/sup><\/a> In this context, the Union of India relied on the international commitments and recommendations of international bodies, including those made by the Financial Action Task Force (\u2018FATF, an international body that reviews money laundering prevention measures in various countries.19<\/sup><\/a> It was submitted that the provisions in the PMLA had been made in compliance with the \u201cmandate of FATF\u201d and the Constitution<\/a>.20<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

In specific relation to Section 45, the Union of India argued that the \u201cstringent bail conditions\u201d under Section 45 were necessary \u201cto give effect to the international standards of preventing money laundering prescribed by FATF and other international treaties\u201d.21<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

Apart from the aforementioned arguments, there was no specific \u201ccompelling State interest\u201d justifying the existence of Section 45, that was demonstrated by the Union of India.22<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

Conclusions of the Supreme Court<\/i><\/h4>\n

The Supreme Court, disagreed with the observations in the decision in Nikesh Tarachand Shah case<\/span>23<\/sup><\/a> to the effect that the offences under the PMLA were not shown to be furthering a compelling State interest in tackling serious crime. In this regard, in its conclusions regarding the constitutional validity of Section 45, the Supreme Court observed that:<\/p>\n

395.<\/span> \u2026 we do not agree with the observations suggestive of that (sic) the offence of money laundering is less heinous offence than the offence of terrorism sought to be tackled under the TADA Act [Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987<\/a>] or that there is no compelling State interest in tackling offence of money laundering. The international bodies have been discussing the menace of money laundering on regular basis for quite some time; and strongly recommended enactment of stringent legislation<\/span> for prevention of money laundering and combating with the menace thereof including to prosecute the offenders and for attachment and confiscation of the proceeds of crime having direct impact on the financial systems and sovereignty and integrity of the countries. That concern has been duly noted even in the opening part of the introduction and Statement of Objects and Reasons, for which the 2002 Act came into being.24<\/sup><\/a> (emphasis supplied)<\/p>\n

Further to the above, the Supreme Court in upholding the constitutional validity of the \u201ctwin conditions\u201d placed substantial reliance on the purposes and objects of the PMLA and recommendations of the FATF and India\u2019s international obligations. In this regard, the Supreme Court held as follows:<\/p>\n

387.<\/span> \u2026 The twin conditions are that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of offence of money laundering and that he is notlikely to commit any offence while on bail. Considering the purposes and objects of the legislation in the form of 2002 Act and the background in which it had been enacted owing to the commitment made to the international bodies and on their recommendations<\/span>, it is plainly clear that it is a special legislation to deal with the subject of money-laundering activities having transnational impact on the financial systems including sovereignty and integrity of the countries. This is not an ordinary offence\u2026.<\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

405.<\/span> \u2026 Instead, we hold that the provision in the form of Section 45 of the 2002 Act, as applicable post-amendment of 2018, is reasonable and has direct nexus with the purposes and objects sought to be achieved by the 2002 Act to combat the menace of money laundering having transnational consequences including impacting the financial systems and sovereignty and integrity of the countries.25<\/sup><\/a> (emphasis supplied)<\/p>\n

No basis to justify the reversal of presumption of innocence<\/h4>\n

A perusal of Preamble to the PMLA, the Statement of Objects and Reasons to the PMLA, the legislative assembly debates, as well as the FATF recommendations extracted in the decision in Vijay Madanlal case<\/span>26<\/sup><\/a>, make it apparent that there were no comments or observations in specific relation to the harsh bail conditions imposed under Section 45 of the PMLA.<\/p>\n

In fact, in parliamentary debates, questions regarding the harshness of Section 45 were raised and appear to have remained unanswered.27<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

It is true that Parliament did consider the FATF recommendations while making amendments to the PMLA.28<\/sup><\/a> However, the FATF recommendations extracted in Vijay Madanlal judgment<\/span>29<\/sup><\/a> did not contain any specific recommendations by the FATF in relation to (i<\/span>) twin conditions; (ii<\/span>) requirements for harsh bail conditions pending trial; or (iii<\/span>) dilution of the general presumption of innocence. In the absence of any such recommendations, it cannot be said that any specific international commitments have been made by India that justify the twin conditions introduced in Section 45 of the PMLA.<\/p>\n

FATF comments and other international obligations reiterating the presumption of innocence<\/h4>\n

On the other hand, India is party to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)30<\/sup><\/a> and international treaties such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)31<\/sup><\/a>, which specifically contain protections for persons being prosecuted in criminal proceedings. Article 14 of the ICCPR (similar to Article 11 of the UDHR) clearly provides that any accused person in a criminal offence \u201cshall have the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law\u201d.<\/p>\n

Pertinently, while India ratified the ICCPR in 1979, it raised certain reservations on certain articles contained in the ICCPR but did not make any such reservation under Article 14, which guarantees a right to presumption of innocence to accused persons.32<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

In the context of obligations under international human rights treaties, the FATF has itself noted that \u201c\u2026 as a matter of principle, complying with the FATF Recommendations should not contravene a country\u2019s obligations under \u2026 international human rights law\u2026.\u201d33<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

Moreover, in a note titled the \u201cUnintended Consequences of the FATF Standards\u201d, the FATF has in fact admitted that it has \u201cnot systematically studied\u201d the curtailment of human rights, especially due process and procedural rights such as the right to a fair trial. It has further acknowledged that countries have misapplied FATF Standards.34<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

Most importantly, the FATF has itself acknowledged misapplication of FATF Standards by some States contrary to the \u201cpresumption of innocence and a person\u2019s right to effective protection by the courts\u201d.35<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

Evidently, far from having made any recommendation supporting the application of harsh conditions for bail under Section 45 reversing the presumption of innocence, the FATF has categorically stated that: (i<\/span>) neither has it systematically studied the curtailment of human rights as a result of its recommendations; and (ii<\/span>) nor do the FATF Standards require any departure from human rights obligations such as the presumption of innocence.36<\/sup><\/a> Pertinently, legislations dealing with money laundering in other jurisdictions that are treated as FATF compliant countries, such as the United Kingdom and the United States of America, also does not appear to contain a harsh bail provision reversing the presumption of innocence, such as that provided under Section 45 of the PMLA.<\/p>\n

Therefore, no useful reliance could have been placed on the FATF Recommendations to specifically justify the stringent twin conditions for bail under Section 45.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h4>\n

In the respectful view of the authors, neither do the \u201cpurposes and objects\u201d of the PMLA, nor do the international commitments of India, mandate such excessively rigorous conditions as provided in the twin conditions. As such the rationale for upholding the constitutionality of Section 45 as stated in the decision in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case<\/span>37<\/sup><\/a> may require reconsideration by the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u2020Partner. Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2020\u2020Partner. Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2020\u2020\u2020Senior Associate. Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

1.<\/a> Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma<\/span> v. State of Maharashtra<\/span>, (2005) 5 SCC 294: \u201cPresumption of innocence is a human right. Art. 21 in view of its expansive meaning not only protects life and liberty, but also envisages a fair procedure.\u201d<\/p>\n

2.<\/a> Order dated 25-08-2022 in R.P(Crl.) No. 219 of 2022.<\/p>\n

3.<\/a> 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>.<\/p>\n

4.<\/a> 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>.<\/p>\n

5.<\/a> 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>.<\/p>\n

6.<\/a> (2018) 11 SCC 1<\/a><\/p>\n

7.<\/a> Nikesh Tarachand Shah case<\/span>, (2018) 11 SCC 1<\/a>, para 35.<\/p>\n

8.<\/a> Nikesh Tarachand Shah case<\/span>, (2018) 11 SCC 1<\/a>, para 46: \u201cWe must not forget that S. 45<\/a> is a drastic provision which turns on its head the presumption of innocence which is fundamental to a person accused of any offence. Before application of a section which makes drastic inroads into the fundamental right of personal liberty guaranteed by Art. 21<\/a> of the Constitution of India<\/a>, we must be doubly sure that such provision furthers a compelling State interest for tackling serious crime.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

9.<\/a> (2018) 11 SCC 1<\/a>.<\/p>\n

10.<\/a> 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>.<\/p>\n

11.<\/a> (2018) 11 SCC 1<\/a>.<\/p>\n

12.<\/a> Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>, para 380.<\/p>\n

13.<\/a> 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>.<\/p>\n

14.<\/a> Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>, paras 31, 34 and 52<\/p>\n

15.<\/a> Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>, para 45.<\/p>\n

16.<\/a> (2018) 11 SCC 1<\/a>.<\/p>\n

17.<\/a> Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>, para 71.<\/p>\n

18.<\/a> Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>, para 110.<\/p>\n

19.<\/a> Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>, para 87 onwards.<\/p>\n

20.<\/a> Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>, para 112.<\/p>\n

21.<\/a> Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>, paras 147 and 148.<\/p>\n

22.<\/a> In Bachan Singh<\/span> v. State of Punjab<\/span>, (1982) 3 SCC 24<\/a>, para 34, the Supreme Court held that the burden to demonstrate the existence of such interest lies on the State. J. Chellameswar, in his concurring opinion in K.S. Puttaswamy<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>, (2017) 10 SCC 1<\/a>, at para 378, described the test of \u201ccompelling State interest\u201d as an \u201camorphous standard\u201d which involves the highest level of scrutiny that a court can adopt i.e. \u201cdepending on the graveness of the right at stake, the court adopts a correspondingly rigorous standard of scrutiny\u201d.<\/p>\n

23.<\/a> (2018) 11 SCC 1<\/a>.<\/p>\n

24.<\/a> Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>.<\/p>\n

25.<\/a> Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>.<\/p>\n

26.<\/a> 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>.<\/p>\n

27.<\/a> Statement dated 25-7-2002 of Mr H.K.J. Gowda, Member of the Rajya Sabha in parliamentary debates on the Prevention of Money Laundering Bill, 1999: \u201cAs far as Cl. 45, for bail, is concerned, yes, much discussion is going on POTA. The application of POTA in a particular case has been interpreted by a number of people in their own way. But, the Home Minister of this country has not interpreted it, not interfered with it, because, it appears, after seeing all the aspects of the matter involved in it and the definition of the sections in it, he has, not at all, opened his lips<\/span>.\u201d (Available at <https:\/\/rsdebate.nic.in\/bitstream\/123456789\/100942\/1\/PD_196_25072002_9_p237_p288_21.pdf<\/a>>.)<\/p>\n

See<\/span> also statement dated 25-7-2002 of Mr Kapil Sibal, Member of the Rajya Sabha in parliamentary debates on the Prevention of Money Laundering Bill, 1999: \u201cNow under the Prevention of Corruption Act, I can get bail, under the normal law. If both these Acts are taken together, then, under S. 45, I won’t even get bail. This is why when the Government is in opposition, it opposes such laws, and when opposition is in Government, it wants such laws, because, ultimately, these very laws are used for certain other purposes, and we have seen it, time and again, that in this country it happens.\u201d (Available at <https:\/\/rsdebate.nic.in\/bitstream\/123456789\/100942\/1\/PD_196_25072002_9_p237_p288_21.pdf<\/a> >.)<\/p>\n

28.<\/a> Vijay Madanlal Choudhary case<\/span>, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>, para 257: \u201cToday, as we will see, many of the amendments in the 2002 Act are in response to the recommendations of the FATF. Thereafter, forty recommendations dated 20-6-2003, were made by the FATF which had led to much deliberations go on to show that all endeavours were to be Vienna and Palermo Conventions compliant. During the evolution of the jurisprudence on money laundering, it was found that India was in fact lacking in some aspects of curbing money laundering. Hence, the recommendations were made to India time and again.\u201d<\/p>\n

29.<\/a> 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>.<\/p>\n

30.<\/a> Universal Declaration of Human Rights <https:\/\/www.un.org\/sites\/un2.un.org\/files\/2021\/03\/udhr.pdf<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

31.<\/a> International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights <https:\/\/www.ohchr.org\/sites\/default\/files\/ccpr.pdf<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

32.<\/a> Human Rights Committee <https:\/\/pmindiaun.gov.in\/pageinfo\/ODY3<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

33.<\/a> FATF, Best Practices Paper on Combating the Abuse of Non-Profit Organisations \u2014 Recommendation 8, Para 22 (June 2015) Available at <https:\/\/www.fatf-gafi.org\/content\/dam\/fatf-gafi\/guidance\/BPP-combating-abuse-non-profit-organisations.pdf<\/a> >.<\/p>\n

34.<\/a> FATF, High-Level Synopsis of the Stocktake of the Unintended Consequences of the FATF Standards, (October 2021) p. 5: \u201cThe FATF has not previously systematically studied this issue. Situations have arisen in the course of FATF evaluations concerning the interaction between the FATF Recommendations on combating TF (particularly R.5 and R.6) and due process and procedural rights (e.g. to legal representation, fair trial, and to challenge designations, etc.), which have been considered on a case-by-case approach as they arise in specific country contexts. In addition, the FATF has also been made aware of instances of the misapplication of the FATF Standards, which are allegedly introduced by jurisdictions to address AML\/CFT deficiencies identified through the FATF\u2019s mutual evaluation or ICRG process, potentially as an excuse measures with another motivation.\u201d Available at <https:\/\/www.fatf-gafi.org\/content\/dam\/fatf-gafi\/reports\/Unintended-Consequences.pdf<\/a> >.<\/p>\n

35.<\/a> FATF, High-Level Synopsis of the Stocktake of the Unintended Consequences of the FATF Standards, (October 2021) p. 6, Available at <https:\/\/www.fatf-gafi.org\/content\/dam\/fatf-gafi\/reports\/Unintended-Consequences.pdf<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

36.<\/a> FATF, Guidance on Criminalising Terrorist Financing (October 2016) p. 23: Even in its guidance note on Criminalising Terrorist Financing, the FATF recognises that \u201cFundamental principles of domestic law\u201d may even allow countries to avoid subjecting \u201clegal persons\u201d to criminal prosecution for terrorist financing. Available at <https:\/\/www.fatf-gafi.org\/en\/publications\/Fatfrecommendations\/Criminalising-terrorist-financing.html<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

The FATF standards define the \u201cpresumption of innocence\u201d as one such \u201cfundamental principle of domestic law\u201d: The FATF Recommendations \u201cInternational Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation\u201d (2012), Glossary, p. 128, Available at <https:\/\/www.fatf-gafi.org\/content\/dam\/fatf-gafi\/recommendations\/FATF%20Recommendations%202012.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf<\/a>>.<\/p>\n

37.<\/a> 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Aashish Gupta\u2020, Aditya Mukherjee\u2020\u2020 and Puneeth Ganapathy\u2020\u2020\u2020
\nCite as: 2023 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 77<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8808,"featured_media":305374,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[20271,46698],"tags":[7601,62114,38500,62113,34084,62111,50541,42597,32860,62112],"class_list":["post-305373","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-experts_corner","category-shardul-amarchand-mangaldas","tag-constitution-of-india","tag-fatf","tag-financial-action-task-force","tag-not-guilty","tag-pmla","tag-pmla-presumed-guilty","tag-twin-conditions","tag-udhr","tag-universal-declaration-of-human-rights","tag-until-proven-guilty"],"yoast_head":"\nBail under PMLA-Presumed Guilty Until Proven Guilty | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Can the presumption of innocence of an accused, which has been considered a human right and juxtaposed with the right to life guaranteed\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bail under PMLA-Presumed Guilty Until Proven Guilty\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Can the presumption of innocence of an accused, which has been considered a human right and juxtaposed with the right to life guaranteed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-20T13:00:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-12-22T11:35:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PMLA-Presumed-Guilty.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bail under PMLA-Presumed Guilty Until Proven Guilty\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Bhumika Indulia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"15 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/\",\"name\":\"Bail under PMLA-Presumed Guilty Until Proven Guilty | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PMLA-Presumed-Guilty.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-20T13:00:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-12-22T11:35:37+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\"},\"description\":\"Can the presumption of innocence of an accused, which has been considered a human right and juxtaposed with the right to life guaranteed\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PMLA-Presumed-Guilty.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PMLA-Presumed-Guilty.jpg\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"Bail under PMLA-Presumed Guilty Until Proven Guilty\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bail under PMLA-Presumed Guilty Until Proven Guilty\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a\",\"name\":\"Bhumika Indulia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Bhumika Indulia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bail under PMLA-Presumed Guilty Until Proven Guilty | SCC Times","description":"Can the presumption of innocence of an accused, which has been considered a human right and juxtaposed with the right to life guaranteed","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bail under PMLA-Presumed Guilty Until Proven Guilty","og_description":"Can the presumption of innocence of an accused, which has been considered a human right and juxtaposed with the right to life guaranteed","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-10-20T13:00:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-12-22T11:35:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PMLA-Presumed-Guilty.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Bhumika Indulia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bail under PMLA-Presumed Guilty Until Proven Guilty","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Bhumika Indulia","Est. reading time":"15 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/","name":"Bail under PMLA-Presumed Guilty Until Proven Guilty | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PMLA-Presumed-Guilty.jpg","datePublished":"2023-10-20T13:00:10+00:00","dateModified":"2023-12-22T11:35:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a"},"description":"Can the presumption of innocence of an accused, which has been considered a human right and juxtaposed with the right to life guaranteed","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PMLA-Presumed-Guilty.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PMLA-Presumed-Guilty.jpg","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"Bail under PMLA-Presumed Guilty Until Proven Guilty"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/20\/bail-under-pmla-presumed-guilty-until-proven-guilty\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bail under PMLA-Presumed Guilty Until Proven Guilty"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/919ec47cc1b871b362af05740398033a","name":"Bhumika Indulia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Me-150x150.jpg","caption":"Bhumika Indulia"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_1\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/PMLA-Presumed-Guilty.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":250872,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/07\/controversial-rule-of-jail-under-the-prevention-of-money-laundering-act-2002\/","url_meta":{"origin":305373,"position":0},"title":"Controversial Rule of Jail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Kapil Madan\u2020 and Saurabh Gauba\u2020\u2020 Cite as: 2021 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 56","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-71.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-71.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-71.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-71.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/MicrosoftTeams-image-71.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":252053,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/30\/naresh-jain-and-bimal-jain-bail-application\/","url_meta":{"origin":305373,"position":1},"title":"Del HC | Does a provision after being declared unconstitutional, gets repealed or wiped out from statute book? HC answers","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Yogesh Khanna, J., remarked that, Once the Parliament steps in and cures the defect pointed out by a Constitutional Court, the defect appears to be cured and the presumption of constitutionality is to apply to such provision. Instant petitions were for grant of bail to the applicants.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":265743,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/04\/22\/for-money-launderers-jail-is-the-rule-and-bail-is-an-exception-allahabad-high-court-pmla\/","url_meta":{"origin":305373,"position":2},"title":"For money launderers \u201cjail is the rule and bail is an exception\u201d: All HC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"April 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: While addressing a matter with regard to anticipatory bail, Krishan Pahal, J., observed that, Money Laundering being an offence is economic threat to national interest and is committed by the white-collar offenders who are deeply rooted in society and cannot be traced out easily. An anticipatory bail\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_4.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_4.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_4.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_4.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/All-HC-Lko-Bench_4.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":275021,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/10\/05\/rigours-of-section-45-of-prevention-of-money-laundering-act-2002-will-not-apply-where-a-prosecution-complaint-has-been-filed-without-arrest\/","url_meta":{"origin":305373,"position":3},"title":"Rigours of Section 45 of Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 will not apply where a Prosecution Complaint has been filed without Arrest","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"by Rohan Wadhwa\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Rigours-of-Section-45-of-Prevention-of-Money-Laundering-Act-2002-will-not-apply-where-a-Prosecution-Complaint-has-been-filed-without-Arrest-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Rigours-of-Section-45-of-Prevention-of-Money-Laundering-Act-2002-will-not-apply-where-a-Prosecution-Complaint-has-been-filed-without-Arrest-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Rigours-of-Section-45-of-Prevention-of-Money-Laundering-Act-2002-will-not-apply-where-a-Prosecution-Complaint-has-been-filed-without-Arrest-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Rigours-of-Section-45-of-Prevention-of-Money-Laundering-Act-2002-will-not-apply-where-a-Prosecution-Complaint-has-been-filed-without-Arrest-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Rigours-of-Section-45-of-Prevention-of-Money-Laundering-Act-2002-will-not-apply-where-a-Prosecution-Complaint-has-been-filed-without-Arrest-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":230416,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/06\/04\/reverse-burden-of-proof-under-section-24-of-the-prevention-of-money-laundering-act-2002-obligation-of-the-prosecution-and-the-accused-and-at-what-stage-can-this-provision-be-invoked\/","url_meta":{"origin":305373,"position":4},"title":"Reverse Burden of Proof under Section 24 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002– Obligation of the prosecution and the accused and at what stage can this provision be invoked","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"June 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Madhav Khurana & Vignaraj Pasayat*","rel":"","context":"In "Op Eds"","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Money-Laundering.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Money-Laundering.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Money-Laundering.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Money-Laundering.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Money-Laundering.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263034,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/04\/yes-bank-loan-fraud-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":305373,"position":5},"title":"[Yes Bank Loan Fraud] Public money under garb of Term loan siphoned off, resulting in generation of \u2018proceeds of crime\u2019 as well as its layering and ultimate projection as untainted money: Del HC while denying bail to Gautam Thapar","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 4, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While addressing a matter wherein bail of Gautam Thapar accused in Yes Bank Loan Fraud case, was sought, Manoj Kumar Ohri, J., expressed that it is well settled that, economic offences constitute a class apart and need to be visited with a different approach, given their severity\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Delhi_New-logo.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305373","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8808"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=305373"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305373\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/305374"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=305373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=305373"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=305373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}