{"id":305147,"date":"2023-10-18T14:30:06","date_gmt":"2023-10-18T09:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=305147"},"modified":"2023-10-26T09:52:53","modified_gmt":"2023-10-26T04:22:53","slug":"decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/","title":{"rendered":"Explained | Allahabad High Court\u2019s verdict on burden of proving claim for tax concession"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Allahabad High Court:<\/span> In a sales tax revision filed against the judgment and order dated 26-05-2022 passed by Commercial Tax Tribunal for the assessment year 2013 — 2014, Piyush Agrawal, J. while dismissing the revision, has held that the burden to prove that concession is upon the assessee in original proceedings. However, in reassessment proceedings, the burden shifts upon the department to prove that the assessee had wrongly claimed the concession.<\/p>\n

Facts:<\/p>\n

The applicant made central sale amounting to Rs. 5,43,43,928\/- of Form C. The revisionist made central sale to Yash Traders and claimed concession rate on the strength of Form C. The said claim was stated to be covered by 23 invoices to the tune of Rs. 2,11,47,201\/-. The Assessing Authority, at the time of framing the assessment order, sought a verification of the said form from sale tax authorities at Rajasthan, to which a report was submitted, that only one transaction for a sum of Rs. 2,75,094\/. has been disclosed by the purchasing dealer. On getting the said information, the Assessing Authority, while passing the assessment order dated 19-01-2019, accepted the one sale made to the said party and granted concession, but imposed higher rate of tax on other 22 sales. Aggrieved against the said order, the applicant preferred to appeal to the Tribunal, which has dismissed vide order dated 26-05-2022. Hence, this revision was filed.<\/p>\n

Issue:<\/p>\n

Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in giving benefit of central sale against Form C amounting to Rs. 2,75,094\/- instead of Rs. 2,11,47,201\/- received from Yash Traders, mentioning the utilization of list of 23 sales invoices on the back of Form C?<\/p>\n

Analysis:<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the sales have been disclosed by the revisionist through 23 invoices for a sum of Rs. 2,11,47,201\/- to Yash Traders, for which Form C has been submitted, but on verification from the corresponding State (Rajasthan), the information was given that the purchasing dealer has only shown purchase against one invoice dated 12-12-2013 for a sum of Rs. 2,75,049\/-. The benefit of concession has been given to the revisionist for the said invoice. So far as the other 22 invoices are concerned, the same have been disbelieved.<\/p>\n

The Court further noted that the present proceeding is an original proceeding, that is the revisionist is claiming concession rate on the strength of Form C. Further, it said that once the corresponding State authority has sent information that only one purchase made by the purchasing dealer could be verified, the benefit of other purchases as alleged to be made by the revisionist against the said Form C cannot be granted.<\/p>\n

The Court referred to ITC Ltd.<\/span> v. CCE<\/span>, (2004) 7 SCC 591<\/a>, wherein it was held that the Assessing Authority is competent to scrutinize the certificate to find out the contents to be genuine and is competent to inquire about the contents of the certificate to satisfy itself that the goods purchased are verifiable. Once the truth of declaration on verification was not found to be correct, the benefit cannot be granted.<\/p>\n

Thus, the Court held that the revisionist has failed to discharge its burden by any cogent material.<\/p>\n

[Amrit Steels v Commissioner Commercial Tax, 2023 SCC OnLine All 2002<\/a>, Order dated 04-10-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Allahabad High Court said that once the corresponding State authority has sent information that only one purchase made by the purchasing dealer could be verified, the benefit of other purchases as alleged to be made by the revisionist against Form C cannot be granted.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67512,"featured_media":290504,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2822,32671,62017,62018],"class_list":["post-305147","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Allahabad_High_Court","tag-burden-to-prove","tag-claim-for-tax-concession","tag-reassessment-proceedings"],"yoast_head":"\nDecoding Allahabad High Court verdict burden of proving claim for tax concession | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Allahabd High Court held that burden to prove that concession has been rightly claimed is upon assessee in original proceedings but, in reassessment proceedings its on department\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Explained | Allahabad High Court\u2019s verdict on burden of proving claim for tax concession\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Allahabd High Court held that burden to prove that concession has been rightly claimed is upon assessee in original proceedings but, in reassessment proceedings its on department\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-18T09:00:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-10-26T04:22:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Explained | Allahabad High Court\u2019s verdict on burden of proving claim for tax concession\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Apoorva\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/18\\\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/18\\\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"headline\":\"Explained | Allahabad High Court\u2019s verdict on burden of proving claim for tax concession\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-18T09:00:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-10-26T04:22:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/18\\\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":548,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/18\\\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/allahabad-high-court.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Allahabad High Court\",\"Burden to Prove\",\"claim for tax concession\",\"reassessment proceedings\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Briefs\",\"High Courts\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/18\\\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/18\\\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/18\\\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\\\/\",\"name\":\"Decoding Allahabad High Court verdict burden of proving claim for tax concession | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/18\\\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/18\\\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/allahabad-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-18T09:00:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-10-26T04:22:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\"},\"description\":\"Allahabd High Court held that burden to prove that concession has been rightly claimed is upon assessee in original proceedings but, in reassessment proceedings its on department\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/18\\\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/18\\\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/18\\\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/allahabad-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/allahabad-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"allahabad high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/18\\\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Explained | Allahabad High Court\u2019s verdict on burden of proving claim for tax concession\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9\",\"name\":\"Apoorva\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Apoorva\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.scconline.com\\\/blog\\\/post\\\/author\\\/scc-editor\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Decoding Allahabad High Court verdict burden of proving claim for tax concession | SCC Blog","description":"Allahabd High Court held that burden to prove that concession has been rightly claimed is upon assessee in original proceedings but, in reassessment proceedings its on department","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Explained | Allahabad High Court\u2019s verdict on burden of proving claim for tax concession","og_description":"Allahabd High Court held that burden to prove that concession has been rightly claimed is upon assessee in original proceedings but, in reassessment proceedings its on department","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-10-18T09:00:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-10-26T04:22:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Apoorva","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Explained | Allahabad High Court\u2019s verdict on burden of proving claim for tax concession","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Apoorva","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/"},"author":{"name":"Apoorva","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"headline":"Explained | Allahabad High Court\u2019s verdict on burden of proving claim for tax concession","datePublished":"2023-10-18T09:00:06+00:00","dateModified":"2023-10-26T04:22:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/"},"wordCount":548,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp","keywords":["Allahabad High Court","Burden to Prove","claim for tax concession","reassessment proceedings"],"articleSection":["Case Briefs","High Courts"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/","name":"Decoding Allahabad High Court verdict burden of proving claim for tax concession | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-10-18T09:00:06+00:00","dateModified":"2023-10-26T04:22:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9"},"description":"Allahabd High Court held that burden to prove that concession has been rightly claimed is upon assessee in original proceedings but, in reassessment proceedings its on department","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"allahabad high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/decoding-allahabad-high-court-verdict-burden-of-proving-claim-for-tax-concession\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Explained | Allahabad High Court\u2019s verdict on burden of proving claim for tax concession"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/288d814d0864b57168e08daa1940a1c9","name":"Apoorva","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/549edb3ed2c7046a0c504583cf71db32c50251c1260a6331b2cc2973e80b0e91?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Apoorva"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/allahabad-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":233507,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/08\/07\/delhi-hc-sets-up-new-arbitral-proceedings-in-the-compensation-dispute-between-gmr-and-nhai\/","url_meta":{"origin":305147,"position":0},"title":"Delhi HC sets up new arbitral proceedings in the compensation dispute between GMR and NHAI","author":"Editor","date":"August 7, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: C. Hari Shankar, J., addressed three different petitions between the same parties arising out of the award passed by Arbitral Tribunal, out of which, first petition was rejected, the second was passed and third stayed. GMR and NHAI were under a concession agreement to build a six-lane,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":352572,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/06\/latest-cases-income-tax-laws-reported-in-itr\/","url_meta":{"origin":305147,"position":1},"title":"Cases Reported in ITR| Latest Cases on Income Tax Laws","author":"Shikha","date":"July 6, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore the latest cases reported in Income Tax Reports (ITR) Volume on Return of Income, Royalty, Exemptions, Investment business, Reassessment, Appeal and much more.","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Latest Cases on Income Tax Laws","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Latest-Cases-on-Income-Tax-Laws.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Latest-Cases-on-Income-Tax-Laws.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Latest-Cases-on-Income-Tax-Laws.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Latest-Cases-on-Income-Tax-Laws.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":247587,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/04\/24\/itat-assessment-officer-cant-mechanically-act-on-incomplete-and-incorrect-facts-and-reopen-a-case-without-consulting-the-assessment-records\/","url_meta":{"origin":305147,"position":2},"title":"ITAT| Assessment Officer can’t “mechanically” act on incomplete and incorrect facts and reopen a case without consulting the assessment records","author":"Editor","date":"April 24, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"by Akshat Malpani\u2020","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Income Tax Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/ITAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":354971,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/30\/latest-cases-income-tax-laws-itr-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":305147,"position":3},"title":"Cases Reported in ITR | Latest Cases on Income Tax Laws","author":"Shikha","date":"July 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Explore the latest cases reported in SCC\u2019s Income Tax Reports (ITR) Volume on Charitable purpose, Exemptions, Revision, Deductions, Search and Seizure, Appeal, Reassessment, Business expenditure, Penalty proceedings and much more.","rel":"","context":"In "Cases Reported"","block_context":{"text":"Cases Reported","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casesreported\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Latest Cases on Income Tax Laws","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Latest-Cases-on-Income-Tax-Laws-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Latest-Cases-on-Income-Tax-Laws-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Latest-Cases-on-Income-Tax-Laws-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Latest-Cases-on-Income-Tax-Laws-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":266464,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/05\/reassessment-notices-90000-section-148a-income-tax-act-revenue-supreme-court-judgments-legal-news-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":305147,"position":4},"title":"Over 90, 000 Reassessment Notices issued after April 1, 2021 saved as Supreme Court directs them to be treated as notices under Section 148A of Income Tax Act\u00a0","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"May 5, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: The bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has modified the order passed by the Allahabad High Court wherein it had quashed several reassessment notices issued by the Revenue, issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the ground that the same are bad\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-155.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-155.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-155.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-155.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/MicrosoftTeams-image-155.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":256834,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/11\/08\/common-parlance-test-marketability-test-are-tools-for-interpretation-to-arrive-at-a-decision-on-proper-classification-of-a-tariff-entry\/","url_meta":{"origin":305147,"position":5},"title":"[VAT] Kar HC | \u2018Common parlance test, \u2018Marketability test\u2019 are tools for interpretation to arrive at a decision on proper classification of a tariff entry","author":"Editor","date":"November 8, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Karnataka High Court: A Division Bench of S. Sujatha and Ravi V Hosmani, JJ., allowed the revision petition and set aside the impugned judgment by the Tribunal. \u00a0The facts of the case are such that the assessee, a registered dealer under the provisions of KVAT Act was engaged in the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305147","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67512"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=305147"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305147\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290504"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=305147"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=305147"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=305147"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}