{"id":305096,"date":"2023-10-18T11:30:15","date_gmt":"2023-10-18T06:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=305096"},"modified":"2023-10-26T09:55:52","modified_gmt":"2023-10-26T04:25:52","slug":"delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court stays eviction order passed against Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court<\/span>: An appeal was filed challenging the order dated 05-10-2023 passed on a review application filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC, seeking review of order dated 18-04-2023 by which the Trial Court had, on an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1<\/a> & 2<\/a> Civil Procedure Code<\/a>, granted to the appellant ad-interim protection against being dispossessed from Bungalow No. AB-5, Pandara Road, New Delhi, without due process of law. Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J., stayed the impugned order and directed the appellant to re-present the plaint before the Trial Court within 03 days of the pronouncement of the present judgment and also directed the Trial Court to proceed with the matter by first deciding the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1<\/a> & 2<\/a> CPC<\/a>, which stands restored before it and thereafter to proceed with the suit, in accordance with the law.<\/p>\n

The appellant was allotted Bungalow No. AB-5, Pandara Road, New Delhi as official accommodation in his capacity as a Member of the Rajya Sabha and has been living there since 09-11-2022. For completeness, it may be mentioned that the House Committee of the Rajya Sabha, that deals with the official accommodation provided to its members, has also ratified the allotment of the subject bungalow on 24-11-2022. There is no dispute that the appellant continues to be a Member of the Rajya Sabha, though, for certain reasons, however, he is presently under suspension from the House.<\/p>\n

The genesis of the dispute is letter dated 03-03-2023, received by the appellant from the Director, Rajya Sabha Secretariat, effectively cancelling the allotment of the subject bungalow. The aforesaid cancellation led to the appellant filing a suit before the Trial Court seeking reliefs essentially against dispossession or interference in his use and physical possession of the subject bungalow, pursuant to letter dated 03-03-2023 which he claimed was as illegal, non-est and void ab-initio. He was directed to the respondent authorities to show cause, but no action was taken. An application was filed under Order XLVII Rule 3 read with Order XLI Rule 5<\/a> CPC<\/a> seeking review and setting-aside of order dated 18-04-2023, wherein the impugned order was passed.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the impugned order must be tested simply and only on the meaning to be ascribed to the words “Government” and “public officer” appearing in section 80<\/a> CPC<\/a>. An analysis of the provision shows that section 80 CPC is in two parts : section 80(1) and section 80(2). Upon a dissection of the parts, it is seen, that section 80(1) bars the institution of a suit against the “Government” or a “public officer” (in respect of an act purporting to have been done by the public officer in his official capacity); and requires that before a suit is instituted against a Government or a public officer, a 02-month prior notice in-writing must be delivered to such Government or public officer. The notice must state the cause of action alongwith the name, description and place of the residence of the plaintiff alongwith the relief claimed. Furthermore, the plaint filed must contain a statement that such notice has been so delivered or left.<\/p>\n

The Court further noted that Section 80(2) deals with a situation where a plaintiff seeks “urgent or immediate relief” against a “Government” or a “public officer” (in respect of an act purporting to have been done by such public officer in his official capacity). In case of such urgency, the provision says that a suit may be instituted without serving the 02-months notice required under section 80(1), provided the leave of the court is taken for the purpose. The provision further states that the court “shall not grant relief in the suit, whether interim or otherwise” except after giving to the Government or public officer, a reasonable opportunity of showing cause in respect of the relief prayed-for. It goes on to say that if the court is satisfied after hearing the parties that no urgent or immediate relief is needed, it shall return the plaint to the plaintiff, to be (re-)presented after complying with the requirements of section 80(1).<\/p>\n

On the submission by the respondent that since the appellant had himself moved an application under section 80 CPC, he is estopped from subsequently contending that that provision has no application as that would amount to approbating and reprobating, the Court observed that section 80<\/a> CPC<\/a> cannot depend on whether a plaintiff has moved an application under that provision in a suit. The applicability of section 80<\/a> CPC<\/a> is a matter of law, which must be decided on the basis of the parties to the suit and the relief claimed in the plaint. Since there is no estoppel against the law, this objection taken by the respondent is meritless. The word “Government” appearing in section 80 CPC would not include the Rajya Sabha Secretariat. Section 80 CPC has no application to the suit filed by the appellant, in which the sole defendant is the Rajya Sabha Secretariat, against which relief has been sought for in the suit.<\/p>\n

The Court held that there was no requirement for the plaintiff to file the application under Section 80 CPC, or to comply with that provision, and therefore the application under Section 80 CPC is disposed of as infructuous. The Court directed the appellant to re-present the plaint before the Trial Court within 03 days of the pronouncement of the present judgment and also directed the Trial Court to proceed with the matter by first deciding the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1<\/a> & 2<\/a> CPC<\/a>, which stands restored before it and thereafter to proceed with the suit, in accordance with the law.<\/p>\n

[Raghav Chadha v Rajya Sabha Secretariat, 2023 SCC OnLine Del 6516<\/a>, decided on 17-10-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Warisha Farasat, Mr. Shadan Farasat, Mr. Amit Bhandari, Mr. Vivek Jain, Mr. Prashant Manchanda, Mr. Aman, Mr. Vivek Jain, Ms. Hrishika Jain and Mr. Honey Kumbhat, Advocates for appellants<\/p>\n

Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG with Mr. Sandeep Mahapatra, Standing Counsel with Ms. Mrinmayee Sahu Mahapatra, Mr. Sugam Kumar Jha, Ms. Kritika Sharma, Mr. Harsh Raj, Mr. Megha Saxena, Ms. Osheen Verma, Ms. Akansha, Mr. Raghav Tandon, Ms. Anu Priya, Mr. Tribhuvan, Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Mr. Prashant Rawat and Mr. N. Chamwibo Zeliang, Advocates with Ms. Saraswati Saraf, EO.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Government and its public officer; from which it must be inferred that the terms Government and public officer cannot be conflated to be one-and-the-same. Thus, the description of the defendant as “Rajya Sabha Secretariat, through its Secretary General” cannot be taken to mean that the Rajya Sabha Secretariat and the Secretary General are one and-the-same thing or that relief has been sought against the Secretary General.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":303940,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[62005,2543,30753,62004,62003,43813],"class_list":["post-305096","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-bungalow-eviction","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-eviction-order","tag-raghav-chadha","tag-rajya-sabha-secretariat","tag-stay-order"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC stays eviction from govt bungalow of Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha| SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court stays eviction order passed against Raghav Chadha, Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha in relation to his government accomodation.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court stays eviction order passed against Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court stays eviction order passed against Raghav Chadha, Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha in relation to his government accomodation.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-18T06:00:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-10-26T04:25:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court stays eviction order passed against Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC stays eviction from govt bungalow of Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha| SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-18T06:00:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-10-26T04:25:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court stays eviction order passed against Raghav Chadha, Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha in relation to his government accomodation.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court stays eviction order passed against Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC stays eviction from govt bungalow of Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha| SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court stays eviction order passed against Raghav Chadha, Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha in relation to his government accomodation.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court stays eviction order passed against Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha","og_description":"Delhi High Court stays eviction order passed against Raghav Chadha, Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha in relation to his government accomodation.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-10-18T06:00:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-10-26T04:25:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court stays eviction order passed against Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC stays eviction from govt bungalow of Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha| SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-10-18T06:00:15+00:00","dateModified":"2023-10-26T04:25:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court stays eviction order passed against Raghav Chadha, Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha in relation to his government accomodation.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/18\/delhi-high-court-stays-eviction-government-bungalow-rajya-sabha-member-parliament-raghav-chadha-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court stays eviction order passed against Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":290645,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/26\/bereft-senior-citizen-in-laws-have-the-right-to-maintain-peaceful-possession-of-self-acquired-property-delhi-high-court-affirms-order-of-eviction-of-badgering-daughter-in-law-legal-news-legal-research\/","url_meta":{"origin":305096,"position":0},"title":"Bereft senior citizen in-laws have the right to maintain peaceful possession of self-acquired property; Delhi High Court affirms eviction order of daughter-in-law","author":"Editor","date":"April 26, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While interpreting the provisions of Senior Citizens Act, 2007, the Courts must bear the objectives and purposes for which the statute was enacted.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":263438,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/03\/11\/issue-of-accommodation-in-a-domestic-violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":305096,"position":1},"title":"Issue of accommodation in a Domestic Violence dispute between husband and wife shall not affect landlord’s right to get possession of his property: SC","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"March 11, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: Refusing to interfere with the Delhi High Court verdict, the bench of MR Shah and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that in a dispute between the husband and wife under the Domestic Violence Act, the landlord, who otherwise is entitled to the decree of eviction should not be\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Issue-of-accommodation-in-a-Domestic-Violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Issue-of-accommodation-in-a-Domestic-Violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Issue-of-accommodation-in-a-Domestic-Violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Issue-of-accommodation-in-a-Domestic-Violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Issue-of-accommodation-in-a-Domestic-Violence-dispute-between-husband-and-wife-shall-not-affect-landlords-right-to-get-possession-of-his-property.png?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":7171,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/02\/25\/public-premises-eviction-of-unauthorised-occupants-amendment-bill-2014\/","url_meta":{"origin":305096,"position":2},"title":"Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Amendment Bill, 2014","author":"Sucheta","date":"February 25, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"On 24-02-2015, Rajya Sabha passed the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Amendment Bill, 2014. The objective of the Bill is to promote urban development and enable quick execution of infrastructure projects. The Bill seeks to empower Delhi Metro Rail Corporation, other Metros, Public Transport Companies, Companies of Delhi Government,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297864,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/27\/delhi-hc-district-magistrate-well-within-rights-under-delhi-senior-citizen-rules-pass-eviction\/","url_meta":{"origin":305096,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court | An eviction order is well within the power of District Magistrate under Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens (Amendment) Rules, 2016","author":"Arunima","date":"July 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Rule 22 (2) & (3) of Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens (Amendment) Rules, 2016 gives powers to the District Magistrate to pass an Order of eviction in case it is found that the senior citizens are being ill-treated and are not being maintained by their children.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":305526,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/23\/eviction-decree-reasonable-requirement-valid-cal-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":305096,"position":4},"title":"Eviction Decree based on reasonable requirement valid even without considering ground of building\/rebuilding: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"October 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA respondent without filing cross objection can canvass the correctness of finding against him in order to support the judgment that has been passed against the appellant.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316010,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/04\/delhi-high-court-rules-eviction-son-daughter-in-law-directs-son-monthly-maintenance-senior-citizen-act-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":305096,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court rules eviction of son and daughter-in-Law; Directs son to pay Rs. 10,000 monthly maintenance under Senior Citizen Act","author":"Arunima","date":"March 4, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Rule 22(3)(1) of the Delhi Senior Citizens Rules outlines a procedure for eviction from a senior citizen's property and sub-rule (iv) allows the authority to conduct summary proceedings and order eviction of a son, daughter, or legal heir for non-maintenance and ill-treatment.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305096","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=305096"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305096\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/303940"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=305096"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=305096"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=305096"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}