{"id":304947,"date":"2023-10-16T17:30:40","date_gmt":"2023-10-16T12:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=304947"},"modified":"2023-10-25T15:58:45","modified_gmt":"2023-10-25T10:28:45","slug":"delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Humans of Bombay cannot claim copyright on images, photographs or videos; Delhi High Court refuses injunction against People of India"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> A suit was filed by Humans of Bombay (plaintiff) seeking an injunction against People of India (defendants) restraining the infringement of copyright of content consisting of photographs, literary works forming the basis of the stories, videos and creative expression, which includes the manner of presenting the said stories. Prathiba M Singh., J., held that no copyright can be claimed either by Humans of Bombay or People of India insofar as the images, photographs or videos submitted by the individuals or subjects from own private collections are concerned.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Two storytelling platforms i.e., Humans of Bombay and People of India are in dispute with each other in the present suit. The Plaintiff runs a website called <span style=\"font-style: italic;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.humansofbombay.in\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">www.humansofbombay.in<\/a><\/span>, and the Defendants run a website by the name <span style=\"font-style: italic;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.peopleofindia.io\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">www.peopleofindia.io<\/a><\/span>. The Plaintiff\u2019s case is that it owns and operates a storytelling platform called <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">\u2018Humans of Bombay\u2019<\/span> since 2014 wherein stories from various individuals are uploaded\/presented as interviews, write ups, posts, etc. The Plaintiff claims that it engages in substantial research and approaches various individuals who are interested in narrating and sharing their life stories which are then converted by the plaintiff into audio-visual works and uploaded on their respective website and various social media platforms.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">It is averred that the plaintiff has a unique method of selecting subjects. After selecting and verifying the subjects, the Plaintiff&#8217;s team or contracted writers and authors craft the literary works that make up the stories, which include synopses, captions, and scripts. The plaint avers that the copyrights for all these literary works, produced as works for hire, are owned by the plaintiff. It is further stated that before publishing, written consent is obtained from the subjects, ensuring an agreement between the subject and the Plaintiff for a specified period, preventing others from telling the subject&#8217;s story.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The plaint avers that Humans of Bombay, due to its format has become one of the nation&#8217;s largest storytelling website\/platforms. Humans of Bombay is stated to have successfully partnered with major brands for story sponsorships and calls to action. Additionally, the Plaintiff is stated to be the official storytelling associate for the Rajasthan Royals during the 2023 Indian Premier League season. The plaintiff has also harnessed the platform&#8217;s extensive reach to fundraise for significant causes also. As of date, the plaintiff boasts of having 26 lakh followers on their Instagram page, and nearly 10 lakh followers as well as over 750 million views on their YouTube page. The plaintiff\u2019s case is that the defendants have imitated and copied a large portion of the contents from its website. Several of the images were stated to have been replicated. The Plaintiff is also aggrieved by the Defendants\u2019 wrongful\/tortious interference in their contracts with the said subjects.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the present case raises the classic issue concerning the idea-expression dichotomy. The settled legal position is that no copyright can be claimed in an idea. However, the expression of any idea cannot be imitated or copied, and if the expression is copied, the same would constitute an infringement of the copyright under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001532761\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">51<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Copyright Act, 1957<\/a>. In the context of the present suit, the idea at the core is of a storytelling platform. There can be no monopoly over the running of such a platform. However, all such platforms that share stories about various individuals\/subjects would be attaching\/incorporating their own creative ways to communicate and disseminate the said stories, which constitute the expression. Such expression is protectable under Copyright law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that in a storytelling platform, the aspects that constitute the creative aspects are <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">images, literary content, and the way stories are depicted<\/span> would be exclusive to the platforms themselves. If any photographs and videos are commissioned by such platforms, then the copyright in the said photographs and videos would vest in the respective platforms, as such content would qualify for protection under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002747171\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Copyright Act, 1957<\/a>, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">literary content<\/span> i.e., the manner in which a particular story of a subject is written\/articulated, is the literary work of a particular author who might have written it and further, subjects could be submitting photographs which form part of their own collection, to different platforms. If such photographs are reproduced by various platforms, then such platforms cannot claim any rights in such content. However, if the photograph is one that is commissioned by the platform itself, then the platform would hold copyright in the said content.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">On the aspect that both the plaintiff and the defendant are replicating each other\u2019s photographs\/images while communicating stories related to the same individuals, the Court observed that there may be various justifications like common source, common subject, and common settings where the image is clicked etc. Thus, neither of the platforms would be entitled to replicate or imitate each other\u2019s content and images. The platforms also cannot copy or replicate each other\u2019s literary content.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the Court held that Humans of Bombay and People of India shall refrain from using each other\u2019s copyrighted works i.e., commissioned photographs and literary works such as interview scripts and original pieces written authors on the respective platforms; videos that may have been commissioned by the platforms themselves, the manner of presentation of the stories published by the platforms in respect of a particular subject.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<strong><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Humans of Bombay Stories (P) Ltd. v. POI Social Media (P) Ltd., <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Sy2hPAp1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 6390<\/a>, decided on 11-10-2023<\/span><\/strong>]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Abhishek Malhotra, Ms. Srishti Gupta, Mr. Kartikay Dutta, Ms. Ishita Goel, Advocates for plaintiff<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Deepesh Joshi, Ms. Bhavna Vijay, Mr. Prashant Sthapak, Mr. Syed Ashhar Anwar, Advocates for respondents<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">The present suit relates to the idea of a storytelling platform, there can be no monopoly over the running of such a platform. However, all such platforms that share stories about various individuals\/subjects would be attaching\/incorporating their own creative ways to communicate and disseminate the said stories, which constitute the expression. Such expression is protectable under Copyright law.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":303940,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[9271,2543,61294,2943,61293,23384],"class_list":["post-304947","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-copyright","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-humans-of-bombay","tag-injunction","tag-people-of-india","tag-social-media"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC: HoB or PoI cannot claim copyright in its images, photographs and videos| SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: Humans of Bombay or People of India cannot claim copyright in its images, photographs and videos.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Humans of Bombay cannot claim copyright on images, photographs or videos; Delhi High Court refuses injunction against People of India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: Humans of Bombay or People of India cannot claim copyright in its images, photographs and videos.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-16T12:00:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-10-25T10:28:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Humans of Bombay cannot claim copyright on images, photographs or videos; Delhi High Court refuses injunction against People of India\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC: HoB or PoI cannot claim copyright in its images, photographs and videos| SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-16T12:00:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-10-25T10:28:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court: Humans of Bombay or People of India cannot claim copyright in its images, photographs and videos.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Humans of Bombay cannot claim copyright on images, photographs or videos; Delhi High Court refuses injunction against People of India\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC: HoB or PoI cannot claim copyright in its images, photographs and videos| SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court: Humans of Bombay or People of India cannot claim copyright in its images, photographs and videos.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Humans of Bombay cannot claim copyright on images, photographs or videos; Delhi High Court refuses injunction against People of India","og_description":"Delhi High Court: Humans of Bombay or People of India cannot claim copyright in its images, photographs and videos.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-10-16T12:00:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-10-25T10:28:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Humans of Bombay cannot claim copyright on images, photographs or videos; Delhi High Court refuses injunction against People of India","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC: HoB or PoI cannot claim copyright in its images, photographs and videos| SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-10-16T12:00:40+00:00","dateModified":"2023-10-25T10:28:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Delhi High Court: Humans of Bombay or People of India cannot claim copyright in its images, photographs and videos.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/delhi-high-court-refuses-injunction-people-of-india-humans-of-bombay-cannot-claim-copyright-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Humans of Bombay cannot claim copyright on images, photographs or videos; Delhi High Court refuses injunction against People of India"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":302200,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/23\/delhihc-issues-notice-to-peopleofindia-portal-in-copyright-infringement-suit-by-humansofbombay-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":304947,"position":0},"title":"\u2018Photographs are identical\/imitative\u2019; Delhi High Court issues notice to \u2018People of India\u2019 portal in a copyright infringement suit by \u2018Humans of Bombay\u2019","author":"Simranjeet","date":"September 23, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe portal, People of India is approaching the very same subjects who are shown on the website, Humans of Bombay, in order to create an imitative platform.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":109511,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/02\/24\/bombay-hc-grants-injunction-against-thomson-press-for-reprinting-of-bhagwat-gita-copyrighted-by-bhaktivedanta-book-trust\/","url_meta":{"origin":304947,"position":1},"title":"Bombay HC grants injunction against Thomson Press for reprinting of Bhagwat Gita copyrighted by Bhaktivedanta Book Trust","author":"Saba","date":"February 24, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0The Court recently dealt with the copyright protection of translated version of Bhagvad Gita. The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust alleged that its copyright has been violated by Thomson Press by copying Srimad Bhagvata- a translated, reprinted version of the Bhagavad Gita. It contended that Thomson Press had reprinted a\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":365789,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/11\/05\/legal-roundup-ipr-october-2025-copyright-trademark-personality-rights-patent-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":304947,"position":2},"title":"Intellectual Property Rights October 2025: A monthly digest of key IPR developments","author":"Editor","date":"November 5, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Bringing together the most important IPR decisions from High Courts across India, this roundup offers an overview of October\u2019s major developments in copyright, trade mark, and personality rights, along with notable updates from related legal domains.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property Rights October 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-October-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-October-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-October-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-October-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":352720,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/07\/08\/legal-roundup-intellectual-property-right-roundup-june-2025-copyright-infringement-trade-mark-infringement-scc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":304947,"position":3},"title":"INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ROUNDUP: A quick recap of the latest Intellectual Property Rights rulings from June 2025.","author":"Editor","date":"July 8, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Covering all the important intellectual property rights cases across various High Courts and the Supreme Court, this roundup provides a quick summary of cases, latest legal updates in intellectual property rights and links to other roundups.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property Rights Roundup June 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup-June-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup-June-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup-June-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-Roundup-June-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":368662,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/12\/04\/legal-roundup-ipr-november-2025-copyright-trademark-personality-rights-patent-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":304947,"position":4},"title":"Intellectual Property Rights November 2025: Key IPR rulings of the Month","author":"Soumya Yadav","date":"December 4, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Compiling key judgments from High Courts across India, this roundup presents November\u2019s significant developments in copyright, trade mark, trade dress, and personality rights, reflecting evolving trends in IP protection and enforcement.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Legal RoundUp&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Legal RoundUp","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Intellectual Property Rights November 2025","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-November-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-November-2025.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-November-2025.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/Intellectual-Property-Rights-November-2025.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":268855,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/22\/bombay-high-court-directs-removal-of-infringing-links-of-film-janhit-mein-jaari-ad-interim-injunction-granted-in-favour-of-bhanushali-studios-ltd\/","url_meta":{"origin":304947,"position":5},"title":"Bombay High Court directs removal of infringing links of film &#8216;Janhit mein Jaari&#8217; from online platforms; Ad-interim injunction granted in favour of Bhanushali Studios Ltd","author":"Editor","date":"June 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: RI Chagla J. granted an ad-interim injunction in favour of the producers of the film \u201cJanhit Mein Jaari\u201d and directed the defendants to remove infringing links with immediate effect. The Applicants\/Plaintiffs are producers of the cinematography film titled \u201cJanhit Mein Jaari which was released worldwide and in\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304947","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=304947"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304947\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/303940"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=304947"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=304947"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=304947"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}