{"id":304921,"date":"2023-10-16T15:00:46","date_gmt":"2023-10-16T09:30:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=304921"},"modified":"2023-10-19T11:22:11","modified_gmt":"2023-10-19T05:52:11","slug":"bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Bombay High Court| Wearing short skirts, dancing provocatively or making gestures cannot be per se obscene acts"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Bombay High Court:<\/span> In an application filed by the applicant seeking to quashing FIR registered at Umred Police Station, Nagpur Rural for the offences punishable under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561594\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">294<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a>, Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002546585\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">110<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002546611\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">131-A<\/a>, <doclink docname=\"Bombay Police Act, 1951\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"33-A\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">33-A<\/doclink>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002546587\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">112<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002546592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">117<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002880442\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Maharashtra Police Act, 1951<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000683078\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">65(e)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000683659\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949<\/a>, is heard and disposed of finally, a division bench of Valmiki Sa Menezes, and Vijay Joshi, JJ., quashed the FIR held that the ingredients of an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561594\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">294<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>, Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002546585\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">110<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002546611\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">131-A<\/a>, <doclink docname=\"Bombay Police Act, 1951\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"33-A\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">33-A<\/doclink>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002546587\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">112<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002546592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">117<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002880442\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Maharashtra Police Act, 1951<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000683078\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">65(e)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000683659\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949<\/a> are not made out.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">A piece of secret information was received by the Police Sub-Inspector that an obscene dance was being performed at a Banquet Hall in Tiger Paradise Resort and Water Park, Tirkhura. The secret information revealed that the audience, who were watching the scantily dressed women performing an obscene dance, were showering dummy currency notes on these women. Based upon the secret information, Police Officials raided the said Banquet Hall and thereafter, lodged FIR revealing that three bottles of foreign liquor were found with an accused at Serial 12 in FIR apart from Disc Jockey (DJ) Music System, an Audio System, Sound Level System, Laptops and other equipment along with the dummy notes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The application was filed on the grounds that the specific ingredients of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561594\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">294<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> have not been made out on a plain reading of the FIR, in that there is no reference in the facts that any person or the complainant experienced a sense of annoyance by witnessing the dancing girls, the dance performance was within a Banquet Hall of a Resort, which was neither in a public place nor open to public view for any member of the public to feel a sense of annoyance, merely because a Police Officer, in his opinion, feels these women were scantily dressed or dancing with movements which he felt were obscene, an offence cannot be said to be made out under that provision of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> and the offences under Sections 110, 131A, 33A, 112 and 117 of the Police Act and under Section 65(e) of the Prohibition Act, have also not been made out without any specific material found by the police.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that from a plain reading of the provision of Section 294 and there being no allegation against any of the applicants that they have indulged in any obscene act nor there being any specific statement in the FIR qua the Applicants of obscenity or any act of the like nature, no offence could be said to be made out on the face of the FIR. However, the only allegation of an action being an obscene act, is the act of the Accused 13 to 18, who are alleged to have dressed in short skirts and were dancing in a provocative manner. Thus, there is no allegation of similar nature with respect to the five applicants, to bring them within the offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561594\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">294<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further noted that the acts of the accused 13 to 18 wearing short skirts, dancing provocatively or making gestures that the police officials consider obscene cannot be termed to be per se obscene acts, which could cause annoyance to any member of the public. However, the Court remarked that it is mindful of the general norms of morality prevalent in present Indian Society and further noted that in present times it is quite common and acceptable that women may be clad in swimming costumes or such other revealing attire.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court concluded that the manner of dressing in films passes censorship or at beauty pageants held in broad public view, does not cause annoyance to any audience. Surely the provisions of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561594\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">294<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> would not apply to all the situations and thus, the Court cannot countenance a situation where acts such as the ones referred to in the FIR would be judged by a Police Officer, who in his personal opinion considers them to be obscene acts to cause annoyance to any member of the public. Taking a narrow view as to what acts could constitute an obscenity would be a retrograde act, on the part of the Court. Thus, taking a progressive view in the matter, the Court finds it unwilling to leave such a decision in the hands of Police Officials.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that there is no material in the FIR\/complaint impugned in the application on the basis of which the offences under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561594\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">294<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561652\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">34<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a>, Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002546585\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">110<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002546611\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">131-A<\/a>, <doclink docname=\"Bombay Police Act, 1951\" actblocktype=\"Section\" sectionno=\"33-A\" doi=\"\" match=\"no\">33-A<\/doclink>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002546587\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">112<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002546592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">117<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002880442\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Maharashtra Police Act, 1951<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000683078\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">65(e)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-9000683659\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949<\/a> can be investigated or prosecuted. Consequently, it is a fit case to exercise our inherent jurisdiction under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">482<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> to quash the FIR.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Lalit v State of Maharashtra, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/CT0ic22V\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Bom 2191<\/a>, decided on 11-10-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr A. A. Naik, Advocate for Applicants.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr S. S. Doifode, Addl. P. P. for Non-Applicant\/State.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Taking a narrow view as to what acts could constitute an obscenity would be a retrograde act. Surely the provisions of Section 294 of IPC would not apply to all the situations and thus, the Court cannot countenance a situation where acts such as the ones referred to in the FIR would be judged by a Police Officer, who in his personal opinion considers them to be obscene acts to cause annoyance to any member of the public.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67516,"featured_media":293501,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2569,13961,30099,4141,61947,61949,61948],"class_list":["post-304921","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Bombay_High_Court","tag-ipc","tag-maharashtra-police","tag-obscenity","tag-provocative-dancing","tag-revealing-clothes","tag-short-clothes"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bombay HC: Wearing short skirts, dancing, gestures does not per se constitute obscenity| SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: Wearing short skirts, provocative dance, making gestures per se does not constitute obscene acts.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court| Wearing short skirts, dancing provocatively or making gestures cannot be per se obscene acts\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Bombay High Court: Wearing short skirts, provocative dance, making gestures per se does not constitute obscene acts.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-16T09:30:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-10-19T05:52:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Bombay High Court| Wearing short skirts, dancing provocatively or making gestures cannot be per se obscene acts\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arunima\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Bombay HC: Wearing short skirts, dancing, gestures does not per se constitute obscenity| SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-16T09:30:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-10-19T05:52:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\"},\"description\":\"Bombay High Court: Wearing short skirts, provocative dance, making gestures per se does not constitute obscene acts.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"bombay high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bombay High Court| Wearing short skirts, dancing provocatively or making gestures cannot be per se obscene acts\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb\",\"name\":\"Arunima\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arunima\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bombay HC: Wearing short skirts, dancing, gestures does not per se constitute obscenity| SCC Blog","description":"Bombay High Court: Wearing short skirts, provocative dance, making gestures per se does not constitute obscene acts.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bombay High Court| Wearing short skirts, dancing provocatively or making gestures cannot be per se obscene acts","og_description":"Bombay High Court: Wearing short skirts, provocative dance, making gestures per se does not constitute obscene acts.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-10-16T09:30:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-10-19T05:52:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arunima","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Bombay High Court| Wearing short skirts, dancing provocatively or making gestures cannot be per se obscene acts","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arunima","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/","name":"Bombay HC: Wearing short skirts, dancing, gestures does not per se constitute obscenity| SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-10-16T09:30:46+00:00","dateModified":"2023-10-19T05:52:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb"},"description":"Bombay High Court: Wearing short skirts, provocative dance, making gestures per se does not constitute obscene acts.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"bombay high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/16\/bombay-high-court-wearing-short-skirts-dance-provocative-gestures-obscenity-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bombay High Court| Wearing short skirts, dancing provocatively or making gestures cannot be per se obscene acts"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/12b21fd8f65a572f39f27151710e16cb","name":"Arunima","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8375ad8b08b1cbd970f4484d3218d81f3222a0ee3e463210f657780cb13e9569?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arunima"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc-editor_9\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/bombay-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":44391,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/04\/20\/obscene-act-in-private-place-will-be-no-offence\/","url_meta":{"origin":304921,"position":0},"title":"Obscene act in private place will be no offence","author":"Sucheta","date":"April 20, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court: Quashing an FIR against men who were arrested from a party, a bench comprising of Naresh H Patil and A M Badar, JJ held that any obscene act in a private place causing no annoyance to others does not constitute an offence. In the present case, an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327216,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/24\/mere-presence-at-hotel-as-customers-while-women-dance-in-obscene-manner-no-offence-u-s-294-ipc-bomhc\/","url_meta":{"origin":304921,"position":1},"title":"Mere presence at hotel as \u2018customers\u2019 while women dance in obscene manner, not sufficient to attract offence u\/s 294 of IPC: Bombay High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"July 24, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"No other specific overt act is attributed to petitioners to attract the offences punishable under Sections 294, 114 read with Section 34 of Penal Code, 1860 against them.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":280403,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/26\/kerala-high-court-reiterates-that-to-satisfy-definition-of-obscenity-to-attract-section-294b-ipc-the-words-uttered-must-be-capable-of-arousing-sexually-impure-thoughts-in-mi\/","url_meta":{"origin":304921,"position":2},"title":"Words uttered must be capable of arousing sexually impure thoughts in minds of hearers to satisfy definition of obscenity to attract Section 294(b) IPC; Kerala High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"December 26, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"If the act is not obscene, or is not done in any public place, or the song recited or uttered is not in or near any public place or that it caused no annoyance to others, no offence under Section 294(b) of IPC is committed.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image-310.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":305676,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/25\/wearing-short-skirts-dancing-provocatively-or-making-gestures-cannot-be-per-se-obscene-acts\/","url_meta":{"origin":304921,"position":3},"title":"Wearing short skirts, dancing provocatively or making gestures cannot be per se obscene acts","author":"Ridhi","date":"October 25, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"https:\/\/youtu.be\/-TByTpKJ53o","rel":"","context":"In &quot;SCC Times Newsflash&quot;","block_context":{"text":"SCC Times Newsflash","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/watch-now-2\/scc-times-newsflash\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"what is obscene","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Media.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Media.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Media.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Media.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":286716,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/10\/obscene-lascivious-and-profane-language-delhi-high-court-reprimands-owners-of-tvf-web-series-college-romance\/","url_meta":{"origin":304921,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court reprimands owners of TVF web series \u2018College Romance\u2019 over \u201cobscene, lascivious and profane language\u201d","author":"Editor","date":"March 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court upheld the order of ASJ to register an FIR under the provision of the Information Technology Act, 2000 against the petitioner, however, clarified that the same does not include the direction to arrest any of the accused or petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":227037,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/03\/14\/bom-hc-sending-personal-messages-on-whatsapp-does-not-amount-to-utterance-of-obscene-words-in-public-place-s-294-ipc-cannot-be-invoked\/","url_meta":{"origin":304921,"position":5},"title":"Bom HC | Sending personal messages on WhatsApp does not amount to utterance of obscene words in public place; S. 294 IPC cannot be invoked","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 14, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Bombay High Court:\u00a0A Division Bench of M.G. Sewlikar and T.V. Nalawade, JJ. while disposing off an application, held that, \"To call a woman, even if she is one's own wife a prostitute and to call her that she earns money by indulging in prostitution amounts to insulting the modesty of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/Bombay-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304921","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67516"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=304921"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304921\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293501"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=304921"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=304921"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=304921"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}