{"id":304602,"date":"2023-10-13T10:00:41","date_gmt":"2023-10-13T04:30:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=304602"},"modified":"2023-10-19T10:25:15","modified_gmt":"2023-10-19T04:55:15","slug":"cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revisional application; leaves property distinction determination to Trial Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Calcutta High Court:<\/span> In a revisional application challenging the trial court’s order which allowed the application for substitution of legal representative of the deceased plaintiff based on registered Will, a single-judge bench comprising of Shampa Sarkar, J. opined that an Executor has the authority to represent the estate of the deceased, and the onus is the opposite party-respondent to prove his right to maintain the suit.<\/p>\n

The Court dismissed the revisional application, stating that the issue of whether the properties are the same or distinct will be determined during the trial.<\/p>\n

Brief Facts<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the revisional application stems from an order dated 07-11-2022 issued by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) which allowed the application under Order 22 Rule 3<\/a> of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (CPC) filed by the opposite party. The opposite party was substituted as the legal representative of the deceased plaintiff, based on a registered Will.<\/p>\n

The deceased plaintiff executed a Will appointing the opposite party as the Executor and bequeathing the suit property to him. The right to sue devolved upon the opposite party as the Executor of the Will.<\/p>\n

The civil court reviewed the Will and found that it was registered, and that deceased plaintiff had bequeathed the property to the opposite party. The civil court held that the law didn’t require the Executor to obtain probate to represent the estate in a legal proceeding.<\/p>\n

Contentions<\/p>\n

The petitioner challenged the order, contending that the suit involved different properties not covered by the Will and that the opposite party could not be substituted for the entire estate. The petitioner contended that deceased plaintiff intended to bequeath only a specified portion of the property in the Will. The petitioner further claimed that the property was thika property and, therefore, the suit was not maintainable.<\/p>\n

Moot Point<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    Whether the substitution of the opposite party as the legal representative of the deceased plaintiff was appropriate?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Whether the properties described in the schedule of the suit and the schedule of the Will were the same or distinct?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Court’s Decision<\/p>\n

    The Court stated that both the properties in question have the same premises number. “The onus is on the opposite party (substituted Executor) to prove that he could maintain the suit for eviction and the reliefs prayed for could be granted to him. These are matters of evidence. Whether the property in the schedule of the plaint and the schedule of the Will were same or distinct cannot be decided without trial. Such issues will be adjudicated at the time of trial.”<\/span><\/p>\n

    The Court found that the properties described in the schedule of the suit and the schedule of the Will shared the same premises number. The Court held that the onus was on the opposite party, the Executor, to prove his ability to maintain the suit, and these issues required a trial. The court upheld the order, allowing the substitution of the opposite party as the legal representative and dismissed the revisional application, giving the petitioner the liberty to raise points at the trial.<\/p>\n

    [Om Prakash Bajoria<\/span> v. Sonaram Das<\/span>, 2023 SCC OnLine Cal 3486<\/a>, order dated 10-10-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

    *Judgment by Justice Shampa Sarkar<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

    Mr. Siddhartha Lahiri, Mr. Debraj Dutta, Counsel for the Petitioners<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Calcutta High Court affirmed the Executor’s authority in representing deceased’s estate and Shifted onus to the executor to establish suitability.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,61871,53891,61869,61870,17331],"class_list":["post-304602","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-distinction-of-property","tag-executor","tag-justice-shampa-sarkar","tag-revisional-application","tag-will"],"yoast_head":"\nCalcutta High Court dismisses revisional application, leaves property distinction determination to Trial Court | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismissed the revisional application and left the distinction of property to the Trial Court.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismisses revisional application; leaves property distinction determination to Trial Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismissed the revisional application and left the distinction of property to the Trial Court.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-13T04:30:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-10-19T04:55:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court dismisses revisional application; leaves property distinction determination to Trial Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court dismisses revisional application, leaves property distinction determination to Trial Court | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-13T04:30:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-10-19T04:55:15+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court dismissed the revisional application and left the distinction of property to the Trial Court.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court dismisses revisional application; leaves property distinction determination to Trial Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revisional application, leaves property distinction determination to Trial Court | SCC Blog","description":"Calcutta High Court dismissed the revisional application and left the distinction of property to the Trial Court.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revisional application; leaves property distinction determination to Trial Court","og_description":"Calcutta High Court dismissed the revisional application and left the distinction of property to the Trial Court.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-10-13T04:30:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-10-19T04:55:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revisional application; leaves property distinction determination to Trial Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/","name":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revisional application, leaves property distinction determination to Trial Court | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-10-13T04:30:41+00:00","dateModified":"2023-10-19T04:55:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court dismissed the revisional application and left the distinction of property to the Trial Court.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/13\/cal-hc-dismisses-revisional-application-leaves-property-distinction-determination-to-trial-court-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Calcutta High Court dismisses revisional application; leaves property distinction determination to Trial Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":299796,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/22\/calcutta-hc-refuses-to-quash-proceeding-against-teacher-for-involvement-in-communal-disturbance-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":304602,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court refuses to quash proceeding against teacher for involvement in Communal Disturbance case","author":"Ritu","date":"August 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Considering the nature of the alleged offences and the available evidence, the Calcutta High Court found a prima facie case against the petitioner to proceed to trial.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311817,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/19\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-claim-of-collusion-and-fraud-asserts-trial-court-as-appropriate-venue-for-adjudication-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":304602,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses Revisional Application on claim of collusion and fraud; Case to proceed for Trial","author":"Ritu","date":"January 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court clarified that rejection of the plaint is not warranted based on allegations of collusion or lack of cause of action, which are factual issues to be determined during the trial.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":316648,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/11\/calcutta-high-court-grants-permission-to-tender-affidavit-in-chief-under-order-18-rule-17-cpc-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":304602,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court grants permission to tender Affidavit-in-Chief due to \u2018necessity\u2019 and for \u2018ends of justice\u2019","author":"Ritu","date":"March 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court directed that both the suits are to be heard together after such evidence on recall is completed and granted the respondent the right to cross-examine the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Calcutta-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":218657,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/08\/27\/utt-hc-non-filing-of-affidavit-along-with-the-application-under-s-1563-of-crpc-held-to-be-a-curable-defect\/","url_meta":{"origin":304602,"position":3},"title":"Utt HC | Non-filing of affidavit along with the application under S. 156(3) of CrPC held to be a curable defect","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 27, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Uttaranchal High Court: Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. contemplated a criminal revision petition, where the main question which had to be decided was related to the revisional power exercised by the Sessions Judge, where an order was rejected by him under Section 156(3) of CrPC and same was held by the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":310189,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/27\/calcutta-high-court-affirms-rejection-of-stay-application-under-section-10-cpc-scc-blog-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":304602,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta High Court affirms rejection of stay application under Section 10 CPC; Allows simultaneous Civil and Criminal proceedings","author":"Ritu","date":"December 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court stated that Section 10 CPC applies to suits in civil court, not proceedings under special statutes.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299948,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/24\/absurd-and-improbable-complaint-failed-to-establish-sufficient-ground-forlegal-action-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":304602,"position":5},"title":"\u201cAbsurd and improbable\u201d: Calcutta High Court sets aside maliciously instituted criminal case with no sufficient grounds for legal action","author":"Ritu","date":"August 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While quashing the criminal proceeding filed against petitioners, the Calcutta High Court held that the same is lacking with substantial evidence and is institutes with malicious intent.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304602","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=304602"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304602\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=304602"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=304602"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=304602"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}