{"id":304513,"date":"2023-10-12T15:30:21","date_gmt":"2023-10-12T10:00:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=304513"},"modified":"2023-10-19T10:06:26","modified_gmt":"2023-10-19T04:36:26","slug":"dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Well within boundaries of permissible comparative advertising\u2019; Delhi High Court refuses to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in a disparagement suit filed by Tata"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a case wherein the plaintiffs, Tata Sons (P) Ltd. and Tata Consumer Products Ltd. (collectively ‘Tata’) were aggrieved by a commercial aired (‘impugned commercial’) by Defendant 1, Puro Wellness (P) Ltd. (‘Puro’), of its product “Puro Healthy Salt”, which was essentially rock salt and was pink in colour and Tata perceived the commercial to be disparaging white salt in general, C. Hari Shankar, J.*<\/span>, observed that Puro’s commercial emphasized the natural character of Puro Healthy Salt, owing to its not being bleached, being free of any added chemicals and possessing naturally occurring iodine, as features which rendered it a healthy alternative. The Court held that it could not be said that the Puro’s impugned commercial disparages white salt even generically, much less could it be said that it disparages Tata’s White Salt particularly. The Court further held that Tata had failed to make out any prima facie<\/span> case justifying interference with continued broadcasting of the impugned commercial.<\/p>\n

Background<\/p>\n

Tata submitted that Regulation 4(7) of the Food Safety and Standards (Advertising and Claims) Regulations, 2018 (‘the Food Safety Regulations’) did not permit Puro to advertise its salt as “healthy”. The Food Safety Regulations required that if, in advertising a product, words such as “natural”, “fresh”, “pure”, “original”, “traditional”, “authentic”, “genuine” or “real” were used in such a way as to mislead the consumer regarding the nature of the product, a disclaimer would also be entered on the reverse of the pack, stating that the expression concerned was merely being used as a brand name or trade mark, and did not represent the true nature or characteristic of the product. Tata further submitted that the impression conveyed by the impugned commercial, when seen as a whole, was that all white salt, including the plaintiffs’ TATA Salt, was unhealthy. The commercial clearly showed the defendant’s Puro salt alongside white salt, thereby disparaging all white salt in general.<\/p>\n

Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n

The Court opined that there was no dispute about the fact that comparative advertisement or for that matter, any form of advertisement, allowed extolling of one’s own product and the advertisement became objectionable only when it made comments about another’s product. The Court further opined that “the highest that could be said, would be that the preference for Puro’s salt, even when white salt was available, was because Puro’s salt was healthy. It was highly debatable as to whether this could result in an inference that white salt was unhealthy”<\/span>.<\/p>\n

The Court opined that what Tata was doing was inferring, from the positive assertions in the impugned commercial, negative inferences regarding Tata’s salt and at a prima facie stage at least, it was difficult to hold that all the positive assertions made with respect to Puro’s Healthy Salt, in the impugned commercial, would inevitably result in a consumer reading, into those assertions, negative aspersions regarding Tata White Salt. The Court relied on Puro Wellness Pvt. Ltd.<\/span> v. Tata Chemicals Ltd.<\/span>, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 10766<\/a> (‘Tata Chemicals Ltd. Case’) and opined that “when the very same allegations and assertions, levelled directly against white salt, had been found by the Division Bench of this Court in Tata Chemicals Ltd. Case (supra) as not to be disparaging of Tata’s product, then how Tata can expect this Court to return a finding of disparagement, especially at a prima facie stage”<\/span>. Thus, the Court held that Puro having earlier directly levelled the very allegations against which Tata was, in the present case, aggrieved, and the Division Bench of this Court in Tata Chemicals Ltd. Case (supra) having found the said allegations not to be disparaging, Tata, clearly, had no prima facie case<\/span> to urge.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the assertions which Tata finds so objectionable in the impugned commercial of Puro, regarding Puro’s product being natural, free from chemicals and additives, not processed or bleached and, most importantly, a healthy alternative to common salt, were selling points based on which Tata had actually sold its own Himalayan Pink Salt and it was incumbent on Tata to have disclosed this fact. The Court held that Tata had studiedly concealed these facts from the Court, and it had, thereby, completely disentitled itself to equitable interlocutory injunctive relief.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that what was prohibited in Regulation 4(7) of the Food Safety Regulations, was the use of the expressions in a manner which “is likely to mislead consumer as to the nature of food” and thus, opined that the use of “healthy” expression by Puro for its Pink Salt could not be said to mislead the consumer in any way and the use of the expression did not, therefore, violate Regulation 4(7) of the Food Safety Regulations.<\/p>\n

The Court observed that Puro’s commercial emphasized the natural character of Puro Healthy Salt, owing to its not being bleached, being free of any added chemicals and possessing naturally occurring iodine, as features which rendered it a healthy alternative. The Court opined that “extolling one’s product, even if it borders on exaggeration, is perfectly permissible in comparative advertising and, so long as it does not contain serious representations of qualitative or quantitative facts, does not even have to pass the test of truth. What is proscribed is denigration of the rival’s product. Declaring one’s product to be superior to the others, or even to all others, is permissible in comparative advertising. It is only where the purported inferiority of others’ products, to one’s own, is attributed to some specific feature, which is described in qualitative or quantitative terms, that the truth of the assertion is required to be established”<\/span>.<\/p>\n

The Court held that it could not be said that the Puro’s impugned commercial disparages white salt even generically, much less could it be said that it disparages Tata’s White Salt particularly. The Court observed that the impugned commercial did not, directly, or indirectly, propose to state that Puro Healthy Salt was preferable over white salt, much less did it provide any reasons in that regard.<\/p>\n

The Court held that the impugned commercial was, therefore, well within the boundaries of what was permissible in comparative advertising. The Court opined that if a commercial as innocuous as this was to be injuncted, one might as well completely do away with the concept of comparative advertising altogether as it was difficult to envisage comparative advertising being undertaken in a manner which was more innocuous than what Puro had done.<\/p>\n

The Court further held that Tata had failed to make out any prima facie<\/span> case justifying interference with continued broadcasting of the impugned commercial. The Court further held that Tata also stands disentitled to any injunctive interlocutory relief as, on merits, the case was squarely covered against Tata by the decision of Tata Chemicals Ltd. Case (supra), and also because the plaint completely suppresses the fact that the very assertions, in the impugned Puro commercial, which Tata finds disparaging of white salt, had been used by Tata itself in selling its Himalayan Pink Salt, to tout it as a “healthy alternative” to white salt.<\/p>\n

[Tata Sons (P) Ltd. v. Puro Wellness (P) Ltd., 2023 SCC OnLine Del 6338<\/a>, decided on 10-10-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment authored by: Justice C. Hari Shankar<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For the Plaintiffs: Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocates; Pravin Anand, Achuthan Sreekumar, Zafeer Ahmed, Rohit Bansal, Apoorva Prasad R., Advocates<\/p>\n

For the Defendants: Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocate; Nishad Nadkarni, Ankur Sangal, Raghu Vinayak Sinha, Khushboo Jhunjhunwala, Shaurya Pandey, Asavari Jain, Jaanvi Chopra, Advocates<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“If Tata can sell its Himalayan Pink Salt by advertising it as natural, free of chemicals, additives, and as being neither processed nor bleached and, therefore, a healthy alternative to common salt, then why Puro cannot do so. Tata cannot seek any injunction against Puro using the very same expressions for its own Puro Healthy Salt, vis-à-vis white salt.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":303940,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[37345,16561,2543,61855,2943,61853,61852,46453,61854],"class_list":["post-304513","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-commercial","tag-comparative-advertising","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-disparagement-suit","tag-injunction","tag-pink-salt","tag-puro-healthy-salt","tag-tata","tag-white-salt"],"yoast_head":"\nDelhi HC refuses to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in disparagement suit filed by Tata | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court refused to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in a disparagement suit filed by Tata\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018Well within boundaries of permissible comparative advertising\u2019; Delhi High Court refuses to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in a disparagement suit filed by Tata\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court refused to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in a disparagement suit filed by Tata\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-12T10:00:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-10-19T04:36:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u2018Well within boundaries of permissible comparative advertising\u2019; Delhi High Court refuses to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in a disparagement suit filed by Tata\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC refuses to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in disparagement suit filed by Tata | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-12T10:00:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-10-19T04:36:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court refused to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in a disparagement suit filed by Tata\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u2018Well within boundaries of permissible comparative advertising\u2019; Delhi High Court refuses to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in a disparagement suit filed by Tata\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC refuses to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in disparagement suit filed by Tata | SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court refused to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in a disparagement suit filed by Tata","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018Well within boundaries of permissible comparative advertising\u2019; Delhi High Court refuses to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in a disparagement suit filed by Tata","og_description":"Delhi High Court refused to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in a disparagement suit filed by Tata","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-10-12T10:00:21+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-10-19T04:36:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u2018Well within boundaries of permissible comparative advertising\u2019; Delhi High Court refuses to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in a disparagement suit filed by Tata","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC refuses to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in disparagement suit filed by Tata | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-10-12T10:00:21+00:00","dateModified":"2023-10-19T04:36:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Delhi High Court refused to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in a disparagement suit filed by Tata","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/12\/dhc-refuses-to-injunct-commercial-of-puro-healthy-salt-in-disparagement-suit-filed-by-tata-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u2018Well within boundaries of permissible comparative advertising\u2019; Delhi High Court refuses to injunct commercial of Puro Healthy Salt in a disparagement suit filed by Tata"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":233141,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/07\/30\/advertisement-to-misleading-advertisement-horlicks-ltd-v-zydus-wellness-products\/","url_meta":{"origin":304513,"position":0},"title":"Advertisement to Misleading Advertisement | Horlicks Ltd. v. Zydus Wellness Products","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 30, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"by Ankoosh Mehta*, Maitrayi Jain** and Anushka Shah***","rel":"","context":"In "Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas"","block_context":{"text":"Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/experts_corner\/law-firm\/cam\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Cyril-Amarchand-CAM.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322754,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/23\/bhc-sets-aside-penalty-imposed-on-tata-chemicals-for-substandard-iodized-salt-due-to-delay-in-sample-analysis-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":304513,"position":1},"title":"‘Time limit for sample analysis must be scrupulously followed’; Bombay HC sets aside penalty imposed on TATA Chemicals Ltd. for selling substandard iodized salt","author":"Simranjeet","date":"May 23, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The delay in completing the analysis may have resulted in salt samples getting deteriorated because of exposure to heat, light, moisture, etc which may have resulted in deteriorating its standard and thus it became substandard, as Iodized Salt can lose its iodine due to the environmental factors.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bombay High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Bombay-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274141,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/21\/delhi-high-court-grants-injunction-against-a-website-using-tata-mark-targeting-indian-public\/","url_meta":{"origin":304513,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court grants injunction against a website using TATA mark “targeting” Indian public","author":"Editor","date":"September 21, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The considerations, while deciding an application for grant of ad-interim injunction could be less stringent than the one for final relief in a suit. Interim decisions are required to be made based on probable rather than a definitive view.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"competitive exam","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court-1.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":322248,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/16\/hindustan-unilever-limited-restrained-from-comparing-ponds-with-nivea-by-dhc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":304513,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court restrains Hindustan Unilever Limited from comparing \u2018Ponds\u2019 with \u2018Nivea\u2019, holds comparison to be misleading","author":"Editor","date":"May 16, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court opined that the law related to advertisements in any form \u2014 print, digital, or TVC will also extend to \u2018in-mall\u2019 marketing campaigns since it is a method of promotion and marketing of company\u2019s product to a consumer.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":250864,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/07\/07\/tata-group-of-companies\/","url_meta":{"origin":304513,"position":4},"title":"Domain Name infringement | Case of identical registered domain names: Delhi HC grants interim injunction in favour of Tatas","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 7, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Subramonium Prasad, J., granted an interim injunction in favour of Tata Sons (P) Ltd. in a case where the defendant has got a domain name registered which is identical to the website of their e-commerce arm. Plaintiffs\u2019 Counsel, Pravin Anand submitted that plaintiff 1, holding company of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/Subramonium-Prasad-1-250x300.jpeg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":304839,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/15\/high-court-weekly-roundup-october-2023-with-stories-on-west-bengal-post-panchayat-polls-violence-pulse-candy-time-trade-mark-case\/","url_meta":{"origin":304513,"position":5},"title":"HIGH COURT OCTOBER 2023 WEEKLY ROUNDUP| Stories on West Bengal post-Panchayat Polls violence; Pulse candy case; T.I.M.E. trade mark case; and more","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.","rel":"","context":"In "High Court Round Up"","block_context":{"text":"High Court Round Up","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/columns-for-roundup\/high-court-round-up\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"High Court weekly Roundup2","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/High-Court-weekly-Roundup2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/High-Court-weekly-Roundup2.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/High-Court-weekly-Roundup2.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/High-Court-weekly-Roundup2.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304513","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=304513"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304513\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/303940"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=304513"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=304513"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=304513"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}