{"id":304389,"date":"2023-10-11T16:00:12","date_gmt":"2023-10-11T10:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=304389"},"modified":"2023-10-26T09:20:06","modified_gmt":"2023-10-26T03:50:06","slug":"order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order for liquidation valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and no alternative plan in CIRP exists: NCLAT"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal:<\/span> In a case where an application is preferred seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal against an order, a 3-member bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson, Barun Mitra (Technical Member) and Arun Baroka (Technical Member), held that the Adjudicating Authority’s order for liquidation was justified, considering the lack of approval for the appellant’s Resolution Plan and the absence of other plans.<\/p>\n

Brief Facts<\/p>\n

The instant matter involves an application seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal against an order dated 15-06-2023. The appellant filed an e-appeal on 24-08-2023 against an order dated 15-06-2023.<\/p>\n

The Appellant contended that the order dated 15.06.2023, which allowed I.A. No. 1487 of 2023, was not passed on the same date. This fact is evident from the order sheet of the same date, which indicated that the detailed order would follow. The detailed order on I.A. No. 1487 of 2023 was uploaded into the system on 31-07-2023 and made available on the website on 02-08-2023. The appellant received communication of the order from the Liquidator on 02-08-2023.<\/p>\n

On the other hand, the Respondent contended that the Appellant was actively involved in the proceedings when the order was passed, and their counsel was present on that date.<\/p>\n

Court’s Analysis and Decision<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the order dated 15-06-2023 explicitly stated, “Detailed order will follow.” It was evident that the order was not immediately available on that date. Given that the detailed order was uploaded on 31-07-2023, the Court held that the appeal filed on 24-08-2023 was not time-barred.<\/p>\n

The Court reviewed the Adjudicating Authority’s order and observed that the appellant’s Resolution Plan had not been approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) due to insufficient majority support (56.86% vote share). Furthermore, there were no other Resolution Plans in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).<\/p>\n

In light of these facts, the Court found no infirmity in the Adjudicating Authority’s decision to direct for liquidation. The Court also noted that the appellant, who was eligible to submit a plan, could participate in the Liquidation Proceeding by submitting an Expression of Interest when the Corporate Debtor is sold as a going concern.<\/p>\n

The Court disposed of the appeal.<\/p>\n

[Kamlesh Mehta<\/span> v. Mirage Ceramics (P) Ltd.<\/span>, 2023 SCC OnLine NCLAT 704<\/a>, order dated 06-10-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Shatadru Chakraborty and Ms. Surbhi Anand, Counsel for the Appellants<\/p>\n

Ms. Usha Singh, Counsel for the Respondent No. 3<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Liquidator should endeavor to sell the Corporate Debtor as a going concern in the Liquidation Proceeding, and the appellant may participate by submitting its plan.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":293392,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[43781,22814,29690,30182,22014,30228],"class_list":["post-304389","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-cirp","tag-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process","tag-liquidation","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat","tag-resolution-plan"],"yoast_head":"\nOrder for liquidation is valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and absence of alternative plan: NCLAT | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"NCLAT held that Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order for liquidation is valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and no alternative plan exists in CIRP.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order for liquidation valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and no alternative plan in CIRP exists: NCLAT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"NCLAT held that Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order for liquidation is valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and no alternative plan exists in CIRP.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-11T10:30:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-10-26T03:50:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order for liquidation valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and no alternative plan in CIRP exists: NCLAT\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"Order for liquidation is valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and absence of alternative plan: NCLAT | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-11T10:30:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-10-26T03:50:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"NCLAT held that Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order for liquidation is valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and no alternative plan exists in CIRP.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"national company law appellate tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order for liquidation valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and no alternative plan in CIRP exists: NCLAT\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Order for liquidation is valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and absence of alternative plan: NCLAT | SCC Blog","description":"NCLAT held that Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order for liquidation is valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and no alternative plan exists in CIRP.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order for liquidation valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and no alternative plan in CIRP exists: NCLAT","og_description":"NCLAT held that Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order for liquidation is valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and no alternative plan exists in CIRP.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-10-11T10:30:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-10-26T03:50:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order for liquidation valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and no alternative plan in CIRP exists: NCLAT","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/","name":"Order for liquidation is valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and absence of alternative plan: NCLAT | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","datePublished":"2023-10-11T10:30:12+00:00","dateModified":"2023-10-26T03:50:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"NCLAT held that Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order for liquidation is valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and no alternative plan exists in CIRP.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"national company law appellate tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/order-for-liquidation-is-valid-when-resolution-plan-remains-unapproved-and-no-alternative-plan-exists-nclat-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Adjudicating Authority\u2019s order for liquidation valid when Resolution Plan remains unapproved, and no alternative plan in CIRP exists: NCLAT"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":285588,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/27\/corporate-insolvency-cirp-resolution-plan-not-approval-eligibility-of-the-resolution-applicant-appeal-last-opportunity-revival-of-corporate-debtor\/","url_meta":{"origin":304389,"position":0},"title":"NCLAT provides time-bound opportunity to Resolution Professional and CoC to revive Corporate Debtor","author":"Ritu","date":"February 27, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In a case related to rejection of Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority, which was once approve the Adjudicating Authority, the Tribunal opined that the Adjudicating Authority was right on non-approval of the Resolution Plan as the Adjudicating Authority's order was not followed in its true spirit.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":315814,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/02\/nclat-affirms-rejection-of-application-for-valuation-queries-post-resolution-plan-approval-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":304389,"position":1},"title":"NCLAT affirms NCLT\u2019s rejection of application for valuation queries post-resolution plan approval","author":"Ritu","date":"March 2, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"In the instant matter, the NCLT rejected the application, noting the approval of the resolution by the Committee of Creditors and the absence of filing through an authorized representative.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":274550,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/27\/nclat-rejection-of-resolution-plan-by-the-nclt-due-to-non-serious-casual-and-non-diligent-conduct-of-resolution-appellant-is-good-in-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":304389,"position":2},"title":"NCLAT | Rejection of Resolution Plan by the NCLT due to Non-Serious, Casual and Non-Diligent Conduct of Resolution Appellant is Good in Law","author":"Editor","date":"September 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\"The CIRP is a time bound process where timeline has been prescribed for each step. The CIRP cannot be allowed to continue for indefinite period.\"","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":281427,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/11\/corporate-debtor-default-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-cirp-coc-liquidation-nclt-reconsider-liquidation-appeal-nclat-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":304389,"position":3},"title":"Adjudicating Authority is obligated to give direction for liquidation only when CoC’s decision is in accordance with IBC: NCLAT","author":"Editor","date":"January 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"In the instant matter, an appeal was filed challenging NCLT's order directing the CoC to reconsider its decision. Upholding the NCLT's order, the Tribunal held that when the CoC's decision for liquidation is in accordance with IBC, then only NCLT's obligation to direct liquidation will arise.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":262217,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/02\/22\/can-application-filed-under-s-951-read-with-s-601-ibc-be-rejected-on-ground-that-no-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-was-pending-against-corporate-debtor-nclat-addresses\/","url_meta":{"origin":304389,"position":4},"title":"Can application filed under S. 95(1) read with S. 60(1) IBC be rejected on ground that no Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was pending against Corporate Debtor? NCLAT addresses","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 22, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0If CIRP or Liquidation Proceeding of a Corporate Debtor is pending before a NCLT, application relating to Insolvency Process of Corporate or Personal Guarantor should be filed before same NCLT. National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (NCLAT): The Coram of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson) and Dr Alok Srivastava (Technical\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/NCLAT_New.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":283000,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/03\/financial-creditor-nclt-corporate-detor-cirp-allowed-appeal-application-condonation-of-delay-nclat-ibc-override-limitation-act-tribunal-no-power-dismissed\/","url_meta":{"origin":304389,"position":5},"title":"NCLAT | IBC overrides Limitation Act; Delay beyond period of 45 days cannot be condoned","author":"Editor","date":"February 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"While adjudicating an appeal file with a delay of 55 days, the Tribunal held that S. 238 IBC overrides S. 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and therefore this Tribunal does not have power to condone a delay beyond a period of 45 days.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304389","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=304389"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304389\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293392"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=304389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=304389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=304389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}