{"id":304367,"date":"2023-10-11T14:00:40","date_gmt":"2023-10-11T08:30:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=304367"},"modified":"2023-10-26T09:21:30","modified_gmt":"2023-10-26T03:51:30","slug":"adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Adequate pleadings and findings required to establish Section 65 IBC compliance; NCLAT revives Section 7 application"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal:<\/span> In an appeal against the order of rejection of an application filed under Section 7<\/a> of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (IBC), a division bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson and Mr. Barun Mitra (Technical Member), held that NCLT’s observation that the Financial Creditor seemed to be settling personal scores and exerting undue pressure on the Corporate Debtor does not fulfill the necessary requirements of Section 65<\/a> of the IBC<\/a> to reject the Section 7 application.<\/p>\n

The NCLAT set aside the Adjudicating Authority’s order and directed that the Section 7 application be revived before the Adjudicating Authority.<\/p>\n

Brief Facts<\/p>\n

In the instant matter, the appellant (Financial Creditor), filed an appeal against the order dated 23-05-2022 issued by the Adjudicating Authority had rejected the appellant’s application filed under Section 7<\/a> of the IBC<\/a>, claiming a financial debt due from the Corporate Debtor.<\/p>\n

The Adjudicating Authority’s basis for rejecting the application was that Section 7 application did not meet the requirements of Section 65<\/a> of the IBC<\/a>, as the Adjudicating Authority found that Section 65 was applicable.<\/p>\n

Appellant’s Contentions<\/p>\n

The appellant asserted that it had extended a loan of Rs. 1,00,00,000\/- to the Corporate Debtor, with an interest rate of 24% per annum, as per a Loan-cum-Share Pledge Agreement dated 20.11.2017. The appellant contended that the Corporate Debtor had defaulted on the loan repayment, leading to the filing of the Section 7 application.<\/p>\n

The appellant challenged the Adjudicating Authority’s decision, contending that the loan disbursement was admitted, partial repayment had been made, and the debt remained due. Therefore, the finding that Section 65<\/a> of the IBC<\/a> was attracted lacked a basis.<\/p>\n

Respondent’s Contentions<\/p>\n

The respondent contended that the entire loan amount had been paid to the appellant. Additionally, some payments had been made to the appellant’s son and his company, in accordance with the instructions of the appellant, which were covered by the loan agreement’s Clause (h).<\/p>\n

The respondent referred to paragraph 26 of the Adjudicating Authority’s order, which suggested that the Financial Creditor had filed the Section 7 application with malicious intent and to settle personal scores, rather than for the purpose of resolving the Corporate Debtor’s insolvency. The order also stated that the Corporate Debtor was a solvent company.<\/p>\n

NCLAT’s Analysis<\/p>\n

Upon considering the arguments presented by both parties and reviewing the records, the NCLAT noted that the respondent’s contention that the entire loan amount had been paid and that the application was malicious had not been addressed with specific findings by the Adjudicating Authority. The Court stated that “for proving the ingredient of Section 65 there has to be adequate pleadings and findings.”<\/span> The absence of findings on these crucial issues meant that the application could not be rejected on these grounds alone.<\/p>\n

The NCLAT also emphasized that the observations made in paragraph 26 of the Adjudicating Authority’s order, indicating malicious intent on the part of the Financial Creditor, did not fulfill the requirements of Section 65<\/a> of the IBC<\/a>. Section 65 requires adequate pleadings and findings to prove its elements, which were lacking in this case.<\/p>\n

NCLAT’s Decision<\/p>\n

The NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority’s order was not sustainable and is liable to be set aside. The NCLAT revived the Section 7 application and directed the Adjudicating Authority to decide the same afresh, ensuring that both parties have an opportunity to be heard in accordance with the law.<\/p>\n

[Amour Infrastructure LLP<\/span> v. Digital Integrated Technologies (P) Ltd.<\/span>, 2023 SCC OnLine NCLAT 727<\/a>, order dated 03-10-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Karan Luthra, Mr. Naman Gowda, Counsel for the Appellant<\/p>\n

Mr. Jitin Singhal, Mr. S.D. Singh, Counsel for the Respondent<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

NCLT’s order did not contain specific findings regarding whether the entire loan amount had been paid and whether nothing remained due.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":293392,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[31422,30182,22014,12521,61808,57710],"class_list":["post-304367","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-financial-debt","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat","tag-nclt","tag-section-65-of-ibc","tag-section-7-application"],"yoast_head":"\nAdequate pleadings and findings required to establish Section 65 of IBC compliance: NCLAT | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"NCLAT revived Section 7 application in absence of adequate pleadings and findings which are required to establish Section 65 of the IBC compliance.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Adequate pleadings and findings required to establish Section 65 IBC compliance; NCLAT revives Section 7 application\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"NCLAT revived Section 7 application in absence of adequate pleadings and findings which are required to establish Section 65 of the IBC compliance.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-11T08:30:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-10-26T03:51:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Adequate pleadings and findings required to establish Section 65 IBC compliance; NCLAT revives Section 7 application\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"Adequate pleadings and findings required to establish Section 65 of IBC compliance: NCLAT | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-11T08:30:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-10-26T03:51:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"NCLAT revived Section 7 application in absence of adequate pleadings and findings which are required to establish Section 65 of the IBC compliance.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"national company law appellate tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Adequate pleadings and findings required to establish Section 65 IBC compliance; NCLAT revives Section 7 application\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Adequate pleadings and findings required to establish Section 65 of IBC compliance: NCLAT | SCC Blog","description":"NCLAT revived Section 7 application in absence of adequate pleadings and findings which are required to establish Section 65 of the IBC compliance.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Adequate pleadings and findings required to establish Section 65 IBC compliance; NCLAT revives Section 7 application","og_description":"NCLAT revived Section 7 application in absence of adequate pleadings and findings which are required to establish Section 65 of the IBC compliance.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-10-11T08:30:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-10-26T03:51:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Adequate pleadings and findings required to establish Section 65 IBC compliance; NCLAT revives Section 7 application","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/","name":"Adequate pleadings and findings required to establish Section 65 of IBC compliance: NCLAT | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","datePublished":"2023-10-11T08:30:40+00:00","dateModified":"2023-10-26T03:51:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"NCLAT revived Section 7 application in absence of adequate pleadings and findings which are required to establish Section 65 of the IBC compliance.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"national company law appellate tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/adequate-pleadings-and-findings-required-to-establish-section-65-of-ibc-compliance-nclat-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Adequate pleadings and findings required to establish Section 65 IBC compliance; NCLAT revives Section 7 application"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":330557,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/09\/11\/money-advanced-for-clearing-land-title-is-an-investment-not-financial-debt-under-section-5-of-the-ibc-nclat-scc-times\/","url_meta":{"origin":304367,"position":0},"title":"Money advanced for clearing land title is an investment, not financial debt under Section 5(8) of the IBC: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"September 11, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT reinforced that not all financial transactions qualify as financial debts under the IBC.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/resolution-plan.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":296119,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/06\/nclat-application-s-9-ibc-for-implementation-of-arbitral-award-not-maintainable\/","url_meta":{"origin":304367,"position":1},"title":"\u2018Arbitration Proceedings\u2019 and \u2018IBC Proceedings\u2019 cannot go on together; NCLAT upholds NCLT’s order rejecting Section 9 application","author":"Ritu","date":"July 6, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT held that an application preferred under Section 9 of the IBC for implementation of an Arbitral Award is not maintainable.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":226105,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/02\/24\/nclat-notice-issued-to-financial-creditor-for-failing-to-reach-settlement-despite-accepting-settlement-amount-filing-of-s-7-ibc-application-with-malicious-intent-to-be-considered\/","url_meta":{"origin":304367,"position":2},"title":"NCLAT | Notice issued to Financial Creditor for failing to reach settlement despite accepting settlement amount; filing of S. 7 IBC application with malicious intent to be considered","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"February 24, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Coram comprising of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Alok Srivastava, Member (Technical), while deciding an appeal filed against Bank of India, stated that, \u201cBank of India once accepted amount is expected to reach a settlement, failing which the question, whether application under Section\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":224562,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2020\/01\/27\/nclat-nclts-order-directing-liquidation-of-corporate-debtor-upheld-where-resolution-applicant-was-a-related-party-and-thus-not-eligible-under-s-29-a-ibc\/","url_meta":{"origin":304367,"position":3},"title":"NCLAT | NCLT’s order directing liquidation of corporate debtor upheld where resolution applicant was a ‘related party’ and thus not eligible under S. 29-A IBC","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"January 27, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0A Bench of Justice Venugopal M., Member (Judicial) and Balvider Singh and Ashok Kumar Mishra, Members (Technical) dismissed an appeal filed against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal. Chandigarh, whereby the resolution plan submitted by the appellant was rejected and liquidation of the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292549,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/18\/nclat-threshold-limit-under-ibc-includes-principal-amount-interest-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":304367,"position":4},"title":"Threshold limit includes both principal amount and interest under IBC; NCLAT set aside NCLT’s order","author":"Ritu","date":"May 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"NCLAT held that the Adjudicating Authority committed error in rejecting the S. 7 application for not fulfilling \u2018threshold\u2019 when Deed of Guarantee mentions about the interest on default.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":219804,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/09\/21\/nclat-nclt-new-delhi-in-terms-of-s-601-ibc-held-to-have-jurisdiction-in-s-7-application-against-corporate-debtor-having-properties-in-up\/","url_meta":{"origin":304367,"position":5},"title":"NCLAT | NCLT, New Delhi in terms of S. 60(1) IBC, held to have jurisdiction in S. 7 application against Corporate Debtor having properties in UP","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT):\u00a0A Bench of Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya (Chairperson); Justice A.I.S Cheema, Member (Judicial) and Kanthi Narahari, Member (Technical) dismissed an appeal filed by the appellant-Director of Corporate Debtor against the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (New Delhi) whereby it had admitted the application filed\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304367","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=304367"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304367\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293392"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=304367"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=304367"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=304367"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}