{"id":304348,"date":"2023-10-11T12:30:58","date_gmt":"2023-10-11T07:00:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=304348"},"modified":"2023-10-26T09:24:55","modified_gmt":"2023-10-26T03:54:55","slug":"closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Closure of CIRP proceedings renders jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant; NCLAT dismisses appeal"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi:<\/span> In a case involving an appeal against an order related to pre-CIRP dues and expenses, a division bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Rakesh Kumar Jain,*<\/span> J., and Naresh Salecha (Technical Member), dismissed the appeal as the appeal was deemed infructuous following the closure of the CIRP proceedings on 15.05.2023, with control of the company returning to the company itself.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Brief Facts<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The present appeal is against the order dated 29-03-2023, passed by the Adjudicating Authority, Kolkata.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The impugned order pertains to an application filed, in CP (IB) No. 1986\/KB\/2019, by the Insolvency Resolution Professional (IRP) of McLeod Russel India Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001549796\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">60(5)<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002802178\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016<\/a> (IBC) read with Regulation 33 of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0000379721\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016<\/a>. CP (IB) No. 1986\/KB\/2019 was originally filed by the Financial Creditor against the Corporate Debtor and was admitted on 10-02-2023.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Subsequently, an appeal was filed against the admission order dated 10-02-2023, and this appeal was disposed of on 15-05-2023, closing the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). During the pendency of the appeal, the IRP-respondent filed the above-mentioned application seeking directions for payments related to pre-CIRP dues and expenses.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Moot Point<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the Adjudicating Authority has jurisdiction to pass an order regarding the payment of pre-CIRP dues during the CIRP?<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">NCLAT&#8217;s Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">After hearing both parties and examining the record, the Court held that the issue raised by the appellant, although attractive, no longer had relevance since the CIRP proceedings initiated by the order dated 10-02-2023 had been closed by the order dated 15-05-2023. The NCLAT held that the appeal had become infructuous due to the closure of the CIRP proceedings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The NCLAT noted that with the CIRP concluded, the company&#8217;s control had reverted to the company itself, and the IRP was no longer in charge. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were imposed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">SBI<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ritesh Prakash Adatiya<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/0Bn32VPs\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine NCLAT 722<\/a>, order dated 09-10-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Avrojyoti Chatterjee, Mr. Rajiv S. Roy, Ms. Jayasree Saha, Mr. Siddharth, Mr. Zoheb Khan, Counsel for the Appellants<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Alok Kumar K., Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 (IRP)<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Abhinav Tyagi, Counsel for the Respondent No. 2<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">NCLAT observed that the issue raised by the appellant, while attractive, no longer had relevance after the closure of the CIRP proceedings.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":293392,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,11],"tags":[43781,22814,58009,30182,22014,61804],"class_list":["post-304348","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-tribunals_commissions_regulatorybodies","tag-cirp","tag-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process","tag-justice-rakesh-kumar-jain","tag-national-company-law-appellate-tribunal","tag-nclat","tag-pre-cirp-dues"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Closure of CIRP proceedings renders jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant: NCLAT | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"NCLAT dismissed the appeal as the Closure of the CIRP proceedings had rendered the jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Closure of CIRP proceedings renders jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant; NCLAT dismisses appeal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"NCLAT dismissed the appeal as the Closure of the CIRP proceedings had rendered the jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-11T07:00:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-10-26T03:54:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Closure of CIRP proceedings renders jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant; NCLAT dismisses appeal\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"Closure of CIRP proceedings renders jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant: NCLAT | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-11T07:00:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-10-26T03:54:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"NCLAT dismissed the appeal as the Closure of the CIRP proceedings had rendered the jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"national company law appellate tribunal\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Closure of CIRP proceedings renders jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant; NCLAT dismisses appeal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Closure of CIRP proceedings renders jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant: NCLAT | SCC Blog","description":"NCLAT dismissed the appeal as the Closure of the CIRP proceedings had rendered the jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Closure of CIRP proceedings renders jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant; NCLAT dismisses appeal","og_description":"NCLAT dismissed the appeal as the Closure of the CIRP proceedings had rendered the jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-10-11T07:00:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-10-26T03:54:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Closure of CIRP proceedings renders jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant; NCLAT dismisses appeal","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/","name":"Closure of CIRP proceedings renders jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant: NCLAT | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","datePublished":"2023-10-11T07:00:58+00:00","dateModified":"2023-10-26T03:54:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"NCLAT dismissed the appeal as the Closure of the CIRP proceedings had rendered the jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"national company law appellate tribunal"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/11\/closure-of-cirp-proceedings-renders-jurisdictional-question-regarding-pre-cirp-dues-irrelevant-nclat-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Closure of CIRP proceedings renders jurisdictional question regarding pre-CIRP dues irrelevant; NCLAT dismisses appeal"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":283175,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/04\/adjudicating-authority-cannot-direct-resolution-professional-to-pay-lease-amount-during-cirp\/","url_meta":{"origin":304348,"position":0},"title":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | Adjudicating Authority cannot direct Resolution Professional to pay lease amount during CIRP","author":"Editor","date":"February 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal held that Adjudicating Authority cannot direct Resolution Professional to pay lease amount under Section 14(1)(d) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, during CIRP","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"NCLAT","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-395.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":254112,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/13\/nclat-refusal-to-sign-form-fa-a-material-irregularity-but-the-other-relevant-considerations-to-not-initiate-cirp-gains-primacy-abuse-of-process-obviated\/","url_meta":{"origin":304348,"position":1},"title":"NCLAT | Refusal to sign Form FA- A material irregularity but the other relevant considerations to not initiate CIRP gains primacy-Abuse of process obviated","author":"Editor","date":"September 13, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): The Coram of Justice Jarat Kumar Jain, Judicial Member and Dr Ashok Kumar Mishra, Technical Member while dismissing as appeal released the Corporate Debtor Company from the rigours of CIRP, and allowed the Board to function through its Board of Directors from immediate effect.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287006,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/16\/financial-creditor-application-section-7-cirp-corporate-debtor-nclat-shareholder-no-locus-standi-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":304348,"position":2},"title":"Do Third-party\/shareholders have locus to challenge initiation of CIRP against Corporate Debtor? NCLAT answers","author":"Ritu","date":"March 16, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT held that there is no law which allows a third party or shareholders to settle the claims of Financial Creditor on behalf of the Corporate Debtor, M\/s McDowell Holdings Limited.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-458.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":255107,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/04\/nclat-finds-raising-a-late-pre-existing-dispute-spurious-and-to-avoid-action-under-ibc-denies-to-stay-cirp\/","url_meta":{"origin":304348,"position":3},"title":"NCLAT| Finds raising a late \u2018pre-existing dispute\u2019, spurious and to avoid action under IBC| Denies to stay CIRP","author":"Editor","date":"October 4, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) -The Coram of Justice Jarat Kumar Jain and Alok Srivastava, Technical Member while deciding an appeal denied to put a stay on the CIRP proceedings. The Tribunal was of the opinion that the alleged \u2018pre-existing-dispute\u2019 was raised at such a late stage even though\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":294481,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/13\/nclat-operational-creditor-cannot-seek-cirp-section-9-ibc-exist-real-dispute-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":304348,"position":4},"title":"Operational creditor cannot seek to initiate CIRP against Corporate Debtor when real dispute exists: NCLAT","author":"Ritu","date":"June 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The NCLAT set aside Adjudicating Authority's order initiating CIRP of the Corporate Debtor.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"national company law appellate tribunal","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/national-company-law-appellate-tribunal-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":214891,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/05\/21\/nclat-rejection-of-application-under-s-9-ibc-upheld-where-cirp-initiated-with-fraudulent-and-malicious-intent\/","url_meta":{"origin":304348,"position":5},"title":"NCLAT | Rejection of application under S. 9 IBC upheld where CIRP initiated with &#8216;fraudulent and malicious&#8217; intent","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 21, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT): A Bench of S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Chairperson and Justice A.I.S Cheema, Member (Judicial) and Kanthi Narahari, Member (Technical) upheld the impugned decision whereby the appellant's (Operational Creditor's) application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, filed against the respondent (Corporate Debtor) was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/NCLAT.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304348","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=304348"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304348\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293392"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=304348"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=304348"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=304348"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}