{"id":304131,"date":"2023-10-09T10:00:02","date_gmt":"2023-10-09T04:30:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=304131"},"modified":"2023-10-18T13:06:18","modified_gmt":"2023-10-18T07:36:18","slug":"magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Magistrate duty bound to scrutinise complaint under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant: Calcutta High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Calcutta High Court:<\/span> In an application filed under Section 482<\/a> of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973<\/a> (CrPC), seeking the quashing of proceedings in complaint case pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, as well as all orders passed in that proceeding, a single-judge bench comprising of Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee,*<\/span> J., held that the impugned orders passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate did not reflect the application of judicial mind to determine whether there were sufficient grounds for proceeding and issuing process and thereby set aside the same.<\/p>\n

Factual Matrix<\/p>\n

The petitioner preferred an application under Section 482<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a> seeking the quashing of proceedings in complaint case pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Alipore, South 24 Parganas. The complaint was filed by the opposite party, alleging offenses under Section 120-B<\/a> of the Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (IPC) and Section 277-A<\/a> of the Income Tax Act, 1961<\/a> (the Act, 1961). The complaint also accused eleven other companies of offenses under Section 120-B<\/a> of the IPC<\/a> along with Sections 277-A<\/a> and 278-B<\/a> of the Act, 1961<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The allegations in the complaint revolve around a survey conducted at an office premises in Kolkata on12-11-2013, where the petitioner’s statement was recorded under Section 131<\/a> of the Act, 1961<\/a>. It was alleged that the petitioner provided accommodation entries to Doller Group of Industries through shell companies managed by him. It was further alleged that certain companies of the Doller Group raised share capital\/premium during the financial years 2010-11 and 2011-12 through these shell entities.<\/p>\n

Moot Point<\/p>\n

Whether the complaint filed against the accused, including the petitioner, justifies the initiation of proceedings, considering the alleged violations of the IPC and the Act, 1961<\/a>?<\/p>\n

Contentions<\/p>\n

The petitioner contended that he is innocent and falsely implicated. The petitioner further contended that the complaint is barred by the period of limitation under Section 468<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a>. The petitioner pointed out that the statements in question were recorded on 12-11-2013, and 30-04-2014. Therefore, the period of limitation commenced on these dates, and it expired in November 2016 and April 2017. However, the complaint was filed on 21-03-2018, which is beyond the prescribed period of limitation.<\/p>\n

Court’s Assessment<\/p>\n

The Court observed that the impugned orders did not contain any observations regarding whether the complaint constituted an offense or under which provision of law the alleged offense was punishable.<\/p>\n

The Court noted that the magistrate, while taking cognizance under Section 200<\/a> of the CrPC<\/a>, is required to apply judicial mind to determine whether there are sufficient grounds for proceeding and for issuance of process. In this case, there was no indication that the magistrate had applied judicial mind before issuing process.<\/p>\n

The Court emphasissrued that even in cases where the complainant is a public servant acting in the discharge of official duties, the magistrate must ascertain whether a prima facie case is made out against the accused before issuing process. The magistrate should not act mechanically but should carefully scrutinise the evidence to ensure that there is a strong suspicion that an offense has been committed.<\/p>\n

Conclusion:<\/p>\n

The Court set aside the impugned orders passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, in the complaint case. The Court directed the magistrate to apply his judicial mind afresh to determine whether there are sufficient grounds for proceeding and for the issuance of process, taking into account the relevant provisions of the CrPC<\/a> and other applicable laws.<\/p>\n

The Court accordingly disposed of the present petition.<\/p>\n

[Sajjan Kumar Garg<\/span> v. Union of India<\/span>, 2023 SCC OnLine Cal 3309<\/a>, order dated 05-10-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, Mr. Dipanjan Dutt, Mr. Sayantak Das, Counsel for the Petitioners<\/p>\n

Mr. Smrajit Roy Chowdhury, Counsel for the Union of India<\/p>\n

Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Code<\/a><\/p>\n

Buy Penal Code, 1860   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"penal<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Calcutta High Court stressed the importance of ensuring that the complaint is not false, vexatious, or intended to harass the accused.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,21604,44814,60251,61726,61725],"class_list":["post-304131","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-complaint-case","tag-judicial-scrutiny","tag-justice-ajoy-kumar-mukherjee","tag-prima-facie-assessment","tag-section-200-of-crpc"],"yoast_head":"\nMagistrate duty bound to scrutinise complaint under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court reiterated that a Magistrate is duty bound to scrutinise complaints under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Magistrate duty bound to scrutinise complaint under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant: Calcutta High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court reiterated that a Magistrate is duty bound to scrutinise complaints under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-09T04:30:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-10-18T07:36:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Magistrate duty bound to scrutinise complaint under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant: Calcutta High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"Magistrate duty bound to scrutinise complaint under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-09T04:30:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-10-18T07:36:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court reiterated that a Magistrate is duty bound to scrutinise complaints under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Magistrate duty bound to scrutinise complaint under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant: Calcutta High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Magistrate duty bound to scrutinise complaint under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog","description":"Calcutta High Court reiterated that a Magistrate is duty bound to scrutinise complaints under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Magistrate duty bound to scrutinise complaint under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant: Calcutta High Court","og_description":"Calcutta High Court reiterated that a Magistrate is duty bound to scrutinise complaints under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-10-09T04:30:02+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-10-18T07:36:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Magistrate duty bound to scrutinise complaint under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant: Calcutta High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/","name":"Magistrate duty bound to scrutinise complaint under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-10-09T04:30:02+00:00","dateModified":"2023-10-18T07:36:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court reiterated that a Magistrate is duty bound to scrutinise complaints under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/09\/magistrate-duty-bound-to-scrutinise-complaint-under-sec-200-of-crpc-even-if-lodged-by-public-servant-cal-hc-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Magistrate duty bound to scrutinise complaint under Section 200 of CrPC, even if lodged by Public Servant: Calcutta High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":294254,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/09\/calcutta-high-court-upheld-trial-court-order-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":304131,"position":0},"title":"Section 138 NI Act| No mandatory disposal of Section 143A application before examination of accused under Section 251 CrPC: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"June 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cSection 143A empowers a Court to pass an order on interim compensation in favour of the complainant where the accused pleads not guilty to the accusations made in the complaint.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":313475,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/09\/cal-hc-sets-aside-issuance-of-process-remands-matter-for-compliance-with-section-202-of-crpc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":304131,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court sets aside Issuance of Process; remands matter to Magistrate for compliance with Section 202 of CrPC","author":"Ritu","date":"February 9, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Whether the process issued against the petitioner by the Magistrate was valid considering the petitioner\u2019s residence outside the territorial jurisdiction of the Magistrate?","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298629,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/05\/wife-leaving-matrimonial-house-with-traditional-marriage-ornaments-cannot-form-basis-for-criminal-case-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":304131,"position":2},"title":"Wife leaving matrimonial house with traditional marriage ornaments cannot form basis for criminal case: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 5, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court quashed the criminal proceeding pending before the Judicial Magistrate and all related orders.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":282925,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/02\/02\/magistrate-cannot-summon-accused-on-a-printed-proforma-without-assigning-any-reason-nor-can-take-cognizance-on-police-report-without-applying-judicial-mind-allahabad-high-cour\/","url_meta":{"origin":304131,"position":3},"title":"Magistrate cannot summon accused on a printed proforma without assigning any reason nor can take cognizance on police report without applying judicial mind, Allahabad High Court reiterates","author":"Editor","date":"February 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court remitted back the matter to the Magistrate and directed him to decide afresh the issue for taking cognizance and summoning the applicants and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Allahabad High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/MicrosoftTeams-image31.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":343989,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/20\/dhc-chief-judicial-magistrate-cannot-transfer-case-from-one-court-or-another-on-application-or-suo-motu\/","url_meta":{"origin":304131,"position":4},"title":"Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate cannot transfer a case from one Court or another on application or suo motu under Section 450 BNSS: Delhi HC","author":"Arushi","date":"March 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate cannot exercise the administrative power of transfer of case from one Court to another within its jurisdiction, unless an order is passed by the High Court under Section 10(2) of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":254911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/09\/30\/domestic-violence-act-5\/","url_meta":{"origin":304131,"position":5},"title":"Is it proper to invoke S. 482 CrPC for quashing Magistrate’s order in a proceeding under S. 12 r\/w S. 23 of Domestic Violence Act on the point of maintainability? Cal HC determines","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"September 30, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Bibek Chaudhari, J., considered the question as to whether Section 482 CrPC is applicable in relation to an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The following is a summary of High Court's determination on legal points that were before it for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=304131"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304131\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=304131"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=304131"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=304131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}