{"id":302263,"date":"2023-09-25T11:00:27","date_gmt":"2023-09-25T05:30:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=302263"},"modified":"2023-09-27T15:27:10","modified_gmt":"2023-09-27T09:57:10","slug":"preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"[Preventive Detention] | Unreasonably belated consideration of representation is equivalent to non-compliance of Art. 22(5) of the Constitution: J&K and Ladakh HC"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court:<\/span> While considering the instant petition challenging the preventive detention order passed by the District Magistrate, Srinagar against the detenue on several grounds including non-consideration of representation of the detenue against the impugned order, the Bench of Sanjay Dhar, J.*<\/span>, allowing the petition stated that non-consideration or an unreasonably belated consideration of the representation tantamounts to non-compliance of Art. 22(5)<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a>, which in turn renders the detention unsustainable in law.<\/p>\n

The detenue was put in preventive detention in Central Jail, Jammu (Kotbhalwal), to prevent him from indulging in the activities which are prejudicial to the security of the State.<\/p>\n

The counsel for the detenue contended that the impugned order was issued without application of mind and that the charges against the detenue have been fabricated. Furthermore, it was alleged that the grounds for detention are vague and procedural safeguards have not been complied with. The detenue specifically contended that his representation against the impugned order of detention has not been considered.<\/p>\n

Per contra, the respondents argued that detenue was informed that he can make a representation to the government as well as to the detaining authority against his detention but despite that he has not chosen to file any representation.<\/p>\n

Perusing the facts of the case and contentions raised, the Court noted that there is substance in the detenue’s contention that he was disabled from making an effective representation against the order of detention as the material, which formed basis of the grounds of detention and the consequent order of detention, has not been furnished to him. The Court thus found that vital safeguards against arbitrary use of law of preventive detention have been observed in breach by the respondents in this case rendering the impugned order of detention unsustainable in law.<\/p>\n

Taking note of the detenue’s specific contention that he had made a representation against his detention through his father, which, seemingly, has been received by the office of District Magistrate, Srinagar, however the same was not considered. The Court also noted that these assertions have gone unrebutted as there is no denial to the same by the respondents in the counter affidavit.<\/p>\n

The Court stated that that non-consideration of the representation indisputably amounts to violation of constitutional safeguards provided the provisions of Art. 22(5)<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n

With the afore-stated assessment, the Court thus allowed the petition and directed the release of the detenue from preventive custody provided he is not required in connection with any other case.<\/p>\n

[Bilal Ahmad Ganie v. UT of J&K, 2023 SCC OnLine J&K 668<\/a>, decided on 19-09-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Judgment by Justice Sanjay Dhar<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

For detenue\/ petitioner-<\/span> Wajid Haseeb, Advocate<\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The detenue specifically alleged that he made a representation against impugned detention order, however, the same was not considered by the detaining authority.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":293506,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[61312,3066,46667,3117,32215],"class_list":["post-302263","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-constitutional-safeguards","tag-delay","tag-jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court","tag-Preventive_Detention","tag-representation"],"yoast_head":"\nUnreasonably belated consideration of representation in preventive detention cases violates Constitution: J&K and Ladakh HC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"J&K and Ladakh HC held that non-consideration of the representation indisputably amounts to violation of constitutional safeguards.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"[Preventive Detention] | Unreasonably belated consideration of representation is equivalent to non-compliance of Art. 22(5) of the Constitution: J&K and Ladakh HC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"J&K and Ladakh HC held that non-consideration of the representation indisputably amounts to violation of constitutional safeguards.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-09-25T05:30:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-09-27T09:57:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"[Preventive Detention] | Unreasonably belated consideration of representation is equivalent to non-compliance of Art. 22(5) of the Constitution: J&K and Ladakh HC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Unreasonably belated consideration of representation in preventive detention cases violates Constitution: J&K and Ladakh HC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-25T05:30:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-27T09:57:10+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"J&K and Ladakh HC held that non-consideration of the representation indisputably amounts to violation of constitutional safeguards.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"jammu and kashmir and ladakh high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"[Preventive Detention] | Unreasonably belated consideration of representation is equivalent to non-compliance of Art. 22(5) of the Constitution: J&K and Ladakh HC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Unreasonably belated consideration of representation in preventive detention cases violates Constitution: J&K and Ladakh HC","description":"J&K and Ladakh HC held that non-consideration of the representation indisputably amounts to violation of constitutional safeguards.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"[Preventive Detention] | Unreasonably belated consideration of representation is equivalent to non-compliance of Art. 22(5) of the Constitution: J&K and Ladakh HC","og_description":"J&K and Ladakh HC held that non-consideration of the representation indisputably amounts to violation of constitutional safeguards.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-09-25T05:30:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-09-27T09:57:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"[Preventive Detention] | Unreasonably belated consideration of representation is equivalent to non-compliance of Art. 22(5) of the Constitution: J&K and Ladakh HC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","name":"Unreasonably belated consideration of representation in preventive detention cases violates Constitution: J&K and Ladakh HC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp","datePublished":"2023-09-25T05:30:27+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-27T09:57:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"J&K and Ladakh HC held that non-consideration of the representation indisputably amounts to violation of constitutional safeguards.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"jammu and kashmir and ladakh high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/25\/preventive-detention-unreasonable-delay-representation-violation-constitution-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"[Preventive Detention] | Unreasonably belated consideration of representation is equivalent to non-compliance of Art. 22(5) of the Constitution: J&K and Ladakh HC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":273151,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/09\/06\/jk-and-ladakh-hc-number-of-acts-not-to-be-determined-for-detention-of-an-individual-but-impact-of-the-acts-preventive-detention\/","url_meta":{"origin":302263,"position":0},"title":"J&K and Ladakh HC| Number of acts not to be determined for detention of an individual, but impact of the act(s) [Preventive Detention]","author":"Editor","date":"September 6, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court: Moksha Khajuria Kazmi, J. dismissed a petition which was filed assailing the detention order in terms of Section (3) of Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 (\u2018NDPS Act\u2019) issued by the Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir (\u2018Detaining\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/JK-HC.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298347,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/02\/fundamentalist-muslim-cannot-equated-extremist-preventive-detention-jammu-and-kashmir-ladakh-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":302263,"position":1},"title":"A fundamentalist Muslim cannot be equated with an extremist; J&K and Ladakh HC observes","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 2, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court also observed that fundamentalism pertaining to a Muslim is merely someone who believes in the fundamentals of Islam and the same cannot have a negative bearing.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jammu and kashmir and ladakh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":204488,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2018\/10\/29\/an-order-of-preventive-detention-passed-without-supplying-the-relevant-materials-to-the-detenue-is-illegal\/","url_meta":{"origin":302263,"position":2},"title":"An order of preventive detention passed, without supplying the relevant materials to the detenue, is illegal","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"October 29, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Rashid Ali Dar, J., allowed a petition filed against the order of District Magistrate, Anantnag, under Section 8 of the J&K Public Safety Act, whereby the petitioner was placed under preventive detention. The main issue that arose before the Court\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":301554,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/15\/brother-militant-justifiy-preventive-detention-terrorism-pok-jammu-kashmir-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":302263,"position":3},"title":"Being brother of a militant, and lacking any ostensible activities disrupting public peace or security, cannot justify preventive detention: J&K and Ladakh HC","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 15, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The live and proximate link between the past conduct of the detenue and the imperative need to detain, must be harmonised to rely upon the alleged illegal activities of the detenue.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"jammu and kashmir and ladakh high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jammu-and-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":321515,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/05\/06\/grounds-of-detention-vague-incapable-of-being-understood-jk-ladakh-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":302263,"position":4},"title":"Grounds of detention incapable of being intelligently understood, can be termed as vague: J&K and Ladakh HC reiterates","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 6, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cIn other words, a detenue may be able to make an effective representation if the details of the facts, on the basis of which conclusion is drawn by the detaining authority, are furnished to him\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Jammu-and-Kashmir-and-Ladakh-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":217211,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/07\/23\/jk-hc-preventive-detention-of-a-person-who-is-already-in-custody-of-state-in-connection-with-commission-of-offence-under-substantive-law-must-not-be-ordered\/","url_meta":{"origin":302263,"position":5},"title":"J&K HC | Preventive detention of a person who is already in custody of State in connection with commission of offence under substantive law must not be ordered","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"July 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Rashid Ali Dar, J. allowed a habeas corpus petition and quashed detention order of a person who had been under Section 3 of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988. (hereinafter \u201cthe Act\u201d). Petitioner herein (detenue) was supplying 50\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/302263","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=302263"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/302263\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293506"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=302263"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=302263"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=302263"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}