{"id":301876,"date":"2023-09-19T16:00:20","date_gmt":"2023-09-19T10:30:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=301876"},"modified":"2023-09-21T10:23:17","modified_gmt":"2023-09-21T04:53:17","slug":"delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Drawback benefits available on gold exports despite non-payment of basic custom duty, if additional duty is paid during import: Delhi High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a case wherein, the petitioner approached the Court to seek issuance of an appropriate writ to command the respondents to release the drawback claim of Rs. 2,15,48,344 with applicable interest to the petitioner, the Division Bench of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Yashwant Varma*<\/span> and Dharmesh Sharma, JJ., directed the respondents to release the petitioner&#8217;s drawback benefits as claimed with due expedition and held the respondents liable to pay the interest computed as per Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001565631\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">75-A<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002780399\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Custom Act, 1962<\/a> (&#8216;CA Act&#8217;) and accordingly allowed the petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant case, AJ Gold and Silver Refinery, the petitioner was a precious metal refining firm, for which purpose, it imported gold dore bars.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Central Board of Excise and Customs issued a circular whereby, the conversion of free shipping bills from one scheme to another scheme, subject to certain conditions were permitted. Thereafter, the petitioner in compliance with the Reserve Bank of India (&#8216;RBI&#8217;) circular dated 14-8-2013, exported 20% of the gold dore bars which had been imported in the form of gold jewellery. However, the petitioner failed to submit duty drawback shipping bills, which were required to claim drawback benefits.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Therefore, the petitioner approached the respondent requesting to amend the free shipping bills as per Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001565527\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">149<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002780399\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Customs Act, 1962<\/a> (&#8216;CA Act&#8217;). On 27-2-2015, the permission to amend the shipping bills and treat them as duty drawback shipping bills was granted to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the petitioner submitted the relevant documents for disbursal of drawback claims. However, despite various requests made by the petitioner to claim drawback benefits, such requests were not acceded. On 4-9-2012, the respondent issued a memorandum, and asserted that during import of gold dore bars, the petitioner did not pay basic custom duty and only paid an additional duty under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002613263\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948288\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Customs Tariffs Act, 1975<\/a> (&#8216;CT Act&#8217;) thus, the petitioner would not be entitled to drawback benefits. The petitioner responded to the memorandum and also participated in a personal hearing. However, since no action was taken, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court analysed the Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002613260\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">12<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002948288\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CA Act<\/a> which specifies the duties payable on imported goods and Section 3 of the CT Act and opined that the importer was obliged to pay an additional duty equivalent to the excise duty for the time being leviable on a like article if produced or manufactured in India.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that mere fact that an additional duty was equated to the excise duty did not change the character of that duty as being other than that which was imposed on import of articles in India. The Court further relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Hyderabad Industries Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=KDE5OTUpIDUgU0NDIDMzOCYmJiYmNDAmJiYmJlNlYXJjaFBhZ2U=\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1995) 5 SCC 338<\/a> wherein it was held that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;while Section 3 of the CT Act may constitute a charging section distinct and separate from Section 12 of the CA Act, it continues to remain in the genre of a customs duty.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court disagreed with the respondents contention that the levy of additional duty would not qualify as duty and noted that Rule 2(a) of the Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 1995 (&#8216;Drawback Rules&#8217;) while defining drawback provided that the drawback would be allowed on goods that are manufactured in India are exported and concept of drawback was the rebate of duty or tax charged on imported material. Thus, the Court opined that it was not possible to state that the duty levied under Section 3 of the CT Act did not fall within the ambit of duty or tax.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that as per Rule 3 of the Drawback Rules, an exporter was entitled to claim drawback on the export of goods at the rates determined by the Government of India. The Drawback Rules, used the words &#8216;duty&#8217; and &#8216;tax&#8217; without confining the words to the CA Act or the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002913364\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Central Excise Act, 1944<\/a>. Thus, the Court concluded that as long as goods had suffered a &#8216;tax&#8217; or &#8216;duty&#8217; at the time of import, the drawback claim at the export would be available.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that the Condition 23 of the Notification dated 14-8-2013 did not deprive the petitioner&#8217;s right to seek drawback benefits since it was restricted to the goods exported in discharge of an export obligation as per Foreign Trade Policy. The Court further opined that once the petitioner had paid the duties under Section 3 of CT Act, it could not be contended that the goods were imported duty free.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that the free shipping bills were amended on 27-2-2015, thereafter, on 6-5-2015, the petitioner applied for release of drawback benefits. Further, as per Section 75A of the CA Act, interest became payable upon the expiry of one month from the date of application seeking drawback application till the time payment was ultimately affected. Thus, the Court opined that in the present case, the respondents were liable to pay interest which would commence from the expiry of the period of one month from 6-5-2015 till the time amount was paid.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Accordingly, the Court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to release the petitioner&#8217;s drawback benefits as claimed with due expedition and held the respondents liable to pay the interest computed as per Section 75A of the CA Act.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">AJ Gold and Silver Refinery v. Assistant Commissioner of Customs, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/4lYR12Qx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 5728<\/a>, decided on 15-9-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by- Justice Yashwant Varma<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> Kishor Kunal and Ankita Prakash, Advocate;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">For the Respondents<\/span>: R. Ramachandran, Standing Counsel<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Once the petitioner had paid the duties as contemplated under Section 3 of the Tariff Act, 1975, it could not be possibly contended that the goods were imported &#8216;duty free&#8217;.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":293503,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[61187,57467,2543,61186,25574,29553,25564,2621],"class_list":["post-301876","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-custom-tariffs-act-1975","tag-customs-act-1962","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-drawback-claim","tag-duty","tag-export","tag-import","tag-Tax"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Drawback beneifts available for gold exports, provided additional duty is paid u\/s 3 of Customs Tariffs Act: Delhi HC |SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court directed the respondents to release the petitioner\u2019s drawback benefits as claimed and held the respondents liable to pay the interest computed as per Section 75A of the CA Act.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Drawback benefits available on gold exports despite non-payment of basic custom duty, if additional duty is paid during import: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court directed the respondents to release the petitioner\u2019s drawback benefits as claimed and held the respondents liable to pay the interest computed as per Section 75A of the CA Act.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-09-19T10:30:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-09-21T04:53:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Drawback benefits available on gold exports despite non-payment of basic custom duty, if additional duty is paid during import: Delhi High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Drawback beneifts available for gold exports, provided additional duty is paid u\/s 3 of Customs Tariffs Act: Delhi HC |SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-19T10:30:20+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-21T04:53:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court directed the respondents to release the petitioner\u2019s drawback benefits as claimed and held the respondents liable to pay the interest computed as per Section 75A of the CA Act.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Drawback benefits available on gold exports despite non-payment of basic custom duty, if additional duty is paid during import: Delhi High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Drawback beneifts available for gold exports, provided additional duty is paid u\/s 3 of Customs Tariffs Act: Delhi HC |SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court directed the respondents to release the petitioner\u2019s drawback benefits as claimed and held the respondents liable to pay the interest computed as per Section 75A of the CA Act.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Drawback benefits available on gold exports despite non-payment of basic custom duty, if additional duty is paid during import: Delhi High Court","og_description":"Delhi High Court directed the respondents to release the petitioner\u2019s drawback benefits as claimed and held the respondents liable to pay the interest computed as per Section 75A of the CA Act.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-09-19T10:30:20+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-09-21T04:53:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Drawback benefits available on gold exports despite non-payment of basic custom duty, if additional duty is paid during import: Delhi High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/","name":"Drawback beneifts available for gold exports, provided additional duty is paid u\/s 3 of Customs Tariffs Act: Delhi HC |SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-09-19T10:30:20+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-21T04:53:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Delhi High Court directed the respondents to release the petitioner\u2019s drawback benefits as claimed and held the respondents liable to pay the interest computed as per Section 75A of the CA Act.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-drawback-beneifts-available-for-gold-exports-provided-additional-duty-is-paid-u-s-3-of-customstariffs-act-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Drawback benefits available on gold exports despite non-payment of basic custom duty, if additional duty is paid during import: Delhi High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":313331,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/07\/benefit-of-duty-drawback-under-exim-policy-available-to-civil-construction-supreme-court-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":301876,"position":0},"title":"SC upholds Karnataka HC\u2019s decision granting 15% interest on belated refund of Duty Drawback to Civil Construction under Exim Policy 1992-1997","author":"Editor","date":"February 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe benefit of duty drawback would take effect from the date of enforcement of the Exim Policy and in case of belated refund of duty drawback, interest rate fixed by the Central Government at the relevant point of time is applicable\u201d.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Duty drawback under Exim Policy to civil construction","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Duty-drawback-under-Exim-Policy-to-civil-construction.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Duty-drawback-under-Exim-Policy-to-civil-construction.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Duty-drawback-under-Exim-Policy-to-civil-construction.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Duty-drawback-under-Exim-Policy-to-civil-construction.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":267434,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/05\/27\/import-without-custom-duty-lower-court-issued-summons-order-but-delhi-hc-sets-aside\/","url_meta":{"origin":301876,"position":1},"title":"Import without custom duty, lower Court issued summons order, but Delhi HC sets aside: Read 5 reasons why impugned order was bad in law","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"May 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: Chandra Dhari Singh, J., while setting aside the order of lower Court in a case concerning Customs Act, laid down five reasons why the impugned order was bad in law. A petition was filed for quashing the order passed by the lower Court. Factual Background The respondent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/DelCustoms.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/DelCustoms.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/DelCustoms.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/DelCustoms.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/DelCustoms.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":289377,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/13\/income-tax-act-duty-drawback-receipts-or-duty-entitlement-passbook-benefits-do-not-form-part-of-the-net-profits-of-eligible-industrial-undertakings-supreme-court-legal-news-legal-research-updates\/","url_meta":{"origin":301876,"position":2},"title":"Assessee not entitled to deduction u\/s 80-IB of Income Tax Act on Duty drawback \/ DEPB Schemes profit: Supreme Court","author":"Editor","date":"April 13, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court affirmed the order passed by the High Court stating that the respondent assessee was neither entitled to the deductions nor profit earned under Section 80-IB on the amount of DEPB as well as Duty Drawback Scheme.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Duty Drawback DEPB Schemes","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1116.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1116.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1116.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/MicrosoftTeams-image-1116.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":318394,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/03\/26\/tribunal-has-discretion-to-dispense-obligation-to-deposit-duty-interest-or-penalty-in-cases-of-undue-hardships-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":301876,"position":3},"title":"[Section 129-E, Customs Act] | Tribunal has discretion to dispense obligation to deposit duty\/interest or penalty in cases of undue hardships: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 26, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Section 129-E of Customs Act, 1962 makes it obligatory to deposit the duty\/penalty pending the appeal and if a party does not comply either with the main Section or with any order that might be passed under the proviso, the Appellate Authority is fully competent to reject the appeal for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299608,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/18\/interest-delayed-refunds-to-be-calculated-from-date-of-receipt-application-under-central-excise-act-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":301876,"position":4},"title":"Interest on delayed refunds to be calculated from the date of receipt of application under Section 11-B of the Central Excise Act, 1944: Delhi High Court","author":"Simranjeet","date":"August 18, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cA levy of interest on refund must undoubtedly follow where it was found that the amount has been unjustifiably retained or remitted with undue delay and thus, the respondents cannot be permitted to retain moneys which are otherwise not due or are otherwise liable to be returned.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":93111,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/12\/17\/notice-to-be-given-within-six-months-for-goods-seized-under-customs-act\/","url_meta":{"origin":301876,"position":5},"title":"Notice to be given within six months for goods seized under Customs Act","author":"Saba","date":"December 17, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: While allowing a petition seeking return of a bracelet seized by the Custom Officers, the Single Bench of Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. held that where goods are seized under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962 and no notice thereof is given under Section 124(a) within six months\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301876","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=301876"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301876\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293503"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=301876"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=301876"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=301876"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}