{"id":301716,"date":"2023-09-17T10:00:36","date_gmt":"2023-09-17T04:30:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=301716"},"modified":"2023-09-20T11:13:20","modified_gmt":"2023-09-20T05:43:20","slug":"issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"Calcutta High Court questions reopening of issue of nullity of eviction decree by Tribunal after it being settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of CPC"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Calcutta High Court:<\/span> While deciding an appeal filed against the order of West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal directing the State to take control of the land after nullifying a decree for eviction against the private respondent as the same is vested with the State, a division bench comprising of <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Debangsu Basak*<\/span> and Md. Shabbar Rashidi, JJ., set aside the Tribunal&#8217;s order, emphasizing that the issue of vesting had been decided in previous execution proceedings under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (CPC), and the Tribunal should not have reopened it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court directed the executing court to comply with the Supreme Court&#8217;s order to expedite the execution proceedings within 6 months.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Brief Facts<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant matter, the petitioner challenged an order dated 02-05-2014, issued by the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal declaring the decree passed by Civil Judge, Howrah which allowed the petitioner&#8217;s eviction suit, as a nullity and directed the State to take control of the land.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Moot Point<\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p>Whether the Tribunal&#8217;s order declaring the decree for eviction as null and void due to alleged land vesting with the State valid?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Whether the petitioner suppress material facts in obtaining the decree?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Whether the Tribunal has the jurisdiction to decide on the issue of vesting when a challenge to the order of vesting is pending before the High Court?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Petitioner&#8217;s Contentions<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner contended that the private respondent, after failing in execution proceedings, approached the Tribunal with mala fide intentions. The petitioner asserted their right as the landlord to execute the decree and cited legal precedents, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ganesh Trading Co. (P) Ltd., In re<\/span>, 1984 SCC OnLine Cal 128, to support their claim.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While referring to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Calcutta Swimming Club<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Lalit Singh<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Cs8Eo6uk\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2009 SCC OnLine Cal 445<\/a>, the petitioner contended that the issue of land vesting with the State was irrelevant to the suit for eviction, and the private respondent had no cause of action to approach the Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The petitioner emphasised that suppression must pertain to a relevant fact. The petitioner contended that the issue of nullity had already been addressed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a> and therefore, the Tribunal&#8217;s order should be set aside.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Respondent&#8217;s Contentions<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The private respondent contended that the petitioner was aware of the order of land vesting by the State Government during the eviction suit. It was claimed that the petitioner had suppressed this fact, leading to the Tribunal&#8217;s decision that the eviction decree was null and void.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">While referring to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">L. Chandra Kumar<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/hn0m4fOX\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1997) 3 SCC 261<\/a>, the private respondent asserted that since the land had vested with the State in 2000, the eviction decree could not be executed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">State&#8217;s Contentions<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The State contended that the land in question had indeed vested under the Land Reforms Act, 1955, and provided evidence in the form of a notice dated 30-10-2000, issued by the State regarding the vesting.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Court&#8217;s Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the petitioner had filed a suit for eviction in 1982, and the order of vesting was issued in 1994, therefore, the petitioner could not have included information about the vesting order in the lawsuit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court observed that the central issue in the suit for eviction was the landlord-tenant relationship, which had not been contested by the private respondent. The Court referred <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">S.J.S Business Enterprises (P) Ltd.<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of Bihar<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/wYDsp1Jc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(2004) 7 SCC 166<\/a>, and observed that suppression of a material fact must be relevant to the case&#8217;s merits and in the present case, the issue of land ownership did not affect the landlord-tenant relationship.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court cited <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ganesh Trading Co. (P) Ltd.<\/span> (Supra) to support the idea that the claim of rent against a lessee with a decree for eviction but not yet evicted remained valid until the decree was satisfied. While referring to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Calcutta Swimming Club<\/span> (Supra), the Court mentioned stressed that a right to sue must accrue in favor of the plaintiff, and in the present case, the private respondent had no right to approach the Tribunal. The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">L. Chandra Kumar<\/span> (Supra) and asserted that Tribunals are competent to hear matters where the vires of statutory provisions were questioned, except those challenging their parent statute.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court held that the issue of nullity of eviction decree based on the land in question as vested to the State had been settled in execution proceedings under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523791\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">47<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a> before the private respondent approached the Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court set aside the Tribunal&#8217;s order and directed the executing court to comply with the Supreme Court&#8217;s order dated 12-08-2013, regarding the execution of the eviction decree as expeditiously as possible, preferably within 6 months.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court allowed the petition, and no costs were awarded.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Additional Ruling<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court refused the prayer for a stay citing the existence of an eviction decree, a Supreme Court order for expeditious execution, and the lack of grounds for a stay.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Calcutta Pinjrapole Society<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">R.S.I. (P) Ltd.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/Fsj4xOrT\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Cal 2813<\/a>, order dated 14-09-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment by Justice Debangsu Basak<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Mrinal Kanti Ghosh, Mr. Kushal Chatterjee, Mr. Sunil Kumar Singhania, Ms. Kalpana Singhania, Ms. Twinkle Kaur, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Subir Sannyal, Mr. Debjit Mukherjee, Mr. Ayan Banerjee, Mr. Mainak Gupta, Mr. Prasun Mukherjee, Counsel for the Private Respondent<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Soumitra Bandhyapadhyay and Ms. Suchana Banerjee, Counsel for the State<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">In the instant matter, the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal reopened the issue of nullity of eviction decree and held that the land in question was vested with the State.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2689,31984,61115,61089,61090,61116,61114],"class_list":["post-301716","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-eviction-decree","tag-execution-proceeding","tag-justice-debangsu-basak","tag-justice-md-shabbar-rashidi","tag-landlord-tenant-relationship","tag-section-47-of-the-cpc"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Issue of nullity on land vesting was settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of the CPC: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court questions Tribunal\u2019s reopening of case when the issue of nullity on land vesting was already settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of the CPC.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court questions reopening of issue of nullity of eviction decree by Tribunal after it being settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of CPC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court questions Tribunal\u2019s reopening of case when the issue of nullity on land vesting was already settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of the CPC.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-09-17T04:30:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-09-20T05:43:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Calcutta High Court questions reopening of issue of nullity of eviction decree by Tribunal after it being settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of CPC\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/\",\"name\":\"Issue of nullity on land vesting was settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of the CPC: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-17T04:30:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-20T05:43:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court questions Tribunal\u2019s reopening of case when the issue of nullity on land vesting was already settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of the CPC.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Calcutta High Court questions reopening of issue of nullity of eviction decree by Tribunal after it being settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of CPC\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Issue of nullity on land vesting was settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of the CPC: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog","description":"Calcutta High Court questions Tribunal\u2019s reopening of case when the issue of nullity on land vesting was already settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of the CPC.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Calcutta High Court questions reopening of issue of nullity of eviction decree by Tribunal after it being settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of CPC","og_description":"Calcutta High Court questions Tribunal\u2019s reopening of case when the issue of nullity on land vesting was already settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of the CPC.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-09-17T04:30:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-09-20T05:43:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Calcutta High Court questions reopening of issue of nullity of eviction decree by Tribunal after it being settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of CPC","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/","name":"Issue of nullity on land vesting was settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of the CPC: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-09-17T04:30:36+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-20T05:43:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court questions Tribunal\u2019s reopening of case when the issue of nullity on land vesting was already settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of the CPC.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/17\/issue-of-nullity-on-land-vesting-was-settled-in-execution-proceeding-under-section-47-of-the-cpc-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Calcutta High Court questions reopening of issue of nullity of eviction decree by Tribunal after it being settled in execution proceeding under Section 47 of CPC"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":280892,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/01\/03\/acid-attack-ocular-evidence-motive-reliable-criminal-trial-section-326a-penal-code-calcutta-high-court-legal-research-updates-news-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":301716,"position":0},"title":"No interference in case of well-founded, unshaken ocular and documentary evidence: Calcutta High Court upholds conviction in Acid Attack case","author":"Editor","date":"January 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court based its ruling on the well settled principle of law that where oral evidence is convincing, reliable and trustworthy, the motive behind the occurrence loses its relevance.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image95.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":302814,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/10\/03\/irrevocable-vesting-of-land-in-state-regardless-of-non-utilization-for-intended-purpose-calcutta-hc-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":301716,"position":1},"title":"Subsequent purchase of land acquired by State does not give purchaser right to challenge acquisition: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"October 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that the issuance of a subsequent notification and the notice by the National Highway Authority did not affect the validity of the earlier acquisition.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":269082,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/06\/27\/calcutta-high-court-order-xli-rule-51-of-the-cpc-grants-the-court-discretion-to-stay-the-execution-of-a-decree-for-sufficient-cause-award-by-arbitral-tribunal-upheld\/","url_meta":{"origin":301716,"position":2},"title":"Calcutta High Court| Order XLI, Rule 5(1) of the CPC grants the court discretion to stay the execution of a decree for &#8216;sufficient cause&#8217;; Award by arbitral tribunal upheld","author":"Editor","date":"June 27, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0 \u00a0 Calcutta High Court: Shekhar B. Saraf, J. upheld the award granted by the Arbitral Tribunal holding that the award holder should be secured for the entirety of the amount along with interest and other costs. The petitioner had filed this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court-2.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court-2.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court-2.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/calcutta_high_court-2.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":272712,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/31\/calcutta-high-court-gets-9-new-additional-judges\/","url_meta":{"origin":301716,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court gets 9 new Additional Judges","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"August 31, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The President appoints following to be the\u00a0 Additional Judges of the Calcutta High Court, in that order of seniority, for a period of two years with effect from the date they assume charge of their respective offices:\u00a0 Shri Biswaroop Chowdhury; Shri Partha Sarathi Sen; Shri Prasenjit Biswas; Shri Uday Kumar;\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Appointments &amp; Transfers&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Appointments &amp; Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/calcutta_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":351683,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/06\/27\/cal-hc-commutes-death-penalty-of-convict-who-raped-minor-girl\/","url_meta":{"origin":301716,"position":4},"title":"Calcutta HC commutes death sentence of man convicted for raping and killing a minor girl","author":"Editor","date":"June 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cAdmittedly, none of the witnesses examined on behalf of the prosecution has claimed to have seen the convict committing the murder of the victim. The case is entirely based upon circumstantial evidence.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"commute death penalty rape","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/commute-death-penalty-rape.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/commute-death-penalty-rape.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/commute-death-penalty-rape.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/commute-death-penalty-rape.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":211346,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2019\/03\/05\/cal-hc-rejecting-adjournment-prayer-is-not-a-breach-of-principles-of-natural-justice\/","url_meta":{"origin":301716,"position":5},"title":"Cal HC | Rejecting adjournment prayer is not a breach of principles of natural justice","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 5, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court:\u00a0Debangsu Basak, J., dismissed a petition filed by State Fisheries Development Corporation relating to a land dispute with the State. The petitioner was a Government of W.B. undertaking engaged in the business of pisciculture. It obtained land from the District Administration. According to the petitioner, the State was\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/calcutta-court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301716","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=301716"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301716\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=301716"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=301716"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=301716"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}