{"id":30151,"date":"2015-12-24T10:56:01","date_gmt":"2015-12-24T05:26:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=30151"},"modified":"2015-12-24T10:56:48","modified_gmt":"2015-12-24T05:26:48","slug":"writ-of-mandamus-against-state-government-rejected-by-the-high-court-on-account-of-unwillingness-of-the-investigation-authority-not-made-out","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/24\/writ-of-mandamus-against-state-government-rejected-by-the-high-court-on-account-of-unwillingness-of-the-investigation-authority-not-made-out\/","title":{"rendered":"Writ of mandamus against State Government rejected by the High Court on account of unwillingness of the investigation authority not made out"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Delhi High Court<\/strong>: While dismissing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India to register a criminal case against Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan, Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia under Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (FCRA), G. Rohini, CJ. and Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. held that there is no reason as to why the investigative agencies to whom the petitioner has already complained would not look into or are not looking into the allegations or would not discover the truth.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Relying on the decisions laid down by Supreme Court, in a catena of judgments including in the cases of <em>State of West Bengal vs. Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights West Bengal <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2010_3_SCC_571\">(2010) 3 SCC 571<\/a><em>, Babubhai Vs. State of Gujarat <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2010_12_SCC_254\">(2010) 12 SCC 254<\/a> and the most recent one in <em>Mithilesh Kumar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan <\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/LoginForNewsLink\/2015_9_SCC_795\">(2015) 9 SCC 795<\/a><em>,<\/em> the Court held that though the Courts, in exercise of their power of judicial review, are entitled to direct investigation into an offence alleged to have taken place and such direction would not amount to infringement of the doctrine of separation of powers but such power should not be exercised just for asking or to satisfy the ego or vindicate the prestige of a party interested in such investigation and should be issued only if such a direction is found necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case\/situation. The Courts would be justified in issuing such a direction only if it were to find <em>prima facie <\/em>an offence to have been committed and the Investigating Agency, unwilling to act or if the investigation though undertaken, to be not a fair one or where there are exceptional circumstances and in order to prevent miscarriage of criminal justice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Court further said that unless an extraordinary case of gross abuse of power is made out by those in charge of investigation, the Court should be quite loath to interfere with the investigation, a field of activity reserved for Police and the executive. Thus, only if a case of <em>malafide<\/em> exercise of power by a police officer is made out, would the Court interfere. Since the petitioners were \u00a0unable to make out an extraordinary case of gross abuse of power, the petition was dismissed. [<em>Manohar Lal Sharma v. Union of India<\/em>,<em> W.P.(C) No.6414\/2013,<\/em> decided on 17-12-2015]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court: While dismissing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India to register a criminal <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3043],"class_list":["post-30151","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Mandamus"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Writ of mandamus against State Government rejected by the High Court on account of unwillingness of the investigation authority not made out | SCC Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/24\/writ-of-mandamus-against-state-government-rejected-by-the-high-court-on-account-of-unwillingness-of-the-investigation-authority-not-made-out\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Writ of mandamus against State Government rejected by the High Court on account of unwillingness of the investigation authority not made out\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court: While dismissing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India to register a criminal\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/24\/writ-of-mandamus-against-state-government-rejected-by-the-high-court-on-account-of-unwillingness-of-the-investigation-authority-not-made-out\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-12-24T05:26:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-24T05:26:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1329\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"888\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/24\/writ-of-mandamus-against-state-government-rejected-by-the-high-court-on-account-of-unwillingness-of-the-investigation-authority-not-made-out\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/24\/writ-of-mandamus-against-state-government-rejected-by-the-high-court-on-account-of-unwillingness-of-the-investigation-authority-not-made-out\/\",\"name\":\"Writ of mandamus against State Government rejected by the High Court on account of unwillingness of the investigation authority not made out | SCC Times\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-12-24T05:26:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-24T05:26:48+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/24\/writ-of-mandamus-against-state-government-rejected-by-the-high-court-on-account-of-unwillingness-of-the-investigation-authority-not-made-out\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/24\/writ-of-mandamus-against-state-government-rejected-by-the-high-court-on-account-of-unwillingness-of-the-investigation-authority-not-made-out\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/24\/writ-of-mandamus-against-state-government-rejected-by-the-high-court-on-account-of-unwillingness-of-the-investigation-authority-not-made-out\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Writ of mandamus against State Government rejected by the High Court on account of unwillingness of the investigation authority not made out\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Writ of mandamus against State Government rejected by the High Court on account of unwillingness of the investigation authority not made out | SCC Times","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/24\/writ-of-mandamus-against-state-government-rejected-by-the-high-court-on-account-of-unwillingness-of-the-investigation-authority-not-made-out\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Writ of mandamus against State Government rejected by the High Court on account of unwillingness of the investigation authority not made out","og_description":"Delhi High Court: While dismissing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India to register a criminal","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/24\/writ-of-mandamus-against-state-government-rejected-by-the-high-court-on-account-of-unwillingness-of-the-investigation-authority-not-made-out\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2015-12-24T05:26:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-24T05:26:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1329,"height":888,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Delhi-HC.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/24\/writ-of-mandamus-against-state-government-rejected-by-the-high-court-on-account-of-unwillingness-of-the-investigation-authority-not-made-out\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/24\/writ-of-mandamus-against-state-government-rejected-by-the-high-court-on-account-of-unwillingness-of-the-investigation-authority-not-made-out\/","name":"Writ of mandamus against State Government rejected by the High Court on account of unwillingness of the investigation authority not made out | SCC Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-12-24T05:26:01+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-24T05:26:48+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/24\/writ-of-mandamus-against-state-government-rejected-by-the-high-court-on-account-of-unwillingness-of-the-investigation-authority-not-made-out\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/24\/writ-of-mandamus-against-state-government-rejected-by-the-high-court-on-account-of-unwillingness-of-the-investigation-authority-not-made-out\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2015\/12\/24\/writ-of-mandamus-against-state-government-rejected-by-the-high-court-on-account-of-unwillingness-of-the-investigation-authority-not-made-out\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Writ of mandamus against State Government rejected by the High Court on account of unwillingness of the investigation authority not made out"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":299552,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/17\/calcutta-hc-restrains-encroachment-of-private-land-by-respondent-authorities\/","url_meta":{"origin":30151,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court restrains Irrigation and Waterways Department from encroaching private land","author":"Ritu","date":"August 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, finding that the respondents had not acquired the land in question and issued a writ of mandamus to restrain the encroachment.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298568,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/04\/postal-department-is-liable-for-fraudulent-acts-committed-by-its-authorized-sas-agent-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":30151,"position":1},"title":"Postal Department is liable for fraudulent act committed by its authorized SAS Agent: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 4, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Postal Department has a sacred duty in upholding Trust as the nation's preferred carrier and guardian of savings.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":6223,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2014\/06\/13\/authorities-bound-to-follow-the-procedures-laid-down-in-the-highway-act-to-remove-unauthorized-construction-on-highway\/","url_meta":{"origin":30151,"position":2},"title":"Authorities bound to follow the procedures laid down in the Highway Act to remove unauthorized construction on highway","author":"Sucheta","date":"June 13, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court: Disposing of the writ petition, a bench comprising of Ashim Kumar Roy, J formulated that to seek relief for encroachment on a highway, the competent authority have to follow the procedure embedded in the West Bengal Highway Act 1964. In the present case, the petitioner is seeking\u00a0\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;High Courts&quot;","block_context":{"text":"High Courts","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/highcourts\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/scc-blog_Page_9.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":112771,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/03\/07\/court-cannot-issue-writ-of-mandamus-against-the-state-to-frame-particular-sets-of-rules\/","url_meta":{"origin":30151,"position":3},"title":"Court cannot issue Writ of Mandamus against the State to frame particular sets of rules","author":"Saba","date":"March 7, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"High Court of Madhya Pradesh: The Court while hearing a public interest litigation filed by the petitioner as objections against certain provision stated in the draft of \u201cMadhya Pradesh Outdoor Advertisement Media Rules, 2016\u201d for regulating the installation of hoardings\/advertisements erected on the road sides, the Bench comprising of SK\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":336673,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/12\/05\/supreme-court-transfers-fir-against-bjp-kabir-shankar-bose-to-cbi\/","url_meta":{"origin":30151,"position":4},"title":"\u2018Politically charged atmosphere not very conducive to fair investigation\u2019; SC transfers FIRs against BJP&#8217;s Kabir Shankar Bose to CBI","author":"Editor","date":"December 5, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Bose has been provided with \u2018X\u2019 category security since 10-04-2019 because of the perception of threat, both on account of his enmity with the TMC\u2019s sitting MP Kalyan Banerjee due to matrimonial feud as well as his alliance with the party at the Centre (BJP).","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"FIR against Kabir Shankar Bose","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/FIR-against-Kabir-Shankar-Bose.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/FIR-against-Kabir-Shankar-Bose.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/FIR-against-Kabir-Shankar-Bose.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/FIR-against-Kabir-Shankar-Bose.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":126961,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/04\/25\/administrative-authority-cannot-be-issued-mandamus-to-exercise-discretionary-power-vested-in-it-by-the-statute\/","url_meta":{"origin":30151,"position":5},"title":"Administrative authority cannot be issued mandamus to exercise discretionary power vested in it by the Statute","author":"Prachi Bhardwaj","date":"April 25, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court: In the appeal against the order of the High Court where it refused to issue mandamus to the Central Government directing the Central Government to issue a notification under Section 11C of the Central Excise Act, 1944 to the effect that duty payable by the appellant on goods\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Supreme-Court_Colour.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30151"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30151\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}