{"id":301429,"date":"2023-09-14T16:00:04","date_gmt":"2023-09-14T10:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=301429"},"modified":"2023-09-19T11:09:26","modified_gmt":"2023-09-19T05:39:26","slug":"delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Trial Court rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim\u2019s age u\/s 94 of the JJ Act, 2015; Delhi High Court upholds discharge in POCSO case"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> This Revision Petition was filed under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519692\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">401<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Criminal Procedure Code, 1973<\/a> (&#8216;CrPC&#8217;) to impugn the order of July 2016 passed by the trial court, wherein the trial court found no authentic document on record which could give clear indication about actual date of birth of the prosecutrix, which was alleged to be about 16 years of age. <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sudhir Kumar Jain, J.*<\/span>, held that the trial court had rightly relied upon the Aadhaar card to ascertain the age of prosecutrix as per mandate of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001520249\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">94<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806282\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015<\/a> (&#8216;JJ Act, 2015&#8217;), which reflected the date of birth of the prosecutrix as 01-01-1994.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The case arose out of FIR registered under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561682\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">363<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561687\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">366<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561688\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">366-A<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561701\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">376<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;) and under Sections <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550519\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">4<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001550528\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">6<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Protection of Children Against Sexual Offences Act, 2012<\/a> (&#8216;POCSO&#8217;). The complainant stated that her daughter, namely &#8220;R&#8221; to be aged about 16 years, was found to be missing in September 2015, and appeared to have left the house without informing any other person. The complainant suspected the respondent as the person who had taken away &#8220;R&#8221;. During investigation it was revealed that &#8220;R&#8221; got married with the respondent in September 2015 and had also refused to undergo medical examination. The statement of &#8220;R&#8221; was also recorded under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001519400\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">164<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726935\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CrPC<\/a> wherein she stated that she had left with the respondent out of her own free will and after getting married to him, she established a relation with him. &#8220;R&#8221; also stated her year of birth as 1994 and was aged about 21 years. The trial court did not find enough evidence which could indicate the commission of alleged offences against the respondent and discharged him for offences in the case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the petitioner argued that the trial court had erred in relying upon the Aadhaar Card and without resorting to Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001520249\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">94<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806282\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">JJ Act<\/a>. It contended that as per the documents collected during the investigation from the concerned school, the prosecutrix was a minor at the time of commission of the offence. Whereas the counsel for the respondent argued that the age of the prosecutrix as appeared in the school record was not based on any birth certificate issued by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (&#8216;MCD&#8217;) or any other statutory authority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">P. Yuvaprakash<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State Rep. by Inspector of Police<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/u44rQ11T\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine SC 846<\/a>, wherein it was observed that <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;wherever the dispute with respect to the age of a person arises in the context of her or him being a victim under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002825996\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">POCSO Act<\/a>, the courts have to take recourse to the steps indicated in Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001520249\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">94<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806282\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">JJ Act<\/a>. The three documents in order of which the JJ Act required consideration was that the concerned court must determine the age by considering the following documents:<\/span><\/p>\n<ol style=\"list-style-type: decimal;\">\n<li>\n<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">the date of birth certificate from the school, or the matriculation or equivalent certificate from the concerned examination Board, if available; and in the absence thereof;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">the birth certificate given by a corporation or a municipal authority or a panchayat;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; font-style: italic;\">and only in the absence of (i) and (ii) above, age shall be determined by an ossification test, or any other latest medical age determination test conducted on the orders of the Committee or the Board.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court noted that in the present case, the Investigating Officer did not collect any birth certificate from the school of the prosecutrix or birth certificate issued by MCD or any other statutory authority or panchayat. Further, the Court opined that the trial court had rightly observed that the date of birth of the prosecutrix as appearing in the school record was not based on birth certificate issued by MCD or any other statutory authority and in the absence of these documents, the trial court had rightly relied upon the Aadhaar card to ascertain the age of prosecutrix as per mandate of Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001520249\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">94<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002806282\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">JJ Act<\/a>, which reflected the date of birth of the prosecutrix as 01-01-1994. Thus, the Court disposed of the present petition and held that the impugn order of the trial court did not call for any interference.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">State (NCT of Delhi) v. X, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/tZLeKM4y\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Del 5557<\/a>, decided on 04-09-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Petitioner: Mr. Utkarsh, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Respondent: Ms. Sunita Arora and Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgement authored by &#8212; Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1309\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1309\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294600\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/protection-of-children-from-sexual-offences-act-2012-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1031\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Code of Criminal Procedure\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/code-of-criminal-procedure-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;Wherever the dispute with respect to the age of a person arises in the context of her or him being a victim under the Protection of Children Against Sexual Offences Act, 2012, the courts have to take recourse to the steps indicated in Section 94 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":293503,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[3670,6862,31004,2543,8011,55061,51815,23204,24384],"class_list":["post-301429","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Aadhaar_card","tag-age","tag-birth-certificate","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-juvenile-justice","tag-mcd","tag-municipal-corporation-of-delhi","tag-pocso","tag-prosecutrix"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Trial Court rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim&#039;s age u\/s 94 of the JJ Act, 2015; Delhi HC upholds discharge in POCSO case | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that the Trial Court had rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim&#039;s age under Section 94 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Trial Court rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim\u2019s age u\/s 94 of the JJ Act, 2015; Delhi High Court upholds discharge in POCSO case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court held that the Trial Court had rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim&#039;s age under Section 94 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-09-14T10:30:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-09-19T05:39:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Trial Court rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim\u2019s age u\/s 94 of the JJ Act, 2015; Delhi High Court upholds discharge in POCSO case\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Trial Court rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim's age u\/s 94 of the JJ Act, 2015; Delhi HC upholds discharge in POCSO case | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-14T10:30:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-19T05:39:26+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court held that the Trial Court had rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim's age under Section 94 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Trial Court rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim\u2019s age u\/s 94 of the JJ Act, 2015; Delhi High Court upholds discharge in POCSO case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Trial Court rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim's age u\/s 94 of the JJ Act, 2015; Delhi HC upholds discharge in POCSO case | SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court held that the Trial Court had rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim's age under Section 94 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Trial Court rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim\u2019s age u\/s 94 of the JJ Act, 2015; Delhi High Court upholds discharge in POCSO case","og_description":"Delhi High Court held that the Trial Court had rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim's age under Section 94 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-09-14T10:30:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-09-19T05:39:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Trial Court rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim\u2019s age u\/s 94 of the JJ Act, 2015; Delhi High Court upholds discharge in POCSO case","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/","name":"Trial Court rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim's age u\/s 94 of the JJ Act, 2015; Delhi HC upholds discharge in POCSO case | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-09-14T10:30:04+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-19T05:39:26+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Delhi High Court held that the Trial Court had rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim's age under Section 94 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/14\/delhi-hc-upholds-trial-court-decision-to-determine-age-of-prosecutrix-based-on-her-aadhaar-card-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Trial Court rightly relied upon Aadhaar card to ascertain victim\u2019s age u\/s 94 of the JJ Act, 2015; Delhi High Court upholds discharge in POCSO case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":290967,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/04\/30\/madhya-pradesh-high-court-revision-age-proof-juvenile-justice-act-rules-aadhar-card-legal-research-news-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":301429,"position":0},"title":"[Juvenile Justice] Aadhaar not a valid document for proof of age of Prosecutrix under Juvenile Justice Rules: Madhya Pradesh High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"April 30, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"JJ Act, 2015 and JJ Rules, 2012 are mandatory and have overreaching effect over any other provision.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Madhya Pradesh High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-681.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":278971,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/02\/pocso-getting-date-of-birth-changed-in-aadhaar-to-establish-that-minor-victim-was-a-consenting-adult-is-a-serious-offence-delhi-high-court-denies-bail-to-a-married-man\/","url_meta":{"origin":301429,"position":1},"title":"POCSO| Getting date of birth changed in Aadhaar to establish that minor victim was a consenting adult is a serious offence; Delhi High Court denies bail to a married man","author":"Editor","date":"December 2, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court denied bail to a married person as he wanted to take advantage of the complainant by getting the complainant's Date of Birth on the Aadhar Card changed so that when the applicant established physical relationship with the complainant, she would not have been a minor.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/Delhi-High-Court-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":272658,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/08\/30\/delhi-high-court-grants-bail-rape-accused-pocso-aadharcard-pancard-verification-not-required-before-sex-sufficient-estblish-indulging-physicalrelationship-minor-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":301429,"position":2},"title":"Judicial scrutiny of date of birth for establishing consensual sexual relation not necessary; Delhi High Court grants bail in light of accused being honey trapped","author":"Editor","date":"August 30, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"Delhi High Court: In a case filed by a woman alleging rape charges under Penal Code, 1860 (\u2018IPC') and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (\u2018POCSO'), Jasmeet Singh, J. granted bail to the applicant accused as the case, in the opinion of the Court and based on the\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/delhi_high_court.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297286,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/20\/school-transfer-certificate-not-document-age-determination-victim-pocso-act-supreme-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":301429,"position":3},"title":"School Transfer Certificate not acceptable for age determination of victim in POCSO Act: Supreme Court","author":"Ridhi","date":"July 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court regarded the result of ossification or bone test in the instant matter, as the most authentic evidence for being corroborated by the examining doctor as well.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"age determination of victim in pocso act","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/age-determination-of-victim-in-pocso-act.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/age-determination-of-victim-in-pocso-act.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/age-determination-of-victim-in-pocso-act.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/age-determination-of-victim-in-pocso-act.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":341929,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/02\/20\/law-should-evolve-to-acknowledge-and-respect-adolescent-relationships-if-they-are-consensual-and-free-from-coercion-delhi-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":301429,"position":4},"title":"Law should evolve to acknowledge and respect adolescent relationships, if they are consensual and free from coercion: Delhi HC upholds acquittal of POCSO accused","author":"Arushi","date":"February 20, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"While the legal age of consent is important for protecting minors, the adolescents should be allowed to express their feelings and engage in relationships without fear of criminalization. The focus of the law should be on preventing exploitation and abuse rather than punishing love.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Delhi-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299056,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/11\/delhi-hc-dismisses-petition-to-recall-seven-year-old-sexual-assault-victim-to-be-cross-examined\/","url_meta":{"origin":301429,"position":5},"title":"POCSO| Delhi High Court dismisses petition to recall 7-year-old victim for cross examination; says repeated opportunities do not necessarily indicate fair trial","author":"Editor","date":"August 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cWhile balancing the right of the accused to a fair trial and upholding the intent of the legislation, the courts are duty bound to remain sensitive to the plight of the seven-year-old sexual assault victim.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301429","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=301429"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301429\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293503"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=301429"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=301429"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=301429"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}