{"id":301380,"date":"2023-09-13T17:00:05","date_gmt":"2023-09-13T11:30:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=301380"},"modified":"2023-09-19T10:54:55","modified_gmt":"2023-09-19T05:24:55","slug":"art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Text of Art. 164(1A) \u201cclear as Gangetic waters\u201d; Karnataka HC dismisses petition challenging appointment of Advisors to Chief Minister of Karnataka"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Karnataka High Court:<\/span> While deciding the instant petition seeking a Writ of Quo Warranto against the private respondents who have been appointed by the State Government as Political Secretaries, Chief Advisor and Media Advisor to the current Chief Minister of Karnataka; the Division Bench of Prasanna B. Varale, CJ*<\/span>., and Krishna S. Dixit, J., dismissed the petition stating that the respondents have been appointed to assist the Chief Minister and they are not functioning as the Ministers in the literal sense hence these appointments do not attract Art. 164(1A)<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The petitioner knocked the doors of the High Court seeking writ of Quo Warranto against the private respondents who were appointed on 01-06-2023 and 22-05-2023.<\/p>\n

Counsel for the petitioner argued that the appointment of the private respondents with the status of Cabinet Rank is without jurisdiction and unconstitutional. Relying on Art. 164(1A)<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a> which prescribes that the total number of Ministers including the Chief Minister in a State shall not exceed 15% of the total number of Members of the Legislative Assembly; the petitioner contended that this ceiling limit is breached by the appointments in question.<\/p>\n

Per contra<\/span>, the respondents rebutted the argument vis-à-vis Art. 164(1A)<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a> stating that none of the private respondents have been appointed as Ministers and therefore, petition is unworthy for consideration.<\/p>\n

Perusing the contentions of the parties, the Court declined to indulge in the matter stating that text of Art. 164(1A)<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a> is “as clear as Gangetic waters<\/span>”. The Court stated that if the private respondents were appointed as Ministers, there could have been scope for the invocation of subject provision of the Article. Merely because a Cabinet Status is conferred on a particular appointee, that per se<\/span> does not make him a Minister within the meaning of Art. 164(1A)<\/a> of the Constitution<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Court pointed out that status of Cabinet Rank is conferred on persons appointed to posts\/offices other than that of Ministers as well. Since the enactment of the Constitution<\/a>, in several States, like Assam, Meghalaya, etc. persons are appointed in such capacities even when they are not Members of the Council of Ministers. Such status is conferred for various reasons that fall within the exclusive domain of the Executive and therefore, Court cannot undertake their deeper examination in judicial review.<\/p>\n

[Umapathi S. v. State of Karnataka, 2023 SCC OnLine Kar 59<\/a>, decided on 07-09-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

*Order by Chief Justice Prasanna B. Varale<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

Petitioner in person<\/p>\n

Respondent- Niloufer Akbar, AGA<\/p>\n

Buy Constitution of India  HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

\"Constitution<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Considering this petition challenging appointment of the private respondents as Secretaries with Cabinet Rank, Court was of the view that the respondents were appointed to assist the Chief Minister and they are not functioning as the Ministers in the literal sense.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":292820,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[2504,60990,35812,19471,60989,28334,8211],"class_list":["post-301380","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-Appointments","tag-article-1641a","tag-cabinet-rank","tag-constitution","tag-government-secretary","tag-karnataka-high-court","tag-ministers"],"yoast_head":"\nArt. 164(1A) of the Constitution is not attracted in appointing Advisors to Chief Minister of Karnataka : Karnataka HC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Karnataka HC stated that the respondents were appointed to assist the Chief Minister and they are not functioning as the Ministers in the literal sense.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Text of Art. 164(1A) \u201cclear as Gangetic waters\u201d; Karnataka HC dismisses petition challenging appointment of Advisors to Chief Minister of Karnataka\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Karnataka HC stated that the respondents were appointed to assist the Chief Minister and they are not functioning as the Ministers in the literal sense.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-09-13T11:30:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-09-19T05:24:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Text of Art. 164(1A) \u201cclear as Gangetic waters\u201d; Karnataka HC dismisses petition challenging appointment of Advisors to Chief Minister of Karnataka\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sucheta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Art. 164(1A) of the Constitution is not attracted in appointing Advisors to Chief Minister of Karnataka : Karnataka HC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-13T11:30:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-19T05:24:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\"},\"description\":\"Karnataka HC stated that the respondents were appointed to assist the Chief Minister and they are not functioning as the Ministers in the literal sense.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"karnataka high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Text of Art. 164(1A) \u201cclear as Gangetic waters\u201d; Karnataka HC dismisses petition challenging appointment of Advisors to Chief Minister of Karnataka\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa\",\"name\":\"Sucheta\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sucheta\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Art. 164(1A) of the Constitution is not attracted in appointing Advisors to Chief Minister of Karnataka : Karnataka HC","description":"Karnataka HC stated that the respondents were appointed to assist the Chief Minister and they are not functioning as the Ministers in the literal sense.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Text of Art. 164(1A) \u201cclear as Gangetic waters\u201d; Karnataka HC dismisses petition challenging appointment of Advisors to Chief Minister of Karnataka","og_description":"Karnataka HC stated that the respondents were appointed to assist the Chief Minister and they are not functioning as the Ministers in the literal sense.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-09-13T11:30:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-09-19T05:24:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sucheta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Text of Art. 164(1A) \u201cclear as Gangetic waters\u201d; Karnataka HC dismisses petition challenging appointment of Advisors to Chief Minister of Karnataka","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sucheta","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","name":"Art. 164(1A) of the Constitution is not attracted in appointing Advisors to Chief Minister of Karnataka : Karnataka HC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-09-13T11:30:05+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-19T05:24:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa"},"description":"Karnataka HC stated that the respondents were appointed to assist the Chief Minister and they are not functioning as the Ministers in the literal sense.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"karnataka high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/art164-constitution-appopintment-secretaries-cabinet-rank-minsters-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Text of Art. 164(1A) \u201cclear as Gangetic waters\u201d; Karnataka HC dismisses petition challenging appointment of Advisors to Chief Minister of Karnataka"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7416b8c43cd3a0a3412cf97fc17b54fa","name":"Sucheta","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/530d4c250404c869212316d6351878b83f86bf27648031b1e6d4857a4bae4b88?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sucheta"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/legal_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/karnataka-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":61951,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2016\/08\/17\/appointment-of-21-parliamentary-secretaries-by-govt-of-punjab-quashed-for-bypassing-article-1641a-of-the-constitution\/","url_meta":{"origin":301380,"position":0},"title":"Appointment of 21 Parliamentary Secretaries by Govt. of Punjab quashed for bypassing Article 164(1A) of the Constitution","author":"Sucheta","date":"August 17, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Punjab and Haryana High Court: While deciding upon the challenge to the appointment of 21 Parliamentary Secretaries by the Government of Punjab, the Division Bench of S.S. Saron and Ramendra Jain, JJ., quashed the appointments made by the State Government observing that the appointments had been made in contravention to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":162294,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2017\/10\/09\/justice-hg-ramesh-appointed-actg-chief-justice-of-karnataka-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":301380,"position":1},"title":"Justice HG Ramesh appointed Actg. Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court","author":"Saba","date":"October 9, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"The President in exercise of the powers conferred by Article 223 of the Constitution of India appointed Shri Justice Humchadakatte Gopalaiah Ramesh, senior-most Judge of Karnataka High Court, to perform the duties of the office of the Chief Justice of that High Court with effect from 10th October, 2017 consequent\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":314585,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/02\/19\/supreme-court-stays-criminal-proceedings-against-karnataka-cm-siddaramaiah-organising-protest-over-suicide-contractor\/","url_meta":{"origin":301380,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court stays criminal proceedings against Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah for organising protest over Contractor\u2019s suicide","author":"Apoorva","date":"February 19, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Supreme Court also stayed proceedings against Karnataka Ministers Ramalinga Reddy, MB Patil, and Congress leader Randeep Singh Surjewala over the protest in 2022.","rel":"","context":"In "Hot Off The Press"","block_context":{"text":"Hot Off The Press","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/hot_off_the_press\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Karnataka-CM-Siddaramaiah.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Karnataka-CM-Siddaramaiah.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Karnataka-CM-Siddaramaiah.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Karnataka-CM-Siddaramaiah.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":349157,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/05\/30\/president-appoints-acting-chief-justice-gauhati-hc-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":301380,"position":3},"title":"President appoints Acting Chief Justices for Gauhati High Court and Karnataka High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 30, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"The appointments were made in consequence of elevation of Chief Justices of Gauhati and Karnataka High Court as Supreme Court Judges.","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Justice Lanusunglcum Jamir Justice Valluri Kameswar Rao","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Justice-Lanusunglcum-Jamir-Justice-Valluri-Kameswar-Rao.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Justice-Lanusunglcum-Jamir-Justice-Valluri-Kameswar-Rao.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Justice-Lanusunglcum-Jamir-Justice-Valluri-Kameswar-Rao.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Justice-Lanusunglcum-Jamir-Justice-Valluri-Kameswar-Rao.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":300482,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/01\/collegium-recommends-appointment-of-permanent-judges-karnataka-madras-hcs-sc\/","url_meta":{"origin":301380,"position":4},"title":"Supreme Court Collegium recommends appointment of Permanent Judges for the High Courts of Karnataka and Madras","author":"Sucheta","date":"September 1, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Collegium recommended names of 7 Judges who are to be appointed as Permanent Judges in their respective High Courts, with exception to Justice S. Rachaiah, whose name was recommended for appointment as Additional Judge of Karnataka High Court for fresh term of 1 year.","rel":"","context":"In "Appointments & Transfers"","block_context":{"text":"Appointments & Transfers","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/news\/appointments\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"appointment of permanent judges","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/appointment-of-permanent-judges.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/appointment-of-permanent-judges.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/appointment-of-permanent-judges.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/appointment-of-permanent-judges.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":248964,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/05\/31\/anticipatory-bail\/","url_meta":{"origin":301380,"position":5},"title":"Karnataka Sessions Court \u2502 Anticipatory bail granted to an advocate accused of publishing defamatory articles against PM of India and CM of Karnataka in Kannada daily newspaper, Prajavani","author":"Editor","date":"May 31, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"LXIV Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru: Sri Rajeshwara, J., granted anticipatory bail to the accused as the investigation regarding offences alleged is under process The facts of the case are such that on 9.5.2021, accused persons hatched a conspiracy to publish defamatory articles against Prime Minister of India,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/City-Civil-Court-Bengaluru.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/City-Civil-Court-Bengaluru.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/City-Civil-Court-Bengaluru.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/City-Civil-Court-Bengaluru.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/City-Civil-Court-Bengaluru.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301380","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=301380"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301380\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/292820"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=301380"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=301380"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=301380"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}