{"id":301377,"date":"2023-09-13T16:30:57","date_gmt":"2023-09-13T11:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=301377"},"modified":"2023-09-15T14:56:07","modified_gmt":"2023-09-15T09:26:07","slug":"sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Third party whose property interests are adversely affected can approach the execution court under Order XXI Rule 97 of CPC: Sikkim High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Sikkim High Court:<\/span> In a case wherein, a writ petition under Article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001574971\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">227<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726967\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Constitution<\/a> was filed to set aside the order dated 7-4-2017, wherein the prayer for execution of arbitral award was rejected, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.*<\/span>, opined that by filing a petition under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523234\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">XXI Rule 97<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (&#8216;CPC&#8217;), the person who was not the party to the arbitral proceedings could seek and obtain relief if the award was not given fairly and upheld the impugned order and accordingly, dismissed the petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In the instant case, the petitioner and the respondent were siblings and mutually agreed to divide the properties as per the settlement deed dated 11-6-2013 executed between them at Gangtok.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The settlement deed was prepared by the siblings without the knowledge of Respondent 2, who was the son of Respondent 1. Further, on 13-6-2013, Respondent 2&#8217;s sons, Respondents 3 and 4 submitted an application before the Sub-divisional Magistrate for transfer and registration of their building mentioned in the Schedule to the application.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Meanwhile, the agreement titled &#8216;Memorandum of Family Arrangement&#8217; was entered between the petitioner and the respondent on 24-6-2013. In the agreement, a mediation clause was inserted, according to which all further disputes and differences that arose between the parties, would be referred the Sole Arbitrator.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Subsequently, an arbitral award was passed on 30-1-2014, pursuant to which Civil Execution Case was filed by the petitioner. Further, the Execution Court vide order dated 14-5-2015 held that the possession of the scheduled property be delivered to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thereafter, on 16-6-2015, Respondents 2, 3 and 4 filed an application under Section 47 read with Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523118\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">XXI Rule 101<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a>, Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523234\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">XXI Rule 97<\/a> read with Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523743\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">151<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a> and Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001544941\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">36<\/a> of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (&#8216;the Act&#8217;) before the Execution Court. The respondents stated that they had an interest in the property and the arbitration award was passed behind their back and hence the execution order to be stayed until the objection filed by them was disposed of.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Execution Court rejected the prayer of the arbitral award and declared the arbitral award as nullity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, the petitioner filed a petition before the present court and contended that Respondent 2-4 had no locus standi to file an application as per Section 47 Explanation II of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a> and also contended that the Order XXI Rule 97 was meant for decree holders and not Respondents 2-4.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court relied on <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Union of India<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Jagat Ram Trehan and Sons<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=KDE5OTYpIDM2IERSSiA0NjYmJiYmJjQwJiYmJiZTZWFyY2hQYWdl\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1996 SCC OnLine Del 20<\/a> and opined that as per Section 47 Explanation II of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a>, a purchaser of property at sale in execution was deemed to be a party to the suit in which the decree had been passed. The Court opined that there was no bar under the law for a third party, whose property interests were adversely affected by sale of the property in execution proceedings to point out that the decree sought to be executed was a nullity. Thus, such person&#8217;s right to approach the execution court under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523234\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">XXI Rule 97<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a> who anticipated dispossession could not be rejected.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that by filing a petition under Order <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001523234\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">XXI Rule 97<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726944\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CPC<\/a>, the person who was not the party to the arbitral proceedings could seek and obtain relief if the award was not given fairly. The Court further stated that the word &#8216;fairly&#8217; was significant as in the present case, the petitioner and the respondent entered into the settlement deed on 11-6-2013, thus, the settlement deed was entered by the parties prior to the objection filed by Respondents 2, 3 and 4 before SDM, but this was not made aware to Respondent 2 or to the SDM.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court referred to <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Bhavan Vaja<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Solanki Hanuji Khodaji Mansang<\/span>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/Members\/NoteView.aspx?enc=SlRYVC0wMDAwMDA4NTk1JiYmJiY0MCYmJiYmU2VhcmNoJiYmJiZmdWxsc2NyZWVuJiYmJiZmYWxzZSYmJiYmKDE5NzMpIDIgU0NDIDQwJiYmJiZQaHJhc2UmJiYmJkZpbmRCeUNpdGF0aW9uJiYmJiZmYWxzZQ==\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">(1973) 2 SCC 40<\/a>, wherein it was held that it was the executing court&#8217;s duty to find out the true effect of the decree and opined that in the present case it was an admitted fact that Respondent 2 was the son of the petitioner and Respondent 3 and 4 were his sons. Thus, their property rights required consideration to prevent prolonged and multiplicity of litigation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court further stated that the impugned order warranted no interference and accordingly, dismissed the petition.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Kiran Devi Chouraria v. Jhumar Mal Singhi, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/1rdWy3c0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Sikk 84<\/a>, decided on 25-8-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by- Justice Meenakshi Madan Rai<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Petitioner:<\/span> N. Rai, Senior Advocate with Navtara Sarda, Yozan Rai, Tara Devi Chettri and Pradeep Tamang, Advocates;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Respondents<\/span>: Sudhir Prasad, Advocate; A. Moulik, Senior Advocate with Ranjit Prasad, Advocate<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Constitution of India &nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=33\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=33\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Constitution of India\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294438\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/constitution-of-india-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=382\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=382\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-191x300.png\" alt=\"arbitration and conciliation act, 1996\" width=\"191\" height=\"300\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294803\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-191x300.png 191w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-38x60.png 38w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996.png 620w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 191px) 100vw, 191px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;By filing a petition under Order XXI Rule 97 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 although the objector is not a party to the arbitral proceedings, he can seek and obtain relief if the award has not been given fairly.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67011,"featured_media":279924,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[60987,39496,60986,60988,31584,30788],"class_list":["post-301377","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-adversely-affected","tag-civil-procedure-code-1908","tag-execution-court","tag-order-xxi-rule-97","tag-sale-of-property","tag-sikkim-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Third party whose property interests are adversely affected can approach the execution court: Sikkim HC| SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Sikkim High Court opined that by filing a petition under Order XXI Rule 97 of CPC, the third party to the arbitral proceedings could obtain relief if the award was not given fairly and accordingly, dismissed the petition.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Third party whose property interests are adversely affected can approach the execution court under Order XXI Rule 97 of CPC: Sikkim High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sikkim High Court opined that by filing a petition under Order XXI Rule 97 of CPC, the third party to the arbitral proceedings could obtain relief if the award was not given fairly and accordingly, dismissed the petition.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-09-13T11:00:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-09-15T09:26:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Sikkim-High-Court-1-886x590-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Third party whose property interests are adversely affected can approach the execution court: Sikkim HC| SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Sikkim-High-Court-1-886x590-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-13T11:00:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-15T09:26:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\"},\"description\":\"Sikkim High Court opined that by filing a petition under Order XXI Rule 97 of CPC, the third party to the arbitral proceedings could obtain relief if the award was not given fairly and accordingly, dismissed the petition.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Sikkim-High-Court-1-886x590-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Sikkim-High-Court-1-886x590-1.jpg\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Third party whose property interests are adversely affected can approach the execution court under Order XXI Rule 97 of CPC: Sikkim High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe\",\"name\":\"Editor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Third party whose property interests are adversely affected can approach the execution court: Sikkim HC| SCC Blog","description":"Sikkim High Court opined that by filing a petition under Order XXI Rule 97 of CPC, the third party to the arbitral proceedings could obtain relief if the award was not given fairly and accordingly, dismissed the petition.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Third party whose property interests are adversely affected can approach the execution court under Order XXI Rule 97 of CPC: Sikkim High Court","og_description":"Sikkim High Court opined that by filing a petition under Order XXI Rule 97 of CPC, the third party to the arbitral proceedings could obtain relief if the award was not given fairly and accordingly, dismissed the petition.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-09-13T11:00:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-09-15T09:26:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Sikkim-High-Court-1-886x590-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/","name":"Third party whose property interests are adversely affected can approach the execution court: Sikkim HC| SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Sikkim-High-Court-1-886x590-1.jpg","datePublished":"2023-09-13T11:00:57+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-15T09:26:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe"},"description":"Sikkim High Court opined that by filing a petition under Order XXI Rule 97 of CPC, the third party to the arbitral proceedings could obtain relief if the award was not given fairly and accordingly, dismissed the petition.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Sikkim-High-Court-1-886x590-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Sikkim-High-Court-1-886x590-1.jpg","width":886,"height":590},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/sikkim-hc-third-party-whose-property-interests-are-adversely-affected-can-approach-the-execution-court-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Third party whose property interests are adversely affected can approach the execution court under Order XXI Rule 97 of CPC: Sikkim High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/84e42bab48238baf12c7e33b3d9761fe","name":"Editor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34e366be721c41333586de05faa13743195f5b142dcd7a015c6fabd2389521d0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_4\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/Sikkim-High-Court-1-886x590-1.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":255568,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/10\/14\/half-a-century-old-litigation-we-wish-it-is-the-knock-out-round-sc-holds-objections-cant-be-raised-in-instalments-res-judicata-applicable-on-execution-proceedings\/","url_meta":{"origin":301377,"position":0},"title":"&#8216;Half a century old litigation, we wish it is the knock out round!&#8217; SC holds objections can\u2019t be raised in instalments; Res judicata applicable on execution proceedings","author":"Editor","date":"October 14, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"\"...the case on hand is fit to be included in the syllabus of a law school as a study material for students to get equipped with the various provisions of the Code relating to execution.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/sc-2-7.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":335737,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/22\/bikaner-house-attached-to-enforce-payment-under-an-arbitral-award\/","url_meta":{"origin":301377,"position":1},"title":"Patiala House Court orders attachment of Bikaner House to enforce payment under an arbitral award","author":"Editor","date":"November 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Nagar Palika of the State of Rajasthan failed to comply with court order to file an affidavit of assets despite being given multiple opportunities and failed to pay the petitioner in accordance with the arbitral award.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Bikaner House attached","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bikaner-House-attached.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bikaner-House-attached.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bikaner-House-attached.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Bikaner-House-attached.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":344440,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/27\/beyond-the-decree-understanding-third-party-objections-against-execution-by-possession\/","url_meta":{"origin":301377,"position":2},"title":"Beyond the Decree Understanding Third-Party Objections against Execution by Possession","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 27, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Dhani Hiremath*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Third-Party Objections","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Third-Party-Objections.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Third-Party-Objections.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Third-Party-Objections.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Third-Party-Objections.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301891,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/19\/delhi-hc-depositing-award-amount-with-notice-decree-holder-sufficient-discharge-judgment-debtor-onus-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":301377,"position":3},"title":"Depositing award amount for withdrawal with due notice to the decree holder is sufficient to discharge onus on the judgment debtor: Delhi High Court","author":"Editor","date":"September 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe decree holder was not required to await the outcome of the objections filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, however, if it did choose to remain under a self-imposed embargo, then it can\u2019t demand interest.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":258148,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2021\/12\/06\/can-executing-courts-order-for-enforcement-of-arbitral-award-be-challenged-under-art-226\/","url_meta":{"origin":301377,"position":4},"title":"All HC | Can Executing Court&#8217;s order for enforcement of arbitral award be challenged under Art. 226? HC decides","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"December 6, 2021","format":false,"excerpt":"Allahabad High Court: Dr Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, J., held that, Section 36 of the 1996 Act makes the arbitral award capable of being enforced in a like manner as a decree without any further judicial intervention. Instant petition was filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India principally seeking\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":343111,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/07\/locus-standi-to-file-application-under-order-21-rule-97-cpc-unsettling-the-settled-law\/","url_meta":{"origin":301377,"position":5},"title":"Locus Standi to File Application under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC \u2014 Unsettling the Settled Law?","author":"Bhumika Indulia","date":"March 7, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"by Tupakula Nikhil*","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Op Eds&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Op Eds","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/op-ed\/legal-analysis\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Order 21 Rule 97 CPC","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Order-21-Rule-97-CPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Order-21-Rule-97-CPC.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Order-21-Rule-97-CPC.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Order-21-Rule-97-CPC.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301377","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67011"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=301377"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301377\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/279924"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=301377"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=301377"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=301377"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}