{"id":301347,"date":"2023-09-13T13:00:06","date_gmt":"2023-09-13T07:30:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=301347"},"modified":"2023-09-19T10:59:03","modified_gmt":"2023-09-19T05:29:03","slug":"watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Watching Pornographic content in private not an offence under Section 292 of IPC: Kerala High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Kerala High Court:<\/span> In a matter which involved the question of &#8216;whether a person watching a porn video in his private time without exhibiting it to others amounts to an offence?&#8217;, involving offence punishable under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">292<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Penal Code, 1860<\/a> (&#8216;IPC&#8217;), P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J. quashed the criminal proceedings against the petitioner while holding that watching porn in private is not an offence as per <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">292<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>Background<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The case of the prosecution was that the de facto complainant and his associates were on patrol duty on 11-07-2016 at 8:40 PM, the petitioner was seen standing on the roadside near Aluva palace, watching obscene videos on his mobile phone. Accordingly, he was arrested, and his mobile phone was seized, and the Judicial Magistrate First Class took cognizance of the matter. The petitioner contended that even if the allegations are accepted in their entirety, no offence was made out under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">292<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>Court&#8217;s Analysis of Section 292 IPC<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court perused <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">292<\/a> and its ingredients and expressed that &#8220;To attract an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">292<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>, there must be evidence to show that the petitioner sells, lets to hire, distributes, publicly exhibits or in any manner puts into circulation, or for purposes of sale, hire, distribution, public exhibition or circulation, makes, produces or has in his possession any obscene book, pamphlet, paper, drawing, painting, representation or figure or any other obscene object whatsoever&#8221;, while the prosecution case did not portray that the petitioner was watching obscene videos using a mobile phone which will attract youngsters. The Court noted that there was no allegation of petitioner publicly exhibiting the video, the police officer in his statement under Section 161 of CrPC stated that the petitioner was watching obscene videos looking down at his mobile phone.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that watching obscene photo\/video from a mobile phone in privacy is not by itself an offence under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">292<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>. It further clarified that if the petitioner would have been trying to circulate or distribute or publicly exhibit any obscene photos or video, then only it could be an offence under <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">292<\/a>. Thus, the Court accepted the petitioner&#8217;s contention that even if the allegations were accepted in toto, no offence was made out against the petitioner under Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">292<\/a> of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a>. The Court cited <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Ramesh Krishnan v. State of Kerala<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/dayK8411\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">1999 SCC OnLine Ker 280<\/a> and <i>Abdul Rasheed<\/i> v. <i>State of Kerala<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/D44iVU0G\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2008 SCC OnLine Ker 107<\/a> wherein, the Court considered the scope of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0002726960\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IPC<\/a> Section <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink.aspx?q=JTXT-0001561592\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">292<\/a>. Therefore, the Court allowed the petition.<\/p>\n<h2>Court&#8217;s Remarks on Porn and Consensual Sex<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court expressed that a Court of Law cannot declare that watching porn in private amounts to an offence because it is a person&#8217;s private choice. It was cautious that interference with the same would amount to intrusion of privacy for such person. The Court further explained that God designed sexuality as something for a man and a woman within a marriage, and that it&#8217;s not only lust but a matter of love and also for having children.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court took the opportunity to state that consensual sex between a male and a female who have attained the age of majority is not an offence. It further explained that &#8220;Pornography has been in practice for centuries. The new digital age has made it more accessible than ever before, and it is available even to children and adults at their fingertips. A court of law need not recognise consensual sex or watching of a porn video in privacy because these are within the domain of the will of society and the decision of legislature.&#8221; Therefore, the Court was restricted to its duty to find out whether the act amounts to an offence or not.<\/p>\n<h2>Court&#8217;s Reminder for Parents of Minor Children<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Before parting with the instant matter, the Court took it as an opportunity to remind parents of minor children in the country that &#8220;Watching pornography may not be an offence. But if minor children start to watch porn videos, which are now accessible in all mobile phones, there will be far reaching consequences.&#8221; Finger pointing the innocent parents who give mobile phones to their minor children just to make them happy, the Court said that instead of delicious mom-made food or cake cutting ceremonies on birthdays, people are gifting mobile phones with internet access to the minor children. The Court specifically cautioned such parents of the danger behind it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court suggested parents to let children watch informative news and videos from their parents&#8217; mobile phones in their presence, and not to hand over the same to make children happy and meanwhile complete their daily routine works, thereby allowing unsupervised use of mobile phones by children. The Court pressed for children to play cricker, football or other games during leisure time, which is necessary for a healthy young generation who will become the &#8220;beacons of hope of our nation in the future&#8221;. It also said that &#8220;Instead of purchasing food from restaurants through &#8216;swiggy&#8217; and &#8216;zomato&#8217;, let the children taste the delicious food made by their mother and let the children play at playgrounds at that time and come back home to the mesmerizing smell of mother&#8217;s food.&#8221; The Court eventually left it to the parents&#8217; wisdom.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">In its conclusion, the Court allowed the instant petition and quashed all the ongoing proceedings against the petitioner in the instant matter.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Aneesh v. State of Kerala, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/MUqu9oOh\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Ker 7900<\/a>, Order dated 5-09-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Judgment by: Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Petitioner: Advocate Bobby Rapheal C., Advocate E.C. Poulose<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For Respondents: Public Prosecutor Vipin Narayan<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"color: #000080;\">Buy Penal Code, 1860 &nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ebcwebstore.com\/product_info.php?products_id=1158\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"penal code, 1860\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"aligncenter size-large wp-image-294601\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-768x511.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-440x293.jpg 440w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-650x433.jpg 650w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860.jpg 886w, https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/penal-code-1860-60x40.jpg 60w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Kerala High Court cautiously expressed that &#8220;Watching pornography may not be an offence. But if minor children start to watch porn videos, which are now accessible in all mobile phones, there will be far reaching consequences.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67513,"featured_media":293587,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[42439,2523,29899,44318,29891],"class_list":["post-301347","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-consensual-sex","tag-Kerala_High_Court","tag-minor-children","tag-pornographic-content","tag-pornography"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Watching Pornography in private not an offence under Section 292 of IPC: Kerala HC | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Kerala High Court held that watching pornographic photos-videos in private is not an offence under Section 292 of IPC; cautioned parents against dangers.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Watching Pornographic content in private not an offence under Section 292 of IPC: Kerala High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kerala High Court held that watching pornographic photos-videos in private is not an offence under Section 292 of IPC; cautioned parents against dangers.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-09-13T07:30:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-09-19T05:29:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Watching Pornographic content in private not an offence under Section 292 of IPC: Kerala High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ridhi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"Watching Pornography in private not an offence under Section 292 of IPC: Kerala HC | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-13T07:30:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-19T05:29:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\"},\"description\":\"Kerala High Court held that watching pornographic photos-videos in private is not an offence under Section 292 of IPC; cautioned parents against dangers.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"kerala high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Watching Pornographic content in private not an offence under Section 292 of IPC: Kerala High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea\",\"name\":\"Ridhi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ridhi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Watching Pornography in private not an offence under Section 292 of IPC: Kerala HC | SCC Blog","description":"Kerala High Court held that watching pornographic photos-videos in private is not an offence under Section 292 of IPC; cautioned parents against dangers.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Watching Pornographic content in private not an offence under Section 292 of IPC: Kerala High Court","og_description":"Kerala High Court held that watching pornographic photos-videos in private is not an offence under Section 292 of IPC; cautioned parents against dangers.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-09-13T07:30:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-09-19T05:29:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ridhi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Watching Pornographic content in private not an offence under Section 292 of IPC: Kerala High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ridhi","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/","name":"Watching Pornography in private not an offence under Section 292 of IPC: Kerala HC | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-09-13T07:30:06+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-19T05:29:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea"},"description":"Kerala High Court held that watching pornographic photos-videos in private is not an offence under Section 292 of IPC; cautioned parents against dangers.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"kerala high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/13\/watching-pornography-in-private-not-offence-under-section-292-ipc-kerala-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Watching Pornographic content in private not an offence under Section 292 of IPC: Kerala High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/a21428c608a56b14de2f1880af8ab8ea","name":"Ridhi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5bb725ff04af51d6ea760aba8bfa827caa7c4b3ff053baff285d71a0ab546955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ridhi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc_editor\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/kerala-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":301949,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/20\/legal-facets-of-watching-pornographic-content-in-private-what-constitutes-an-offence-under-section-292-of-ipc-kerala-high-courts-decision\/","url_meta":{"origin":301347,"position":0},"title":"Legal facets of watching pornographic content in private: What constitutes an offence under Section 292 of IPC? &#8211; Kerala High Court&#8217;s decision","author":"Ridhi","date":"September 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"https:\/\/youtu.be\/D7eejhmtYNM","rel":"","context":"In &quot;SCC Times Newsflash&quot;","block_context":{"text":"SCC Times Newsflash","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/watch-now-2\/scc-times-newsflash\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-16.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-16.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-16.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/MicrosoftTeams-image-16.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":311599,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/01\/17\/merely-watching-child-porn-not-an-offence-under-pocso-act-or-s-67b-it-act-madras-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":301347,"position":1},"title":"Is watching child pornography an offence under POCSO Act or S. 67B of IT Act? Madras High Court answers","author":"Apoorva","date":"January 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDue to accessibility of sexually explicit material on the internet, porn addiction is becoming a growing concern in teenagers. With the click of a button, they can be exposed to endless pages of adult content\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"madras high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/madras-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":327114,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/07\/22\/order-recall-watching-child-porn-not-offence-it-act-karnataka-hc-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":301347,"position":2},"title":"Know Why Karnataka HC Recalled its judgment holding watching website containing child porn not an offence under S. 67-B of IT Act, 2000","author":"Sucheta","date":"July 22, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The Court in the impugned order had held that the petitioner watched a pornographic site, which would not become publishing or transmitting material as necessary under S. 67-B(a) and quashed the criminal proceedings against the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Karnataka High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Karnataka-High-Court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":343531,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2025\/03\/12\/attempt-to-commit-unnatural-sex-minor-boy-kerala-high-court-reduces-convict-sentence-one-day-imprisonment\/","url_meta":{"origin":301347,"position":3},"title":"Attempt to commit unnatural sex with minor boy: Kerala High Court reduces convict\u2019s sentence to imprisonment for a day","author":"Apoorva","date":"March 12, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cConsidering the age of the convict at the time of the commission of the offence and the nature of the offence made out from the materials on record, a lenient view can be taken. The interest of justice can be met by adequately compensating the victim.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":333302,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/10\/17\/having-sexual-intercourse-naked-minor-amounts-sexual-harassment-punishable-under-pocso-kerala-high-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":301347,"position":4},"title":"Having sexual intercourse, being naked in front of minor amounts to sexual harassment, punishable under POCSO Act: Kerala High Court","author":"Apoorva","date":"October 17, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"Kerala High Court noted that accused 2 had abused and thrashed the minor victim and concluded that the offense falls under Section 323 of IPC in conjunction with Section 34 IPC.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":334578,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2024\/11\/07\/kerala-high-court-quashes-criminal-case-director-sreekumar-menon\/","url_meta":{"origin":301347,"position":5},"title":"Kerala High Court quashes criminal case against director Sreekumar Menon filed by film actress","author":"Apoorva","date":"November 7, 2024","format":false,"excerpt":"The actress alleged that the Sreekumar, through Facebook and over phone, abused her in a manner causing disrepute to her and outraged her modesty.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Kerala High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/Kerala-High-Court-1.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301347","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67513"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=301347"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301347\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293587"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=301347"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=301347"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=301347"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}