{"id":301079,"date":"2023-09-08T14:00:12","date_gmt":"2023-09-08T08:30:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=301079"},"modified":"2023-09-15T16:55:13","modified_gmt":"2023-09-15T11:25:13","slug":"attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cAttorney-client communication is privileged\u201d; Calcutta High Court upholds maintainability of third-party appeal in GST fraud investigation"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Calcutta High Court:<\/span> A Division bench comprising of T. S. Sivagnanam, CJ., and Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J., held that an appeal preferred, against the order in relation to GST fraud investigation, by the third party is maintainable. The Court also emphasised on the need for proper investigation in cases of revenue fraud rather than issuing standardized notices.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The instant case involved three separate matters, all stemming from an order dated 03-04-2023, passed by a single judge. The applicant filed the first application and sought leave to prefer an appeal against the impugned order, even though he was not a party to the original writ application. The applicant claimed that the order significantly impacted him. The Court granted leave to the applicant to proceed with his appeal against the impugned order dated 03-04-2023.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The appellants filed a second application requesting condonation of a 32-day delay in filing their appeal. The Court considered the explanation provided in the application and concluded that the delay was sufficiently justified and, therefore, condoned the delay and allowed the appeal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The third application was an intra-court appeal filed by the petitioner, who was a practicing advocate and a third party to the writ proceedings, against the same impugned order dated 03-04-2023. The State objected to the maintainability of the appeal by a third party and contended that criminal proceedings had already been initiated based on the directions from the writ petition and, therefore, the appeal was not maintainable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"\">The Court considered the maintainability issue and concluded that the appeal by the third party was indeed maintainable. The Court cited the protection of attorney-client communications as a reason and noted that the police and GST departments had withdrawn notices sent to advocates calling for client information.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%; margin-left: 36pt; font-weight: bold;\">&#8220;A communication is privileged if it is made to a legal advisor by a client after the commission of a crime and with a view to his defence, but it is not privileged if it is made before the commission of the crime or wrong and for the purpose of being guided or assisted in furthering or committing it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court clarified that the impugned order&#8217;s directions were to investigate fake cases and the Anti-Fraud Department had misunderstood the scope of these directions. The Court emphasized the need for a proper investigation into specific cases rather than issuing standardized notices. The Court also stated that any conclusion of criminal activity should be based on thorough examination of documents and compliance with the law.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court directed the GST authorities to conduct a thorough study and investigation to determine any illegal GST claims. The Court instructed the appropriate investigation authorities to proceed according to the law, if they found criminal activity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Himangshu Kumar Ray<\/span> v. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">State of W.B.<\/span>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scconline.com\/DocumentLink\/cda64fa4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2023 SCC OnLine Cal 1745<\/a>, order dated 14-06-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Mr. Vinay Kr. Shraff, Ms. Priya Sarah Paul, Counsel for the Appellant<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">Md. T.M. Siddiqui, Counsel for the Respondent\/State<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">Calcutta High Court emphasizing that attorney-client communication is privileged and held that &#8220;Section 126 of the Evidence Act is designed to abort the attempt to intrude privacy of the close preserve of the fund of information conveyed by the client closeted in confidence.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[60852,2689,59371,59104,9821,60853],"class_list":["post-301079","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-attorney-client-communication","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-chief-justice-t-s-sivagnanam","tag-justice-hiranmay-bhattacharyya","tag-maintainability","tag-third-party-appeal"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Attorney-client communication is privileged, and notice cannot be issued to the attorney: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While upholding the maintainability of the third-party appeal, the Calcutta High Court held that Attorney-client communication is privileged.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u201cAttorney-client communication is privileged\u201d; Calcutta High Court upholds maintainability of third-party appeal in GST fraud investigation\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While upholding the maintainability of the third-party appeal, the Calcutta High Court held that Attorney-client communication is privileged.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-09-08T08:30:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-09-15T11:25:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"\u201cAttorney-client communication is privileged\u201d; Calcutta High Court upholds maintainability of third-party appeal in GST fraud investigation\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/\",\"name\":\"Attorney-client communication is privileged, and notice cannot be issued to the attorney: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-08T08:30:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-15T11:25:13+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"While upholding the maintainability of the third-party appeal, the Calcutta High Court held that Attorney-client communication is privileged.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u201cAttorney-client communication is privileged\u201d; Calcutta High Court upholds maintainability of third-party appeal in GST fraud investigation\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Attorney-client communication is privileged, and notice cannot be issued to the attorney: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog","description":"While upholding the maintainability of the third-party appeal, the Calcutta High Court held that Attorney-client communication is privileged.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u201cAttorney-client communication is privileged\u201d; Calcutta High Court upholds maintainability of third-party appeal in GST fraud investigation","og_description":"While upholding the maintainability of the third-party appeal, the Calcutta High Court held that Attorney-client communication is privileged.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-09-08T08:30:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-09-15T11:25:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"\u201cAttorney-client communication is privileged\u201d; Calcutta High Court upholds maintainability of third-party appeal in GST fraud investigation","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/","name":"Attorney-client communication is privileged, and notice cannot be issued to the attorney: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-09-08T08:30:12+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-15T11:25:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"While upholding the maintainability of the third-party appeal, the Calcutta High Court held that Attorney-client communication is privileged.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/08\/attorney-client-communication-is-privileged-and-notice-cannot-be-issued-to-the-attorney-cal-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u201cAttorney-client communication is privileged\u201d; Calcutta High Court upholds maintainability of third-party appeal in GST fraud investigation"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":298991,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/10\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-pil-in-alleged-misuse-of-national-flag-in-election-campaign\/","url_meta":{"origin":301079,"position":0},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL in alleged misuse of National Flag in election campaign","author":"Ritu","date":"August 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court dismissed the PIL as after noting that the FIR is already registered on the alleged offence and the investigation was in progress.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299010,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/11\/calcutta-hc-directs-examination-safety-measures-prevent-entry-ragpickers-into-dumping-yards\/","url_meta":{"origin":301079,"position":1},"title":"Calcutta High Court directs examination of safety measures to prevent entry of ragpickers into dumping yards","author":"Ritu","date":"August 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court asked for a detailed report from the appropriate authorities on the steps to be taken to prevent the entry of ragpickers and ensure their safety.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292368,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/17\/know-thy-judge-chief-justice-calcutta-high-court-justice-ts-sivagnanam-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":301079,"position":2},"title":"Know Thy Judge | Justice T.S. Sivagnanam &#8211; Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court","author":"Sucheta","date":"May 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Justice Tirunelveli Subbiah Sivagnanam was sworn in as the Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court on 11-05-2023.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Know thy Judge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Know thy Judge","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/judges-information\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court chief justice","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/calcutta-high-court-chief-justice.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/calcutta-high-court-chief-justice.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/calcutta-high-court-chief-justice.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/calcutta-high-court-chief-justice.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299080,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/11\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-pre-mature-writ-petition-challenging-appointment\/","url_meta":{"origin":301079,"position":3},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses premature writ petition challenging appointment of WBSCTVESD&#8217;s Chief Administrative Officer","author":"Ritu","date":"August 11, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The petitioner challenged the appointment of the Chief Administrative Officer based on the absence of a notification number and approval details in the 2021 notification.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299693,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/19\/distribution-company-can-levy-delayed-payment-surcharge-on-payment-default-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":301079,"position":4},"title":"Distribution Company can levy Delayed Payment Surcharge under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003 on payment default: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that the liability to pay other charges (DPS) would arise not from the date when the bill was first raised but from the first instance of non-payment of the concerned charges,","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":299013,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/10\/calcutta-high-court-dismisses-pil-alleging-misappropriation-of-funds-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":301079,"position":5},"title":"Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL alleging misappropriation of funds by Kharagpur Panchayat Samity&#8217;s Executive Officer","author":"Ritu","date":"August 10, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court observed that at this stage, the Court we cannot examine the disputed questions and directed the District Magistrate to provide an appropriate reply to the petitioner.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301079","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=301079"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301079\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=301079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=301079"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=301079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}