{"id":300944,"date":"2023-09-07T11:00:45","date_gmt":"2023-09-07T05:30:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=300944"},"modified":"2023-09-07T10:13:46","modified_gmt":"2023-09-07T04:43:46","slug":"delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"text-align: justify; line-height: 150%;\">\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Delhi High Court:<\/span> In a case wherein the plaintiff, Monster Energy Co. was aggrieved by the defendant&#8217;s use of the identical mark &#8216;MONSTER&#8217;, with an identical logo <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-15.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-15.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"146\" height=\"30\"\/><\/a>, as well as a deceptively similar device mark <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"122\" height=\"70\"\/><\/a>, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">C. Hari Shankar, J.*<\/span>, granted permanent injunction restraining the defendant, from selling, offering for sale, manufacturing, advertising, importing, exporting, or in any manner commercially dealing in any goods bearing the trade mark MONSTER (word per se) or any stylized representation thereof including <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"122\" height=\"70\"\/><\/a>, and\/or Claw Icon or any mark identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiff&#8217;s MONSTER trade marks\/logos\/trade name, amounting to infringement of the plaintiffs&#8217; registered trade marks.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Background<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The plaintiff was the proprietor of various registered trade marks, namely &#8216;MONSTER&#8217;, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-6.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-6.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"58\" height=\"68\"\/><\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-7.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-7.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"57\" height=\"83\"\/><\/a>, &#8216;MONSTER ENERGY&#8217;, etc and under these marks, the plaintiff was packing and selling energy drinks and energy beverages. The plaintiff carried out its operations through the websites www.monsterenergy.com, www.monsterbevcorp.com and www.monsterarmy.com, which prominently featured <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-15.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-15.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"146\" height=\"30\"\/><\/a> mark of the plaintiff.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The plaintiff was aggrieved by the defendant&#8217;s use of the identical mark &#8216;MONSTER&#8217;, with an identical logo <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-15.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-15.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"122\" height=\"70\"\/><\/a>, as well as a deceptively similar device mark <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"122\" height=\"70\"\/><\/a>, whereunder the defendant had been selling sportswear, sports apparels, and associated products. Thus, the plaintiff had approached this Court seeking a decree of injunction, restraining the defendant as well as all others acting on his behalf from using <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-15.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-15.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"122\" height=\"70\"\/><\/a> mark, either as a word mark or as a device mark with lettering and style similar to that of the plaintiff, and from using <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"122\" height=\"70\"\/><\/a> mark for which the defendant had applied for registration either in respect of sportswear or sports apparel in respect of any goods whatsoever.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Analysis, Law, and Decision<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">This Court, on 18-02-2022 had passed <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">ex parte<\/span> interlocutory orders restraining the defendant from selling, offering for sale, manufacturing, advertising, importing, exporting, or in any manner commercially dealing in any goods bearing the trade mark MONSTER (word per se) or any stylized representation thereof including <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"122\" height=\"70\"\/><\/a> and\/or Claw Icon or any mark identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiff&#8217;s trade marks\/logos\/trade name, amounting to infringement of plaintiff&#8217;s trade mark and\/or passing off goods.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">This Court had appointed a local Commissioner to visit the premises of the defendant and effect search and seizures. The Court noted that the report of the local Commissioner revealed that 145 articles, which bore infringing marks, were found in the premises of the defendant, all of which were inventorised and seized.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that it was clear that the defendant had copied the registered trade mark of the plaintiff, both in word and device form. The mere insertion of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-14.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-14.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"59\" height=\"56\"\/><\/a> figure above the word <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-15.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-15.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"122\" height=\"70\"\/><\/a> in the defendant&#8217;s mark did not mitigate the fact of infringement or of the defendant consciously seeking to pass off its products as those of the plaintiff. The word <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-15.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-15.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"122\" height=\"70\"\/><\/a> clearly constituted the prominent, and dominant, feature of the impugned mark. A customer of average intelligence and imperfect recollection, who knows of the plaintiff&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-15.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-15.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"122\" height=\"70\"\/><\/a> mark, and encounters, later, the defendant&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"122\" height=\"70\"\/><\/a> mark, was bound to regard both as belonging to the same person, with a mere figure of a monster added over the word by way of embellishment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">Thus, this Court granted permanent injunction restraining the defendant, from selling, offering for sale, manufacturing, advertising, importing, exporting, or in any manner commercially dealing in any goods bearing the trade mark MONSTER (word per se) or any stylized representation thereof including <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"122\" height=\"70\"\/><\/a>, and\/or Claw Icon or any mark identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiff&#8217;s MONSTER trade marks\/Logos\/trade name, amounting to infringement of the plaintiffs&#8217; registered trade marks.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">The Court opined that as the defendant acted with clear dishonesty, with the transparent intent of copying the plaintiff&#8217;s mark and passing off its goods as those of the plaintiff, it was not possible for the Court to let the defendant of unconditionally. The Court agreed with the plaintiff&#8217;s counsel that the defendant&#8217;s statement that he was earning only Rs. 600 per day was unbelievable, especially when the defendant was, in the past, selling sportswear and sports goods using the impugned <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"122\" height=\"70\"\/><\/a> mark on online platforms including Flipkart. Thus, the Court held that the defendant shall be liable to pay punitive costs to the plaintiff a sum of Rs 1,00,000. The Court further held that based on this order, the Register of Trade Mark shall proceed to pass orders treating the application for registration of the mark <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-12.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"122\" height=\"70\"\/><\/a>, as not pressed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 3%;\">[<span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #632423;\">Monster Energy Co. v. Vineet Deshwal, CS(COMM) 118 of 2022, decided on 04-09-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n<hr\/>\n<p>Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Plaintiff: Saif Khan, Shobhit Agarwal, Prajjwal Kushwaha, Advocates<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-left: 18pt;\">For the Defendant: Bhawana Nanda, Advocate<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent: 18pt;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">*Judgment authored by: Justice C. Hari Shankar<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-style: italic;\">&#8220;The mere insertion of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-14.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-14.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"59\" height=\"56\"\/><\/a> figure above the word <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-15.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/11_monster-mark-15.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"146\" height=\"30\"\/><\/a> in the defendant&#8217;s mark does not mitigate the fact of infringement or of the defendant consciously seeking to pass off its products as those of the plaintiff.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":293503,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[17801,2543,53066,44998,60800,14201,2616,60801],"class_list":["post-300944","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-costs","tag-Delhi_High_Court","tag-device-mark","tag-logo","tag-monster","tag-permanent-injunction","tag-Trade_Mark","tag-work-mark"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.4 (Yoast SEO v26.4) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Delhi HC grants permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark and directed defendant to pay Rs. 1 lakh as costs to the company.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark and directed defendant to pay Rs. 1 lakh as costs to the company.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-09-07T05:30:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Simranjeet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"Delhi HC grants permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-07T05:30:45+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\"},\"description\":\"Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark and directed defendant to pay Rs. 1 lakh as costs to the company.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"delhi high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd\",\"name\":\"Simranjeet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Simranjeet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Delhi HC grants permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark | SCC Blog","description":"Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark and directed defendant to pay Rs. 1 lakh as costs to the company.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark","og_description":"Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark and directed defendant to pay Rs. 1 lakh as costs to the company.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-09-07T05:30:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Simranjeet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Simranjeet","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/","name":"Delhi HC grants permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-09-07T05:30:45+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd"},"description":"Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark and directed defendant to pay Rs. 1 lakh as costs to the company.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"delhi high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-monster-energy-co-for-its-monster-mark-legal-news\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to Monster Energy Co. for its \u2018MONSTER\u2019 mark"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/aaee99423671d3377042373c5dcdabbd","name":"Simranjeet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/03d92c7ef8267a8c57730c194d10ea045f0dc6cb00ce27a633a2e25adccce1c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Simranjeet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/scc\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":298461,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/03\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-new-balance-athletics-inc-for-its-n-device-mark\/","url_meta":{"origin":300944,"position":0},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to New Balance Athletics Inc for its \u2018N\u2019 device mark","author":"Simranjeet","date":"August 3, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe matter will next be listed on 16-08-2023, to decide whether the plaintiff's registered trade marks , and , are \"well-known\u201d trade marks within the meaning of Section 2(1)(zg) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298755,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-whitehat-education-for-its-marks-and-logos-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":300944,"position":1},"title":"[WhiteHat Jr v. Whitehat Sr] Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to Whitehat Education Technology for its marks \u2018WhiteHat Jr\u2019, \u2018W\u2019; awards Rs. 9 lakhs costs","author":"Editor","date":"August 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cDue to the fact that the defendant has not contested the matter, but compelled the plaintiff to file the present suit, by not agreeing to give up the infringing mark, despite being put to notice, the plaintiff is entitled to receive actual costs.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":279674,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2022\/12\/15\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-to-lifelong-online-retail-p-ltd-for-its-mark-lifelong-in-a-trade-mark-infringement-suit\/","url_meta":{"origin":300944,"position":2},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to Lifelong Online Retail (P) Ltd for its mark \u2018Lifelong\u2019 in a trade mark infringement suit","author":"Editor","date":"December 15, 2022","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court restrained the defendant from dealing in any goods, under the impugned trade mark \u2018Lifelong\u2019 or any other mark as may be identical to or deceptively similar with the plaintiff's (Lifelong Online Retail (P) Ltd.) registered trade mark \u2018Lifelong\u2019, to cause infringement of the plaintiff's trade marks.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/MicrosoftTeams-image-418.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":294044,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/06\/07\/delhi-hc-grants-permanent-injunction-to-mark-new-balance-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":300944,"position":3},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to New Balance Athletics for \u2018NEW BALANCE\u2019 mark and \u2018NB\u2019 device mark","author":"Simranjeet","date":"June 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The use of \u2018NEW BALANCE IMMIGRATION\u2019 as a part of its trade name by New Balance Immigration (P) Ltd. (defendant) is likely to deceive unwary consumers of their association with New Balance Athletics Inc (plaintiff).","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"new balance mark","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/new-balance-mark.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/new-balance-mark.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/new-balance-mark.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/new-balance-mark.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":291593,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/08\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-to-vivanta-mark-legal-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":300944,"position":4},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to a well-known mark \u2018VIVANTA&#8217; against the mark \u2018VIVANTA VACATION CLUB&#8217;; awards Rs. 6 lakhs costs","author":"Simranjeet","date":"May 8, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The use of \u2018VIVANTA VACATION CLUB' as a part of a trade name will likely deceive unwary consumers of their association with the mark \u2018VIVANTA' as a domain name can have all the characteristics of a trade mark and could result in an act of passing off.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"delhi high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/delhi-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":287658,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/24\/delhi-high-court-grants-permanent-injunction-to-sandisk-llc-for-its-trade-marks-sandisk-and-cruzer-blade-awards-rs-5-lakhs-as-damages-legal-research-updates-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":300944,"position":5},"title":"Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction to SanDisk LLC for its trade marks \u2018SanDisk\u2019 and \u2018Cruzer Blade\u2019; awards Rs. 5 lakhs as damages","author":"Simranjeet","date":"March 24, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to SanDisk LLC for its trade mark \u2018SanDisk\u2019 and \u2018Cruzer blade\u2019. Additionally, Rs. 5 lakhs were awarded as damages.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Case Briefs&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Delhi High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/MicrosoftTeams-image-472.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300944","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=300944"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300944\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293503"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=300944"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=300944"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=300944"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}