{"id":300768,"date":"2023-09-05T12:00:25","date_gmt":"2023-09-05T06:30:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?p=300768"},"modified":"2023-09-06T13:07:52","modified_gmt":"2023-09-06T07:37:52","slug":"article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/","title":{"rendered":"Review application for Arbitrator\u2019s appointment maintainable under Article 215 of the Constitution of India: Calcutta High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Calcutta High Court:<\/span> While addressing the maintainability of a review application related to an order of appointment of an Arbitrator under Section 11<\/a> of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a> (the Act), a single-judge bench comprising of Moushumi Bhattacharya, J., held that the application for review was maintainable under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, and the review application satisfied the threshold for review.<\/p>\n

“This Court is therefore of the view that the present application succeeds in clearing the threshold test and entering the arena of review. The Court will consider whether the application succeeds on the merits and the tests of Order XLVII Rule 1 once the matter is taken up for hearing.”<\/p>\n

Brief Facts<\/p>\n

The instant matter involves an application for the review of a judgment delivered by the Court on 26-06-2023. The judgment was issued in response to an application which sought the appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11<\/a> of the Act<\/a>. The application was granted, and a former judge of the Court was appointed as the Sole Arbitrator.<\/p>\n

Moot Point<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    Whether the review of the judgment is permissible under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Whether the conditions of Order 57 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908<\/a> (CPC) have been satisfied?<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Court’s Assessment<\/p>\n

    The Court rejected the distinction between the power to recall an order and the power to review on merits. The Court observed that the High Court’s plenary powers as a Court of record extend to reviewing judgments when there are apparent errors.<\/p>\n

    The Court observed that while the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996<\/a>, is a complete code, the power of review is not restricted by its provisions, and the Court can review orders if they meet the requirements of Order 57 Rule 1 of the CPC.<\/p>\n

    The Court observed that the Supreme Court, in M.M Thomas<\/span> v. State of Kerala<\/span>, (2000) 1 SCC 666<\/a>, affirmed the High Court’s inherent powers to correct records and held that these powers encompass the ability to review decisions with apparent errors on the face of the record.<\/p>\n

    The Court held the High Courts, as Courts of record under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, have inherent powers to correct records, including the power to review their own judgments and orders. This power includes the correction of errors apparent on the face of the records.<\/p>\n

    “Article 215 can be invoked for exercising the power to review the judgment passed by this Court on 26th June, 2023. The High Court, in exercise of its plenary powers, cannot be fettered by the limitations of the 1996 Act<\/a> in respect of review or be hemmed-in by the strictures of Order XLVII Rule 1<\/a> of the Code of Civil Procedure<\/a> at the stage of allowing the application to enter through the gates. The first, that is invocation of the powers under Article 215 of the Constitution is a question of maintainability which is answered in the affirmative; the second that is Order XLVII Rule 1<\/a> of the Code of Civil Procedure<\/a> is a question on merits which will determine the review-ability of the order within the contours of Order XLVII Rule 1<\/a> of the Code of Civil Procedure<\/a>.”<\/p>\n

    Court’s Decision<\/p>\n

    The Court held that the application for review was maintainable under Article 215 of the Constitution, and it satisfied the threshold for review. The Court would proceed to hear the application on its merits and consider whether it met the criteria of Order 57 Rule 1 of the CPC. The present Review petition was held to be maintainable, and the parties were allowed to schedule a hearing at an early date.<\/p>\n

    [Radha Bhattad v. Rashmi Cement Ltd., 2023 SCC OnLine Cal 2570<\/a>, order dated 01-09-2023<\/span>]<\/p>\n

    *Judgment by Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n

    Advocates who appeared in this case :<\/p>\n

    Mr. Suddhasatva Banerjee, Mr. Dyutimoy Paul, Mr. Soumyadip Panda, Counsel for the Petitioner<\/p>\n

    Mr. Soumabho Ghose, Mr. Rishav Dutt, Mr. Siddhartha Sharma, Ms. Shalini Basu, Counsel for the Respondent\/State<\/p>\n

    Buy Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996   HERE<\/a><\/h3>\n

    \"arbitration<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    High Courts are superior Courts of records, and the power to review orders is not restricted by the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":67514,"featured_media":290502,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,10],"tags":[24904,60744,2689,57782,2897],"class_list":["post-300768","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-casebriefs","category-highcourts","tag-appointment-of-arbitrator","tag-article-215-of-the-constitution-of-india","tag-Calcutta_High_Court","tag-justice-moushumi-bhattacharya","tag-Review"],"yoast_head":"\nArticle 215 of the Constitution of India empowers the High Court to review its judgments: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court held that Article 215 of the Constitution of India empowers the High Court to review its judgments.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Review application for Arbitrator\u2019s appointment maintainable under Article 215 of the Constitution of India: Calcutta High Court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Calcutta High Court held that Article 215 of the Constitution of India empowers the High Court to review its judgments.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"SCC Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-09-05T06:30:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-09-06T07:37:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"886\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"590\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Review application for Arbitrator\u2019s appointment maintainable under Article 215 of the Constitution of India: Calcutta High Court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ritu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/\",\"name\":\"Article 215 of the Constitution of India empowers the High Court to review its judgments: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-09-05T06:30:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-09-06T07:37:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\"},\"description\":\"Calcutta High Court held that Article 215 of the Constitution of India empowers the High Court to review its judgments.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp\",\"width\":886,\"height\":590,\"caption\":\"calcutta high court\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Review application for Arbitrator\u2019s appointment maintainable under Article 215 of the Constitution of India: Calcutta High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"SCC Times\",\"description\":\"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9\",\"name\":\"Ritu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ritu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Article 215 of the Constitution of India empowers the High Court to review its judgments: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog","description":"Calcutta High Court held that Article 215 of the Constitution of India empowers the High Court to review its judgments.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Review application for Arbitrator\u2019s appointment maintainable under Article 215 of the Constitution of India: Calcutta High Court","og_description":"Calcutta High Court held that Article 215 of the Constitution of India empowers the High Court to review its judgments.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/","og_site_name":"SCC Times","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/scc.online\/","article_published_time":"2023-09-05T06:30:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-09-06T07:37:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":886,"height":590,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ritu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Review application for Arbitrator\u2019s appointment maintainable under Article 215 of the Constitution of India: Calcutta High Court","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ritu","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/","name":"Article 215 of the Constitution of India empowers the High Court to review its judgments: Calcutta High Court | SCC Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","datePublished":"2023-09-05T06:30:25+00:00","dateModified":"2023-09-06T07:37:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9"},"description":"Calcutta High Court held that Article 215 of the Constitution of India empowers the High Court to review its judgments.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","width":886,"height":590,"caption":"calcutta high court"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/09\/05\/article-215-constitution-empowers-hc-review-its-judgments-calcutta-hc-scc-blog-legal-research\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Review application for Arbitrator\u2019s appointment maintainable under Article 215 of the Constitution of India: Calcutta High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/","name":"SCC Times","description":"Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/392f265bae2f48f0f0d02b8e0e9015b9","name":"Ritu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c47318594774c1fe55e3e8c85dcd1909276373d9bf11730032fc1a7d05d56a47?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ritu"},"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/author\/editor_7\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":287070,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/03\/17\/arbitration-petition-calcutta-high-court-appointment-arbitrator-disqualification-section-12-seventh-schedule-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-legal-research-news-scc-online-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":300768,"position":0},"title":"All unilateral appointments of arbitrators are not invalid: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"March 17, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Calcutta High Court held that all the unilateral appointment of arbitrators is not invalid unless the arbitrator's relationship falls within the Seventh Schedule to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Calcutta High Court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/MicrosoftTeams-image-604.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":308662,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/12\/07\/section-434-of-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-does-not-create-new-window-after-expiry-of-limitation-calcutta-high-court-scc-blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":300768,"position":1},"title":"Section 43(4) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not create new window after expiry of limitation: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"December 7, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe limitation for filing an application will start to run from the day when the cause of action accrues regardless of the existence of an arbitration clause.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292770,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/22\/calcutta-high-court-appointment-arbitrator-pendency-reference-msme-facilitation-council-contrary-to-msmed-act-scc-blog-legal-research-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":300768,"position":2},"title":"Appointment of Arbitrator during pendency of reference before MSME Facilitation Council is contrary to MSMED Act: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"May 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201c\u2026being a special statute the MSMED Act will have an overriding effect vis-\u00e0-vis the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":297360,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/07\/20\/if-supplier-is-medium-enterprise-defaulting-buyer-need-not-to-pay-interest-three-times-of-bank-rate-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":300768,"position":3},"title":"Defaulting Buyers exempted from paying 3 times the Bank Interest Rate under Section 16 of the MSMED Act when supplier is \u2018medium enterprise\u2019: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"July 20, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe irrationality of the quantum of the costs imposed will be considered at the time of determining whether the Award should be set aside under Section 34 of the 1996 Act.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":298911,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/08\/09\/compliance-s19-msmed-act-is-a-pre-requisite-for-seeking-stay-arbitral-award-calcutta-hc\/","url_meta":{"origin":300768,"position":4},"title":"Compliance of Section 19 of MSMED Act is a pre-requisite for seeking Stay on Arbitral Award: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"August 9, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"The Calcutta High Court held that failure to comply with procedural requirements under Section 19 of the MSMED Act renders application for stay of Arbitral Award as not maintainable.","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":292783,"url":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/2023\/05\/22\/calcutta-high-court-dismissed-writ-petition-ground-of-maintainability-scc-blog-legal-reseach-news\/","url_meta":{"origin":300768,"position":5},"title":"Supplier can refer to MSME Facilitation Council for adjudication despite post-contract MSME registration: Calcutta High Court","author":"Ritu","date":"May 22, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"\u201cThe MSMED Act of 2006 is a special statute as it was specifically enacted for facilitating the promotion and development of micro, small and medium Enterprises and enhancing their competitiveness.\u201d","rel":"","context":"In "Case Briefs"","block_context":{"text":"Case Briefs","link":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/post\/category\/casebriefs\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"calcutta high court","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/calcutta-high-court.webp?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]}],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300768","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/67514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=300768"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/300768\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/290502"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=300768"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=300768"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.scconline.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=300768"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}